Abstract
Democracy is a multi-dimensional concept, ranging from definitions based exclusively on institutional frameworks (for example, Held, 2005, Przeworski, Alvarez, Cheibub and Limongi, 2000) to complex and integrated measures that include political and civil rights, democratic practices, values and, finally, a diverse set of institutional arrangements in society, including welfare, education, industrial relations and the legal system (Inglehart and Welzel, 2005, Jaggers and Gurr, 1995, O’Donnell, Cullel and Iazetta, 2004). This reflects the range of and distinction between merely formal electoral democracy and genuinely ‘effective liberal democracy’ (Inglehart and Welzel, 2005: 149), where democracy is firmly embedded not only in its institutions but in the values of its citizenry. Evidence from cross-national research confirms that formal democratic institutions, different dimensions of effective democracy, and democratic values are indeed strongly linked (Inglehart and Welzel, 2005: 154, Jaggers and Gurr, 1995: 446). Democracy is more than just a set of institutions, rules and mechanisms: it is a set of core values engrained in the Tived experience’ of its citizens. Core values of democracies are individual autonomy and egali- tarianism, tolerance of diversity, and freedom from oppression for both individuals and institutions. Democracies restrain their governments by the rule of law and grant its citizens equal access to and equal treatment by legal institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aas, K.F. (2007) Globalization and Crime, Los Angeles, London: Sage.
Aas, K.F. (2012) The Earth is One but the World is Not: Criminological Theory and Its Geopolitical Divisions’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 16, pp. 5–20.
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. and Wacziarg, R. (2003) ‘Ethnic Fractionalization’, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 8, pp. 155–94.
Esty, D.C., Goldstone, J.A., Gurr, T.R., Harff, B., Levy, M., Dabelko, G.D., Surko, R.T. and Unger, A.N. (1998) State Failure Task Force Report: Phase II Findings, Working Papers, 31 July 1998, College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland.
Granovetter, M. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, pp. 360–80.
Held, D. (2005) Models of Democracy, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Polity.
Hirschman, A.O. (1988) Engagement und Enttaeuschung, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp [original: (1982) Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action, Princeton: Princeton University Press].
Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G.J. (eds) (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edn, New York: MacGraw-Hill Professional.
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T. (1995) ‘Tracking Democracy’s Third Wave with the Polity III Data’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 32, pp. 469–82.
Karstedt, S. (2006) ‘Democracy, Values and Violence: Paradoxes, Tensions, and Comparative Advantages of Liberal Inclusion’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 605, pp. 50–81.
Karstedt, S. (2011) ‘Liberty, Equality and Justice: Democratic Culture and Punishment’ in A. Crawford (ed.), International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance: Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 356–85.
Karstedt, S. (2012) Democracy, Crime and Justice, London: Sage Mann, M. (1970) ‘The Social Cohesion of Liberal Democracies’, American Sociological Review, vol. 35, pp. 423–39.
Mann, M. (2005) The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnical Cleansing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neapolitano, J.L. (2001) ‘An Examination of Cross-National Variation in Punitiveness’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, vol. 45(6), pp. 691–710.
O’Donnell, G., Cullel, J.V. and Iazetta, O.M. (2004) The Quality of Democracy, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Weil-Being in the World, 1950–1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R.D. (2007) ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century’, The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 30(2), pp. 137–74.
Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville, A. de (2000 [1835 und 1840]) Democracy in America, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
US Department of State (1999-2005) Human Rights: Country Reports, Washington, DC, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt, date accessed 15 May 2012.
VanDijk, I. (2008) The World of Crime, Los Angeles and London: Sage.
VanKesteren, J. (2009) ‘Public Attitudes and Sentencing Policies across the World’, European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, vol. 15, pp. 25–46.
Walmsley, R. (1999-2009) World Prison Population List, lst-8th edns, London: International Centre for Prison Studies.
Whitman, J. (2003) Harsh Justice. Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Susanne Karstedt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karstedt, S. (2013). Democracy and the Project of Liberal Inclusion. In: Carrington, K., Ball, M., O’Brien, E., Tauri, J.M. (eds) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43575-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00869-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)