Abstract
Applying Sen’s capability approach involves tackling a number of challenges. These challenges include the specification and justification of a capability list for the particular evaluative exercise at hand. A second challenge is capturing the complex concept of ‘capability’, where possible going beyond observation of functionings. Thirdly, researchers must try to identify data sources which reflect the breadth and depth of the theoretical approach. The Equality Measurement Framework (EMF) is a new capability-based analytical tool that we have developed in partnership with the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which attempts to tackle these challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkire, S., Bastagli, F., Burchardt, T., Clark, D., Holder, H., Ibrahim, S., Munoz, M., Terrazas, P., Tsang, T. and Vizard, P. (2009) Developing the Equality Measurement Framework: Selecting the Indicators, EHRC Research Report 31.
Bleich, S., Ozaltin, E. and Murray, C. (2009) ‘How Does Satisfaction with the Healthcare System Relate to Patient Experience?’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(4), pp. 271–278.
Burchardt, T. (2004) ‘Capabilities and Disability: the Capabilities Framework and the Social Model of Disability’, Disability & Society, 19 (7), pp. 735–751.
Burchardt, T. (2005) ‘One Man’s Rags Are Another Man’s Riches: Identifying Adaptive Preferences Using Panel Data’, Social Indicators Research, 74, pp. 57–102.
Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. (2011) ‘Operationalizing the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twenty-First-Century Britain’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12 (1), pp. 91–119.
Care Quality Commission (2011) Dignity and Nutrition Inspection Programme: National Overview, available online at http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report_final_ update.pdf (accessed 12 November 2011).
Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2008) ‘Complexity and Vagueness in the Capability Approach: Strengths or Weaknesses?’ In Alkire S. et al. (eds) The Capability Approach: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Clarke, J., Newman, J. and Westmarland, L. (2007) ‘The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the Reform of Public Services’, Social Policy & Society, 7 (2), pp. 245–253.
Cooper, Z., Gibbons, S., Jones, S. and McGuire, A. (2011) ‘Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence From the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms’, The Economic Journal, 121 (August), F228–F260.
Crawford, R. (2010) Where Did the Axe Fall? Institute for Fiscal Studies 2010 Spending Review briefing, 21 October, http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5311 (accessed 29 November 2013).
Department of Health (1998) Independent Inquiry into inequalities in Health (Acheson Report), http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4097582 (accessed 19 July 2012).
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1980), Inequalities in Health, Report of a Research Working Group. DHSS, London.
Glendinning, C. (2008) ‘Increasing Choice and Control for Older and Disabled People: a Critical Review of New Developments in England’, Social Policy & Administration, 42 (5), pp. 451–469.
Healthcare Commission (2006) Variations in the experiences of patients in England: Analysis of the Healthcare Commission’s 2004/2005 national surveys of patients, http://archive.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/Surveys_Variations_Report1.pdf (accessed 5th April 2012).
Hills, J. (2011) ‘The Changing Architecture of the uk Welfare State’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27 (4), pp. 589–607.
Holder, H., Tsang, T. and Vizard, P. (2011) Developing the Equality Measurement Framework: Selecting the Indicators for Children and Young People, EHRC Research Report 31.
Humphries, R. (2011) Social Care Funding and the nhs: An Impending Crisis? The King’s Fund, London.
Le Grand, J. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Marmot Review (2010), Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review http://www. instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmotreview (accessed 19 July 2012).
Natcen and CASE (2012) Analysing Data on Equality, Good Relations and Human Rights, EHRC commissioned project.
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003) ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Global Justice’, Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), pp. 33–59.
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2008) Infant mortality by ethnic group, 2005 data, Reference table, 24 June 2008, available: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77–46494 (accessed February 2012).
Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (2011) Care and Compassion. Report of the Health Services Ombudsman on 10 Investigations into NHS Care of Older People, Fourth report of the Health Service Commissioner for England.
Qizilbash, M. (2002) ‘Development, Common Foes and Shared Values’, Review of Political Economy, 14(4), pp. 463–480.
Roche, M. (2009) ‘Capability and Group Inequalities: Revealing the Latent Structure’, Working Paper, http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/OPHIRP18a.pdf?cda6c1.
Sassi F. (2009) ‘Health Inequalities: A Persistent Problem’, in Hills, J., Sefton, T., and Stewart, K. (eds), Towards a More Equal Society, Poverty: Inequality and Policy since 1997, Policy Press, Bristol.
Session 2010–2011, HC 778: TSO, London. Available online at www.ombudsman. org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/7216/Care-and-Compassion-PHSO0114web.pdf.
Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Sen, A. (1989) ‘Women’s Survival as a Development Problem’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 43, pp. 14–29.
Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Re-examined, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Sen, A. (2002) Rationality and Freedom, Belknap Press, Massachusetts.
Sen, A. (2004) ‘Capabilities, Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation’, Feminist Economics, 10(3), pp. 77–80.
Sen, A., Stiglitz, J and Fitoussi, J. (2009) Final Report of Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz–Sen Commission) http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (accessed 10 May 2012).
Sizmur, S. (2011) Multilevel Analysis of Patient Experience, Picker Institute.
Sugden, R. (1993) ‘Review: Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Re-Examined by Amartya Sen’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, pp. 1947–1962.
Sugden, R. (2003) ‘Opportunity as a Space for Individuality: Its Value and the Impossibility of Measuring It’, Ethics, 113(4), pp. 783–809.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Tania Burchardt and Polly Vizard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burchardt, T., Vizard, P. (2014). Using the Capability Approach to Evaluate Health and Care for Individuals and Groups in England. In: Ibrahim, S., Tiwari, M. (eds) The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43363-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00143-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)