Skip to main content

Conclusion: Taking Account of War, Making It Count

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War
  • 1116 Accesses

Abstract

Contra Elias’ (1937) presumption of a civilising process, rather than the two world wars of the twentieth century and their consequences provoking human beings into looking for different ways of resolving their differences, wars, conflicts, and genocidal behaviours continue to be a routine, everyday experience for many people across the globe. As noted in the comments of Shaw (1991) and Baudrillard (1991) relating to the 1991 Gulf War and commented on in the introduction to this Handbook, the nature, practice, and knowledge of such conflicts may indeed have changed their shape, form, and locus. Evidenced in the contemporary use of remotely controlled drones to deliver fatal blows to a distant enemy, war is now frequently—but not exclusively—fought remotely and at a distance. However, the costs to those targeted in this way remain the same: injury, death, and destruction of homes and infrastructure. These costs are visually self-evident but there are other costs, for example, to economies. As illustration, Bilmes (2013) has estimated that the projected financial costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to the USA alone stand in the region of four to six trillion dollars. Hagan et al. (2012) further suggest that the economic costs to Iraq (borne predominantly by the Sunni groups) amount to around 239 billion dollars. If it were possible to add to these figures the costs on a global scale, not only of the impacts of war but also of the various investments made by different economies to the production of weapons, military personnel, and so on, it would be very difficult not to agree with Bourke (2015: 1) that ‘we are a warring people’. Whilst Bourke (2015) is talking primarily of the UK and the USA, it is an observation that carries weight above and beyond these particular nations. Thus, the ‘costs’ of war alone suggest an important agenda for the social sciences. At the conclusion of this Handbook the question remains: What does such an agenda imply for criminology?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, D., & Gartner, R. (1987). Violence and crime in cross national perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1991 [1995]). The Gulf War did not take place. Sydney: Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilmes, L. J. (2013). The financial legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan: How wartime spending will constrain future national security (Budgets Faculty Research Working Paper Series). Harvard: University of Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, J. (2015). Deep violence. Berkeley: Counterpoint Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. The British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (2013). Towards a different common sense. www.cynthiacockburn.org

  • Connell, R. (2007). The northern theory of globalization. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 368–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1937). The civilising process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D., & Rechtman, R. (2009). The empire of trauma. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. (2015). While criminology slept: A criminal war of aggression in Iraq. The Criminologist: The Official Newsletter of the American Society of Criminology, 40(6), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., & Rymond-Richmond, W. (2009). Dafur and the crime of genocide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Kaiser, J., Rothenberg, D., Hanson, A., & Parker, P. (2012). Atrocity victimisation and the costs of economic conflict crimes in the battle for Baghdad and Iraq. European Journal of Criminology, 9(5), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. (1998). Towards a criminology of war in Europe. In V. Ruggiero, N. South, & I. Taylor (Eds.), The new European criminology: Crime and social order in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. (1999). Councils of war. Criminal Justice Matters, 34(1), 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. (Ed.). (2014). The criminology of war. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2005). War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 446–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K. & McConnachie, K. (2012). Victimology in transitional justice: Victimhood, innocence and hierarchy, 9(5), 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, R. (2015). War, crime and military victimhood. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 23(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, R. (2016). The ‘typical victim’. No story to tell, and no one to tell it to. In M. H. Jacobsen & S. Walklate (Eds.), Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research (pp. 100–120). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, R., & Walklate, S. (2011). The soldier as victim: Peering through the looking glass. The British Journal of Criminology, 51(6), 900–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, R., & Walklate, S. (2015). Introduction: Placing war within criminology. In S. Walklate & R. McGarry (Eds.), Criminology and war: Transgressing the borders (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, B. (1956). A new branch of bio-psychological science: La victimology. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J. (2007). Shadow values, shadow figures: Real violence. Critical Criminology, 15, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, W. (2006). Criminology, civilization and the New World Order. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R. (1972). Who is the victim? Criminology, 10, 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2006). Understanding political violence: A criminological approach (pp. 177–194). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2015). War and the death of Achilles. In S. Walklate & R. McGarry (Eds.), Criminology and war: Transgressing the borders (pp. 21–37). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (1991). Post-military society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. C. (1954). Crime and the services. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, H. (2003). The indispensable metaphor of war: On populist politics and the contradictions of the state’s monopoly of force. Theoretical Criminology, 7(3), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. G. (2012). Lawful murder: Unnecessary killing in the land of war. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 25(2), 417–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S., & McGarry, R. (2016). Murderousness in war: From Mai Lai to Marine A. In S. Walklate & K. Fitz-Gibbon (Eds.), Murder, gender and responsibility (pp. 97–112). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S., & Mythen, G. (2015). The contradictions of terrorism: Risk, security and resilience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. (2014). Military landscapes: Agendas and approaches for future research. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2007). The vertigo of late modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walklate, S., McGarry, R. (2016). Conclusion: Taking Account of War, Making It Count. In: McGarry, R., Walklate, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43169-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43170-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics