Skip to main content

Pre-emption and Entry Timing

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

Entry timing research examines how firm performance varies, possibly non-monotonically, with the order (also known as order of entry) or elapsed time since first entry into a new market. While the pre-emption literature in economics focuses on assumptions for a first entrant to monopolize a market, contemporary strategy scholarship emphasizes more subtle and contingent entry timing effects – with recognition of the importance of endogenous firm characteristics (e.g., complementary assets) and choices (e.g., modes of expansion or entry), and industry contingencies (e.g., knowledge tacitness). Groundbreaking applications of entry timing concepts pertain to international management as well as innovation contexts.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., M.B. Sarkar, and R. Echambadi. 2002. The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach. Academy of Management Journal 45: 971–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. 1996. Preemptive R&D, rent dissipation, and the leverage theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 1153–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R.J., and D.M.G. Newbery. 1982. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review 72: 514–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L., and C. Shapiro. 1987. R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation. American Economic Review 77: 402–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B., and D.B. Montgomery. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal 9: 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B., and D.B. Montgomery. 1998. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 19: 1111–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makadok, R. 1998. Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal 19: 683–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, X., A. Swaminathan, and W. Mitchell. 1998. Organizational evolution in an interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 566–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, X., A. Swaminathan, and L. Tihanyi. 2007. Modeling international expansion. In Research methodology in strategy and management, vol. 4, ed. D.J. Ketchen and D.D. Bergh. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, B. 1992. Order of entry and performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal 13: 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. 1989. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging medical subfields. Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 208–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W., J.M. Shaver, and B. Yeung. 1994. Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal 15: 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofek, E., and M. Sarvary. 2003. R&D, marketing, and the success of next generation products. Marketing Science 22: 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J.F. 1989. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. In Handbook of industrial organization, vol. 1, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.T., G. Kalyanaram, and G.L. Urban. 1994. First mover advantages from pioneering new markets: A survey of empirical evidence. Review of Industrial Organization 9: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, R., and X. Martin. 2008. Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Science 54: 1266–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, F., and G. Lanzolla. 2007. The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review 32: 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., and B. Kogut. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science 6: 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Martin, X. (2016). Pre-emption and Entry Timing. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_590-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_590-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics