Abstract
Denmark, like the other Scandinavian countries, is built on the “Nordic welfare model” where policies emerge through political dialogue and parallel decision-making (Lappi-Seppälä 2007). However, the “Nordic Welfare Model” is under pressure and the previous expert-driven and research-led strategy especially recognised within penal policy-making has been challenged and changed to a more politically ruled approach over the last decades (Lappi-Seppälä and Storgaard 2014). Nevertheless, the Scandinavian countries are still acknowledged for their stable penal policies and by some categorised as the epitome of “Scandinavian penal exceptionalism” (Pratt 2008a, b; Lappi-Seppälä 2007). The arguments for including Denmark in this “exception” are among others the country’s relatively low prison population rate trend varying from 61 to 72 per 100,000 of the national population the last 15 years; the rather stable total capacity of prisons with places for about 4,000 inmates (World Prison Brief); and the comparatively low sentences where 59 %. 6).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
It should be mentioned that the debtors of legal costs cannot be incarcerated for non-payment; neither can the debtors repay legal costs through an alternative sentence such as imprisonment.
- 2.
I do not report the findings of the ex-prisoners’ experiences of having only unreported income and the attention it entails from the Tax Authority and the police here, but they are included in the larger work (Olesen 2013a).
References
The Annual Report of the Danish Prison Service. (2015). file:///C:/Users/aol/Downloads/Kriminalforsorgens+Statistik+2015.pdf. Accessed 5 September 2016.
Bannon, A., Nagrecha, M., Diller, R. (2010). Criminal justice debt. New York: University School of Law.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998a). On the fundamental ambivalence of the state. Polygraph, 10, 21–32.
Bourdieu, P. (1998b). Acts of resistance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Firing back. London: Verso.
Bourdieu, P., Sayad, A., Christin, R., Champagne, P., Balazs, G., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1999). The weight of the world. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Clausen, S. (2013). Fængslet ta’r (stadig) de sidste. København: Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen.
The Danish Bar and Law Society. (2012). Sagsomkostninger i straffesager. http://www.advokatsamfundet.dk/Service/Nyheder/Nyhedsbrev/~/media/Rapporter/sagsomkostninger.ashx. Accessed 5 September 2016.
The Danish Guidance and Directions for Recovery. (2010). http://skat.dk/SKAT.aspx?oId=1617406&vId=0&lang=DA. Accessed 5 September 2016.
Dingeldey, I. (2007). Between workfare and enablement. European Journal of Political Research, 46(6), 823–851.
Dyb, E., Kielstrup, B., Muiluvuori, M. L., Tyni, S., Baldursson, E. S., & Guðmundsdóttir, H. (2006). Løslatt og hjemløs. Oslo: NIBR, Byggforsk, KRUS.
Edmark, K. (2005). Unemployment and crime. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(2), 353–373.
Graunbøl, H. M., et al. (2010). Retur. Oslo: Kriminalomsorgen.
Gustafson, K. (2011). Cheating welfare. New York: New York University Press.
Harris, A., et al. (2010). Drawing blood from stones. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1753–1799.
Hickey, C. (2002). Crime and homelessness. Dublin: Focus Ireland & PACE.
Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., Stoll, M. A. (2006). Perceived criminality, criminal background checks and the racial hiring practices of employers. Journal of Law and Economics, 49(2), 451–480.
Kyvsgaard, B. (1989). …og fængslet ta’r de sidste. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Kyvsgaard. B. (1999). Klientundersøgelsen. København: Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen.
Kyvsgaard, B. (2006). Hvad virker—hvad virker ikke? København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, pp. 83–108.
Lappi‐Seppälä, T. (2007). Penal policy in Scandinavia. Crime and Justice, 36(1), 217–295.
Lappi˗Seppälä, T., & Storgaard, A. (2014). Unge i det strafferetlige system. Tidsskrift for Strafferet, 4, 333˗359.
Naser, R., & Visher, C. (2006). Family members’ experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review, 7(2), 20–31.
Nautrup, J. (1984). Sagsomkostninger i retssager. Juristen, 66(3), 73–88.
