Skip to main content

Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid of … the Environmental Activist? Ideological War, Coercive Justice, and Orwellian Dystopia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Geography of Environmental Crime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology ((PSGC))

  • 1223 Accesses

Abstract

Referring to the Red Scare, the fear of communism creeping into Western democracies (Skoll and Korstanje 2013), the term ‘Green Scare’ has been coined to describe the perceived threat posed by environmental activists (Potter 2009). A range of repressive legislation has been passed against various environmental activists with the term eco-terrorist appearing in the public lexicon in 1983 and some states going as far as to employ anti-terrorist legislation against environmental activists (Elefsen 2012). This chapter explores whether the political ‘violence’ used by radical environmental activists can legitimately be defined as terrorism, or whether this term is inappropriately used to widen the net of social control (Cohen 1985), protecting the interests of neoliberal markets against environmental activism. Arguably, the term ‘terrorism’ loses its true meaning if used by the state and policing agencies as an umbrella term for everyone pursuing political dissent. Accordingly, the vilification of environmental activists warrants further attention. This chapter underlines that through propaganda and smear campaigns in the USA, corporations and their partners nurture the War on Terror to instil fear about this new ‘bogeyman’—the environmental activist. Their goal is to silence opposition and intimidate potential critics to protect economic interests and preserve the functioning of neoliberal markets irrespective of their associated environmental harms (Lynch and Stretsky 2014). We can indeed witness the complicity of law enforcement agencies through their ubiquitous use of surveillance which erodes civil liberties. One may wonder if this is a new era of repressive social control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Grassroots movement or groups refers to smaller local groups that are decentralised with limited members and financial resources.

  2. 2.

    Sagebrush Rebellion was a political movement aimed at influencing the environmental policy of use of Western federal lands during the 1970s and 1980s where the US Federal government owns roughly 60% of land. The Sagebrush Rebels sought to work around restrictive environmental laws for mining, ranching, and with real estate development.

  3. 3.

    The ELF was founded by Earth First! members in Brighton, England, in 1992, to pursue ecosabotage as a tactic.

  4. 4.

    Animal Liberation Front.

  5. 5.

    Riggs, for example, claimed before the committee that communities were ‘under outright siege by the most militant, extreme and I would say fringe elements of the environmental movement’ and that activists put the environment before or above the lives (and livelihoods) of people and families and communities despite a lack of evidence of threat to life.

  6. 6.

    The prosecution presented a 30-page sentencing memorandum quoting Kaczynski’s own writings (Taylor, 1998).

  7. 7.

    The UN has many reports on corruption affecting environmental crimes.

  8. 8.

    On 15 April 2013, two bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, causing 3 deaths and injuring over 170 people.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sauvant, A., Fitzgibbon, W., Nurse, A. (2016). Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid of … the Environmental Activist? Ideological War, Coercive Justice, and Orwellian Dystopia. In: Potter, G., Nurse, A., Hall, M. (eds) The Geography of Environmental Crime. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53843-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53843-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53842-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53843-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics