Abstract
In this concluding chapter the key findings of the volume are summarized and an outlook on the prospective development of the social dimension in the Eurozone are given. As the various country case studies in this book have shown, the EU has been unprecedentedly involved in national welfare state affairs, particularly in those countries that had to seek official financial assistance from the European Union (EU) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) as well as in the wider Eurozone. Nevertheless, the contributors to this book pointed to important differences in the level of intrusiveness depending on country context or policy area. Regarding welfare societies in European more widely following the Great Recession, it can be concluded that all have become less secure and more unequal. Looking at pensions, economic stabilization has been reached for the time being, but adequacy remains a challenge. Regarding unemployment benefits and labour market policies we find that these have become characterised by less generosity and more flexibility. In the context of a still fragile economic recovery and a rejection of the prescribed austerity measures by many electorates in the crisis countries, the European Commission now emphasises more upfront that social fairness considerations have to be taken into account when implementing measures that aim at stabilizing the European economies. Important debates have been initiated recently as to how not only to make the Eurozone more crisis-resilient but also to strengthen the political union and the social dimension.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boeri, T., & Garibaldi, P. (2009). Beyond eurosclerosis. Economic Policy, 24(58), 409–461.
Casey, B. (2004). The OECD jobs strategy and the European employment strategy: Two views of the labour market and the welfare state. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10(3), 329–352.
Claeys, G., Darvas, Z., & Wolff, G. B. (2014). Benefits and drawbacks of European unemployment insurance. In Bruegel Policy Brief 2014/06, Brussels: Bruegel.
Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (Eds.). (2011). Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DG ECFIN. (2015). Spring 2015 economic forecast. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2015/pdf/ee2_en.pdf
Clegg, D. (2011). France: Integration versus dualization. In J. Clasen & D. Clegg (Eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe (pp. 34–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clegg, D. (forthcoming). Labour market policies in Europe. In P. Kennett & N. Lendvai (Eds.), A handbook of European social policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
de la Porte, C., & Natali, D. (2014). Altered Europeanization of pension reform during the Great Recession: Denmark and Italy compared. West European Politics, 37(4), 732–749.
Dølvik, J.-E., & Martin, A. (2015). From crisis to crisis: European social models and labour market outcomes in the era of monetary integration. In J.-E. Dølvik & A. Martin (Eds.), European social models from crisis to crisis: Employment and inequality in the era of monetary integration (pp. 325–385). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dukelow, F., & Heins, E. (forthcoming). The Anglo-Saxon welfare states: Still Europe’s outlier – or trendsetter? In P. Kennett & N. Lendvai (Eds.), A handbook of European social policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Eichhorst, W., & Konle-Seidl, R. (2008). Contingent convergence: A comparative analysis of activation policies. In IZA Discussion Paper no. 3905. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp3905.pdf
Erne, R. (2015). A supranational regime that nationalizes social conflict: Explaining European trade unions’ difficulties in politicizing European economic governance. Labor History, 56(3), 345–368.
European Commission. (2015a, August 19). Assessment of the social impact of the new stability support programme for Greece. Retrieved September 8, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/assistance_eu_ms/greek_loan_facility/pdf/assessment_social_impact_en.pdf
European Commission. (2015b). The 2015 pension adequacy report: Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, Vol. 1. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurostat. (2015). Unemployment statistics. Data up to September 2015. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics
Farnsworth, K., & Irving, Z. (2012). Varieties of crisis, varieties of austerity. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20(2), 133–147.
Hinrichs, K., & Jessoula, J. (Eds.). (2012). Labour market flexibility and pension reforms. Flexible today, secure tomorrow? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iudicone, F., & Arca Sedda, A. (2015). Italy: Reforms to system of unemployment benefits. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/industrial-relations-law-and-regulation/italy-reforms-to-system-of-unemployment-benefits
Jacobsson, K. (2004). Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: The case of EU employment policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 355–370.
Juncker, J.-C., Tusk, D., Dijsselbloem, J., Draghi, M., & Schulz, M. (2015). Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/economic-monetary-union/docs/5-presidents-report_en.pdf
Laffan, B. (2014). Testing times: the growing primacy of responsibility in the Euro area. West European Politics, 37(2), 270–287.
Laterza, V. (2015). Greece: Government to roll out a Guaranteed Minimum Income scheme. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://www.basicincome.org/news/2015/08/greece-government-to-roll-out-a-guaranteed-minimum-income-scheme
Natali, D. (2008). Pensions in Europe, European pensions. The evolution of pension policy at national and supranational level. Brussels: Peter Lang.
OECD. (1994). The OECD jobs study. Facts, analysis, strategies. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schmidt, V. A. (2015). The forgotten problem of democratic legitimacy. In M. Mathijs & M. Blyth (Eds.), The future of the Euro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Viebrock, E., & Clasen, J. (2009). Flexicurity and welfare reform. Socio-Economic Review, 7(2), 305–331.
Woll, C., & Jacquot, S. (2010). Using Europe: Strategic action in multilevel politics. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 110–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heins, E., de la Porte, C. (2016). Depleted European Social Models Following the Crisis: Towards a Brighter Future?. In: De La Porte, C., Heins, E. (eds) The Sovereign Debt Crisis, the EU and Welfare State Reform. Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58179-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58179-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58178-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58179-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)