Skip to main content

Varieties of Virtue Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varieties of Virtue Ethics

Abstract

Virtue ethics has been diverse in several ways, offering divergent lists of virtues, presupposing different metaphysical backgrounds, especially of fundamental anthropology, understanding differently the relation between the virtues and emotions, having divergent understandings of the broad conceptual structure of morality, some being aretaically monistic while others are pluralistic. Others offer monisms that make some dimension of the moral life other than virtue fundamental, and derive their concept of virtue from this other single foundation. And finally, the purpose of the activity of virtue ethics can be variously conceived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notice how Watson, Slote and Kawall neglect any attention to particular virtues; they are only interested in using the concept of virtue to construct a theory.

  2. 2.

    Bernard Williams (1985) would share many of the above concerns. See also Talbot Brewer (2009), especially the Introduction, which is a brief but pungent history of contemporary virtue ethics. For a spirit akin in some ways to “radical” virtue ethics, see Michael Stocker (1976) on the schizophrenia of modern ethical theories.

  3. 3.

    Theoria must not be confused with ethical theory as contemporary philosophers understand it (see Roberts 2013a, chapter 1; see Rorty 1978).

  4. 4.

    I am grateful to Ryan West and David Carr for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Bibliography

  • Anscombe, E. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy 33, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2012). Summa Theologiae. The Aquinas Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1934). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Victor Gollantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M. (1985). Varieties of ethics of virtue. American Philosophical Quarterly, 22, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L. (1975). The neglect of virtue. Ethics, 85, 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L. (1997). A New Stoicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (1998). Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, T. (2009). The Retrieval of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J. (2001). Uneasy Virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epictetus (2004). Enchiridion. Dover Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life. Edited with an introduction by Arnold Davidson. Translated by Michael Chase. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2002). What is Ancient Philosophy? Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1888). Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1983). Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited with an introduction by J.B. Schneewind. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1985). Essays Moral Political and Literary. Edited by Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2009). A Dissertation on the Passions and The Natural History of Religion. Edited by Tom Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (2003, revised 2012). Virtue Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/

  • Kant, I. (1997). Practical Philosophy (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant). Edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawall, J. (2009). In defense of the primacy of the virtues. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 3, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louden, R. (1986). Kant’s virtue ethics. Philosophy, 61, 473–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1989). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1991). Incommensurability, truth, and the conversation between Confucians and Aristotelians about the virtues. In E. Deutsche (Ed.) Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives (pp. 104–123). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Edited with an introduction by George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1961). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1988). Non-relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13, 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1983). Kant after virtue. Inquiry, 26, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997). Complete Works of Plato. Edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2007). Compassion as an emotion and as a virtue. In I. Dalferth and A. Hunziker (Eds.) Mitleid (Religion in Philosophy and Theology, Vol. 28 (pp. 119–137). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2010). Emotions and the canons of evaluation. In P. Goldie, (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotions (pp.561–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2013a). Emotions in the Moral Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2013b). Emotion. In H. LaFollette (Ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2014). Temperance. In K. Timpe and C. Boyd (Eds.) Virtues and Their Vices (pp. 93–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2015). Does virtue contribute to flourishing? In M. Alfano, (Ed.) Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (pp. 36–49). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. and Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A. (1978). The place of contemplation in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Mind, 87, 343–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca (1995). On Favors in Moral and Political Essays. Edited and translated by J. M. Cooper and J. F. Procopé. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, N. (1997). Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2001). Morals from Motives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. (2003). Virtue ethics: radical or routine? In M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski (Eds.) Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, M. (1976). The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, E. (2014). Faith, wisdom, and the transmission of knowledge through testimony. In L. Callahan and T. O’Connor (Eds.) Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1990). On the primacy of character. In O. Flanagan and A. Rorty (Eds.) Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, R.C. (2017). Varieties of Virtue Ethics. In: Carr, D., Arthur, J., Kristjánsson, K. (eds) Varieties of Virtue Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59177-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics