Abstract
Spin angular momenta play important roles in light–matter interactions, leading to the emergence of the spin Hall effect and topological quasiparticles in modern optics. The typical approach is to decompose the spins of plane electromagnetic waves into longitudinal and transverse components, yet this description is not easily transferable to more structured electromagnetic environments. Here, we developed a field theory to reveal the physical origin and topological properties of longitudinal and transverse spins for arbitrary electromagnetic waves (including water waves and acoustic waves) in both near-field and free space. For electromagnetic waves carrying intrinsic helicity, we observed the emergence of helicity-dependent transverse spin possessing helicity-dependent spin-momentum locking. To verify that the number of spin-momentum locking states coincides with the spin Chern number, we experimentally measured the three-dimensional spin angular momentum densities of Bloch-type optical skyrmions. Our findings yield valuable insight for constructing spin-based field theory and exploiting optical topological quasiparticle-based applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Momentum and angular momentum are fundamental dynamical properties of elementary particles and waves and play important roles in understanding the behaviours arising from wave–matter interactions1,2,3,4,5,6,7. In classical electromagnetic (EM) fields, the angular momentum can be divided into spin angular momentum (SAM) associated with the degree of circular polarization and orbital angular momentum (OAM) related to the phase singularity. Recently, it was discovered that, for a plane-wave solution of Maxwell’s equations, the EM helicity-dependent SAM component oriented along the mean wavevector (canonical momentum P) was considered a longitudinal spin (L-spin)2, whereas the SAM components oriented perpendicular to the mean wavevector represented the helicity-independent transverse spins (T-spin)8. To date, the helicity-independent T-spins have been investigated in various EM systems, including focused fields9,10, interference fields11, evanescent fields12,13,14,15, guided fields16,17 and unpolarized fields18. The SAM interacts intensively with OAM19, especially on the subwavelength scale, raising strong research interest in spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) and other remarkable phenomena20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 and offering potential applications in the fields of angular-momentum-based optical manipulation28,29, unidirectional guided waves30,31,32,33, imaging34,35,36, detection and nanometrology37,38, and on-chip quantum technologies39.
However, if complicated structural properties40, including the inhomogeneities of the intensity, phase, polarization and helicity, are introduced into the EM fields, distinguishing between L-spins and T-spins in the empirical wavevector approach (i.e., longitudinal/transverse meaning parallel/perpendicular to the canonical momentum) brings physical challenges. Moreover, it is ambiguous when the decomposition of the total SAM into the L-spin and T-spin is based on their direction of vector instead of their physical difference. This ambiguity emerges because an arbitrary structured EM field can possess three-dimensional (3D) distributions of spin angular momentum density. Previously, some researchers proposed that T-spins possess the property of spin-momentum locking13. However, such a proposal is based on a single evanesce wave. Soon afterwards, these researchers presented diversified expressions to describe the T-spins for different EM systems28. These expressions are intriguing because from the physical point of view, a class of physical quantities should possess a unified physical mechanism embodied by a single universal equation. In quantum physics, photons are spin-1 bosons41, and hence, it is reasonable to extract the L-spin correspondence using concepts in quantum physics. However, for a generic EM field, the physical origin of T-spins and their properties await quantitative elucidation. For other diverse classical wave fields, such as acoustic and gravity water waves, the mediating phonons are spin-0 phonons and hence should not possess L-spin. However, both wave fields definitely carry SAMs6. These helicity-independent SAMs correspond to the T-spin of a helicity-independent linearly polarized EM field17 and have the same physical origin and possess unified physical properties.
In this study, we constructed a unified field theory based on the decomposition of the SAM for a generic interfering EM field into L-spins and T-spins, which enables their physical origins and accompanying intrinsic topological properties to be uncovered. The decomposition technique can be applied to spin decompositions for diversified classical wave fields, including acoustic and gravity water waves. The equations reveal that L-spins are associated with the helicity that is oriented parallel to the local wavevector given by the Minkowski-type canonical momentum42,43,44,45, whereas T-spins stem from the inhomogeneity of the kinetic Abraham momentum density42,43,44,45 of the field and locks with the kinetic Abraham momentum in the near field or free space. Here, the Minkowski-type canonical momentum is related to the quantum momentum operator, and the Abraham kinetic momentum is related to the relativistic transportation of photons and determined by the group velocity. If an inhomogeneity of the helicity-related kinetic momentum density is present in a structured EM field, a helicity-dependent T-spin appears and simultaneously leads to helicity-dependent spin-momentum locking. Under this circumstance, the number of spin-momentum locking states is consistent with the nontrivial topological spin Chern number of the EM field. In addition, the helicity-dependent T-spin refers to the inverted helical component in the EM system and therefore is closely related to the evolution of the geometric phase in optical systems. More curiously, this decomposition of the spin vector results in a kind of T-spin oriented parallel to the mean wavevector and L-spin oriented perpendicular to the mean wavevector, which demonstrates that the empirical wavevector approach definitely faces challenges in separating the L-spins and T-spins of structured light fields. By this theory, we theoretically deduced that a Bloch-type optical skyrmion will be present in free space. Furthermore, we experimentally demonstrated the spin properties of this Bloch-type optical skyrmion by mapping the three SAM components in an optical focused beam with circular polarizations in our in-house developed near-field imaging system. Our findings deepen the understanding of the underlying physics of spins for classical wave fields and open an avenue for applications including optical manipulations and data storage.
Results
Basic concepts of the EM longitudinal and transverse spin
In quantum physics, photons are spin-1 bosons with the direction of spin parallel to that of the photon momentum41. To determine the physical properties of L-spins in a classical EM field, we first took an elliptically polarized plane wave propagating in the x-direction with electric and magnetic fields [Fig. 1(a)]
defined in arbitrary orthogonal coordinates (x, y, z). Here, the total SAM density of this plane wave is \({{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}=\hslash \sigma \hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\), where \(\sigma ={{\mbox{Im}}}\{{A}_{s}^{\ast }{A}_{p}-{A}_{p}^{\ast }{A}_{s}\}/\{{A}_{s}^{\ast }{A}_{s}+{A}_{p}^{\ast }{A}_{p}\}\) is the helicity of a single wave packet (in accordance with the Stokes parameter s3 and termed the polarization ellipticity11,28) and \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) is only related to the canonical momentum density P by \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}={{{{{\bf{P}}}}}}/\hslash k\) but is not the unit directional vector (Supplementary Note 1). Moreover, As and Ap denote the amplitudes of the s-polarization and p-polarization, respectively; \(\eta =\sqrt{\mu /\varepsilon }\) is the wave impedance; ℏ is the reduced Planck constant; ω is the angular frequency; and k is the wavenumber. The special instances σ = ±1 represent the two circularly polarized (CP) modes of light corresponding to the two helical states in quantum physics2,26,27,28,41. Thus, the expression for the SAM helps delineate the global properties of EM fields from the perspective of classical field theory as well as the elementary dynamical properties of optical wave packets from the viewpoint of quantum theory. The spin vector of CP light is parallel to the local wavevector density \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) and thus was previously regarded as L-spin. In physics, for theoretical consistency, the elementary feature of L-spins in a generic EM field should coincide with the definition of the photonic spin in quantum physics, i.e., the L-spin is parallel to the local wavevector density \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\), and its magnitude and sign are determined by the helicity σ of the EM field.
