Abstract
This chapter aims to reveal underlying language ideologies regarding English-medium instruction (EMI) in a non-English-speaking context. The case study is based on a comparison between Flanders (the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) and Finland. In both areas, the ‘national’ language played a seminal role in the construction of a common identity, while in today’s academic context, there is an increasing demand for English. Thus, measures have been taken to ‘promote’ the nation’s language while at the same time introducing EMI. The analysis draws on language policy research and critical discourse analysis to explore how discourses on one’s language and identity are reflected in language policies regarding EMI in Flanders and in Finland. The analysis takes into account the socio-historical context in both regions, and it focuses on current ‘texts in context’ (legislation, university policy). The analysis reveals that Flanders adheres to essentialist views regarding language, whereas Finland takes a more pragmatic approach, which may be due to the fact that Finland was established as an independent nation-state in 1917, whereas Flanders may be regarded as an emerging nation-state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised ed.). London: Verso.
Björkman, B. (2014). Language ideology or language practice? An analysis of language policy documents at Swedish universities. Multilingua, 33(3–4), 335–363.
Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (2006). Language policy and national identity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 238–254). Malden: Blackwell.
Bologna Declaration. (1999). Retrieved from: http://www.magna-charta.org/resources/files/BOLOGNA_DECLARATION.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brenn-White, M., & Van Rest, E. (2012). English-Taught master’s programs in Europe: New findings on supply and demand. New York: Institute of International Education.
Cartwright, D. (2006). Geolinguistic analysis in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy. Theory and method (pp. 194–209). Oxford: Blackwell.
Coleman, M. C. (2010). You might all be speaking swedish today: Language change in 19th-century Finland and Ireland. Scandinavian Journal of History, 35(1), 44–64.
Constitution of Belgium. (1994). Retrieved from: http://www.senate.be/doc/const_nl.html
Constitution of Finland. (1999). Retrieved from: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990731.pdf
Dalby, A. (2002). Language in danger. How language loss threatens our future. London: Penguin.
Declaration on Nordic Language Policy. (2007). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Deprez, K., & Vos, L. (Eds.) (1998). Nationalism in Belgium. Shifting identities 1780–1995. London: Macmillan.
Edwards, J. (1985). Language, society and identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
European Commission. (2012). First European survey of language competences. Final report. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/languages/policy/strategic-framework/documents/language-survey-final-report_en.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalisation. London: Routledge.
Finnish Universities Act. (558/2009). Retreived from: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2009/en20090558.pdf
Fishman, J. A. (2006). Language policy and language shift. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy. Theory and method (pp. 311–328). Oxford: Blackwell.
Flemish Decree Concerning Language Regulation in Higher Education. (2012). Retrieved from: http://docs.vlaamsparlement.be/docs/stukken/2011–2012/g1655-6.pdf
Flemish Decree Concerning the Restructuring of Higher Education in Flanders. (2003). Retrieved from: http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/edulex/database/document/document.asp?docid=1
Flemish Government Memorandum. (2010). Retrieved from: http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/integratie/VR_2011_1507_MED.0393_Hervorming_hoger_onderwijs.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Programme, myth, reality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hultgren, A. K. (2014). English language use at the internationalised universities of Northern Europe: Is there a correlation between Englishisation and world rank? Multilingua, 33(3–4), 389–411.
Hultgren, A. K., Gregersen, F., & Thøgersen, J. (Eds.) (2014). English in Nordic universities. Ideologies and practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ihalainen, P., & Saarinen, T. (2014). Constructing “language” in language policy discourse: Finnish and Swedish legislative processes in the 2000s. In M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen, & T. Saarinen (Eds.), Language policies in Finland and Sweden. Interdisciplinary and multi-sited comparisons (pp. 29–56). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirby, D. (2006). A concise history of Finland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuteeva, M. (2014). The parallel language use of Swedish and English: the question of “nativeness” in university policies and practices. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(4), 332–344.
Law Concerning Language Regulation in Education. (1963). Wet houdende taalregeling in het onderwijs. http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/edulex/database/document/document.asp?docid=12391
Leppänen, S., & Pahta, P. (2012). Finnish culture and language endangered – Language ideological debates on English in the Finnish Press from 1995 to 2007. In J. Blommaert, S. Leppänen, & T. Räisänen (Eds.), Dangerous multilingualism: Northern perspectives on order, purity and normality (pp. 142–175). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
May, S. (2005). Language rights: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 319–347.
May, S. (2006). Language policy and minority rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy. Theory and method (pp. 255–272). Oxford: Blackwell.
Nelde, P., Labrie, N., & Williams, C. H. (1992). The principles of territoriality and personality in the solution of linguistic conflicts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13(5), 387–406.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.
Ricento, T. (Ed.) (2006). An introduction to language policy. Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.
Saarinen, T. (2012). Internationalization of Finnish higher education — Is language an issue? IJSL, 216, 157–173.
Saarinen, T. (2014). Language ideologies in Finnish higher education in the national and international context: a historical and contemporary outlook. In A. K. Hultgren, F. Gregersen, & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), English in Nordic universities: Ideologies and practices (pp. 127–146). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskity, P. (Eds.) (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In D. Brenneis & R. Macaulay (Eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology (pp. 284–306). Boulder: Westview Press.
Smit, U., & Dafouz, E. (2012). Integrating content and language in higher education: Gaining insights into English-medium instruction at European universities. AILA, 25, 1–12.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy. Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Oxford: Blackwell.
Universities Act, Finland 558/2009. (2014). Retrieved from: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2009/en20090558.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.
University of Antwerp Code of Conduct Regarding the Language of Instruction. (2013–2014), Retrieved from: https://www.uantwerpen.be/images/uantwerpen/container1163/files/Gedragscode%20Onderwijstaal%20RVBOK.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.
University of Jyväskylä Language Policy. (2012). Retrieved from: https://www.jyu.fi/hallinto/strategia/en/university-of-jyvaskyla-language-policy-2012
University of Jyväskylä Language Policy Action Plan. (2012–2013), https://www.jyu.fi/hallinto/strategia/en/UniversityofJyvskyllanguagepolicyactionplan2012.pdf
van Splunder, F. (2014). Negotiating multilingualism in Flemish higher education. In J. W. Unger, M. Krzyżanowski, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Multilingual encounters in Europe’s institutional spaces (pp. 221–242). London: Bloomsbury.
van Splunder, F. (2015). A tale of two countries. Diverging policies on English-medium instruction in the Netherlands and Flanders. In B. Wilkinson & M. L. Walsh (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: From theory to practice (pp. 89–98). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
van Splunder, F. (2016). Varieties of English in an international academic context. In Proceedings of the VSTS Colloquium, 2014. Leiden: Leiden University Repository, p. 15–26.
Wächter, B. (2014). The European map of English-taught programmes in 2014: Results of a new ACA study. Paper presented at the ACA, Brussels, 4 December 2014.
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2008). English-taught programs in European higher education. The picture in 2007. In ACA papers on international cooperation in education. Bonn: Lemmens.
Witte, E., & Van Velthoven, H. (1999). Language and politics. The Belgian case study in a historical perspective. Brussels: VUB University Press.
Wodak, R. (2006). Linguistic analyses in language policies. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy. Theory and method (pp. 170–193). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action. Politics as usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to Taina Saarinen (University of Jyväskylä) for providing insightful information on language policy issues in Finland. In addition, I would like to thank the editors, Elisabeth Barakos and Johnny Unger, for providing critical feedback on earlier versions of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Splunder, F. (2016). Language Ideologies Regarding English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education: Insights from Flanders and Finland. In: Barakos, E., W. Unger, J. (eds) Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53133-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53134-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)