Skip to main content

Authority, Instrumental Reason and the Fault Lines of Modern Civilization in Peter Brook’s Cinematic Rendering of Shakespeare’s King Lear

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shakespeare and Authority

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

  • 416 Accesses

Abstract

Peter Brook’s 1971 film adaptation of King Lear dramatizes a paradigm shift from the discretionary authority and divine right of Kings to a recognizably modern rule of law governed by instrumental rationality. The rupture of bonds between power and authority, and between family members, is a result of the emergence of a modern sensibility. In Brook’s hands, the Lear story becomes a malleable myth chronicling the transition from a primitive, patriarchal culture into a culture reflective of Brook’s own post-war, existential sensibility. What makes the film most remarkable is its timelessness and timeliness. Brook’s Lear evokes the primitive world of Shakespeare’s King Lear as well as the inevitable collapse of civilization characteristic of ancient Greek tragedy, while at the same time embodying the apocalyptic vision of post-war avant-garde theatre and film. Thus Shakespeare’s Lear, although clearly the source for Brook’s film, is one of many ‘authorities’ operating as an intertext. In black and white documentary, epic-paratactic style, Brook forwards the tragic consequences of the modern act of giving up personal freedom and power—thus authority—to the state for the sake of security and social order, an act culminating in the erasure of all signs of civilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, P. (1968). The empty space. New York: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. R. (2005). Shakespeare on film. Harlow: Longman Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, C. (2013). Shakespeare and classical antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croall, J. (2015). Performing King Lear: Gielgud to Russell Beale. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, B. (1983). Two King Lears: Uncovering the filmtext. Literature/Film quarterly, 11(3), 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A., & Reeves, G. (1995). Directors in perspective: Peter Brook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kott, J. (1964). Shakespeare our contemporary. London: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1968). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marowitz, C. (1992). Lear Log. In Peter Brook: A theatrical casebook. Ed. D. Williams. London: Methuen: 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, K. (2004). A history of Shakespeare on screen: A century of film and television (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, A. (2014). Rethinking Shakespeare’s political philosophy: From Lear to Leviathan. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa, C. (1995). “The name and all th’addition”: King Lear’s opening scene and the common law use. Shakespeare studies, 23, 146–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Ribkoff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ribkoff, F., Tyndall, P. (2018). Authority, Instrumental Reason and the Fault Lines of Modern Civilization in Peter Brook’s Cinematic Rendering of Shakespeare’s King Lear . In: Halsey, K., Vine, A. (eds) Shakespeare and Authority. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics