Abstract
The character of Cinna-the-poet in Julius Caesar is often considered to represent a form of poetic counter-authority. Far from taking the murdered poet as a figure of self-identification for Shakespeare, this chapter argues that Cinna deserves to die. The two poets in Julius Caesar fare so ill when it comes to convincing others (the plebeians not to kill him for Cinna in Act 3, Brutus and Octavius to patch up their quarrel for the anonymous camp poet in Act 4) because they fail at composing and delivering effective rhetorical speeches. By showing the failures of uninventive poets on stage, Shakespeare is actually staging the triumph of a more rounded figure of authority, that of the poet-playwright-actor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Baldwin, T. W. (1944). William Shakspeare’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Baldwin, T. W. (1961) [1927]. The organization and personnel of the Shakespearean company. New York: Russell & Russell.
Burrow, C. (2013). Shakespeare and classical antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheney, P. (2004). Shakespeare, national poet-playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheney, P. (2008). Shakespeare’s literary authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cicero. (1971). Brutus; Orator (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cicero. (1977). De oratore: Book III; De fato; Paradoxa stoicorum; De partitione oratoria (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Conn Liebler, N. (2005). Buying and selling so(u)les: Marketing strategies and the politics of performance in Julius Caesar. In H. Zander (Ed.), Julius Caesar: New critical essays (pp. 165–179). London: Routledge.
Drakakis, J. (2004). Julius Caesar and the politics of theatrical representation. In C. M. S. Alexander (Ed.), Shakespeare and politics (pp. 206–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gil, D. J. (2013). Shakespeare’s anti-politics, sovereign power and the life of the flesh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gosson, S. (1582). Playes confuted in fiue actions. London: T. Gosson.
Halpern, R. (2002). Vicissitudes of the public sphere: Julius Caesar. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Julius Caesar: A new casebook (pp. 210–228). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hapgood, R. (1988). Shakespeare the theatre-poet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hartwig, J. (1983). Shakespeare’s analogical scene: Parody as structural syntax. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Heywood, T. (1612). An apology for actors containing three briefe treatises. 1 Their antiquity. 2 Their ancient dignity. 3 The true vse of their quality. London: N. Okes.
Holland, N. (1960). The “Cinna” and “Cynicke” episodes in Julius Caesar. Shakespeare Quarterly, 11(4), 439–444.
Holmes, C. (2001). Time for the plebs in Julius Caesar. Early Modern Literary Studies, 7(2). http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/07-2/holmjuli.htm.
Hutson, L. (2006). Forensic aspects of Renaissance mimesis. Representations, 94, 80–109.
Jeaffreson, J. C. (1886–1892). Middlesex county records. 8 vols. London: Clerkenwell.
Kezar, D. (2001). Guilty creatures. Renaissance poetry and the ethics of authorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kezar, D. (2005). Julius Caesar’s analogue clock and the accents of history. In H. Zander (Ed.), Julius Caesar: New critical essays (pp. 241–255). London: Routledge.
Lloyd, N. (1990). Stages: Norman Lloyd, interviewed by Francine Parker. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
Martindale, C., & Martindale, M. (1990). Shakespeare and the uses of antiquity: An introductory essay. London and New York: Routledge.
McNeir, W. F. (1971). Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: A tragedy without a hero. Mainz: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.
Muir, K. (1970). Shakespeare’s poets. Shakespeare Survey, 23, 91–100.
Ovid. (1567). The. xv. bookes of P. Ouidius Naso, entytuled Metamorphosis, translated oute of Latin into English meeter, by Arthur Golding Gentleman, a worke very pleasaunt and delectable (A. Golding, Trans.). London: W. Seres.
Palfrey, S., & Stern, T. (2007). Shakespeare in parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Platter, T. (1937). Thomas Platter’s travels in England, 1599 (C. Williams, Ed., Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape.
Plett, H. (2004). Rhetoric and Renaissance culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Plutarch (1579). The lives of the noble grecians and romans (T. North, Trans.). London: T. Vautrollier and J. Wright.
Pughe, T. (1988). “What should the wars do with these jigging fools?”: The poets in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. English Studies, A Journal of English Language and Literature, 69(4), 313–322.
Puttenham, G. (1589). The arte of English poesie. London: R. Field.
Shakespeare, W. (1623). Mr. William Shakespeares comedies, histories, & tragedies published according to the true originall copies (J. Heminges & H. Condell, Eds.). London: I. Jaggard and E. Blount.
Shakespeare, W. (1997). The Norton Shakespeare. In S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J. E. Howard, and K. Eisaman Maus (Eds.). New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Skinner, Q. (2014). Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, T. (2004). Making Shakespeare: From stage to page. London: Routledge.
Taylor, G. (2002). ‘Bardicide’. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Julius Caesar: A new casebook (pp. 188–209). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Visser, N. (2009). ‘Plebeian politics’. In H. Bloom (Ed.), William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar (pp. 47–60). New York: Chelsea House.
Wells, R. H. (2002). Julius Caesar, Machiavelli, and the Uses of History. Shakespeare Survey, 55, 209–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sansonetti, L. (2018). Poetic Authority in Julius Caesar: The Triumph of the Poet-Playwright-Actor. In: Halsey, K., Vine, A. (eds) Shakespeare and Authority. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57852-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57853-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)