Skip to main content

Framing Global Climate Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Insecurity

Abstract

As the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the broader scientific community produce dire warnings and stronger evidence that climate change exists, is caused by human activities, and poses a significant threat to humans and all living creatures on the earth, effective agreements to mitigate climate change on the international level have seen little success. Even with little international progress, an increasing number of actors from the local to the global level are framing climate change as a security threat. Climate security, defined as reducing vulnerability and risk of harm, is a contested issue. This chapter will focus on identifying the language and processes used by global actors to frame climate change as a security issue, and the impact of such a frame on policymakers. In the end, the chapter will advance our understanding of the efficacy of framing climate change as a global security issue, and the impediments to reducing its threat vis-à-vis the promise of global governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Press release after his presentation to the United Nations Security Council, February 2013 (deBrun 2013).

  2. 2.

    For an introduction to frame analysis, see Entman (1993) for a discussion of framing as ‘a process of selecting some aspects of a perceived reality in order to make them more salient for audience members’ (Entman 1993, p. 5), Goffman’s (1974) introduction of frame analysis as a tool to examine symbolic communication, and Hoffman’s (2011) and Nisbet’s (2009) application of frame analysis to climate change.

Bibliography

  • Barkdull, J., & Harris, P. G. (2014). Climate Catastrophe and Transformationalism. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 16, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. W. (2007). Climate change and national security: An agenda for action. CSR No. 32, November. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. M. ed. (2008). Climatic cataclysm: The Foreign policy and national security implications of climate change. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, S., & Doyle, T. (2015). Climate terror: A critical geopolitics of climate change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. J., & Steffen, W. (2003). How long have we been in in the Anthropocene era? Climatic Change, 61(3), 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2009). Security and environmental change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2013a). Climate change as an issue of human security. In M. R. Redclift & M. Grasso (eds.), Handbook on climate change and human security (pp. 21–40). Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2013b). Climate change. The RUSI Journal, 158(3), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2016). Climate change and the insecurity frame. In S. O’Lear & S. Dalby (Eds.), Reframing Climate Change: Constructing Ecological Geopolitics. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • deBrun, T. (2013) “Climate change and security” http://webtv.un.org/watch/climate-change-and-security-tony-debrum-marshall-islands-press-conference/2167969694001.

  • DiMento, J. F. C., & Doughman, P. eds. (2014). Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren. Cambridge, MA/ London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 691–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, G. (2011). Climate wars: The fight for survival as the world overheats. London, UK: One World Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, S. et al. (2014). Global climate risk index 2015: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events from 2013 and 1994 to 2013. Bonn, Germany: Germanwatch e.V. (www.germanwatch.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, M. J. (2005). Security and climate change: International relation and the limits of realism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94((5 July)), 1153–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A., (2010) “Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis” (Yale University and George Mason University: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, R. A. (2014). Climate change and human security. In J. F. C. DiMento & P. Doughman (eds.), Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren (pp. 257–294). Cambridge MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, T., Nisbet, M., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climate Change, 113(3), 1105–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environement: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2015) “Climate Change and President Obama’s Action Plan” https://www.whitehouse.gov/climate-change.

  • Oels, A. (2014). Climate security as governmentality: From precaution to preparedness. In J. Stripple & H. Bulkeley (eds.), Governing the climate: New approaches to rationality, power and politics (pp. 197–218). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oels, A. (2016). Resisting the climate security discourse: Restoring ‘the political’ in climate change politics. In S. O’Lear & S. Dalby (eds.), Reframing climate change (pp. 188–202). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Lear, S., & Dalby, S. (Eds.). (2016). Reframing Climate Change: Constructing Ecological Geopolitics. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettenger, M. (2007). The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses. London, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. (2016). Securitizing global warming: A climate of complexity. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowling, M. (2016) “Interview: Stop ignoring cost of smaller disasters - UN risk chief” in Thomson Reuters Foundation, 21 January, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-disaster-risks-idUSKCN0UZ12U.

  • Selby, J. (2014). Positivist climate conflict research: A critique. Geopolitics, 19(4), 829–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (2015), “For the Marshall Islands, the Climate Goal is ‘1.5 to Stay Alive’ “ http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/12/09/459053208/for-the-marshall-islands-the-climate-goal-is-1-5-to-stay-alive.

  • Szasz, A. (2016). Novel framings create new, unexpected allies for climate activism. In S. O’Lear & S. Dalby (eds.), Reframing climate change (pp. 150–170). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - Paris Agreement (2015), FCCC/CP/2015/L.9, Paris, 11 December 2015, Available from https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/2016/02/20160215%2006-03%20PM/Ch_XXVII-7-d.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Defense [DoD]. (2016). DoD directive 4715.21 climate change adaptation and resilience. January 14. http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/471521p.pdf.

  • Vergara, A. 2003 “Vermeer and the Dutch Interior” http://essentialvermeer.com.

  • Von Lucke, F., Wellmann, Z., & Diez, T. (2014). What’s at stake in securitising climate change? Towards a differentiated approach. Geopolitics, 19(4), 857–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webersik, C. (2010). Climate change and security: A gathering storm of global challenges. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzer, H. (2012). Climate wars: Why people will be killed in the 21st century. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization, 26 January 2016, “2015 the hottest year on record” https://www.wmo.int/media/content/2015-hottest-year-record.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary E. Pettenger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pettenger, M.E. (2017). Framing Global Climate Security. In: Burke, A., Parker, R. (eds) Global Insecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95145-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics