Abstract
This chapter argues that governance networks claiming to represent the global public opinion need to follow two opposing principles: coherence and openness. To probe this argument and observe its practical implications, the authors focus on the Trilateral Commission (TC), which brings together leaders of several influential think tanks and outstanding personalities from business corporations, political organizations, academic institutions, and media firms. They find that the TC is highly coherent but excessively endogamous, centering on an exclusive group of pro-US leaders, members of transnational corporations, and partisans of free trade. Thus, the TC is a coherent but closed network, very powerful but scarcely representative, which is ironic for a network that claims to promote the use of “soft power” in the international sphere.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, D. 2009. Holding Firm Against Plots by Evildoers. The New York Times, June 25.
Boiral, O. 2003. Trente ans d’une institution secrete. Pouvoirs opaques de la Trilatèrale. Le Monde Diplomatique, November 14.
Burris, V. 2008. The Interlock Structure of the Policy-Planning Network and the Right Turn in US State Policy. Research in Political Sociology 17 (1): 3–43.
Burt, R.S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, R., K. Kaiser, and M. Cosaca. 1977. Toward a Renovated International System. The Triangle Papers, 14. Washington, DC: The Trilateral Commission.
Crozier, M.J., S.P. Huntington, and J. Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracy to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.
Gill, S. 1991. American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, S. 2011. Who Elected the Bankers? Capital and Resistance in an Era of Transnational Technocratic Politics, Interview with Dr Iraklis Oikonomou. http://stephengill.com/news/2011/12/who-elected-the-bankers.html. Accessed 30 July 2016.
Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2010. Mecanismos de toma de decisiones y desempeño en sistemas asociativos complejos. In Nuevas perspectivas en el estudio de las asociaciones, ed. M. Luna and C. Puga. Barcelona: Anthropos/IIS-UNAM.
Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2013. Legitimidad y eficacia en la Sección Norteamérica de la Comisión Trilateral. In ¿Cómo se gobierna América del Norte? Estrategias, instituciones y políticas públicas, ed. M. Luna and A. Salas-Porras. Mexico City: UNAM/SITESA.
Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2017, in process. Complex Associative Systems: Cooperation amid Diversity. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM.
Nye, J.S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Rosenau, J.N. 2004. Strong Demand, Huge Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch. In Multi-Level Governance, ed. I. Bache and M. Flinders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Salas-Porras, A. 2012. La red de centros de pensamiento de América del Norte: ¿Cómo se construye y sostiene un consenso a favor del TLCAN? In ¿Quién gobierna América del Norte? Elites, redes y organizaciones, ed. A. Salas-Porras and M. Luna. Mexico City: UNAM/SITESA.
Trilateral Commission (TC). 2016. The Trilateral Commission. http://trilateral.org. Accessed 12 Jan 2016.
Tucker, J.P. 2008. Global Elite Gather in DC. American Free Press. http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/global_elite_gather_135.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. I. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wood, P. 2009. Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame. Technocracy News, January 29. https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2009/01/29/obama-trilateral-commission-endgame. Accessed 21 Jan 2016.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate Karin Fischer’s comments to the initial draft of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luna, M., Velasco, J.L. (2017). Power Without Representation: The Coherence and Closeness of the Trilateral Commission. In: Salas-Porras, A., Murray, G. (eds) Think Tanks and Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56756-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56756-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57493-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56756-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)