Abstract
Energy transitions are understood as structural long-term transformations of the way energy needs are met. The ongoing energy transition poses significant challenges for analysis and theory building. It is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and complexity, a key role for public policy, strong vested interests and lock-in, simultaneous changes of technologies, organizations and institutional structures, and a variety of possible transition pathways. This chapter discusses how insights from two so far disconnected strands of literature, transition studies and international political economy, can be mobilized for addressing these challenges when studying energy transitions. The chapter also briefly introduces the other chapters in this section.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Here and elsewhere, we use the singular (‘energy transition’) as a catchword to point to general characteristics of energy transitions. At the same time, we acknowledge that there is not one energy transition but that actual transition processes and pathways may vary substantially, for example, across different countries or regions.
- 2.
Note that in transition studies, institutions are mostly viewed as formal and informal rules and/or patterns of behaviour, not as organizations that create and implement policies.
- 3.
The contribution of nuclear to electricity production was 15 % in 2013 (down from almost 30% in earlier years). Denmark has never used nuclear power.
- 4.
However, as renewable energy and efficiency technologies become more and more mature and economically attractive, policies might lose some of their importance as drivers of sustainable energy transitions.
- 5.
Note that table entries are indicative; among others they do not fully reflect the differences among frameworks within the two strands of literature.
References
Araújo, K. (2014). The emerging field of energy transitions, progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 112–121.
Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(4), 543–569.
Baker, L., Newell, P., & Phillips, J. (2014). The political economy of energy transitions: The case of South Africa. New Political Economy, 19(6), 791–818.
Bakker, S., van Lente, H., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2012). Credible expectations—The US Department of Energy’s Hydrogen Program as enactor and selector of hydrogen technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1059–1071.
Bakker, S., Leguijt, P., & Van Lente, H. (2015). Niche accumulation and standardization: The case of electric vehicle recharging plugs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 155–164.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008a). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sanden, B. (2008b). ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’, two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592.
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M. P., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sanden, B. A., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51–64.
Blyth, M. (1997). ‘Any more bright ideas?’ The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 229–250.
Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations. Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Boon, W. P., Moors, E. H., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Exploring dynamics and strategies of niche protection. Research Policy, 43(4), 792–803.
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93–118.
Cohen, B. J. (2014). Advanced introduction to international political economy. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Cox, R. (2009). The “British School” in the global context. New Political Economy, 14(3), 315–328.
Dolata, U. (2013). The transformative capacity of new technologies: A theory of sociotechnical change. London: Routledge.
Eberlein, B., & Doern, G. B. (Eds.). (2009). Governing the energy challenge. Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.
Fouquet, R. (2010). The slow search for solutions: Lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6586–6596.
Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Pinter.
Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., & Neukirch, M. (2012). Adaptive capacities, path creation and variants of sectoral change: The case of the transformation of the German energy supply system (p. 48). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Organisations- und Innovationsforschung, SOI Discussion Paper 2012–02. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes: Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772–791.
Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards, the case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30, 589–610.
GEA. (2012). Global Energy Assessment: Toward a sustainable future. Cambridge/New York/Laxenburg: Cambridge University Press/The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6), 897–920.
Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445–476.
Geels, F. W. (2006). Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970). Technovation, 26(9), 999–1016.
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510.
Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2006). Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3), 375–392.
Goldbach, R. (2015). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 1–41.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York/Milton Park: Routledge.
Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50, 8–16.
Haas, P. M. (2016). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. London/New York: Routledge.
Hadjilambrinos, C. (2000). Understanding technology choice in electricity industries: A comparative study of France and Denmark. Energy Policy, 28(15), 1111–1126.
Hekkert, M., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.
Hendriks, C. M. (2008). On inclusion and network governance: The democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions. Public Administration, 86(4), 1009–1031.
Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 341–368.
Hess, D. J. (2015). The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (in press, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.002).
Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management. London/New York: Spon Press.
Hughes, L., & Lipscy, P. Y. (2013). The politics of energy. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 449–469.
Hwang, K.-S., & Kim, H.-J. (2014). Three-level game theory and the strategy of Eu-Korea FTA negotiation. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 28(1), 85.
IEA. (2014). World energy outlook 2014. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2011). Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 41–57.
Jänicke, M., & Jacob, K. (2005). Ecological modernisation and the creation of lead markets. In M. Weber and J. Hemmelskamp (Eds.), Towards environmental innovation systems (pp. 175–194). Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 103–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.
Kern, F. (2010). The politics of governing ‘system innovations’ towards sustainable electricity systems. DPhil thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests, explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(6), 1116–1134.
Kern, F. (2015). Engaging with the politics, agency and structures in the technological innovation systems approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 67–69.
Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391–408.
Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4093–4103.
Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change, the case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 513–530.
Kungl, G. (2014). The incumbent German power companies in a changing environment (p. 35). Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.
Laes, E., Gorissen, L., & Nevens, F. (2014). A comparison of energy transition governance in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 6(3), 1129–1152.
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.
Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237–246.
MacKenzie, D. (1996). Economic and sociological explanations of technological change. In D. MacKenzie (Ed.), Knowing machines. Essays on technical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.
Markard, J. (2011). Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change. Journal of Infrastructure Systems (ASCE), 17(3), 107–117.
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2006). Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? Research Policy, 35(5), 609–625.
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2015). Socio-technical transitions and policy change: Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18(2016), 215–237.
Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016). Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy: A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy, 45(1), 330–344.
McLean, E. V., & Stone, R. W. (2012). The Kyoto Protocol: Two-level bargaining and European integration1. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 99–113.
Meadowcroft, J. (2005). Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10(4), 479–498.
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340.
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75.
Nelson, R. R. (1988). National systems of innovation: Preface to part V. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 309–311). London: Pinter.
Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nill, J., & Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38(4), 668–680.
Penna, C. C., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 999–1020.
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499.
Price, R. (2006). Detecting ideas and their effects. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 252–265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., & Smith, A. (2015). Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18(2016), 164–180.
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: Resources and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 327–399). Columbus: Battelle Press.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31.
Salsbury, S. (1988). The emergence of an early large-scale technical system: The American railroad network. In R. Mayntz & T. P. Hughes (Eds.), The development of large technical systems (pp. 37–68). Boulder: Westview Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2003). How, where and when does discourse matter in small states’ welfare state adjustment? New Political Economy, 8(1), 127–146.
Schmitz, H. (2014). How does the global power shift affect the low carbon transformation? Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Scrase, I., & Smith, A. (2009). The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 707–726.
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead, politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763–770.
Sioshansi, F. P. (2006). Electricity market reform: What has the experience taught us thus far? Utilities Policy, 14(2), 63–75.
Smink, M. M., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2015). Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(2), 86–101.
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036.
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510.
Smith, R., El-Anis, I., & Farrands, C. (2014). International political economy in the 21st century: Contemporary issues and analyses. London: Routledge.
Solomon, B. D., & Krishna, K. (2011). The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7422–7431.
Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39(4), 449–458.
Stenzel, T., & Frenzel, A. (2008). Regulating technological change: The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2645–2657.
Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 83–95.
Strunz, S. (2014). The German energy transition as a regime shift. Ecological Economics, 100, 150–158.
Truffer, B., Markard, J., Binz, C., & Jacobsson, S. (2012). A literature review on energy innovation systems: Structure of an emerging scholarly field and its future research directions. Radar-Paper of the strategic research alliance for energy innovation systems and their dynamics, Dübendorf/Gothenburg.
Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50, 35–49.
Van den Bergh, J. C. (2013). Policies to enhance economic feasibility of a sustainable energy transition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(7), 2436–2437.
Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2007). The ongoing energy transition, lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35(2), 1025–1037.
Verbong, G., & Loorbach, D. (Eds.). (2012). Governing the energy transition. Reality, illusion or necessity? New York: Routledge.
Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy, rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kern, F., Markard, J. (2016). Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., Klare, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55630-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55631-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)