Abstract
Memoir, as a literary genre, is a multisemiotic resource. Memoir texts are multilayered and contribute to greater discursive conversations through the variation in function between voices. These texts deal with complex social issues such as addiction, trauma and genocide. Situated within a wide range of historical discourses, they ought to be analysed linguistically because, as Coffin states, ‘if history is seen as a significant social phenomenon, surely its discourse merits some serious reflection and discussion in order to better understand it’ (Coffin 2006, p. 2). Different types of historical discourse construe history differently. This is because each text is underpinned by its own particular view of what occurred and how it should be told. While some texts are designed to provide an unbiased, detached analysis, others are designed to describe a gripping narrative. Memoir straddles the line between argument and narrative by using different voices to serve different functions. The result is a text that both describes the experiences of the memoirist and persuades the reader to follow a given point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balzer, P. (2014). Finding your Memoir’s Voice. Writer’s Digest, November/December.
Christie, F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching; Genre theory and ESL teaching: A systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759–763.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Bloomsbury.
Dolot, M. (1985). Execution by Hunger. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mickan, P. (2012). Language curriculum design and socialisation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Morris, D. B. (1996). About suffering: Voice, genre, and moral community. Daedalus, 125(1), 25–45.
Silverman, S. W. (2004). From innocence to experience: Multiple voices in memoir. Fourth Genre: Explorations in Nonfiction, 6(2), 121–123.
Steinberg, M. (2004). One story, two voices: Bridging the past and present through multiple voices. Fourth Genre: Explorations in Nonfiction, 6(2), 123–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lopez, E. (2017). Locating Multiple Voices in Memoir: Modelling Voice Through Analysis of Interpersonal Linguistic Choices. In: Mickan, P., Lopez, E. (eds) Text-Based Research and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59849-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59849-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59848-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59849-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)