Skip to main content

The Thin Blue Line between Monitoring Advertising Rules and Commercial Freedom in Broadcasting: The Case Study of Product Placement

  • Chapter
Private Television in Western Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business ((GMPB))

  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

Private broadcasters experience difficult economic times as advertising revenues are decreasing. The decline in advertising revenues is in the first instance caused by the increase in media outlets and audience fragmentation (Berte, 2010; Picard, 2000). The public migrates to new devices and providers for content and, hence, advertising shifts as well (IBM, 2007). Moreover, new technologies (like the video recorder) give viewers the opportunity to skip ads (ANA/Forrester Research Study, 2006; Goetzl, 2006; Smith and Krugman, 2011).1 As a result, the end of the 30-second spot has been announced on multiple occasions (ANA/Forrester Research Study, 2006; IBM, 2007). It comes as no surprise that these evolutions pose a significant threat to the traditional advertising model for television (IBM, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANA/Forrester Research Study (2006). Beyond the 30-second Spot: Marketers Adding Alternatives to Television Advertising. Association of National Advertisers, available online at: http://www.marketingtoday.com/research/0306/tv_advertising_Iess_ effective.htm (retrieved 16 March 2012).

  • Angelopoulos, C. (2010). “Product Placement in European Audiovisual Productions”. Iris Plus, 3, available online at: http://www.obs.coe.int/oea_publ/iris/iris_ plus/iplus3LA_2010.pdf.en (retrieved 4 January 2012).

  • Berte, K. (2010). Reclame in een Digital Medialandschap: Uitdagingen, Knelpunten en Opportuniteiten voor Reclame op Interactieve Digitale Televisie. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent, available online at: http://www.cim.be/ downloads.php?files=Doctoraat%20Katrien%20Berte.pdf&size=6785202 (retrieved 4 April 2012).

  • BEUC (2006). Revision of theTelevision Without FrontiersDirective — BEUC Position Paper, BEUC/X/023/2006, available online at: http://www.arbeiterkammer.at/bilder/ d40/beuc2006.pdf (retrieved 21 March 2012).

  • Castendyk, O. (2008a). “Article 4 TWFD”. In: Castendyk, 0., Dommering, E. J. and Scheuer, A. (eds), European Media Law (pp. 429–455). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castendyk, O. (2008b). “Article 1 TWFD”. In: Castendyk, 0., Dommering, E. J. and Scheuer, A. (eds), European Media Law (pp. 267–336). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castendyk, O. and Schaar, O. (2008). “Article 10 AVMSD”. In: Castendyk, O., Dommering, E. J. and Scheuer, A. (eds), European Media Law (pp. 943–951). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. and Newell, J. (2011). “Product Placement in Entertainment Media Proposing Business Process Models”. International Journal ofAdvertising, 28(5), 783–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, CETS No. 005, 4 November 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2007). Freedom of expression in Europe: case law concerning article 10 of the European convention on human rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA (2009). Recommandation relative au placement de produit, 17 December 2009, available online at: http://www.csa.be/system/document/nom/1143/CAC_20091217_ recommandation_placement_produit.pdf (retrieved 4 January 2012).

  • DCMS (2008). The audiovisual media services directive consultation on proposals for implementation in the United Kingdom, available online at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/consultations/AVMS_Consultation_Document.pdf (retrieved 5 April 2012).

  • Decree of the Flemish Government on the use of a product placement logo (Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering van 10 september 2010 betreffende hetgebruik van een logo voor de aanduiding van productplaatsing), Official Gazette, 6 October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. (2012). Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (1979). Sunday Times v the United Kingdom, 26 April 1979, Application no. 6538/74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (1989). Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v Germany, 20 November 1989, Application no. 10572/83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (1990). Groppera Radio AG and others v Switzerland, 28 March 1990, Application no. 10890/84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (1994). Casado Coca v Spain, 24 February 1994, Application no. 15450/89.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (2001). VgT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 28 June 2001, Application no.24699/94.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (2008a). TV Vest AS & Rogaland Pensjonistparti v Norway, 11 December 2008, Application no. 21132/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (2008b). Khurshid Mustafa and Tarzibach v Sweden, 16 December 2008, Application no. 23883/06.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR (2011). Sigma Radio Television Ltd. v Cyprus, 21 July 2011, Applications nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endemol (2003). Submission to the consultation on the review of the “Television without Frontiers Directive” — “Promotion of cultural diversity and of competitiveness of the European programme industry”, available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/reg/modernisation/2003_review/contributions/wc_endemol.pdf (retrieved 4 April 2012).

  • European Commission (2004). Commission interpretative communication on certain aspects of the provisions on televised advertising in the “Television without Frontiers” Directive. OJ (2004) C102/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005a). Issues paper for the audiovisual conference in Liverpool — Commercial communications, available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/reg/modernisation/issue_papers/ispa_advert_en.pdf (retrieved 21 March 2012).

  • European Commission (2005b). Commission staff working document — Annex to the proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending council directive 89/552/EC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities Impact Assessment — Draft Audiovisual Media Services Directive. 13 December 2005, SEC(2005) 1625/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice (2003). RTL Television GmbH v Niedersachsische Landesmedienanstalt fur privaten Rundfunk Judgment, Case C-245/01, 23 October 2003, ECR I-12489.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council Directive of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). OJ (2010) L 95/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Community Radio and Television Broadcasting Act (Decreet van 27 maart 2009 betreffende radio-omroep en televisie, Official Gazette 30 April 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. (2006). Nets’ study finds little difference in ad recall among DVR owners. Mediapost, available online at: http://publications.mediapost.com/index (retrieved 16 March 2012).

  • Goetzl, D. (2006). New data reveals virtually no viewers for time-shifted spots. MediaPost, available online at: http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/ 41887/new-data-reveals-virtually-no-viewers-for-time-shi.html (retrieved 19 March 2012).

  • GUNKtv (2010). GUNKtv gaat in beroep tegen de beslissing van de VRM naar aanleiding van boete, available online at: http://www.gunk.be/gunktv-nieuws-polls-en-magazines/4070-gunktv-gaat-beroep-tegen-de-beslissing-van-de-vrm-naar-aanleiding-van-boete.html (retrieved 9 March 2010).

  • Herold, A. (2009). “The New Audiovisual Media Services Directive”. In: Pauwels, C., Kalimo, H., Donders, K. and Van Rompuy, B. (eds), Rethinking European Media and Communications Policy (pp. 99–126). Brussels: VUBPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefkens, K. (2010, 23 June). Vlaamse televisiezenders gefrustreerd door vele boetes. De Standaard, available online at: http://www.standaard.be/artikel/detail. aspx?artikelid=NQ2RTQER&subsection=64 (retrieved 23 June 2010).

  • IBM (2007). The end of advertising as we know it, available online at: http://www-05.ibm.com/de/media/downloads/end-of-advertising.pdf (retrieved 16 March 2012).

  • Lefever (2012). Flemish commercial broadcaster infringes product placement provisions. IRIS, 4, 11, available online at: http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2012/4/articlel1. en.html (retrieved 13 June 2012).

  • Macovei, M. (2004). A guide to the implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Human Rights handbooks No. 2. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, available online at: http://www.humanrights.coe.int/aware/GB/publi/ materials/947.pdf (retrieved 14 July 2011).

  • Picard, R. (2000). Audience Fragmentation and Structural Limits on Media lnnovation and Diversity. In Van Cuilenburg, J. and van der Wurff, R. (eds), Media and Open Societies: Cultural, Economic and Policy Foundations for Media Opennes and Diversity in East and West (pp. 180–191). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • PQ Media (2007). PQ media market analysis finds global product placement spending grew 37% in 2006; forecast to grow 30% in 2007, driven by relaxed European rules, emerging Asian markets; double-digit growth in U.S. decelerates, available online at: http://www.pqmedia.com/about-press-20070314-gppf.html (retrieved 16 March 2012).

  • Smit E. G., van Reijmersdal, E. and Neijens, P. C. (2011). Today’s practice of brand placement and the industry behind it. International Journal of Advertising, 28(5), 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. and Krugman, D. (2011). Viewer as media decision-maker digital video recorders and household media consumption. International Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solman, G. (2007). DVRs have small impact on ads, available online at: http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/results/docview/docview. do?risb=21_T313 742 0675 &format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1 &resultsUrlKey=29_T313 7420683&cisb=2213137420682&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=7907&doc No=5 (retrieved 16 March 2012).

  • Valcke, P. and Lievens, E. (2010). International encyclopedia of media law: media law in Belgium. Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P. C. and Smit, E. G. (2007). Effects of TV brand placement on brand image. Psychology & Marketing, 24(5), 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhoof, D. (2001). European court of human rights: case of VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland. Iris, 7/2, available online at: http://merlin.obs.coe.int/ iris/2001/7/articl e2.en.html (retrieved 4 January 2012).

  • Voorhoof, D. (2004). “Artikel 10 — Vrijheid van meningsuiting”. In: Vande Lanotte, J. and Haeck, Y. (eds), Handboek EVRM — Deel 2 Artikelsgewijze cornmentaar Volume I (pp. 837–1050). Antwerpen: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v BVBA Vlamex, Decision 2011/020, 26 September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v NV Life! TV Broadcasting Company, Decision 2011/028, 24 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v NV Media Ad Infinitum, Decision 2011/008, 28 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v NV NJAM!, Decision 2011/005, 21 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v NV T-VGas, Decision 2010/033, 20 September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v SBS Belgium, Decision 2010/005, 18 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v SBS Belgium, Decision 2012/002, 23 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v T-VGAS, Decision 2010/003, 18 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v VMMa, Decision 2010/012, 15 March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v VMMa, Decision 2010/027, 26 April 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v VMMa, Beslissing 2011/035, 19 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v VRT, Decision 2010/015, 15 March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • VRM v VRT, Decision 2010/026, 26 April 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L. (2008). “The Consumer and Advertising Regulation in the Television without Frontiers and Audiovisual Media Services Directives”. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Katrien Lefever

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lefever, K. (2013). The Thin Blue Line between Monitoring Advertising Rules and Commercial Freedom in Broadcasting: The Case Study of Product Placement. In: Donders, K., Pauwels, C., Loisen, J. (eds) Private Television in Western Europe. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017550_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics