Abstract
Peter Brook’s 1971 film adaptation of King Lear dramatizes a paradigm shift from the discretionary authority and divine right of Kings to a recognizably modern rule of law governed by instrumental rationality. The rupture of bonds between power and authority, and between family members, is a result of the emergence of a modern sensibility. In Brook’s hands, the Lear story becomes a malleable myth chronicling the transition from a primitive, patriarchal culture into a culture reflective of Brook’s own post-war, existential sensibility. What makes the film most remarkable is its timelessness and timeliness. Brook’s Lear evokes the primitive world of Shakespeare’s King Lear as well as the inevitable collapse of civilization characteristic of ancient Greek tragedy, while at the same time embodying the apocalyptic vision of post-war avant-garde theatre and film. Thus Shakespeare’s Lear, although clearly the source for Brook’s film, is one of many ‘authorities’ operating as an intertext. In black and white documentary, epic-paratactic style, Brook forwards the tragic consequences of the modern act of giving up personal freedom and power—thus authority—to the state for the sake of security and social order, an act culminating in the erasure of all signs of civilization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Brook, P. (1968). The empty space. New York: Touchstone Books.
Buchanan, J. R. (2005). Shakespeare on film. Harlow: Longman Pearson.
Burrow, C. (2013). Shakespeare and classical antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croall, J. (2015). Performing King Lear: Gielgud to Russell Beale. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Hodgson, B. (1983). Two King Lears: Uncovering the filmtext. Literature/Film quarterly, 11(3), 143–151.
Hunt, A., & Reeves, G. (1995). Directors in perspective: Peter Brook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kott, J. (1964). Shakespeare our contemporary. London: Doubleday.
Lukács, G. (1968). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marowitz, C. (1992). Lear Log. In Peter Brook: A theatrical casebook. Ed. D. Williams. London: Methuen: 6–22.
Rothwell, K. (2004). A history of Shakespeare on screen: A century of film and television (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schulman, A. (2014). Rethinking Shakespeare’s political philosophy: From Lear to Leviathan. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Spinosa, C. (1995). “The name and all th’addition”: King Lear’s opening scene and the common law use. Shakespeare studies, 23, 146–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ribkoff, F., Tyndall, P. (2018). Authority, Instrumental Reason and the Fault Lines of Modern Civilization in Peter Brook’s Cinematic Rendering of Shakespeare’s King Lear . In: Halsey, K., Vine, A. (eds) Shakespeare and Authority. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57852-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57853-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)