Nautrup, J. (1995). Sagsomkostningernes behandling under domsforhandlingen i straffesager. Fuldmægtigen, 67(5), 79–81.
Nelson, M., Deess, P., Allen, C. (1999). The first month out. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
Olesen, A. (2013a). Løsladt og gældsat. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Olesen, A. (2013b). Eftergivelse af gæld vedrørende sagsomkostninger i straffesager. In H. V. G. Pedersen (Ed.), Juridiske emner ved Syddansk Universitet 2013 (pp. 327–344). København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Olesen, A. (2014). Retlige, retssikkerhedsmæssige og resocialiserende omkostninger ved sagsomkostninger i straffesager. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 101(3), 248–270.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.
Pogrebin, M., et al. (2014). Employment isn’t enough. Criminal Justice Review, 39(4), 394–410.
Pratt, J. (2008a). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I. British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119–137.
Pratt, J. (2008b). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part II. British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 275–292.
The Prison and Probation Service. (2015). Reoffending statistics of the prison and probation service 2014. https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjUv-egkfnOAhWD3SwKHQwtBgkQFgghMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kriminalforsorgen.dk%2FAdmin%2FPublic%2FDownload.aspx%3Ffile%3DFiles%252FFiler%252FStatistik%252FKriminalforsorgens%2Brecidivstatistik%2B2014%2B(november%2B2015).pdf&usg=AFQjCNGyf2svmG5hPfyVExkURPQrrqYdmQ&bvm=bv.131783435,d.bGg. Accessed 5 September 2016.
Ramboll. (2013). Cost benefit analysis of crime preventing initiatives. https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjOgOXflPnOAhUIXiwKHZfLCnoQFggbMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kk.dk%2Ffiles%2Fsamfundskonomisk-analyse-af-kriminalprventive-indsatser-1825-rige-i-socialforvaltningen%2Fdownload%3Ftoken%3DnkxbdcLD&usg=AFQjCNGBlt2MfDywOhLSK2rN3CI8ysTPnw&bvm=bv.131783435,d.bGg. Accessed 5 September 2016.
Recommendation no. 1547/2014. Sagsomkostninger i straffesager. http://jm.schultzboghandel.dk/upload/microsites/jm/ebooks/bet1547/pdf/bet1547.pdf. Accessed 5 September 2016
The Rockwool Foundation. (2006). Technical minute no. 15. Direct expenses to crime prevention in Denmark. https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiWppaYlPnOAhVMiiwKHfRzBIgQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rockwoolfonden.dk%2Fapp%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2FTeknisk-note-nr-15-1.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFr8U8w3SDBf0nSpMnM_R8huET_WA. Accessed 5 September 2016.
Roxell, L. (2009). Tur och retur. Efter løsladelse, pp. 34–43. Rapport fra NSfK’s 51.
Rørdam, P. (1961). Om tilståelsessager og om sagsomkostninger i straffesager. Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen 327–332.
Skardhamar, T., & Telle, K. (2012). Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 629–649.
Skjødt, B. (2004). Sagens omkostninger og retssikkerheden. Lov & Ret, 14(3), 16–19.
Smith, P. S. (2014). When the innocent are punished. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Torfing, J. (1999a). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare postnational regime. Economy and Society, 28(3), 369–402.
Tranæs, T., et al. (2008). Forbryderen og samfundet. København: Gyldendal.
Visher, C., Debus S., Yahner, J. (2008). Employment after prison. Washington: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993). From ruling class to field of power. Theory, Culture & Society, 10(3), 19–44.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (2001). The penalisation of poverty and the rise of neo-liberalism. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9(4), 401–412.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (2009). Punishing the poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Wildeman, C. & Western, B. (2010). Incarceration in fragile families. The Future of Children, 20(2), 157–177.
Williams, K., Poyser, J., Hopkins, J. (2012). Accommodation, homelessness and reoffending of prisoners. London: Ministry of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olesen, A. (2017). Released to the “Battlefield” of the Danish Welfare State: A Battle Between Support and Personal Responsibility. In: Scharff Smith, P., Ugelvik, T. (eds) Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58529-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58529-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58528-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58529-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)