Abstract
This chapter begins with an overview of contemporary counterterrorism (CT) policies in Germany. The general focus in CT has been on domestic elements up to 2001; but Germany has shifted its attention from domestic level to global terrorism since the September 11, 2001 (the infamous 9/11 attacks). The primary reason for Germany’s eagerness to wage a war against Islamist fundamentalism is the belief that there were many Islamist extremists in situation in and across Germany and they were believed to be enjoying the liberal environment and extensive rights and freedoms, which facilitated al-Qaeda’s attacks on 9/11. A discussion is made of the change in the direction of CT policies in Germany and the current outlook in the field of CT more generally. The chapter moves forward by presenting an analysis of Germany’s activism in its fight against global terrorism. Unlike the country’s Cold War and post–Cold War period stance, Germany adopted an ambitious position to address growing threats posed by terrorism beyond the domestic and regional levels. In the period since the 2000s, Germany has demonstrated unprecedented activism in the domain of CT. This activism involves at least five main strategies: (1) identifying and prosecuting terrorists; (2) dealing with social, economic, and cultural causes of terrorism; (3) assisting other countries facing a danger of collapse and failure; (4) reliance on the EU for multilateral legitimization; and (5) addressing radicalization and extremism processes in fight of terrorism. Addressing these strategies also requires taking into consideration the way Muslim communities in Germany are affected by growing CT measures. Germany is known for broad constitutional and legal rights recognized for both citizens and foreigners, and for its subscription to human rights mechanisms. However, unlike the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), Muslims in Germany have expressed feelings of alienation despite having been able to exercise their rights. Muslim communities who failed to integrate within German society and feel part of the German social and political life, despite recognition of their rights and freedoms, were further alienated by the shifted attention to Islamist extremism and concrete measures to deal with so-called Islamist terrorism. Germany’s response to global terrorism and to the root causes of terrorism in domestic level includes some cliché and predictable strategies that suggest a flawed CT strategy. It is observed that this strategy failed to consider the sensitivities of Muslim peoples in Germany. The situation has become quite delicate with a growing number of German people expressing the view that tolerance towards Muslims, via recognition of their rights under German laws, contributed to the increased activities of Muslim radicals; on the other hand, reliance on CT measures that could offend Muslims would not properly address the problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Hamarneh, A., & Thielmann, J. (Eds.). (2008). Islam and Muslims in Germany. Leiden: Brill.
Archick, K., Belkin, P., Blanchard, C. M., Carl, E., & Mix, D. E. (2011). Muslims in Europe: Promoting integration and countering extremism. Washington, DC: CRS Report for Congress.
“Aus Deutschland nach Syrien und Irak: Mindestens 20 Dschihadisten reisten ohne Pass aus,” Focus Online, 13 January 2015.
Blaauw-Wolf, L. (2004). The Hamburg terror trials – American political poker and German legal procedure: An unlikely combination to fight international terrorism. German Law Journal, 5(7), 792–828.
“Bundestag verabschiedet neue Anti-Terror-Gesetze,” Zeit, 23 April 2015.
“CDU-Politiker kritisieren türkische “Import-Imame,” Welt, 27 February 2015.
“Daughters of Jihad: The German Women of Islamic State, Der Spiegel, 13 February 2015.
“Disillusionment in Afghanistan: The Fate of 11 Aspiring Jihadists from Germany,” Der Spiegel, 18 October 2010.
“DIK entwickelt praktische Präventionsmaßnahmen für die Jugendarbeit,” German Islam Conference (DIK), 03 May 2013. http://www.deutsche-islam-konferenz.de/DIK/DE/DIK/6Praevention/Themenschwerpunkt%20Praevention/2013-ueberblick_ag-p-node.html. Accessed 13 August 2015.
“Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung von Theologien und religionsbezogenen Wissenschaften an deutschen Hochschulen,” Science Council(WR), 29 January 2010. (http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/9678-10.pdf# http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/9678-10.pdf. Accessed 13 August 2015).
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Contemporary Integration Policy: Islamic Theology at German Universities. http://www.bmbf.de/en/15619.php. Accessed 13 August 2015.
Federal Ministry of the Interior of Germany, “Security: Counter-terrorism,” http://www.bmi.bund.de/EN/Topics/Security/Counter-terrorism/counter-terrorism_node.html. Accessed 20 May 2015.
Fetzer, J. S., & Soper, Z. C. (2005). Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gatzke, H. W. (1980). Germany and the United States: A “Special” Relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldziher, I. (1981). Introduction to Islamic theology and law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haubrich, D. (2003, September 11). Anti-terror laws and civil liberties: Britain, France and Germany compared. Government and Opposition, 38(1), 3–28.
“Islamgesetz für Deutschland?: Geregelte Religion,” Der Tagesspiegel, 30 January 2015.
“Islamunterricht in den Bundesländern – ein Überblick,” Der Spiegel, 26 January 2015.
Joppke, C. (2007). Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1), 1–22.
“Keine Garantie für Sicherheit: Gefahr besteht auch in Deutschland,” n-tv, 26 June 2015.
Koenig, M. (2005). Incorporating Muslim migrants in Western Nation states: A comparison of the United Kingdom, France and Germany. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 6(2), 219–234.
Lepsius, O. (2004). Liberty, security, and terrorism: The legal position in Germany. German Law Review, 5(5), 435–460.
Lepsius, O. (2006). Human dignity and the downing of aircraft: The German Federal Constitutional Court strikes down a prominent anti-terrorism provision in the new Air-transport Security Act. German Law Journal, 7(9), 761–776.
Lutz, J. M., & Lutz, B. J. (2004). Global terrorism. London: Routledge.
Miko, F. T., & Froehlich, C. (2004). Germany’s role in fighting terrorism: Implications for U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: CRS Report for Congress.
Oehmichen, A. (2008). Incommunicado detention in Germany: An example of reactive anti-terror legislation and long-term consequences. German Law Journal, 9(7), 856–888.
Oehmichen, A. (2009). Conceptualisation of terrorism from a historical perspective. Terrorism and Anti-Legislation: The Terrorised Legislator, School of Human Rights Research Series, 34, 1–45.
Özyürek, E. (2015). Being German, becoming Muslim: Race, religion, and conversion in the new Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pluchinsky, D. A. (1992). An organizational and operational analysis of Germany’s red army faction rerrorist group (1972–1991). In Y. Y. Alexander & D. A. Pluchinsky (Eds.), European terrorism: Today and tomorrow (pp. 3–92). Washington, DC: Brassey’s.
Pluchinsky, D. A. (1993). Germany’s Red Army Faction: An obituary. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 16(2), 135–157.
“Radical Muslims Declare ‘Sharia Zone’ in Western German City,” Haaretz, (6 September 2014).
Safferling, C. J. M. (2006). Terror and Law German responses to 9/11. Journal of International Criminal Law, 4, 1152–1165.
Tost, D. (2015, February 5). Germany Set to Pass ‘One of the Harshest’ anti-terror laws in Europe. Euractiv.com.
“Universität Frankfurt: Zentrum für Islamische Studien eröffnet,“ Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 20 June 2013.
US Department of State Human Rights Report: Germany (Washington, DC: Department of State, 2010).
Zentrum für Islamische Studien, https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/46589921/. Accessed 13 August 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Çakmak, C. (2017). Traveling along Sword’s Edge: Germany’s Ambivalence between Protecting Civil Rights of Muslim Communities and Fighting Terror. In: Romaniuk, S., Grice, F., Irrera, D., Webb, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Counterterrorism Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55769-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55769-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55768-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55769-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)