Abstract
The rhythmic elements of music are integral to experiences such as singing, musical emotions, the urge to dance and playing a musical instrument. Thus, studies of musical rhythm are an especially fertile ground for the development of innovative theories of complex naturalistic behaviour. In this Review, we first synthesize behavioural and neural studies of musical rhythm, beat and metre perception. Then, we describe key theories and models of these abilities, including nonlinear oscillator models and predictive-coding models, to clarify the extent to which they overlap in their mechanistic proposals and make distinct testable predictions. Next, we review studies of development and genetics to shed further light on the psychological and neural basis of rhythmic abilities and provide insight into the evolutionary and cultural origins of music. Last, we outline future research opportunities to integrate behavioural and genetics studies with computational modelling and neuroscience studies to better understand musical behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hamilton, L. S. & Huth, A. G. The revolution will not be controlled: natural stimuli in speech neuroscience. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 573–582 (2020).
Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A. & Poeppel, D. Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 480–490 (2017).
Zaki, J. & Ochsner, K. The need for a cognitive neuroscience of naturalistic social cognition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1167, 16–30 (2009).
Cooper, G. & Meyer, L. B. The Rhythmic Structure of Music (Univ. Chicago, 1960).
Hasty, C. Meter as Rhythm (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).
Lerdahl, F. & Jackendoff, R. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (MIT Press, 1983).
London, J. Hearing in Time: Psychological Aspects of Musical Meter 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
Kotz, S. A., Ravignani, A. & Fitch, W. T. The evolution of rhythm processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 896–910 (2018).
Mehr, S. A., Krasnow, M. M., Bryant, G. A. & Hagen, E. H. Origins of music in credible signaling. Behav. Brain Sci. 44, e60 (2021).
Savage, P. E. et al. Toward inclusive theories of the evolution of musicality. Behav. Brain Sci. 44, e121 (2021).
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Marton-Alper, I. Z. & Gvirts, H. Z. Herding brains: a core neural mechanism for social alignment. Trends Cognit. Sci. 23, 174–186 (2019).
Bregman, A. S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (MIT Press, 1990).
Griffiths, T. D. & Warren, J. D. What is an auditory object? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 887–892 (2004).
Snyder, J. S., Gregg, M. K., Weintraub, D. M. & Alain, C. Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes. Front. Psychol. 3, 15 (2012).
Hannon, E. E., Snyder, J. S., Eerola, T. & Krumhansl, C. L. The role of melodic and temporal cues in perceiving musical meter. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 956–974 (2004).
Essens, P. J. & Povel, D. J. Metrical and nonmetrical representations of temporal patterns. Percept. Psychophys. 37, 1–7 (1985).
Thomassen, J. M. Melodic accent: experiments and a tentative model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1596–1605 (1982).
Brochard, R., Abecasis, D., Potter, D., Ragot, R. & Drake, C. The “ticktock” of our internal clock: direct brain evidence of subjective accents in isochronous sequences. Psychol. Sci. 14, 362–366 (2003).
Holzapfel, A. Relation between surface rhythm and rhythmic modes in Turkish makam music. J. N. Music Res. 44, 25–38 (2015).
London, J., Polak, R. & Jacoby, N. Rhythm histograms and musical meter: a corpus study of Malian percussion music. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 474–480 (2017).
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E. & Currie, T. E. Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8987–8992 (2015).
Fraisse, P. in The Psychology of Music (ed. Deutsch, D.) 149–180 (Academic Press, 1982).
Povel, D. J. Internal representation of simple temporal patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 3–18 (1981).
Repp, B. H., London, J. & Keller, P. E. Production and synchronization of uneven rhythms at fast tempi. Music Percept. 23, 61–78 (2005).
Snyder, J. S., Hannon, E. E., Large, E. W. & Christiansen, M. H. Synchronization and continuation tapping to complex meters. Music Percept. 24, 135–145 (2006).
Jacoby, N. & McDermott, J. H. Integer ratio priors on musical rhythm revealed cross-culturally by iterated reproduction. Curr. Biol. 27, 359–370 (2017).
Polak, R. et al. Rhythmic prototypes across cultures: a comparative study of tapping synchronization. Music Percept. 36, 1–23 (2018).
Jacoby, N. et al. Commonality and variation in mental representations of music revealed by a cross-cultural comparison of rhythm priors in 15 countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01800-9 (2024).
Cook, P., Rouse, A., Wilson, M. & Reichmuth, C. A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) can keep the beat: motor entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non vocal mimic. J. Comp. Psychol. 127, 412–427 (2013).
Schachner, A., Brady, T. F., Pepperberg, I. M. & Hauser, M. D. Spontaneous motor entrainment to music in multiple vocal mimicking species. Curr. Biol. 19, 831–836 (2009).
Roeske, T. C., Tchernichovski, O., Poeppel, D. & Jacoby, N. Categorical rhythms are shared between songbirds and humans. Curr. Biol. 30, 3544–3555.e6 (2020).
Bouwer, F. L., Nityananda, V., Rouse, A. A. & ten Cate, C. Rhythmic abilities in humans and non-human animals: a review and recommendations from a methodological perspective. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200335 (2021).
De Gregorio, C. et al. Categorical rhythms in a singing primate. Curr. Biol. 31, R1379–R1380 (2021).
Lenc, T. et al. Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200325 (2021).
Burger, B., London, J., Thompson, M. R. & Toiviainen, P. Synchronization to metrical levels in music depends on low-frequency spectral components and tempo. Psychol. Res. 82, 1195–1211 (2018).
Burger, B., Thompson, M. R., Luck, G., Saarikallio, S. & Toiviainen, P. Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Front. Psychol. 4, 183 (2013).
Cameron, D. J. et al. Undetectable very-low frequency sound increases dancing at a live concert. Curr. Biol. 32, R1222–R1223 (2022).
Ross, J. M., Warlaumont, A. S., Abney, D. H., Rigoli, L. M. & Balasubramaniam, R. Influence of musical groove on postural sway. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42, 308–319 (2016).
Demos, A. P., Layeghi, H., Wanderley, M. M. & Palmer, C. Staying together: a bidirectional delay-coupled approach to joint action. Cogn. Sci. 43, e12766 (2019).
Repp, B. H. Probing the cognitive representation of musical time: structural constraints on the perception of timing perturbations. Cognition 44, 241–281 (1992).
Repp, B. H. & Su, Y.-H. Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 403–452 (2013).
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G. & Hove, M. J. Rhythm in joint action: psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130394 (2014).
Drake, C., Penel, A. & Bigand, E. Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music. Music Percept. 18, 1–23 (2000).
Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. & Moelants, D. Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. J. N. Music Res. 28, 43–66 (1999).
McAuley, J. D., Jones, M. R., Holub, S., Johnston, H. M. & Miller, N. S. The time of our lives: life span development of timing and event tracking. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 348–367 (2006).
Ullal-Gupta, S., Hannon, E. E. & Snyder, J. S. Tapping to a slow tempo in the presence of simple and complex meters reveals experience-specific biases for processing music. PLoS ONE 9, e102962 (2014).
Snyder, J. & Krumhansl, C. L. Tapping to ragtime: cues to pulse finding. Music Percept. 18, 455–489 (2001).
Toiviainen, P. & Snyder, J. S. Tapping to Bach: resonance-based modeling of pulse. Music Percept. 21, 43–80 (2003).
Witek, M. A., Clarke, E. F., Wallentin, M., Kringelbach, M. L. & Vuust, P. Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE 9, e94446 (2014).
Polak, R., London, J. & Jacoby, N. Both isochronous and non-isochronous metrical subdivision afford precise and stable ensemble entrainment: a corpus study of Malian jembe drumming. Front. Neurosci. 10, 285 (2016).
Pressing, J. Black Atlantic rhythm: its computational and transcultural foundations. Music Percept. 19, 285–310 (2002).
Jakubowski, K., Polak, R., Rocamora, M., Jure, L. & Jacoby, N. Aesthetics of musical timing: culture and expertise affect preferences for isochrony but not synchrony. Cognition 227, 105205 (2022).
Grahn, J. A. & Brett, M. Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 893–906 (2007).
Grahn, J. A. See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms. Exp. Brain Res. 220, 51–61 (2012).
Patel, A. D., Iversen, J. R., Chen, Y. Q. & Repp, B. H. The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat. Exp. Brain Res. 163, 226–238 (2005).
Grahn, J. A. & McAuley, J. D. Neural bases of individual differences in beat perception. Neuroimage https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.039 (2009).
McAuley, J. D., Frater, D., Janke, K. & Miller, N. S. Detecting changes in timing: evidence for two modes of listening. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 188–189 (2006).
Snyder, J. S., Pasinski, A. C. & McAuley, J. D. Listening strategy for auditory rhythms modulates neural correlates of expectancy and cognitive processing. Psychophysiology 48, 198–207 (2011).
McPherson, T., Berger, D., Alagapan, S. & Fröhlich, F. Intrinsic rhythmicity predicts synchronization-continuation entrainment performance. Sci. Rep. 8, 11782 (2018).
Phillips-Silver, J. et al. Born to dance but beat deaf: a new form of congenital amusia. Neuropsychologia 49, 961–969 (2011).
Sowiński, J. & Dalla Bella, S. Poor synchronization to the beat may result from deficient auditory-motor mapping. Neuropsychologia 51, 1952–1963 (2013).
Cinelyte, U., Cannon, J., Patel, A. D. & Müllensiefen, D. Testing beat perception without sensory cues to the beat: the Beat-Drop Alignment Test (BDAT). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 84, 2702–2714 (2022).
Iversen, J. R. & Patel, A. D. The Beat Alignment Test (BAT): surveying beat processing abilities in the general population. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 465–468 (2008).
Palmer, C. & Krumhansl, C. L. Mental representations for musical meter. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 728–741 (1990).
Nave-Blodgett, J. E., Snyder, J. S. & Hannon, E. E. Auditory superiority for perceiving the beat level but not measure level in music. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 47, 1516–1542 (2021).
Nave-Blodgett, J. E., Snyder, J. S. & Hannon, E. E. Hierarchical beat perception develops throughout childhood and adolescence and is enhanced in those with musical training. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 314–339 (2021).
Fujii, S. & Schlaug, G. The Harvard Beat Assessment Test (H-BAT): a battery for assessing beat perception and production and their dissociation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 771 (2013).
Law, L. N. & Zentner, M. Assessing musical abilities objectively: construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills. PLoS ONE 7, e52508 (2012).
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C. & Vuust, P. The musical ear test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learn. Individ. Differ. 20, 188–196 (2010).
Mullensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J. & Stewart, L. The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS ONE 9, e89642 (2014).
Bonacina, S., Krizman, J., White-Schwoch, T., Nicol, T. & Kraus, N. How rhythmic skills relate and develop in school-age children. Glob. Pediatr. Health 6, 2333794X19852045 (2019).
Fiveash, A., Bella, S. D., Bigand, E., Gordon, R. L. & Tillmann, B. You got rhythm, or more: the multidimensionality of rhythmic abilities. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 84, 1370–1392 (2022).
Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A. & Engle, R. W. A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 242–275 (2021).
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R. & Bottesini, J. G. Credibility beyond replicability: improving the four validities in psychological science. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 162–168 (2022).
Janata, P., Tomic, S. T. & Haberman, J. M. Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141, 54–75 (2012).
Senn, O. et al. An SEM approach to validating the psychological model of musical groove. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 49, 290–305 (2023).
Madison, G. Experiencing groove induced by music: consistency and phenomenology. Music Percept. 24, 201–208 (2006).
O’Connell, S. R., Nave-Blodgett, J. E., Wilson, G. E., Hannon, E. E. & Snyder, J. S. Elements of musical and dance sophistication predict musical groove perception. Front. Psychol. 13, 998321 (2022).
Witek, M. A. G. et al. Syncopation affects free body-movement in musical groove. Exp. Brain Res. 235, 995–1005 (2017).
Dotov, D., Bosnyak, D. & Trainor, L. J. Collective music listening: movement energy is enhanced by groove and visual social cues. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 74, 1037–1053 (2021).
Spiech, C., Sioros, G., Endestad, T., Danielsen, A. & Laeng, B. Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings. Sci. Rep. 12, 11620 (2022).
Matthews, T. E., Witek, M. A., Heggli, O. A., Penhune, V. B. & Vuust, P. The sensation of groove is affected by the interaction of rhythmic and harmonic complexity. PLoS ONE 14, e0204539 (2019).
Senn, O., Kilchenmann, L., Bechtold, T. & Hoesl, F. Groove in drum patterns as a function of both rhythmic properties and listeners’ attitudes. PLoS ONE 13, e0199604 (2018).
Sioros, G., Madison, G., Cocharro, D., Danielsen, A. & Gouyon, F. Syncopation and groove in polyphonic music: patterns matter. Music Percept. 39, 503–531 (2022).
Stupacher, J., Wrede, M. & Vuust, P. A brief and efficient stimulus set to create the inverted U-shaped relationship between rhythmic complexity and the sensation of groove. PLoS ONE 17, e0266902 (2022).
Witek, M. A. G. et al. A critical cross-cultural study of sensorimotor and groove responses to syncopation among Ghanaian and American university students and staff. Music Percept. 37, 278–297 (2020).
Huron, D. B. Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation (MIT Press, 2006).
Meyer, L. B. Emotion and Meaning in Music (Univ. Chicago Press, 1956).
Salimpoor, V. N. et al. Interactions between the nucleus accumbens and auditory cortices predict music reward value. Science 340, 216–219 (2013).
Shany, O. et al. Surprise-related activation in the nucleus accumbens interacts with music-induced pleasantness. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 459–470 (2019).
Dalla Bella, S. in Music and the Aging Brain (eds Cuddy, L. L., Belleville, S. & Moussard, A.) 383–406 (Academic Press, 2020).
Ghai, S., Ghai, I., Schmitz, G. & Effenberg, A. O. Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on parkinsonian gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 8, 506 (2018).
Nombela, C., Hughes, L. E., Owen, A. M. & Grahn, J. A. Into the groove: can rhythm influence Parkinson’s disease? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 2564–2570 (2013).
Schaefer, R. S., Vlek, R. J. & Desain, P. Decomposing rhythm processing: electroencephalography of perceived and self-imposed rhythmic patterns. Psychol. Res. 75, 95–106 (2011).
Tierney, A., White-Schwoch, T., MacLean, J. & Kraus, N. Individual differences in rhythm skills: links with neural consistency and linguistic ability. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 855–868 (2017).
Nave, K. M., Hannon, E. E. & Snyder, J. S. Steady state-evoked potentials of subjective beat perception in musical rhythms. Psychophysiology 59, e13963 (2022).
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M. & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. J. Neurosci. 31, 10234–10240 (2011).
Winkler, I., Haden, G. P., Ladinig, O., Sziller, I. & Honing, H. Newborn infants detect the beat in music. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2468–2471 (2009).
Pasinski, A. C., McAuley, J. D. & Snyder, J. S. How modality specific is processing of auditory and visual rhythms? Psychophysiology 53, 198–208 (2016).
Pfeuty, M., Ragot, R. & Pouthas, V. Processes involved in tempo perception: a CNV analysis. Psychophysiology 40, 69–76 (2003).
Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W. & Ross, B. Internalized timing of isochronous sounds is represented in neuromagnetic beta oscillations. J. Neurosci. 32, 1791–1802 (2012).
Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H. & Patel, A. D. Top-down control of rhythm perception modulates early auditory responses. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169, 58–73 (2009).
Snyder, J. S. & Large, E. W. Gamma-band activity reflects the metric structure of rhythmic tone sequences. Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 117–126 (2005).
Desain, P. & Honing, H. Computational models of beat induction: the rule-based approach. J. N. Music Res. 28, 29–42 (1999).
Longuet-Higgins, H. C. & Lee, C. S. The perception of musical rhythms. Perception 11, 115–128 (1982).
Scheirer, E. D. Tempo and beat analysis of acoustic musical signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 588–601 (1998).
Tomic, S. T. & Janata, P. Beyond the beat: modeling metric structure in music and performance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 4024–4041 (2008).
Todd, N. & Lee, C. The sensory–motor theory of rhythm and beat induction 20 years on: a new synthesis and future perspectives. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 444 (2015).
Eck, D. Identifying metrical and temporal structure with an autocorrelation phase matrix. Music Percept. 24, 167–176 (2006).
Toiviainen, P. & Eerola, T. Autocorrelation in meter induction: the role of accent structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 1164–1170 (2006).
Giraud, A.-L. & Poeppel, D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 511–517 (2012).
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L. & Penhune, V. B. When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 547–558 (2007).
Proksch, S., Comstock, D. C., Mede, B., Pabst, A. & Balasubramaniam, R. Motor and predictive processes in auditory beat and rhythm perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 13 (2020).
Harms, M. P. & Melcher, J. R. Sound repetition rate in the human auditory pathway: representations in the waveshape and amplitude of fMRI activation. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 1433–1450 (2002).
Giraud, A. L. et al. Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 1588–1598 (2000).
Eck, D. Finding downbeats with a relaxation oscillator. Psychol. Res. 66, 18–25 (2002).
Large, E. W. & Kolen, J. F. Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connect. Sci. 6, 177–208 (1994).
Toiviainen, P. An interactive MIDI accompanist. Comput. Music J. 22, 63–75 (1998).
Jones, M. R. & Boltz, M. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol. Rev. 96, 459–491 (1989).
Large, E. W. & Jones, M. R. The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychol. Rev. 106, 119–159 (1999).
Bartolo, R., Prado, L. & Merchant, H. Information processing in the primate basal ganglia during sensory-guided and internally driven rhythmic tapping. J. Neurosci. 34, 3910–3923 (2014).
Fujioka, T., Ross, B. & Trainor, L. J. Beta-band oscillations represent auditory beat and its metrical hierarchy in perception and imagery. J. Neurosci. 35, 15187–15198 (2015).
Large, E. W., Herrera, J. A. & Velasco, M. J. Neural networks for beat perception in musical rhythm. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 159 (2015).
Tal, I. et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: the “missing-pulse” phenomenon. J. Neurosci. 37, 6331–6341 (2017).
Tichko, P., Kim, J. C. & Large, E. W. Bouncing the network: a dynamical systems model of auditory–vestibular interactions underlying infants’ perception of musical rhythm. Dev. Sci. 24, e13103 (2021).
Tichko, P. & Large, E. W. Modeling infants’ perceptual narrowing to musical rhythms: neural oscillation and Hebbian plasticity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1453, 125–139 (2019).
Friston, K. Hierarchical models in the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000211 (2008).
Friston, K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127–138 (2010).
Rao, R. P. & Ballard, D. H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79–87 (1999).
Koelsch, S., Vuust, P. & Friston, K. Predictive processes and the peculiar case of music. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 63–77 (2019).
Denham, S. L. & Winkler, I. Predictive coding in auditory perception: challenges and unresolved questions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 51, 1151–1160 (2020).
Heilbron, M. & Chait, M. Great expectations: is there evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex? Neuroscience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.061 (2017).
Palmer, C. & Demos, A. P. Are we in time? how predictive coding and dynamical systems explain musical synchrony. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 147–153 (2022).
Cannon, J. Expectancy-based rhythmic entrainment as continuous Bayesian inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009025 (2021).
Cannon, J. J. & Patel, A. D. How beat perception co-opts motor neurophysiology. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 137–150 (2021).
Shenoy, K. V., Sahani, M. & Churchland, M. M. Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 337–359 (2013).
Bengtsson, S. L. et al. Listening to rhythms activates motor and premotor cortices. Cortex 45, 62–71 (2009).
Chen, J. L., Zatorre, R. J. & Penhune, V. B. Interactions between auditory and dorsal premotor cortex during synchronization to musical rhythms. Neuroimage 32, 1771–1781 (2006).
Cheng, T. H. Z., Creel, S. C. & Iversen, J. R. How do you feel the rhythm: dynamic motor–auditory interactions are involved in the imagination of hierarchical timing. J. Neurosci. 42, 500–512 (2022).
Grahn, J. A. & Brett, M. Impairment of beat-based rhythm discrimination in Parkinson’s disease. Cortex 45, 54–61 (2009).
Kasdan, A. V. et al. Identifying a brain network for musical rhythm: a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis and systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 136, 104588 (2022).
Schubotz, R. I. & von Cramon, D. Y. Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas. Cereb. Cortex 11, 210–222 (2001).
Ross, J. M., Iversen, J. R. & Balasubramaniam, R. The role of posterior parietal cortex in beat-based timing perception: a continuous theta burst stimulation study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 634–643 (2018).
Phillips-Silver, J. & Trainor, L. J. Feeling the beat: movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science 308, 1430 (2005).
Hannon, E. E. & Trehub, S. E. Metrical categories in infancy and adulthood. Psychol. Sci. 16, 48–55 (2005).
Hannon, E. E. & Trehub, S. E. Tuning in to musical rhythms: infants learn more readily than adults. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12289–12290 (2005).
Lenc, T., Keller, P. E., Varlet, M. & Nozaradan, S. Neural and behavioral evidence for frequency-selective context effects in rhythm processing in humans. Cereb. Cortex Commun. 1, tgaa037 (2020).
Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden, C. M., Joanisse, M. F. & Grahn, J. A. Music as a scaffold for listening to speech: better neural phase-locking to song than speech. Neuroimage 214, 116767 (2020).
Zhao, T. C. & Kuhl, P. K. Neural and physiological relations observed in musical beat and meter processing. Brain Behav. 10, e01836 (2020).
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I. & Keller, P. E. Individual differences in rhythmic cortical entrainment correlate with predictive behavior in sensorimotor synchronization. Sci. Rep. 6, 20612 (2016).
Carver, F. W., Fuchs, A., Jantzen, K. J. & Kelso, J. A. S. Spatiotemporal analysis of the neuromagnetic response to rhythmic auditory stimulation: rate dependence and transient to steady-state transition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 1921–1931 (2002).
Gutschalk, A. et al. Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 856–868 (1999).
Rajendran, V. G., Harper, N. S., Garcia-Lazaro, J. A., Lesica, N. A. & Schnupp, J. W. H. Midbrain adaptation may set the stage for the perception of musical beat. Proc. Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1455 (2017).
Rajendran, V. G. & Schnupp, J. W. H. Frequency tagging cannot measure neural tracking of beat or meter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2779–2780 (2019).
Kaplan, T., Cannon, J., Jamone, L. & Pearce, M. Modeling enculturated bias in entrainment to rhythmic patterns. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1010579 (2022).
van der Weij, B., Pearce, M. T. & Honing, H. A probabilistic model of meter perception: simulating enculturation. Front. Psychol. 8, 824 (2017).
Vuust, P. & Witek, M. A. Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: a novel approach to modeling rhythm and meter perception in music. Front. Psychol. 5, 1111 (2014).
Vuust, P., Dietz, M. J., Witek, M. & Kringelbach, M. L. Now you hear it: a predictive coding model for understanding rhythmic incongruity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1423, 19–29 (2018).
Lumaca, M., Trusbak Haumann, N., Brattico, E., Grube, M. & Vuust, P. Weighting of neural prediction error by rhythmic complexity: a predictive coding account using mismatch negativity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 49, 1597–1609 (2019).
Zalta, A., Large, E. W., Schön, D. & Morillon, B. Neural dynamics of predictive timing and motor engagement in music listening. Sci. Adv. 10, eadi2525 (2024).
Stupacher, J., Hove, M. J., Novembre, G., Schutz-Bosbach, S. & Keller, P. E. Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: a TMS investigation. Brain Cogn. 82, 127–136 (2013).
Ross, J. M., Comstock, D. C., Iversen, J. R., Makeig, S. & Balasubramaniam, R. Cortical mu rhythms during action and passive music listening. J. Neurophysiol. 127, 213–224 (2022).
Matthews, T. E., Witek, M. A. G., Lund, T., Vuust, P. & Penhune, V. B. The sensation of groove engages motor and reward networks. Neuroimage 214, 116768 (2020).
Cameron, D. J. et al. Neural entrainment is associated with subjective groove and complexity for performed but not mechanical musical rhythms. Exp. Brain Res. 237, 1981–1991 (2019).
Honing, H. & Ploeger, A. Cognition and the evolution of music: pitfalls and prospects. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4, 513–524 (2012).
Demany, L., McKenzie, B. & Vurpillot, E. Rhythm perception in early infancy. Nature 266, 718–719 (1977).
Chang, H. W. & Trehub, S. E. Infants’ perception of temporal grouping in auditory patterns. Child Dev. 48, 1666–1670 (1977).
Trehub, S. E. & Thorpe, L. A. Infants’ perception of rhythm: categorization of auditory sequences by temporal structure. Can. J. Psychol. 43, 217–229 (1989).
Hannon, E. E. & Johnson, S. P. Infants use meter to categorize rhythms and melodies: implications for musical structure learning. Cogn. Psychol. 50, 354–377 (2005).
Soley, G. & Hannon, E. E. Infants prefer the musical meter of their own culture: a cross-cultural comparison. Dev. Psychol. 46, 286–292 (2010).
Hannon, E. E., Soley, G. & Levine, R. S. Constraints on infants’ musical rhythm perception: effects of interval ratio complexity and enculturation. Dev. Sci. 14, 865–872 (2011).
Trehub, S. E. & Hannon, E. E. Conventional rhythms enhance infants’ and adults’ perception of musical patterns. Cortex 45, 110–118 (2009).
Flaten, E., Marshall, S. A., Dittrich, A. & Trainor, L. J. Evidence for top-down metre perception in infancy as shown by primed neural responses to an ambiguous rhythm. Eur. J. Neurosci. 55, 2003–2023 (2022).
Cirelli, L. K., Spinelli, C., Nozaradan, S. & Trainor, L. J. Measuring neural entrainment to beat and meter in infants: effects of music background. Front. Neurosci. 10, 11 (2016).
Edalati, M. et al. Rhythm in the premature neonate brain: very early processing of auditory beat and meter. J. Neurosci. 43, 2794–2802 (2023).
Lenc, T. et al. Infants show enhanced neural responses to musical meter frequencies beyond low-level features. Dev. Sci. 26, e13353 (2023).
Ilari, B. Rhythmic engagement with music in early childhood: a replication and extension. J. Res. Music Educ. 62, 332–343 (2015).
Fujii, S. et al. Precursors of dancing and singing to music in three- to four-months-old infants. PLoS ONE 9, e97680 (2014).
Kim, M. & Schachner, A. The origins of dance: characterizing the development of infants’ earliest dance behavior. Dev. Psychol. 59, 691–706 (2023).
Zentner, M. & Eerola, T. Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5768–5773 (2010).
Lense, M. D., Shultz, S., Astesano, C. & Jones, W. Music of infant-directed singing entrains infants’ social visual behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116967119 (2022).
Schmuckler, M. A. & Paolozza, A. Auditory influences on walking: children’s walking to the beat. Dev. Psychol. 59, 1236–1248 (2023).
Kirschner, S. & Tomasello, M. Joint drumming: social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 102, 299–314 (2009).
Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M. & Trainor, L. J. Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Dev. Sci. 17, 1003–1011 (2014).
Kirschner, S. & Tomasello, M. Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 354–364 (2010).
Cirelli, L. K. & Trehub, S. E. Dancing to Metallica and Dora: case study of a 19-month-old. Front. Psychol. 10, 1073 (2019).
Cameron, D. J., Caldarone, N., Psaris, M., Carrillo, C. & Trainor, L. J. The complexity-aesthetics relationship for musical rhythm is more fixed than flexible: evidence from children and expert dancers. Dev. Sci. 26, e13360 (2022).
Kragness, H. E., Anderson, L., Chow, E., Schmuckler, M. & Cirelli, L. K. Musical groove shapes children’s free dancing. Dev. Sci. 26, e13249 (2022).
Rocha, S. & Mareschal, D. Getting into the groove: the development of tempo-flexibility between 10 and 18 months of age. Infancy 22, 540–551 (2017).
Woodruff Carr, K., White-Schwoch, T., Tierney, A. T., Strait, D. L. & Kraus, N. Beat synchronization predicts neural speech encoding and reading readiness in preschoolers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14559–14564 (2014).
Braun Janzen, T., Thompson, W. F. & Ranvaud, R. A developmental study of the effect of music training on timed movements. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 801 (2014).
Drake, C., Jones, M. R. & Baruch, C. The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition 77, 251–288 (2000).
Thompson, E. C., White-Schwoch, T., Tierney, A. & Kraus, N. Beat synchronization across the lifespan: intersection of development and musical experience. PLoS ONE 10, e0128839 (2015).
Nave, K., Carrillo, C., Jacoby, N., Trainor, L. & Hannon, E. The development of rhythmic categories as revealed through an iterative production task. Cognition 242, 105634 (2024).
Hoff, E. Language Development (Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009).
Einarson, K. M. & Trainor, L. J. Hearing the beat: young children’s perceptual sensitivity to beat alignment varies according to metric structure. Music Percept. 34, 56–70 (2016).
Nave, K. M., Snyder, J. S. & Hannon, E. Sustained musical beat perception develops into late childhood and predicts phonological abilities. Dev. Psychol. 59, 829–844 (2023).
Gerry, D. W., Faux, A. L. & Trainor, L. J. Effects of Kindermusik training on infants’ rhythmic enculturation. Dev. Sci. 13, 545–551 (2010).
Hannon, E. E., Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden, C. M. & Tichko, P. Effects of perceptual experience on children’s and adults’ perception of unfamiliar rhythms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1252, 92–99 (2012).
Hannon, E. E., Soley, G. & Ullal, S. Familiarity overrides complexity in rhythm perception: a cross-cultural comparison of American and Turkish listeners. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 543–548 (2012).
Kalender, B., Trehub, S. E. & Schellenberg, E. G. Cross-cultural differences in meter perception. Psychol. Res. 77, 196–203 (2013).
Rocha, S., Southgate, V. & Mareschal, D. Infant spontaneous motor tempo. Dev. Sci. 24, e13032 (2021).
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J. & Mehler, J. Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 756–766 (1998).
Hart, S. A., Little, C. & van Bergen, E. Nurture might be nature: cautionary tales and proposed solutions. NPJ Sci. Learn. 6, 2 (2021).
Bouchard, T. J. The Wilson effect: the increase in heritability of IQ with age. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 16, 923–930 (2013).
Plomin, R. & Deary, I. J. Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 98–108 (2015).
Mosing, M. A., Verweij, K. J. H., Madison, G. & Ullén, F. The genetic architecture of correlations between perceptual timing, motor timing, and intelligence. Intelligence 57, 33–40 (2016).
Ullén, F., Mosing, M. A., Holm, L., Eriksson, H. & Madison, G. Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish Musical Discrimination Test. Pers. Individ. Differ. 63, 87–93 (2014).
Niarchou, M. et al. Genome-wide association study of musical beat synchronization demonstrates high polygenicity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1292–1309 (2022).
Uffelmann, E. et al. Genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 59 (2021).
Gordon, R. L. et al. Confronting ethical and social issues related to the genetics of musicality. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1522, 5–14 (2023).
Gustavson, D. E. et al. Exploring the genetics of rhythmic perception and musical engagement in the Vanderbilt Online Musicality Study. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1521, 140–154 (2023).
Wesseldijk, L. W. et al. Using a polygenic score in a family design to understand genetic influences on musicality. Sci. Rep. 12, 14658 (2022).
Grotzinger, A. D. et al. Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 513–525 (2019).
Nayak, S. et al. The musical abilities, pleiotropy, language, and environment (MAPLE) framework for understanding musicality-language links across the lifespan. Neurobiol. Lang. 3, 615–664 (2022).
Denny, J. C. & Collins, F. S. Precision medicine in 2030 — seven ways to transform healthcare. Cell 184, 1415–1419 (2021).
Melloni, L. et al. An adversarial collaboration protocol for testing contrasting predictions of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory. PLoS ONE 18, e0268577 (2023).
Nozaradan, S. et al. Intracerebral evidence of rhythm transform in the human auditory cortex. Brain Struct. Funct. 222, 2389–2404 (2017).
Celma-Miralles, A. & Toro, J. M. Discrimination of temporal regularity in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens). J. Comp. Psychol. 134, 3–10 (2020).
Rajendran, V. G., Harper, N. S. & Schnupp, J. W. H. Auditory cortical representation of music favours the perceived beat. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191194 (2020).
Spierings, M., Hubert, J. & ten Cate, C. Selective auditory grouping by zebra finches: testing the iambic–trochaic law. Anim. Cogn. 20, 665–675 (2017).
Patel, A. D. Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. Hear. Res. 308, 98–108 (2014).
Fiveash, A. et al. Can rhythm-mediated reward boost learning, memory, and social connection? Perspectives for future research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 149, 105153 (2023).
Ladanyi, E., Persici, V., Fiveash, A., Tillmann, B. & Gordon, R. L. Is atypical rhythm a risk factor for developmental speech and language disorders? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 11, e1528 (2020).
Chang, A. et al. Inferior auditory time perception in children with motor difficulties. Child Dev. 92, E907–E923 (2021).
Lense, M. D., Ladanyi, E., Rabinowitch, T. C., Trainor, L. & Gordon, R. Rhythm and timing as vulnerabilities in neurodevelopmental disorders. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200327 (2021).
Levi, D. M., Knill, D. C. & Bavelier, D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: a mini-review. Vis. Res. 114, 17–30 (2015).
Nallet, C. & Gervain, J. Neurodevelopmental preparedness for language in the neonatal brain. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 3, 41–58 (2021).
Webb, A. R., Heller, H. T., Benson, C. B. & Lahav, A. Mother’s voice and heartbeat sounds elicit auditory plasticity in the human brain before full gestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3152–3157 (2015).
Choi, D., Batterink, L. J., Black, A. K., Paller, K. A. & Werker, J. F. Preverbal infants discover statistical word patterns at similar rates as adults: evidence from neural entrainment. Psychol. Sci. 31, 1161–1173 (2020).
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X. & Poeppel, D. Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 158–164 (2016).
Ghio, M., Cara, C. & Tettamanti, M. The prenatal brain readiness for speech processing: a review on foetal development of auditory and primordial language networks. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 128, 709–719 (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Abdel Abdellaoui, Takako Fujioka, E. Glenn Schellenberg and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Snyder, J.S., Gordon, R.L. & Hannon, E.E. Theoretical and empirical advances in understanding musical rhythm, beat and metre. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 449–462 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00315-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00315-y
- Springer Nature America, Inc.