Abstract
A number of studies have been conducted on Japanese as a second or foreign language (JSL or JFL) pedagogy. (See the exhaustive list of studies in the past two decades on Shirai’s website at http://www.pitt.edu/~yshirai/jpn.html ; also see the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (NINJAL)’s website at https://www.ninjal.ac.jp/english/research/project/a/teachingandlearning/.) At NINJAL, more than 20 research projects have been carried out regarding the Japanese language. One area, called ‘Study on teaching and learning Japanese as a second language in a multicultural society’, covers research studies regarding JSL or JFL pedagogy, and five subgroups are studying Japanese based on individual themes. One topic area is ‘Research on the acquisition of Japanese as a second language in different learning environments’; this group aims to investigate how learners develop their knowledge from input and how it is used in communication. The group is also creating a database of learners’ utterances and written compositions to enable them to analyse variations according to the learning environment. In other words, they are aiming to build a large corpus to study learners’ language. Themes of the other four groups are: research on evaluation as an interactive act in society; research on the content of Japanese as a second language; research on basic vocabulary for learners of Japanese; and research on Japanese language and education for communication. None of these is related directly to second-language acquisition (SLA) research even though the title includes the word ‘acquisition’. Only a few studies focus on acquisition in grammar, particularly with regards to the role and effect of different types of instructional intervention to help specific grammatical features. There are almost no studies of JSL/JFL grammar acquisition in international journals, in contrast to the large number found in EFL and ESL acquisition literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The Agency of Cultural Affairs is a special body of the Japanese Ministry of Education (the MEXT). It was set up to promote Japanese arts and culture. With many missions regarding fine arts, music, museums, theatre, etc., are carried out, it is also concerned with the improvement of the national language, Japanese, particularly taught inside of Japan, whereas the Japan Foundation deals with such affairs carried outside of Japan. The descriptive statistics of the Japanese learners are presented by the different agencies due to the difference of their missions.
References
Benati, A., Lee, J. F., & Hikima, N. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse-level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. Benati & J. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). London: Bloomsbury.
Berwick, R. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–193.
Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirotani, M. (2013). Syntactic complexity development in L2 writing: A longitudinal study using blog corpora. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 16, 142–159.
Japan Foundation (2013). Survey report on Japanese-language education abroad 2012 [Excerpt].
Kamada, O. (2006). KY corpus to Nihongo kyoiku kenkyu [KY corpus and Japanese language education research]. Nihongo Kyoiku [Japanese Language Education], 130–2, 72–85.
Kondo-Brown, K. (2001). Effects of three types of practice in teaching Japanese verbs of giving and receiving. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 4, 82–115.
Koyanagi, K. (1998). The effect of instruction on the acquisition of conditionals. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 2, 1–26.
Kubota, Y. (1994). Daini gengo to shite no Nihongo no ju-dan teki shutoku kenkyu—Kaku joshi o, ni, de, e, no shutoku katei ni tsuite [Longitudinal acquisition study of Japanese as a second language—Process of acquisition of case marking particles, o, ni, de, e. Nihongo Kyoiku [Japanese Language Education], 82–1, 72–85.
Lee, J. F. (2004). On the generalizability, limits and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Oxford: Routledge.
Lee, J. F., & Benati, A. (2007). The effect of structured input activities on the acquisition of two Japanese linguistic features. In J. F. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Delivering processing instruction in classroom and virtual contexts: Research and practice (pp. 49–72). London: Equinox.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In S. M. Gass & G. Crookes (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Moroishi, M. (2003). Learning simple and complex rules: Acquisition of Japanese location particles and conjectural auxiliaries. Nihongo Kagaku [Japanese Language Science], 14, 54–72
Mukoyama, Y. (2004). Imi jushi no shidou ni bunpou setsumei o kumikomu koto no koka—Rentai shushoku setsu o taisho ni shite [The effect of explicit formal instruction in a meaning-focused lesson on the acquisition of Japanese noun modifying clauses]. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 7, 100–120.
Muranoi, H. (1996). Effects of interaction enhancement on restructuring interlanguage grammar: A cognitive approach to foreign language instruction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.
Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, participation and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System, 19, 437–452.
Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sasaki, Y. (2002). Nihongo shutoku kenkyu no Nichi-bei oie jijo [Environmental difference of Japanese language acquisition studies in Japan and the U.S.] Gengo Bunka to Nihongo Kenkyu [Language Culture and Japanese Language Education], Special Issue, 9–18.
Sawanabe, Y., & Yasui, A. (2008). Kankoku-jin gakushusha no nihongo kango doshi no shutoku ni kansuru ichi kosatsu—Kankoku de Manabu gakushusha to Nihon de Manabu gakushusha o taisho ni [A study of Japanese language acquisition regarding Chinese verbs in Korean learners: Comparing learners in Korea and Japan]. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 12, 141–159.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 119–132.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.
Sugaya, N. (2002). Nihongo gakushusha ni yoru iku, kuru, teiku, tekuru no shutoku kenkyu: Prototype riron no kanten kara [An acquisition study of iku/kuru and teiku/tekuru by JSL learners: Based on an OPI corpus analysis]. Gengo Bunka to Nihongo Kyoiku [Language Culture and Japanese Language Education], 23, 66–79.
Usami, K. (2013). Experimental research for instruction of the Japanese conjunction de: The effectiveness of input flood, input enhancement, and explicit grammar explanation. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 16, 196–213.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 287–301.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435–450.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243.
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510.
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7(2), 133–161.
Yagi, K. (1996). Shokyu gakushusha no sakubun ni mirareru Nihongo no joshi no seiyo junjo-joshibetsu, joshi no kinobetsu, kino group betsu ni [Correct order of Japanese particles used by beginners in their essay compositions-particles, functions, and function groups] Sekai no Nihongo Kyoiku [Japanese Language Education around the world], 6, 65–82.
Yamauchi, H. (2014). Syllabus sakusei ni kyakkan-sei o motseru kokoromi [Attempting to maintain objectivity in syllabus creation]. NINJAL Project Review, 4–3, 197–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamashita, S. (2016). Review of Classroom-Based Research on the Acquisition of Japanese Grammar. In: Benati, A., Yamashita, S. (eds) Theory, Research and Pedagogy in Learning and Teaching Japanese Grammar. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49892-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49892-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49891-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49892-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)