Skip to main content

Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels

  • Chapter
Assessing Second Language Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics ((PADLL))

Abstract

The role of English as the international language of business and education has grown immeasurably in recent decades. With a burgeoning population of English language learners the world over, there is a clear and increasing need for valid measures of communicative language ability. Business people, international students, and ordinary citizens need the English skills necessary to operate in their target language use domain; the acquisition of English is critical to their educational opportunities, money-making potential, and upward mobility — this is undeniably a high-stakes issue. For better or worse, language tests are critical to language learners and end-users (companies, universities, communities, among others) in that they help determine who is proficient enough to work, study, and survive in the target culture, and who needs further instruction and/or exposure. Therefore, the constructs underlying language tests should reflect theoretical notions of what it means to know a language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, L., & Waring, H. Z. (2002, April). The pragmatics in the interlanguage pragmatics research agenda: The case of tone. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton, L. (1994). Conversational implicatures in the second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22: 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, K., & Yoshitake-Strain, S. (1996). Self-assessment and role plays for evaluating appropriateness in speech act realizations. ICU Language Research Bulletin, 11: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, K., & Yoshitake-Strain, S. (1999). Evaluating six measures of EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. JALT Journal, 21: 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhady, H. (1983). New directions for ESL proficiency testing. In J. Oller (ed.), Issues in Language Testing (pp. 253–69). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. (1975). Towards a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, B. (1978). From the Community to the Classroom: Gathering second language speech samples. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P. (2004). Pragmatic comprehension of high and low level language. TESL-EJ, 8(2). Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej30/toc.html

  • Grabowski, K. (2009). Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 113–127). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a socio-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T., Detmer, E. & Brown, J. D. (1992). A Framework for Testing Cross-cultural Pragmatics. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T., Detmer, E. & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing Prototypic Measures of Crosscultural Pragmatics. Technical Report #7. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, R. (1961). Language Testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. (1989). Many-faceted Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2006). Measuring Interlanguage Pragmatic Knowledge of EFL Learners. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring Second Language Performance: A new era in language testing. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, A., & Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing, 4: 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C. (2006). Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics. Language Testing, 23: 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C. (2008). Rater, item, and candidate effects in discourse completion tests: A FACETS approach. In E. Alcón & A. Martínez-Flor (eds.), Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 249–266). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22: 27–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., & Berwick, R. (1992). The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14: 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 89: 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, S. (1996). Six Measures of JSL Pragmatics. Technical Report #14. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, S. (2001). Using pictures for research in pragmatics. Eliciting pragmatic strategies by picture response tasks. In T. Hudson & J. D. Brown (eds.), A Focus on Language Test Development (pp. 35–56). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshitake-Strain, S. (1997). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic competence of Japanese students of English as a foreign language: A multi-test framework evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Pacific University, Novata, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Kirby Grabowski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grabowski, K. (2013). Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. In: Ross, S.J., Kasper, G. (eds) Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics