Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ideology and (Im)politeness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness

Abstract

In this chapter, Manfred Kienpointner and Maria Stopfner examine the manifold interrelationship of two scientifically much disputed concepts: ideology and (Im)politeness. Providing a condensed overview of the conceptual history of the term, ‘ideology‘, a non-pejorative concept of ideology as common sense is assumed, in order to describe the different perspectives taken with a view to (Im)politeness. After a critical review of the first wave theories of (Im)politeness, the authors establish a typology including ideologies of the folk theories of (Im)politeness, based on concepts such as class, gender or ethnicity, as well as ideologies within the scientific theories of (Im)politeness, such as the ideology of rationalisation. The systematic classification of the implicit ideological assumptions within these theories serves to clarify the relationship between ideology and (Im)politeness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, L. 1994. Selected Texts. In Ideology, ed. T. Eagleton, 87–111. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulou, E. 2001. Brief Service Encounters: Gender and Politeness. In Linguistic Politeness Across Boundaries. The Case of Greek and Turkish, ed. A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou, 241–269. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. G.A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, T. 2005. Blaikie’s Guide to Modern Manners. London: The Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, A. 2005. La descortesía en la dinámica social y política. In Actos de habla y cortesía en distintas variedades de español: Perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas, ed. J. Murillo Medrano, 137–164. Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, D., and J. Culpeper, eds. 2008. Impoliteness: Eclecticism and Diaspora. Special Issue of Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, D., ed. 2005. Estudios de la (des)cortesía en español. Estocolmo: Dunken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, D., and A. Briz, eds. 2004. Pragmática sociocultural. Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briz, A., et al. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., and S.D. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: ‘The Weakest Link’. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield, and A. Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, L., and P. Schulz, eds. 2005. Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, J.M. 2004. Ideology. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, R., R. Frank, and C. Ilie, eds. 2001a. Language and Ideology. Volume II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, R., B. Hawkins, and E. Sandikcioglu, eds. 2001b. Language and Ideology. Volume I: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. 1993. Ideologie: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Introduction. In Ideology, ed. T. Eagleton, 1–20. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, A. 2006. Habermas. The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and W.V. Friesen. 1975. Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs: Spectrum-Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Language and Power. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B. 1987. El español bonaerense: Cuatro siglos de evolución lingüística (1580–1980). Buenos Aires: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1969. L’Archéologie du Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress, and T. Trew. 1979. Language and Control. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. 1992. Sprachgewalt. Die sprachliche Reproduktion der Geschlechterhierarchie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. 1994. Ideology. In Ideology, ed. T. Eagleton, 260–278. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y. 1990. Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, D. 1996. Ideology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, G. 1995. Verbale Höflichkeit. Studien zur linguistischen Theoriebildung und empirische Untersuchung zum Sprachverhalten französischer und italienischer Jugendlicher in Bitt- und Dankessituationen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Flores, N. 1999. Politeness Ideology in Spanish Colloquial Conversations: The Case of Advice. Pragmatics 9 (1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J.R., K.B. Smith, and J.R. Alford. 2014. Differences in Negativity Bias Underlie Variations in Political Ideology. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 37: 297–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q., and G.N. Smith, eds. 1999. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: ElecBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., and G. Kress. 1974. Transformations, Models and Processes. Journal of Literary Semantics 3: 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., M. Marra, and B. Vine. 2012. Politeness and Impoliteness in Ethnic Varieties of New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1063–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J.Sh. 2005. The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist 60 (6): 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ide, S. 1989. Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, S. 1993. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. Duisburg: Edition DISS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. 6th ed. München: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kádár, D.Z., and M. Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kádár, D.Z., and S. Mills, eds. 2011. Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul de Marlangeon, S. 2005. Descortesía intragrupal-crónica en la interacción colloquial de la clase media baja del español rioplatense. In Actos de habla y cortesía en distintas variedades de español: Perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas, ed. J. Murillo Medrano, 165–179. Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. 1974. Norm-Makers, Norm-Breakers. Uses of Speech by Men and Women in a Malagasy Community. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. R. Bauman and J. Sherzer, 125–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner, M. 1997. Varieties of Rudeness. Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances. Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1999. Ideologies of Politeness. Special Issue of Pragmatics, 9(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Impoliteness and Emotional Arguments. Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Cortesía, emociones y argumentación. In Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral. III Coloquio Internacional del Programa EDICE, ed. A. Briz, A. Hidalgo, M. Albelda, J. Contreras, and N. Hernández Flores, 25–52. València: Universitat de València.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, E.F.K. 2001. Linguistics and Ideology in 19th and 20th Century Studies of Language. In Language and Ideology Volume I: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches, ed. R. Dirven, B. Hawkins, and E. Sandikcioglu, 253–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. 2002. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G.N. 1983. Pragmatics. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M.A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. 1977. Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1952. Ideologie und Utopie. 3rd ed. Schulte-Blumke: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Ideology and Utopia. Collected Works, Volume I. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Rojo, L. 1994. The Jargon of Delinquents and the Study of Conversational Dynamics. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (3): 243–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1962. Die deutsche Ideologie. Kritik der neuesten deutschen Philosophie in ihren Repräsentanten Feuerbach, B. Bauer und Stimer, und des deutschen Sozialismus in seinen verschiedenen Propheten. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Selected Texts. In Ideology, ed. T. Eagleton, 23–30. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Y. 1988. Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. 2008. Those Naughty Teenage Girls: Japanese Kogals, Slang and Media Assessments. In Language and Gender. Volume III, ed. S. Ehrlich, 259–289. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S., and D.Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness and Culture. In Politeness in East Asia, ed. D.Z. Kádár and S. Mills, 21–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. 1996. Aristotle on Emotions and Rational Persuasion. In Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. A. Rorty, 303–323. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Barr, W., and B. Atkins. 1980. Women’s Language or ‘Powerless Language’? In Women in Language in Literature and Society, ed. S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman, 193–210. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, S. 1999. Situated Politeness: Coordinated Honorific and Non-Honorific Expressions in Japanese Conversations. Pragmatics 9 (1): 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizziconi, B. 2011. Honorifics: The Cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism in Japanese. In Politeness in East Asia, ed. D.Z. Kádár and S. Mills, 45–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhi, Ş., and G. Doğan. 2001. Relevance Theory and Compliments as Phatic Communication. In Linguistic Politeness Across Boundaries. The Case of Greek and Turkish, ed. A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou, 341–390. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey, A. 1990. Wording, Meaning and Linguistic Ideology. American Anthropologist 91: 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer-Elmayer, Th. 1991. Der Elmayer. Gutes Benehmen gefragt. Wien: Zsolnay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. 1979. Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. R. Clyne, W. Hanks, and C. Hobauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.B., D.R. Oxley, M.V. Hibbing, J.R. Alford, and J.R. Hibbing. 2011. Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology. Political Psychology 32 (3): 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. 1986. You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M. 1999. Frames for Politeness: A Case Study. Pragmatics 9 (1): 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-Based Approach. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, J.W. 2013. Creating Worldviews. Methaphor, Ideology and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T.A. 1987. Communicating Racism. Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Discourse and Knowledge. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verschueren, J. 2014. Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V.N. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.N., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Language and Politeness in Early Eighteenth Century Britain. Pragmatics 9 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.J., S. Ide, and K. Ehlich, eds. 1992. Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. 1985. Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2009. Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 2nd ed., 1–33. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., P. Nowak, J. Pelikan, H. Gruber, R. de Cillia, and R. Mitten. 1990. ‘Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter’ Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt amMain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. 1992. Language Ideology: Issues and Approaches. In Language Ideologies. Special Issue of Pragmatics, ed. P. Kroskrity, B. Schieffelin, and K. Woolard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2(3) 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Manfred Kienpointner

  2. European Academy Bozen (EURAC), Bolzano, Italy

    Maria Stopfner

Authors
  1. Manfred Kienpointner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Stopfner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Kienpointner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Linguistics & English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

    Jonathan Culpeper

  2. School of Languages and Cultures, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Michael Haugh

  3. Dept of Linguistics and Modern Languages, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, United Kingdom

    Dániel Z. Kádár

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kienpointner, M., Stopfner, M. (2017). Ideology and (Im)politeness. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37507-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37508-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation