Skip to main content

Supporting Practices Inspired by Solidarist Ideas: The EU in the UNSC Open Debates on Women, Peace and Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Policy Responses to a Shifting Multilateral System

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

Abstract

Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security (WPS), adopted by the UNSC in 2000, is considered a watershed in the evolution of women’s rights, resulting from an international liberal solidarist context. This chapter focuses on how the sovereignism of emerging powers contests the liberal practices underpinning the resolution, such as the human security approach, participation of the civil society or accountability mechanisms. This contestation is reflected in the regular Open Debates of the UNSC on WPS, where the Europeans have turned the most vocal supporters of those practices. Building on the analytical framework of this book, this chapter argues that the EU opts for a strategy of protective entrenchment since the undergoing changes clash with the EU’s values and policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badie, B. (2014). Le temps des humiliés. In Pathologie des relations internationales. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K. (2011). The evolution and implementation of UNSCR 1325: An overview. In F. Olonisakin, K. Barnes, & E. Ikpe (Eds.), Women, peace and security. Translating policy into practice (pp. 15–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2006). The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. In F. Kratochwil & E. Mansfield (Eds.), International organization and global governance. A reader (pp. 177–201). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (2012). Permanent security council members and resolutions on women, peace and security. Available at http://www.e-ir.info/2012/10/31/permanent-security-council-members-and-resolutions-on-women-peace-and-security. Accessed June 2014.

  • Börzel, T., Pamuk, Y., & Dtahn, A. (2008). Good governance in the European Union, Berlin Working Paper on European Integration, num. 7, Freie Universität, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhary, H. E., Mrs. (2011). Representative of India, Security Council Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security October 28, Security Council Chamber. Available at http://www.peacewomen.org/security_council_monitor/debate-watch/all-debates/38/security-council-open-debate-on-women-peace-and-security-october-2011#statements. Accessed June 2014.

  • Civil Society Dialogue Network. (2011). Women, peace and security in EU common security and defence policy missions, Brussels, 21 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2005). Implementation of UNSCR 1325 in the context of ESDP, 11932/2/05 REV 2, DGE IV, Brussels, 29 September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2008). Comprehensive approach to the EU implementation of UNSCR 1325 and 1820 on women, peace and security, 15671/1/08, Brussels, 1 December 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2010). Revised guidelines on the protection of civilians in CSDP missions and operations, 13047/10, Brussels, 31 August (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1996). Approaches to world order [with Timothy J. Sinclair]. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cuillerier, M. (2014). Global Summit on ending sexual violence in conflict, Building a world community mondial, July. Available at: http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/documents/SexualViolence.pdf. Accessed Jan 2015.

  • Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmerman, L. (2013). Things we lost in the Fire: How different types of contestation affect the validity of international norms, Peace Research Institute-PRIF Working Paper, num. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Joint communication to the European Parliament and the council. The EUs comprehensive approach to external conflict and crises, Brussels, 11.12.2013 JOIN (2013) 30 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European External Action Service. (2014). Report EU Member states annual meeting on UNSCR 1325, Brussels, 4 July 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union External Action. (2013). EEAS review, July. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/library/publications/2013/3/2013_eeas_review_en.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Goldberg, E., & Hubert, D. (2001). The Security Council and the protection of civilians. In R. Mac Rae & D. Hubert (Eds.), Human security and the new diplomacy. Montreal: Mc Gill Queens U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, J. (2010). The three faces of liberal internationalism. In A. S. Alexandoff & A. F. Cooper (Eds.), Rising states and rising institutions. Challenges for global governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Informal Task. (2014). Exchange of information and best practices, 18 August. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/features/features-working-women/working-with-women/article21_en.html. Accessed Jan 2015.

  • Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., & Weiss, T. (2009). UN Ideas that changed the world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (2006). The contingent legitimacy of multilateralism. In E. Newman, R. Thakur, & J. Tirman (Eds.), Multilateralism under challenge. Power, international order and structural change (pp. 56–76). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr-Harting, T. (2014a), Security Council open debate on sexual violence. Security Council Chamber, April. Available at: http://www.peacewomen.org. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Mayr-Harting, T. (2014b). Security Council open debate on sexual violence. Security Council Chamber, October. Available at: http://www.peacewomen.org. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • Otto, D. (2010). The security’s council alliance of gender legitimacy: The symbolic capital of resolution 1325. In H. Charlesworth & J.-M. Coicaud (Eds.), Fault lines of international legitimacy (pp. 239–275). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, V. (2011). Multilateralism as an end in itself? International Studies Perspectives, 12, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy. (2008). Brussels, 11 December 2008 S407/08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogachev, Mr. (2007). Security Council open debate on women, peace and security23 October 2007, Extract Meeting Transcript/English S/PV.5766. Available at: http://www.peacewomen.org/security_council_monitor/debate-watch/all-debates/6/open-debate-on-women-peace-and-security-october-2007. Accessed June 2014.

  • Security Council Report. (2013a). Women, peace and security: Sexual violence in conflict and sanctions. Cross Cutting Reports, April 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Council Report. (2013b). What’s in blue, 17 October 2013. Available at: (http://www.whatsinblue.org/. Accessed June 2014.

  • Security Council Report. (2013c). September 2013 Monthly Forecast. In Hindsight: Penholders. Available at: http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/. Accessed Apr 2015.

  • Security Council Report. (2014a). Women, peace and security: Sexual violence in conflict and sanctions. Cross Cutting Reports, April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Council Report. (2014b). What’s in blue, 24 April 2014. Available at: http://www.whatsinblue.org/. Accessed June 2014.

  • Security Council Report. (2014c). What’s in blue, 27 October 2014. Available at: http://www.whatsinblue.org/. Accessed Jan 2015.

  • Security Council Report. (2015). Open debate and draft resolution on women, peace and security, October 2015. Available at: http://www.whatsinblue.org/. Accessed Oct 2015.

  • Shaw, M. (2003). War and genocide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • True-Frost, C. (2007). The Security Council and norm comsumption. Journal of International Law and Politics, 40(1), 115–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryggestad, T. L. (2009). Trick or treat? The UN and implementation of Security Council resolution 1325 on women, peace and security. Global Governance, 15(4), 539–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Department of Public Information Strategic Communications Division. (2010). Tenth anniversary of Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) on women and peace and security, 12 October. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/documents/background_1325_anniversary.pdf. Accessed June 2014.

  • UN Security Council. (2000). Women and peace and security, S/PV.4208, 24 October 2000, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. (2002). Women and peace and security, S/PV.4635, 28 October, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. (2003). Women and peace and security, S/PV.4852 (Resumption 1), 29 October, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. (2004). Women and peace and security, S/PV.5066, 28 October, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. (2008). Intervention prononcée par S.E. Jean-Maurice Ripert, 29 October 2008, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. (2009). Statement on behalf of the European Union by H.E. Anders Liden, 5 October 2009, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, G. (2015). Diplomatic practices at the United Nations. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Group. (2013–2014). Mapping women, peace and security in the UN Security Council (2013–2014). Available at: http://womenpeacesecurity.org/media/pdf-2013-14_MappingWPS_PolicyBrief.pdf. Accessed Jan 2015.

  • Zhenmin, L. (2007), Statement by Amb. Liu Zhenmin at the open debate of the security council on women, peace and security, 23 October 2007. Available from: http://www.peacewomen.org/security_council_monitor/debate-watch/all-debates/6/open-debate-on-women-peace-and-security-october-2007. Accessed June 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbé, E. (2016). Supporting Practices Inspired by Solidarist Ideas: The EU in the UNSC Open Debates on Women, Peace and Security. In: Barbé, E., Costa, O., Kissack, R. (eds) EU Policy Responses to a Shifting Multilateral System. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54758-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics