Abstract
There are signs of growing resistance to repressive approaches to crime prevention—so-called mano dura—in Latin America and the Caribbean. Faced with spiralling violence and comparatively high spending on public security, alternatives to mano dura started emerging in the late 1990s. Progressive mayors, industry leaders, scholars, and civil society groups have initiated a host of city-based interventions, building what are called “citizen security” strategies from the ground-up. This chapter considers the intended and unintended consequences of mano dura in Latin America and the opportunities for alternative approaches to preventing and reducing violent crime. In highlighting the costs and benefits of prevention, it makes a case for strengthening citizen security measures across the region.
Credit to Juan Carlos Garzón and Manuela Suárez for their contribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
There is a two-way causality between poverty and incarceration rates that implies a type of positive feedback loop, where rising incarceration rates create conditions that beget even higher rates of imprisonment. See Haney (2006).
- 2.
See also https://crimesolutions.gov.
- 3.
One area or the city where the programme was implemented reported 17 months without a single shooting.
- 4.
For a complete review of effective recidivism initiatives in the US, consult: https://www.crimesolutions.gov/TopicDetails.aspx?ID=35/.
- 5.
See the Prison Entrepreneurship Program at http://www.pep.org/.
- 6.
See the Portal Âmbito Jurídico at http://www.ambitojuridico.com.br/site/index.php?n_link=revista_artigos_leitura&artigo_id=9296/.
- 7.
See the European Union External Action at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquartershomepage_en/7857/A%20new%20chance%20for%20prisoners%20in%20Brazil/.
References
Abt, T., and C. Winship. 2016. What Works to Reduce Community Violence: Central America. Washington, DC: USAID.
Ahnen, R. 2007. The Politics of Police Violence in Democratic Brazil. Latin American Politics & Society 49: 141.
Aos, S., R. Lieb, J. Mayfield, M. Miller, and A. Pennucci. 2004. Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth. Washington, DC: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Barnett, W.S., and L.N. Masse. 2007. Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Abecedarian Program and Its Policy Implications. Economics of Education Review 26 (1): 113–125.
Chaux, E. 2012. Educación, convivencia y agresión escolar. Colombia.: Ediciones Uniandes.
Clark, D., and J. Cornelius. 2004. Childhood Psychopathology and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Prospective Survival Analysis in Children at High Risk for Substance Use Disorders. Addictive Behaviors 29: 837–841.
Cruz, J. 2009. Police Abuse in Latin America. Americas Barometer Insights 2009. Vanderbilt University and LAPOP, USAID.
Dammert, L., and J. Bailey. 2007. ¿Militarización de la seguridad pública en América Latina? Foreign Affairs. En Español.
DeFina, R., and L. Hannon. 2013. The Impact of Mass Incarceration on Poverty. Crime & Delinquency 59: 562–586.
Dossetor, K. 2011. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Its Application to Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Research. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Drake, E., S. Aos, and M. Miller. 2009. Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs: Implications in Washington State. Washington, DC: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Espinosa, V., and D. Rubin. 2015. Did the Military Interventions in the Mexican Drug War Increase Violence? The American Statistician 69: 17.
Farrington, D.P., and B.C. Welsh. 2003. Family-Based Prevention of Offending: A Meta-Analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 36 (2): 127–151.
Frühling, H. 2003. Policía Comunitaria y Reforma Policial en América Latina ¿Cúal es el impacto? Centro de Estudios en Seguridad Ciudadana. Universidad de Chile.
Garland, D. 2008. On the Concept of Moral Panic. Crime Media Culture 4 (1): 9–30.
Goldschmidt, P., D. Huang, and M. Chinen. 2007. The Long-Term Effects of After-School Programming on Educational Adjustment and Juvenile Crime: A Study of the LA’s BEST After-School Program. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) and Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) and Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California.
Haney, C. 2006. The Wages of Prison Overcrowding: Harmful Psychological Consequences and Dysfunctional Correctional Reactions. Washington, DC: Washington University Journal of Law & Policy.
Hill, P., P. Uris, and T. Bauter. 2007. The Nurse-Family Partnership: A Policy Priority. In-Home Nurse Visits Are Cost-Effective and Evidence Based. American Journal of Nursing 108: 73–75.
Jutersonke, O., R. Muggah, and D. Rogers. 2009. Gangs, Urban Violence and Security Interventions in Central America. Security Dialogue 40: 4–5.
LAPOP. 2017. Beneath the Violence. Rule of Law Working Paper, October. https://www.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Crime-Avoidance-Report-FINAL-ONLINE.pdf/.
McVay, D., V. Schiraldi, and J. Ziedenberg. 2004. Treatment or Incarceration? National and State Findings of the Efficacy and Cost Savings of Drug Treatment Versus Imprisonment. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
Miller, T. 2015. Projected Outcomes of Nurse-Family Partnership Home Visitation During 1996–2013, USA. Prevention Science 16 (6): 765–777.
Morales, H. 2007. Factores no Cognitivos Asociados al Logro de Aprendizajes: El caso del Programa Escuela Abierta de Unesco en Brasil. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación: 172–178.
Muggah, R., and J. Garzon. 2017. The Fear of Being Killed in Latin America. El Pais 25, October. https://elpais.com/internacional/2017/10/25/america/1508957538_308023.html/.
Muggah, R., and B. Winter. 2017. Is Populism Making a Comeback in Latin America. Foreign Policy 23, October. http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/10/23/populism-is-coming-for-latin-america-in-2018/.
Muggah, R., I. de Carvalho, N. Alvarado, L. Marmolejo, and R. Wang. 2016. Making Cities Safer: Citizen Security Innovations from Latin America. Washington, DC: IADB, WEF and Igarapé Institute. https://publications.iadb.org.
Nieto, A., C. Ramos, and E. Chaux. 2007. Aulas en Paz: Resultados Preliminares de un Programa Multi-Componente. Interamerican Journal of Education for Democracy. RIED-IJED.
Nores, M., C. Belfield, W. Barnett, and L. Scheinhart. 2005. Updating the Economic Impacts of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 27 (3): 245–261.
Olds, L. 2007. Preventing Crime with Prenatal and Infancy Support of Parents: The Nurse-Family Partnership. Denver: Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado.
Osher, D., J. Sprague, R.P. Weissberg, J. Axelrod, S. Keenan, K. Kendziora, and J.E. Zins. 2003. A Comprehensive Approach to Promoting Social, Emotional, and Academic Growth in Contemporary Schools. In Best Practices in School Psychology, ed. A. Thomas and J. Grimes, vol. 4, 1–16. Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Publications.
Osse, A., and I. Cano. 2017. Police Deadly Use of Firearms: An International Comparison. The International Journal of Human Rights. Taylor & Francis Group.
Peixoto, B.T., M.V. Andrade, and J.P. Azevedo. 2007. Preventing Criminality: An Economic Evaluation of a Brazilian Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ransford, C., R. Decker, G. Cruz, F. Sánches, and G. Slutkin. 2017. El modelo Cure Violence: Reducción de la violencia en San Pedro Sula (Honduras). Revista CIDOB d’afers internacionals: 116 (Septiembre). Nueva época.
Robertson, M., N. Devlin, M. Gardner, and A. Campbell. 2001. Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of a Nurse Delivered Home Exercise Programme to Prevent Falls: Randomised Controlled Trial. British Medical Journal 322: 697–701.
UNESCO. 2008. Open Schools: Education and Culture for Peace. Brasilia: UNESCO.
World Health Organization. 2015. Preventing Youth Violence: An Overview of the Evidence. Geneva.
Zedlewski, E. 2009. Conducting Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Justice Evaluations: Do We Dare. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muggah, R. (2019). Reviewing the Costs and Benefits of Mano Dura Versus Crime Prevention in the Americas. In: Shaw, T.M., Mahrenbach, L.C., Modi, R., Yi-chong, X. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-45442-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45443-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)