Abstract
This article describes the core political and economic institutions of Muslim societies during Islam’s ‘classical’ period. We argue that the reliance of Muslim leaders on slave armies discouraged the development of a hereditary baronage in Muslim societies and contributed to the underdevelopment of private ownership of land. Societal resistance to sultanistic governance emanated not from land-owning elites but rather from religious leaders who came to enjoy high levels of moral authority through their role as mediators between state and society. Authoritarian governance, a weak tradition of private property rights and empowerment of religious elites in the realms of law and education had important implications for the economic development of Muslim societies.
This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online edition, 2016. Edited by Palgrave Macmillan.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Acemoglu, D., and J.A. Robinson. 2000. Political losers as a barrier to economic development. American Economic Review 90(2): 126–130.
Al-Ghazali, A.H. 1111 [1971]. al-Munqidh min al-Dalal. Lahore: Hayat al-Awqaf.
Blaydes, L., and E. Chaney. 2013. The feudal revolution and Europe’s rise: Political divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim world before 1500 CE. American Political Science Review 107(1): 16–34.
Blaydes, L., and J. Lo. 2012. One man, one vote, one time? A model of democratization in the Middle East. Journal of Theoretical Politics 24(1): 110–146.
Blaydes, L., J. Grimmer, and A. McQueen. 2016. Mirrors for Princes and Sultans: Advice on the art of governance in the Medieval Christian and Islamic worlds. Working paper.
Chamberlain, M. 1994. Knowledge and social practice in Medieval Damascus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaney, E. 2012. Democratic change in the Arab world, past and present. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 42(1): 363–414.
Chaney, E. 2013. Revolt on the Nile: Economics shocks, religion and political power. Econometrica 81(5): 2033–2053.
Chaney, E. 2015a. Religion and the rise and fall of Islamic Science. Working paper.
Chaney, E. 2015b. Measuring the military decline of the Western Islamic world: evidence from Barbary ransoms. Explorations in Economic History 58: 107–124.
Hodgson, M. 1974. The venture of Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuran, T. 2001. The provision of public goods under Islamic law: Origins, impact, and limitations of the waqf system. Law & Society Review 35(4): 841–898.
Kuran, T. 2004. Why the Middle East is economically underdeveloped: Historical mechanisms of institutional stagnation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3): 71–90.
Kuran, T. 2011. The long divergence: How Islamic law held back the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lapidus, I.M. 2014. A history of Islamic societies. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malik, A. 2012. Was the Middle East’s economic descent a legal or political failure? Debating the Islamic law matters thesis. Working paper, Center for the Study of African Economies.
Olson, M. 1993. Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review 87(3): 567–576.
Sabra, A.I. 1987. The appropriation and subsequent naturalization of Greek science in medieval Islam: a preliminary statement. History of Science 25: 223–243.
von Grunebaum, G.E. 2008 [1970]. Classical Islam: A history, 600 AD to 1258 AD. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Blaydes, L., Chaney, E. (2016). Political Economy Legacy of Institutions from the Classical Period of Islam. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3028-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3028-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences