Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prison Rates, Social Democracy, Neoliberalism and Justice Reinvestment

  • Chapter
Crime, Justice and Social Democracy

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

Abstract

This chapter will begin with a brief summary of some recent research in the field of comparative penology. This work will be examined to explore the benefits, difficulties and limits of attempting to link criminal justice issues to types of advanced democratic polities, with particular emphasis on political economies. This stream of comparative penology examines data such as imprisonment rates and levels of punitiveness in different countries, before drawing conclusions based on the patterns which seem to emerge. Foremost among these is that the high imprisoning countries tend to be the advanced western liberal democracies which have gone furthest in adopting neoliberal economic and social policies, as against the lower imprisonment rates of social democracies, which variably have attempted to temper free-market economic policies in various ways. Such work brings both social democracy and neoliberalism into focus as issues for, or subjects of, criminology. Not in the sense of new ‘brands’ of criminology but rather as an examination of the connections between the political projects of social democracy and neoliberalism, and issues of crime and criminal justice. In the new comparative penology, social democracy and neoliberalism are cast in opposition, simultaneously raising the questions of to what extent and how adequately both social democracy and neoliberalism have been constituted as subjects in criminology and whether dichotomy is the only available trope of analysis?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2010) Prisoners in Australia 2009, Cat no, 4517, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. and Roberts, J. (2005) ‘Globalization and the New Punitiveness’, in J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Hallsworth and W. Morrison (eds), The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 121–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (2006) ‘The Politics of Punishing: Building a State Governance Theory of American Imprisonment Variation’, Punishment and Society, vol. 8, pp. 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, K. and Western, B. (2001) ‘Governing Social Marginality: Welfare, Incarceration and the Transformation of State Policy’, Punishment and Society, vol. 3, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. (2011) Criminal Justice and Neoliberalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Box, S. (1987) Recession, Crime and Punishment, London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Box, S. and Hale, C. (1986) ‘Unemployment, Crime and Imprisonment, and the Enduring Problem of Prison Overcrowding’, in R. Matthews and J. Young (eds). Confronting Crime. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2005) ‘Continuity, Rupture or Just More of the “Volatile And Contradictory”?: Glimpses of New South Wales’ Penal Practice Behind and Through the Discursive’, in J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Hallsworth and W. Morrison (eds), The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2010) ‘The Limited Benefit of Prison in Controlling Crime’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 22(1), pp. 461–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2011a) ‘Neoliberalism as a Criminological Subject’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 44, pp. 129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2011b) ‘The Global Financial Crisis: Neoliberalism, Social Democracy and Criminology’, in M. Bosworth and C. Hoyle (eds), What is Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. Schwartz, M. and Boseley, L. (2012) ‘The Promise of Justice Reinvestment’, Alternative Law Journal, vol 37(2), pp. 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2005) ‘Imprisonment and the Penal Body Politic: The Cancer of Disciplinary Governance’, in A. Leibling and S. Maruna (eds), The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2008) ‘Imaginary Penalities and Risk-Crazed Governance’, in P. Carlen (ed.), Imaginary Penalities. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. (2011) ‘A Private-Sector Incentives-Based Model for Justice Reinvestment’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 10(3), pp. 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (1997) The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Community and Partnership, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (2003) ‘Contractual Governance of Deviant Behaviour’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 30(4), pp. 479–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSGJC (Council of State Governments JusticeCenter) (2010) About the Project: The Strategy. Justice Reinvestment, http://www.justicereinvestment.org./about, date accessed 17 December 2011.

  • Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006) ‘Welfare and Punishment in Comparative Perspective’, in S. Armstrong and I. McAra (eds), Perspectives on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, D.M. (1988) Contrasts in Tolerance: Post War Penal Policy in the Netherlands and England and Wales, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. (2006) The Transformation of Welfare States, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, K. and Ward, K. (eds) (2007) Neoliberalization: States, Networks, Peoples, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Anderson, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, F. (1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. and Hay, C. (2010) ‘Not So Tough on Crime? Why Weren’t the Thatcher Governments More Radical in Reforming the Criminal Justice System?’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 50(3), pp. 550–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, S. (2006) ‘“Rolling Back the State”: Mrs Thatcher’s Criminological Legacy’, International Journal of Sociology of Law, vol. 34, pp. 256–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994) Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law’, in D. Nelken (ed.), The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1996) ‘The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36(4), pp. 445–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1997) ‘“Governmentality” and the Problem of Crime’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 1(2), pp. 173–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001a) The Culture of Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (ed.) (2001b) ‘Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences’, Punishment and Society, vol. 5, pp. 347–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. (2005) ‘Economic Marginalization and Social Exclusion’, in C. Hale, K. Hayward, A. Wahidin and E. Wincup (eds), Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L. (2005) ‘Crime Control in Western Countries’, in J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Hallsworth and W. Morrison (eds), The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R. (2013) ‘Punishment and “The People”: Rescuing Populism from its Critics’, in K. Carrington, M. Ball, E. O’Brien and J.M. Tauri (eds), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: International Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R. and Brown, D. (1998) Rethinking Law and Order, Sydney: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C, Weatherburn, D. and McFarland, K. (2008) ‘Public Confidence in the New South Wales Criminal Justice System’ Crime and Justice Bulletin, vol. 118, Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2007) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice, Open University Press: Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Commission of NSW (2010) The Impact of the Standard Non-Parole Period Sentencing Scheme on Sentencing Patterns in NSW, Research monograph 33, Sydney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2008) The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2007) On Populist Reason, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, 2nd edn, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanning, T, Loader, I. and Muir, R. (2011) Redesigning Justice: Reducing Crime Through Justice Reinvestment, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W., Le Heron, R. and Lewis, N. (2007) ‘Co-Constituting “After Neoliberalism”: Political Projects and Globalizing Governmentalities in Aoteoroa/New Zealand’, in K. England and K. Ward (eds), Neoliberalism: States, Networks, Peoples. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I. (2006) ‘Fall of the “Platonic Guardians”: Liberalism, Criminology and Political Responses to Crime in England and Wales’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 12(3), pp. 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I. (2010) ‘For Penal Moderation: Notes towards a Philosophy of Punishment’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 14(3), pp. 349–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, I. and Sparks, R. (2010) Public Criminology, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment, Stanford, California: Stanford Law Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2011) ‘Lessons for Justice Reinvestment from Restorative Justice and the Justice Model Experience’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 10(3), pp. 661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M. and Chesney-Lind, M. (2002) Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. (ed.) (2011) The Costs of Crime: Towards Fiscal Responsibility, Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. (2011) ‘Critical Criminology: The Renewal of Theory, Politics and Practice’, in M. Bosworth and C. Hoyle (eds). What is Criminology. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. and Murji, K. (2000) ‘Lost Connections and New Directions: Neo-Liberalism, New Managerialism and the Modernisation of the British Police’, in K. Stenson and R. Sullivan (eds). Crime, Risk and Justice. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E., Muncie, J. and Hughes, G. (2001) ‘The Permanent Revolution: New Labour, New Public Management and the Modernization of Criminal Justice’, Criminal Justice, vol. 1, pp. 301–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2010) The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty and the Politics of Crime Control, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2006) ‘Contrasts in Tolerance’, in T. Newburn and P. Rock (eds), The Politics of Crime Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2007) ‘“Tough on crime”: Penal Policy in England and Wales’, Crime and Justice, vol. 36. pp. 425–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. and Rock, P. (eds) (2006) The Politics of Crime Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Malley, P. (1992) ‘Risk, Power and Crime Prevention’, Economy and Society, vol. 21(3), pp. 252–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Malley, P. (1999) ‘Volatile and Contradictory Punishment’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 3(2), pp. 175–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Malley, P. (2000) ‘Criminologies of Catastrophe? Understanding Criminal Justice on the Edge of the New Millennium’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 33(2), pp. 153–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Malley, P. (2004) Risk, Uncertainty and Government, London: Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2007) Penal Populism, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2008) ‘Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 48, pp. 119–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2011) ‘The International Diffusion of Punitive Penality: Or, Penal Exceptionalism in the United States? Wacquant v. Whitman’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 44, pp. 116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., Brown, D., Brown, M., Hallsworth, S. and Morrison, W. (eds) (2005) The New Punitiveness, Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (2006) ‘Beyond Risk: A Lament for Social Democratic Criminology’, in T. Newburn and P. Rock (eds), The Politics of Crime Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (2007a) Law and Order: An Honest Citizen’s Guide to Crime and Control, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (2007b) ‘Political Economy, Crime and Criminal Justice’, in M. McGuire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook in Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. and Clear, T. (1998) ‘Incarceration, Social Capital and Crime: Implications for Social Disorganisation Theory’, Criminology, vol. 36(3), pp. 441–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (2005) ‘Engaging with Punitive Attitudes Towards Crime and Punishment: Some Strategic Lessons From England and Wales’, in j. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Hallsworth and W. Morrison (eds), The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2007) Governing Through Crime, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steketee, M. (2011) ‘Breaking the Prison Cycle’, The Australian, 15 October, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/breaking-the-prison-cycle/ story-e6frg6zo-1226167021281, date accessed 3 May 2012.

  • Stenson, K. and Sullivan, R.R. (eds) (2001) Crime, Risk and Justice: The Politics of Crime Control in Liberal Democracies, Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1999) Crime in Context, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (ed.) (1990) The Social Effects of Free Market Policies, Hemel Hampstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2010) ‘The Costly Consequences of Populist Posturing: ASBOs, Victims, “Rebalancing” And Diminution in Support for Civil Liberties’, Punishment and Society, vol. 12(4), p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2011) ‘Making Peace, Not a Desert: Penal Reform Should Be about Values Not Justice’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol. 10(3), pp. 637–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S. and Cadora, E. (2003) ‘Justice Reinvestment: To invest in public safety by Reallocating Justice Dollars to Refinance Education, Housing, Healthcare, and Jobs’, Ideas for an Open Society, vol. 3(3), http://www.soros.org/resources/articles_ publications/publications/ideas_20040106/ideas_reinvestment.pdf, date accessed 15 May 2012.

  • USDJ (US Department of Justice) (2009, December) Prisoners in 2008, Washington DC: US Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2006) ‘Penalization, Depoliticization, Racialization: On the Over-Incarceration of Immigrants in the European Union’, in S. Armstrong and I. McAra (eds), Perspectives on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherburn, D. (2004) Law and Order in Australia: Rhetoric and Reality, Annandale, Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R. and Pickett K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London: Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (1999) The Exclusive Society, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2007) The Vertigo of Late Modernity, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. and Brown, M. (1993) ‘Cross-National Comparisons of Imprisonment’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 17, pp. 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1991) The Scale of Imprisonment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, Australia

    Kerry Carrington (Professor and Head of the School of Justice), Matthew Ball (Senior Lecturer in the School of Justice), Erin O’Brien (Lecturer in the School of Justice) & Juan Marcellus Tauri (Lecturer in the School of Justice) (Professor and Head of the School of Justice),  (Senior Lecturer in the School of Justice),  (Lecturer in the School of Justice) &  (Lecturer in the School of Justice)

Copyright information

© 2013 David Brown

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, D. (2013). Prison Rates, Social Democracy, Neoliberalism and Justice Reinvestment. In: Carrington, K., Ball, M., O’Brien, E., Tauri, J.M. (eds) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation