Abstract
This chapter asks how disabled children’s childhood studies constitute alternative forms of authority to the dominant discourses of disability and childhood. Studies concerned with impairment and child development discuss disabled children in problematic terms and, it is suggested, these are not studies of their childhood. The dominant discourses of childhood and disability that emerged in the global North continue to have worldwide authority and impact in presenting disabled children in deficit and negative terms (Oliver & Barnes, 2012). The authority of these discourses is based on the positivist methodologies used. In England, they continue to be endorsed by policy, patterns of service provision and professional practices, but the links between concepts, policy and practice, and how we can be as people, are complex, and Foucault’s work is used to analyze these links.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson, P. (2000) Young children’s rights, 2nd edn (London and Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).
Avery, D.M. (1999) Talking tragedy: Identity issues in the parental story of disability, in M. Corker & S. French (eds), Disability and discourses (Buckingham: Open University Press).
Beresford, B. (1996) ‘Coping with the care of a severely disabled child’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 4, 1, 30–40.
Beresford, B., Sloper, P. , Baldwin, S. & Newman, T. (1996) What works in services for families with a disabled child? (Ilford: Barnardos).
Burman, E. (1994) Deconstructing developmental psychology (London: Routledge).
Clarke, J. (2010) The origins of childhood: In the beginning …, in D. Kassam, L. Murphy & E. Taylor (eds), Key issues in childhood and youth studies (Abingdon and New York: Routledge), pp. 3–14.
Curran, T. (2010) ‘Social work and disabled children’s childhoods: A Foucauldian framework for practice transformation’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 3, 806–825.
Curran, T., Benjimen, C. & Oliver, B. (2013) ‘A critical analysis of workforce development research use in the transformation of children’s services’, Journal of Social Work. Published online before print April 3, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1468017313477977.
CWDC, NCSL and TDA, (2008) 2020 Children and young people’s workforce strategy: Evidence & knowledge management (Leeds: Department for Children, Schools and Families).
Danaher, G., Schirato, T. & Webb, J. (2000) Understanding Foucault (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
Davis, J.M. (2000) ‘Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: Research strategies and roles for promoting social change?’, Disability and Society, 15, 2, 191–206.
Davis, J.M. & Hogan, J. (2004) Research with children: Ethnography, participation, disability and self empowerment, in C. Barnes & G. Mercer (eds), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research, (Leeds: The Disability Press), pp. 172–191.
Davis, J.M. & Watson, N. (2001) ‘Where are the children’s experiences? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in “special” and “mainstream” schools’, Disability and Society, 16, 5, 671–687.
Department for Education and Skills (2003) Every Child Matters: Change for children (London: Stationery Office).
Department of Health (1991) Children Act 1989: Guidance and regulations (London: HMSO).
Dreyfus, H.L. (2012) Heidegger and Foucault on the subject, agency and practices [Homepage of University of California, Berkeley]. http://socrates.berkeley.edu [accessed 28 July 2012].
Elden, S. (2006) ‘Discipline, health, and madness: Foucault’s Le Pouvoir psychiatrique’, History of Human Sciences, 19, 1, 39–66.
Ennew, J. & Swart-Kruger, J. (2003) ‘Introduction: Homes, places and spaces in the construction of street children and street youth’, Children, Youth and Environments, 13, 1. http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye/13_1/Vol13_1Articles/CYE_CurrentIssue_ArticleIntro_Kruger_Ennew.htm edn, [accessed 28 July 2012].
Faubion, J.D. (ed.) (1998) The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 2: Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (London: Allen Lane).
Flynn, R. (2002) Short breaks: Providing better access and more choice for Black disabled children and their parents (Bristol: Policy Press).
Fook, J. (2004) What professionals need from research: Beyond evidence-based practice, in D. Smith (ed.), Social work and evidence-based practice, Research Highlights in Social Work 45 (London and Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).
Foucault, M. (1974) The archaeology of knowledge (London: Tavistock).
Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power, in H.L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermaneutics, trans. L. Sawyer (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf), pp. 208–226.
Foucault, M. (2005) Power, right, truth, in R.E. Goodin & P. Pettit (eds), Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 541–548.
Franklin, A. & Sloper, P. (2007) Participation of disabled children and young people in decision-making relating to social care (Social Policy Research Unit, University of York).
Garrett, P.M. (2009) ‘Transforming’ children’s services? Social work, neoliberalism and the ‘modern’ world (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
Goodinge, S. (1998) Inspection of services to disabled children and their families (London: Social Services Inspectorate, Department of Health).
Goodley, D. (2011) Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2010) ‘Emancipating play: Disabled children, development and deconstruction’, Disability and Society, 25, 499–512.
Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011) Cyborgs: Photovoice and Disabled Children. Presentation to ESRC Seminar Series: Researching the Lives of Disabled Children and Young People, with a Focus on Their Perspectives. Seminar 4: Recent Research, University of Bristol, 21 January. http://www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/schoolofappliedsocialsciences/socialwork/esrcseminarseries/ [accessed 28 July 2012].
Gould, N. & Baldwin, M. (2004) Social work, critical reflection and the learning organisation (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Hall, S. (2001) Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse, in M. Wetherall, S. Yates, & S. Taylor (eds), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (London: Sage).
Howe, D. (2006) ‘Disabled children, maltreatment and attachment’, British Journal of Social Work, 36, 5, 743–760.
Kendall, G. & Wickham, G. (1999) Using Foucault’s methods (London: Sage).
Marchant, R. (2001) Working with disabled children, in P. Foley, J. Roche & S. Tucker (eds), Children in society: Contemporary theory, policy and practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave in association with Open University Press), pp. 215–224.
Meekosha, H. (2008) Contextualising disability: Developing southern/global theory. Keynote presentation, Disability Studies Association, 4th conference, Lancaster, 2–4 September 2008.
Morris, J. (2001) ‘Social exclusion and young disabled people with high levels of support needs’, Critical Social Policy, 21, 2, 161–183.
Murray, M. & Osborne, C. (2009) Safeguarding disabled children practice guidance. (Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families, and Children’s Society).
Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H.T.O. (2009) ‘Promoting evidence-based: practice: Models and mechanisms from cross sector review’. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 552 originally published online May 27, 2009.
Oliver, M. (1990) The politics of disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
Oliver, M. & Barnes, C. (2012) The new politics of disablement (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Oliver, M. & Sapey, B. (1999) Social work with disabled people, 2nd edn (Houndsmills: Macmillan).
Philp, M. (1979) ‘Notes on the form of knowledge in social work’, Sociological Review, 27, 1, 83–111.
Philp, M. & Duckworth, D. (1982) Children with disabilities and their families (Windsor: NFER-Nelson).
Priestley, M. (1999) Discourse and identity: Disabled children in mainstream high schools, in M. Corker & S. French (eds), Disability discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. 92–102.
Priestley, M. (2003) Disability: A life course approach (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Rabinow, P. (ed.) (1997) The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 1: Ethics, subjectivity and truth (London: Allen Lane).
Read, J., Clements, L.J. & Ruebain, D. (2006) Disabled children and the law: Research and good practice, 2nd edn (London and Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishing).
Rose, N. & Miller, P. (2010) ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology. http://www.bjsshapingsociology.com/view/0/index.html [accessed 28 July 2012].
Rossiter, A. (2001) ‘Innocence lost and suspicion found: Do we educate for or against social work?’, Critical Social Work. http://www.criticalsocialwork.com/CSW_2001_1.html [accessed 6 June 2001].
Roulstone, S. & McLeod, S. (eds) (2011) Listening to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (Guildford: J & K).
Runswick-Cole, K. (2010) ‘Living with dying and disablism: Death and disabled children’, Disability and Society, 25, 7, 813–826.
Runswick-Cole, K. & Goodley, D. (2012) Resilience in the lives of disabled people across the life course (Manchester: Scope and Manchester Metropolitan University).
Schwan, A. & Shapiro, S. (2011) Foucault’s ‘Discipline and Punish’ (London: Pluto Press).
Shah, S. (2007) ‘Special or mainstream? The views of disabled students’, Research Papers in Education, 22, 4, 425–442.
Shah, S. & Priestley, M. (2009) ‘Home and away: The impact of educational policies on disabled children’s experiences of family and friendship’, Research Papers in Education, 25, 2, 155–174.
Shakespeare, T. (2000) Help (Birmingham: Venture Press).
Shakespeare, T., Barnes, C., Priestley, M., Cunningham-Burley, S., Davis, J. & Watson, N. (1999) Life as a disabled child: A qualitative study of young people’s experiences and perspectives (Disability Research Unit, University of Leeds).
Simmons, B. (2011) The PMLD ambiguity: Articulating the life worlds of children with profound and multiple learning difficulties, Conference Paper, NNDR 2011.
Sloper, P. , Rabiee, P. & Beresford, B. (2007) Outcomes for disabled children (Social Policy Unit, University of York).
Stalker, K. (2012) ‘Editorial: Researching the lives of disabled children and young people’, Children and Society, 26, 173–178.
Stalker, K., Green Lister, P., Lerpiniere, J. & McArthur, K. (2010) Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children and young people: A scoping study, University of Strathclyde. http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/27036 [accessed 28 July 2010].
Todd, L. (2006) Enabling practice for professionals: The need for practical post structural theory, in D. Goodley & R. Lawthom (eds), Disability and psychology, (Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 141–155.
Tremain, S. (2001) ‘On the government of disability’, Social Theory and Practice, 27, 4, 617–636.
Tremain, S.L. (2005) Foucault, governmentality and critical disability theory: An introduction, in S.L. Tremain (ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (Michigan: University of Michigan Press), pp. 1–24.
Tremain, S. (2006) On the government of disability: Foucault, power, and the subject of impairment, in L.J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies reader, 2nd edn (New York and Abingdon: Taylor & Francis), pp. 185–197.
Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D. & Frost, S. (2004) Improving the use of research in social care, Practice Knowledge Review 7 (London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, and Policy Press).
Watson, N. (2012) ‘Theorising the lives of disabled children: How can disability theory help?’, Children and Society, 26, 192–202.
Wells, K. (2009) Childhood in global perspective (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Wickenden, M. (2011) ‘Give me time and I’ll tell you’: Using ethnography to investigate aspects of identity with teenagers who use alternative and augmentative methods of communication, in S. Roulstone & S. McLeod (eds), Listening to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs, (Guildford: J&R Press), pp. 167–179.
Woodcock, J. & Tregaskis, C. (2006) ‘Understanding structural communication barriers to ordinary family life for families with disabled children: A combined social work and social model of disability analysis’, British Journal of Social Work, 1, 1–17.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Tillie Curran
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curran, T. (2013). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Alternative Relations and Forms of Authority?. In: Curran, T., Runswick-Cole, K. (eds) Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43555-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00822-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)