Skip to main content

Vertical Integration

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Vertical integration, in which one company owns and controls two or more stages of a supply chain, can have many causes, including avoiding contractual difficulties (high transaction costs), remedying capability deficits and achieving informational efficiencies. Sometimes vertical integration that is justified when intermediate markets are underdeveloped becomes burdensome once vigorous competition emerges for provision of the intermediate goods. A general guideline is that, from a strategic management perspective, the assets in the ‘supply’ chain that are most critical to own and control, subject to certain conditions, are those that are not readily available in the market and are difficult to replicate. These can be thought of as ‘bottleneck assets’.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J. 1975. Vertical integration and communication. Bell Journal of Economics 6: 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blois, K.J. 1972. Vertical quasi-integration. Journal of Industrial Economics 20: 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., and D. Iacobucci. 2012. Agglomeration, related variety, and vertical integration. Economic Geography 88: 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. 1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. 1992. Organizational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W., and D.J. Teece. 1996. Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? Harvard Business Review 74: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., T. Brady, and M. Hobday. 2007. Organizing for solutions: Systems seller vs. systems integrator. Industrial Marketing Management 36: 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobry, P.-E. 2011. ‘Apple’s … exclusive supply chain of advanced technology [is] literally years ahead of anyone else on the planet’. businessinsider.com, 4 July. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-supply-chain-2011-7. Accessed 29 Jan 2014.

  • Grossman, S.J., and O.D. Hart. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R. 1986. Matching vertical integration strategies to competitive conditions. Strategic Management Journal 7: 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M.G., and S. Billinger. 2006. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From ‘make, buy, or ally’ to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science 17: 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, F., and M. Slade. 2007. Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 629–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1991. The capabilities of industrial capitalism. Critical Reviews 5: 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 2002. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49: 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S. 1984. The organization of production: Evidence from the aerospace industry. Journal of Law and Economics 27: 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S.E., J.W. Meehan, and E.A. Snyder. 1991. The costs of organization. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 7: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K. 1995. Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Science 41: 1624–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K., and D.J. Teece. 1982a. Appropriable rents and quasi-vertical integration. Journal of Law and Economics 25: 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K., and D.J. Teece. 1982b. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C.R., and C.H. Ferguson. 1993. How architecture wins technology wars. Harvard Business Review 71: 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M.K. 1989. Vertical integration: Determinants and effects. In Handbook of industrial organization, vol. 1, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F.T., M.A. Hitt, and L.A. Jobe. 2006. Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: Effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 27: 1033–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satariano, A. 2013. Apple’s $10.5B on robots to lasers shores up supply chain. Bloomberg.com, 12 November. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-13/apple-s-10-5b-on-robots-to-lasers-shores-up-supply-chain.html. Accessed 27 Feb 2014.

  • Stigler, G.J. 1951. The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy 59: 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T.J. 2002. Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 451–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1976. Vertical integration and vertical divestiture in the U.S. Oil industry: Economic analysis and policy implications. Stanford: Institute for Energy Studies, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 15: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1990. Structure and organization of the natural gas industry: Differences between the United States and the federal republic of Germany and implications for the carrier status of pipelines. Energy Journal 11: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 2006. Reflections on profiting from innovation. Research Policy 35: 1131–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 2010. Forward integration and innovation: Transaction costs and beyond. Journal of Retailing 86: 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1971. The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. American Economic Review 61: 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Teece .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Teece, D.J. (2016). Vertical Integration. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_452-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_452-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics