Abstract
Discussion about visual research ethics predominantly focuses on the effects of visual research methodologies on participants. The effect of visual research methodologies on researchers has received little attention and there has been no sustained investigation into how visual materials generated by the research methodology can impact on the researcher. This chapter draws on a research project where participants created photographs to share their experiences of antidepressant use and wellbeing. It shows how photographs act in particular ways with serious ethical consequences for researchers. The effect that photographs can enact on the researcher introduces an ethical issue that requires further attention and articulation by visual researchers. We discuss some of the implications of considering the action of photographs themselves to ethical discussion about visual research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. 2004. Recorded music and practices of remembering. Social and Cultural Geography 5(1): 3–20. doi:10.1080/1464936042000181281.
Barthes, R. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bennett, J. 2005. The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture 17: 445–465.
Braidotti, R. 2006a. The ethics of becoming imperceptible. In Deleuze and Philosophy, ed. C. Boundas, 133–159. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
———. 2006b. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, S., and I. Tucker. 2010. Eff the ineffable: Affect, somatic mangement, and mental health service users. In The Affect Theory Reader, ed. Melissa Gregg, and Gregory J. Seigworth, 229–249. Durham: Duke University Press.
Catalani, C., and M. Minkler. 2010. Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior 37(3): 424–451. doi:10.1177/1090198109342084.
Clark, A. 2013. Haunted by images? Ethical moments and anxieties in visual research. Methodological Innovations Online 8(2): 68–81. doi:10.4256/mio.2013.014.
Cox, S., S. Drew, et al. 2014. Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
Deleuze, G. 1977. Literature and Life. Critical Inquiry 23(2): 225–230.
Gil-Glazer, Ya’ara. 2015. Photography, critical pedagogy and ‘difficult knowledge. International Journal of Education through Art 11(2015): 261–276.
Johnsen, S., J. May, and P. Cloke. 2008. Imag(in)ing ‘homeless places’: Using auto-photography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. Area 40(2): 194–207. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00801.x
Lapenta, F. 2011. Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, ed. E. Margolis, and L. Pauwels, 201–213. London: SAGE Publications Ltd..
Laub, D. 1992. Bearing witness or the vicissitudes of listening. In Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, ed. S. Felman, and D. Laub, 57–74. New York: Routledge.
Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
McLeod, K. (2013) Wellbeing machine: Mobilising collective bodies to conceptualise wellbeing (PhD), University of Melbourne. Retrieved 20 Jan 2015 from https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/37710
———. 2014a. The missing work of collaboration: Using assemblages to rethink antidepressant action. Contemporary Drug Problems 41: 109–142. doi:10.1177/009145091404100106.
———. 2014b. Orientating to assembling: Qualitative inquiry for more-than-human worlds. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 13: 377–394.
McLeod, K., and M. Guillemin. 2015. Adding the agentic capacities of visual materials to visual research ethics. Visual Methodologies (in press) 3(2): 27–42.
Mitchell, C. 2011. Doing Visual Research. London: Sage. doi:10.1177/0091450915600119.
Mol, A. 2008. The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.
Padgett, D.K., B.T. Smith, et al. 2013. A picture is worth…? Photo elicitation interviewing with formerly homeless adults. Qualitative Health Research 23(11): 1435–1444. doi:10.1177/1049732313507752.
Pink, S. 2011. A multisensory approach to visual methods. In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, ed. E. Margolis, and L. Pauwels, 601–614. London: SAGE Publications Ltd..
Poland, W. 2000. The analyst’s witnessing and otherness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48(1): 17–34. doi:10.1177/00030651000480011301.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41: 85–106. doi:10.1177/0306312710380301.
Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications Ltd..
Simon, Roger. 2011. A shock to thought: Curatorial judgement and the public exhibition of ‘difficult knowledge’. Memory Studies 4: 432–449. doi:10.1177/1750698011398170.
Sitvast, J.E., and T.A. Abma. 2012. The photo-instrument as health care intervention. Health Care Analysis 20: 177–195. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0176-x.
Warren, S. 2008. Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies 29(4): 559–580. doi:10.1177/0170840607083104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLeod, K., Guillemin, M. (2016). The Impact of Photographs on the Researcher: An Ethical Matter for Visual Research. In: Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S., Waycott, J. (eds) Ethics and Visual Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54854-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54305-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)