Skip to main content

Poetic Authority in Julius Caesar: The Triumph of the Poet-Playwright-Actor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shakespeare and Authority

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

  • 406 Accesses

Abstract

The character of Cinna-the-poet in Julius Caesar is often considered to represent a form of poetic counter-authority. Far from taking the murdered poet as a figure of self-identification for Shakespeare, this chapter argues that Cinna deserves to die. The two poets in Julius Caesar fare so ill when it comes to convincing others (the plebeians not to kill him for Cinna in Act 3, Brutus and Octavius to patch up their quarrel for the anonymous camp poet in Act 4) because they fail at composing and delivering effective rhetorical speeches. By showing the failures of uninventive poets on stage, Shakespeare is actually staging the triumph of a more rounded figure of authority, that of the poet-playwright-actor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Baldwin, T. W. (1944). William Shakspeare’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. W. (1961) [1927]. The organization and personnel of the Shakespearean company. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, C. (2013). Shakespeare and classical antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, P. (2004). Shakespeare, national poet-playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, P. (2008). Shakespeare’s literary authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. (1971). Brutus; Orator (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. (1977). De oratore: Book III; De fato; Paradoxa stoicorum; De partitione oratoria (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn Liebler, N. (2005). Buying and selling so(u)les: Marketing strategies and the politics of performance in Julius Caesar. In H. Zander (Ed.), Julius Caesar: New critical essays (pp. 165–179). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakakis, J. (2004). Julius Caesar and the politics of theatrical representation. In C. M. S. Alexander (Ed.), Shakespeare and politics (pp. 206–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. J. (2013). Shakespeare’s anti-politics, sovereign power and the life of the flesh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gosson, S. (1582). Playes confuted in fiue actions. London: T. Gosson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R. (2002). Vicissitudes of the public sphere: Julius Caesar. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Julius Caesar: A new casebook (pp. 210–228). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hapgood, R. (1988). Shakespeare the theatre-poet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, J. (1983). Shakespeare’s analogical scene: Parody as structural syntax. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, T. (1612). An apology for actors containing three briefe treatises. 1 Their antiquity. 2 Their ancient dignity. 3 The true vse of their quality. London: N. Okes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. (1960). The “Cinna” and “Cynicke” episodes in Julius Caesar. Shakespeare Quarterly, 11(4), 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. (2001). Time for the plebs in Julius Caesar. Early Modern Literary Studies, 7(2). http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/07-2/holmjuli.htm.

  • Hutson, L. (2006). Forensic aspects of Renaissance mimesis. Representations, 94, 80–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeaffreson, J. C. (1886–1892). Middlesex county records. 8 vols. London: Clerkenwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, D. (2001). Guilty creatures. Renaissance poetry and the ethics of authorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, D. (2005). Julius Caesar’s analogue clock and the accents of history. In H. Zander (Ed.), Julius Caesar: New critical essays (pp. 241–255). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, N. (1990). Stages: Norman Lloyd, interviewed by Francine Parker. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C., & Martindale, M. (1990). Shakespeare and the uses of antiquity: An introductory essay. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeir, W. F. (1971). Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: A tragedy without a hero. Mainz: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, K. (1970). Shakespeare’s poets. Shakespeare Survey, 23, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovid. (1567). The. xv. bookes of P. Ouidius Naso, entytuled Metamorphosis, translated oute of Latin into English meeter, by Arthur Golding Gentleman, a worke very pleasaunt and delectable (A. Golding, Trans.). London: W. Seres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, S., & Stern, T. (2007). Shakespeare in parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Platter, T. (1937). Thomas Platter’s travels in England, 1599 (C. Williams, Ed., Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plett, H. (2004). Rhetoric and Renaissance culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch (1579). The lives of the noble grecians and romans (T. North, Trans.). London: T. Vautrollier and J. Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pughe, T. (1988). “What should the wars do with these jigging fools?”: The poets in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. English Studies, A Journal of English Language and Literature, 69(4), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttenham, G. (1589). The arte of English poesie. London: R. Field.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1623). Mr. William Shakespeares comedies, histories, & tragedies published according to the true originall copies (J. Heminges & H. Condell, Eds.). London: I. Jaggard and E. Blount.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1997). The Norton Shakespeare. In S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J. E. Howard, and K. Eisaman Maus (Eds.). New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2014). Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, T. (2004). Making Shakespeare: From stage to page. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (2002). ‘Bardicide’. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Julius Caesar: A new casebook (pp. 188–209). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, N. (2009). ‘Plebeian politics’. In H. Bloom (Ed.), William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar (pp. 47–60). New York: Chelsea House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R. H. (2002). Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey, 55, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laetitia Sansonetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sansonetti, L. (2018). Poetic Authority in Julius Caesar: The Triumph of the Poet-Playwright-Actor. In: Halsey, K., Vine, A. (eds) Shakespeare and Authority. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics