Abstract
Workplace flexibility — that is, individuals’ ability to affect when, where and how much they work — can be an effective approach to dealing with competing work and non-work demands (Bailyn, 1993; Johnson, Shannon, & Richman, 2008; Pitt-Catsouphes, Smyer, Matz-Costa, & Kane, 2007). As individuals attempt to enact flexibility, however, they encounter numerous challenges and obstacles (Bailyn, 1993; Barker, 1993; Blair-Loy & Wharton, 2002; Briscoe, 2007; Evans, Kunda, & Barley, 2004; Kelliher & Anderson, 2010; Kossek, Lewis, & Hammer, 2010; Lautsch, Kossek, & Eaton, 2009; Perlow, 1997, 1998; Powell & Greenhaus, 2006; Thompson, Beauvais, & Lyness, et al., 1999). This chapter adds to this emerging literature by studying concerns with fairness1 that also critically shape individuals’ coping with the competing demands of work, and life outside of work. When one person gets flexibility, another is likely to have to pick up the slack, be inconvenienced, or perceive that he or she has been somehow short-changed in comparison. Such concerns can limit individuals’ ability to manage the multitude of demands. Yet, many find ways to address fairness concerns while still enacting the desired flexibility. This chapter illuminates ways in which individuals do this and thus contributes to the theory of coping with work — non-work conflict, and provides practical ideas for those facing simultaneous work and non-work demands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press.
Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437.
Beutell, N. J., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1983). Integration of home and nonhome roles: Women’s conflict and coping behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 43–48.
Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2002). Employees’ use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80 (3), 813–845.
Briscoe, F. (2007). From iron cage to iron shield? How bureaucracy enables temporal flexibility for professional service workers. Organization Science, 18, 297–314.
Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In: J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 3–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Evans, J. A., Kunda, G., & Barley, S. R. (2004). Beach time, bridge time, and bill-able hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 1–38.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Grover, S. L. (1991). Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 247–255.
Hall, D. T. (1972). A model of coping with role conflict: The role behavior of college educated women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 471–486.
Johnson, A. A., Shannon, L. L., & Richman, A. L. (2008). Challenging common myths about workplace flexibility: Research notes from the multi-organization database. Community, Work & Family, 11 (2), 231–242.
Kaitz, M. (1985). Role conflict resolution for women with infants. Birth Psychology Bulletin, 6, 10–20.
Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63 (1), 83–106.
Kossek, E. E., Lewis, S., & Hammer, L. (2010). Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3–19.
Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795–827.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45 (1), 1–52.
Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. R., St Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 133–162.
Meindl, J. R. (1989). Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives, and leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 252–276.
Nord, W., Fox, S., Phoenix, A., & Viano, K. (2002). Real-world reactions to work-life balance programs: Lessons for effective implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 30 (3), 223–238.
Parker, L., & Allen, T. (2001). Work/family benefits: Variables related to employees’ fairness percentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 453–468.
Perlow, L. A. (1997). Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit From New Work Practices. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Perlow, L. A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328–357.
Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Smyer, M. A., Matz-Costa, C., & Kane, K. (2007). The National Study Report: Phase II of the National Study of Business Strategy and Workforce Development. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center on Aging and Work.
Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2006). Managing incidents of work-family conflict: A decision-making perspective. Human Relations, 59, 1179–1212.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The idiosyncratic deal: Flexibility versus fairness? Organizational Dynamics, 29 (4), 260–273.
Siegel, P. A., Post, C., Brockner, J., Fishman, A. Y., & Garden, C. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 13–24.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.
Trefalt, S. (2008). Between you and me: A relational perspective on managing work-nonwork boundaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, MA, USA.
Young, M. (1999). Work-family backlash: Begging the question, what’s fair? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 562, 32–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Špela Trefalt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trefalt, Š. (2013). Fairly Flexible: Preventing Perceptions of Unfairness in Enactment of Workplace Flexibility. In: Poelmans, S., Greenhaus, J.H., Maestro, M.L.H. (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Work-Family Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006004_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006004_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43491-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00600-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)