Abstract
Efforts to specify main patterns of political elite relations and link them to types of political regimes and other major political phenomena have been a long-standing aspect of elite theory and research. Some patterns provide elite persons and groups with considerable security and ways of defending and advancing their interests peacefully. Other patterns make elite power wielding a precarious, highly uncertain game in which conspiracy and violence are key elements. Different patterns result in different modes of elite behavior: relatively benevolent or predacious, relatively calculating or capricious, and relatively cooperative or conflicting. The systematic study of political elites thus involves identifying patterns of elite relations in modern societies, how and when changes from one to another pattern occur, the ways in which mass populations affect elite relations, and the chief political and other consequences of each pattern. These are complex and controversial issues. By analyzing the relations and practices of political elites in the world’s major regions and many of its most important national states, this section of the handbook addresses these issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, R. (1950). Social Structure and the Ruling Class. British Journal of Sociology, 1(March–June), 1–16, 126–43.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1967). Society and Democracy in Germany. New York: Doubleday.
Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential in Western Democracy. London: Polity Press.
Femia, J. V. (2007). Pareto and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
Field, G. L., & Higley, J. (1980). Elitism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Finer, S. E. (1968). Pareto and Pluto-Democracy: The Retreat to the Galapagos. American Political Science Review, 62(2), 440–450.
Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham: Bowman & Littlefield.
Keller, S. (1963). Beyond the Ruling Class. Strategic Elites in Modern Society. New York: Random House.
Meisel, J. (1958). The Myth of the Ruling Class. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Miliband, R. (1969). The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mosca, G. (1923). The Ruling Class (H. D. Kahn, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pareto, V. (1921/1984). The Transformation of Democracy. Introduced by Charles H. Powers. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Piekalkiewicz, J., & Penn, A. W. (1996). Politics of Ideocracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Vol. 1. The Contemporary Debate. Chatham: Chatham House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Higley, J. (2018). Patterns of Political Elites. In: Best, H., Higley, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51903-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51904-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)