Abstract
This chapter discusses the manner in which the government of Botswana influences and controls the news agenda in Botswana’s public media. The chapter will show that the public media agenda is skewed in favour of the ruling party and its functionaries. This is achieved through periodic instructions to the public media journalists and reinforced by the production culture of self-censorship and executive interference. The chapter uses, inter alia, McQuail’s (McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, Sage, 2000, 491) typology of bias as both intended and unintended and his definition of it as a tendency in a news report to deviate from an accurate, neutral, balanced and impartial representation of reality. The chapter demonstrates this bias by showing the different methods of manipulation used by the government, such as redeployment of ‘undesirable’ journalists, spiking undesirable stories, interference with content by giving preferential access to ministers and the president, and through legislation, such as exemption from regulation, and by freezing broadcasts of undesirable programmes. The other methods used are denial of access to the opposition and intimidation or harassment of the private media, in the form of law suits, public condemnation or deportation of editors. The other theoretical guide for the chapter is the concept of ideology, in this case, the promotion of the dominant ideas of the ruling class. The chapter also looks at the government’s authoritarian treatment of the private press and concludes that Botswana is no different from the rest of Africa.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
State media is a media apparatus that is run as a government department and is often controlled by the ruling party to promote its own interests. Public service media, or public media, on the other hand, is media apparatus that exists to promote interests of the public, principally to promote citizenship. While it is characteristically overseen by government and given its funding by public coffers, in countries committed to liberal democratic rule, such as the UK, it is never treated as property of the ruling party.
- 2.
This morning programme was a phone-in show conducted in the vernacular Setswana language and it had many followers. It gave the public a chance to confront cabinet ministers and other senior government officials.
References
Barratt, Elizabeth, and Guy Berger, eds. 2007. 50 Years of Journalism: African Media Since Ghana’s Independence. Johannesburg: African Editors’ Forum.
Bourgault, Louise M. 1995. Mass Media in Sub-Saharan Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Branston, Gill, and Roy Stafford. 1996. The Media Student’s Book. London and New York: Routledge.
Eribo, Festus, and William Jong-Ebot, eds. 1997. Press Freedom and Communication in Africa. Trenton and Asmara: Africa World Press.
FES (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung). 2015. African Media Barometer: Botswana 2014. Windhoek: FES (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung).
Fourie, Pieter J. 2011. Normative Theory in a Changed Media Landscape and Globalised Society. In Communication and Media Ethics in South Africa, ed. Natalie Hyde-Clarke, 9–24. Cape Town: Juta and Company.
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London and New York: Routledge.
Good, Kenneth. 1996. Authoritarian Liberalism: A Defining Characteristic of Botswana. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 14 (1): 29–51.
Hall, Stuart. 1977. Culture, Media and the Ideological Effect. Cited in J. Curran et al. (eds.) Mass Communication and Society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hughes, James. 1968. Report on the Information Functions of Government. Gaborone: Government of Botswana.
Hunt, Kelvin. 1999. The Future of Television in Botswana. A Report by Co-ordinator of Botswana Television Project. Gaborone. May 19.
Hyde-Clarke, Nathalie, ed. 2011. Communication and Media Ethics in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.
Laughey, Dan. 2007. Key Themes in Media Theory. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Lewis, Stephen. n.d. Explaining Botswana’s Success: The Importance of Culture. The Richard R. Lewis Blog, Undated. https://apps.carleton.edu/campus/president/slewis/speeches_writings/botswana_success/. Accessed 19 June 2016.
McNair, Brian. 1998. The Sociology of Journalism. London: Arnold.
McQuail, Denis. 2000. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 4th ed. London: Sage.
———. 2005. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 5th ed. London: Sage.
MISA (Media Institute of Southern Africa). 2014. So This Is Democracy: State of Media in Southern Africa 2013. Windhoek: MISA.
Mosime, Sethunya. 2007. Botswana Television (BTV) Negotiating Control and Cultural Production in a Globalizing Context: A Political Economy of Media State Ownership in Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Kwazulu Natal.
Mytton, Graham. 1983. Mass Communication in Africa. London: Edward Arnold.
Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos, and Ralph Negrine, eds. 2010. Communications Policy: Theories and Issues. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saunders, Richard. 1999. Dancing Out of Tune: A History of the Media in Zimbabwe. Harare: Edwina Spicer Productions.
Tamado, Albert. 2005. The Development and Role of the Public Mass Media and Press Agency in Botswana: 1936–1997. MA Thesis, History Department, University of Botswana.
Tutwane, Letshwiti. 2011a. Regulating the Media in a Democracy: The Case of Botswana. PhD Thesis, University of Leicester.
———. 2011b. The Myth of Press Freedom in Botswana: From Sir SeretseKhama to Ian Khama. Journal of African and Media Studies 3 (1): 43–55.
UPI Online. 1984. President Reagan Praised Botswana as an Example of Democracy. http://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/05/10. Accessed 5 July 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tutwane, L.B.B. (2018). Ideology as News: Political Parallelism in Botswana’s Public Media. In: Mabweazara, H. (eds) Newsmaking Cultures in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54109-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54109-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54108-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54109-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)