On the other hand, to uncover the physical origin of T-spin, we considered a classical hydrodynamic model in which a particle is immersed in a fluid possessing a gradient field of momentum [Fig. 2]. Assuming the flow of the water wave is in the +x-direction with its momentum density decreasing in the y-direction, the immersed particle experiences an anticlockwise transverse torque (Mz), and its intensity is proportional to the local gradient of the momentum density in the y-direction [Fig. 2(a)]. If the flow is in the +y-direction with momentum density increasing in the x-direction, the immersed particle also experiences an anticlockwise transverse torque (Mz) with an intensity proportional to the local gradient of momentum density in the x-direction [Fig. 2(b)]. In total, the particle immersed in the fluid flow with a gradient momentum density experiences a transverse torque, the intensity of which is proportional to the vorticity associated with the momentum density. This model is also available if the generation of T-spins is considered for the linearly polarized surface plasmon plane wave, as shown in Fig. 1(b), because the three momentum densities, including the kinetic, canonical and spin momentum densities2,26,27,28,42,43,44,45, decay exponentially along the +z-direction. Correspondingly, we conjectured that the generation of T-spins in an EM system is related to the vorticity associated with the momentum flow of the photons.
In classical field theory, there are three types of momentum densities:6,46 the Abraham kinetic momentum density Π of photons or phonons associated with the Poynting vectors of wave fields, which can be decomposed into the Minkowski-type canonical momentum density P and the Belinfante spin momentum density Ps. These three momentum densities describing the flows (group velocities) of photons47 or phonons6 are candidates for evaluating T-spin. Previously, for plane waves of an EM system, only the canonical momentum P associated with the local wavevector was employed to identify the T-spin in various ways28. However, for these diverse classical wave fields, basic physical challenges are faced when searching for a unified physical mechanism to evaluate T-spins in a universal manner because the spin momentum density Ps appears to also play a critical role in the generation of T-spins. For example, for plane waves of an EM field that has a pure L-spin (\({{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}||\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\)), if the spin momentum density Ps = ∇ × S/2 exists, it would be perpendicular to the wavevector \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) (\({{{{{{\bf{P}}}}}}}_{s}\perp \hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\)). This is illogical because spin momentum density should also be longitudinal; thus, Ps vanishes for the field with pure L-spin. In contrast, for an inhomogeneous structured EM field containing T-spins [Fig. 1(b) and (c)], the spin momentum density Ps = ∇ × S/2 would contain the longitudinal component (for example, the spin momentum density of a single evanescent wave contains longitudinal and transverse components simultaneously12). This is prevalent in a structured field, and thus, the spin momentum is closely connected with the T-spin. In particular, for a relativistic field such as an EM wave, the canonical group velocity determined by the canonical momentum would be superluminal47. This contradicts a principle of relativity, and hence, a spin momentum should appear and be antiparallel to the canonical momentum to guarantee that the total group velocity associated with the kinetic momentum is subluminal47. In other words, spin momentum is essential and highly related to the T-spin in a structured field, and therefore, the kinetic momentum, which combines canonical and spin momenta, is reasonable when employed to evaluate the T-spin in general scenarios.
Field theory for the EM longitudinal and transverse spins
For a general structured EM wave carrying helicity and inhomogeneities simultaneously, we theoretically proved that the T-spin (St) and L-spin (Sl) of an arbitrary EM wave can be determined by (Supplementary Notes 2, 3)
and
Here, we considered a generic EM field for which the electric and magnetic field components can be expanded into the superpositions of a plane-wave basis and carry the helicity σi and local wavevector \({\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{i}\) for each elementary plane wave i and the helicity σij and local wavevector \({\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{ij}\) for the coupling of the interfering plane waves i and j. We must emphasize that the coupling term \(\hslash {\sigma }_{ij}{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{ij}\) appears for the non-orthogonality of the plane-wave basis, which can be widely found in focused structured light. For example, the focused Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) beam carrying OAM but without EM helicity can result in an L-spin48,49,50,51. The total spin is thus given by \({{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}={{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{l}+{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{t}=\langle \psi |\bar{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}|\psi \rangle /\hslash \omega\) and \(\bar{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}=[\hat{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}},{{{{{\bf{0}}}}}};{{{{{\bf{0}}}}}},\hat{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}]\), with \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}\) representing the spin-1 matrix in SO(3)46, 0 representing the 3 × 3 zero matrix, and \(|\psi \rangle\) representing the Riemann–Silberstein vector, which can be considered the photon wave function analogous to the quantum wave function46. Notably, the L-spin is based on the link between the EM helicities σi for each of the elementary interfering waves and their local wavevectors \({\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{i}\) rather than the mean wavevector. In our work, the mean wavevector is given by the canonical momentum of the total EM field, whereas the local wavevector is identified by the canonical momentum of each plane-wave component when expanding the EM field into a superposition of plane waves. Thus, the first term on the right side of Eq. (2) represents the summation of L-spins of each elementary plane wave, and the second term represents the sum of L-spins from couplings between the interfering plane waves. The appearance of the coupling term stems from the non-orthogonality of the two plane-wave basis in the 3D polarization space.
On the other hand, Eq. (3) reveals that for an EM wave, the T-spin arises from the inhomogeneous momentum flow density of the EM field. Moreover, the T-spin is locked to the kinetic momentum13,14,15,16,17 in a manner unrelated to the L-spin of the EM wave propagating in a homogeneous medium. This spin-momentum locking originates from the intrinsic spin–orbit coupling in Maxwell’s equations and is considered a fundamental property of the T-spin for an arbitrary EM field, either propagating in free space or confined at an interface (evanescent and surface waves). Moreover, because of the long-standing Abraham–Minkowski debate42,43,44,45, the accepted wisdom is that the Minkowski-type canonical momentum determines the local wavevector of photons and is reasonable for evaluating the L-spin, whereas the Abraham kinetic momentum is always associated with the group velocities and describes the current properties of EM wave fields (called a current by M.V. Berry46). Therefore, spin-momentum locking between the kinetic momentum and SAM can also be regarded as spin-current locking and thus is different from the quantum spin-Hall effect in condensed matter physics52. In addition, from the PT-symmetric point of view, the angular momentum given by L = r × P is P-even and T-odd because the position vector r is P-odd and T-even, whereas the momentum vector P is P-odd and T-odd. Regarding the L-spin given by Eq. (2), the helicity σ is P-odd and T-even, whereas the unit vector of the local wavevector \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\), which possesses properties in accordance with the momentum (\({{{{{\bf{P}}}}}}=\hslash k\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\)), is P-odd and T-odd. Therefore, the L-spin Sl is also P even and T odd. Regarding the T-spin given by Eq. (3), the kinetic momentum is P-odd and T-odd, and the gradient operator ∇ is P-odd and T-even; thus, the angular momentum St is also P-even and T-odd.
Helicity-dependent and spin-momentum locking properties of the EM spins
To further understand the decomposition of the spins of complex EM fields into L-spins and T-spins using our theory, we still considered an elliptically polarized plane wave. A plane wave either propagates or evanesces depending on the wavevector components [Fig. 3(a)]. If the wave is propagating along the x-direction, for a plane wave in free space, as demonstrated in Eq. (1) [Point “A” in Fig. 3(a)], the SAM of the wave is \({{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}=\hslash \sigma \hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) and is pure L-spin, as analysed in Fig. 1(a). We now consider its evanescent counterpart [point “B” in Fig. 3(a)] with the following electric and magnetic fields:
The SAM is found to be
where kp denotes the horizontal wavenumber, iκ represents the wavenumber in the z-direction with \({k}_{p}^{2}={k}^{2}+{\kappa }^{2}\), and W denotes the time-averaged energy density. We observed that the y-component of the SAM corresponds to the normal helicity-independent T-spin of a linearly polarized surface plane wave (transverse magnetic (TM) or transverse electric (TE) polarization)17 and is perpendicular to the local wavevector \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\). However, compared with the EM helicity of a propagating elliptically polarized plane wave, the SAM component parallel to the local wavevector contains an additional factor: \({k}^{2}/{k}_{p}^{2}\), which is illogical in physics if we consider it entirely as an L-spin because the elementary feature of the L-spin for the same kind of wave-packet should be constant [Fig. 3(a)]. Indeed, given the evanescent property of the wave in the z-direction, we determined that the kinetic momentum density contains two components:
where the helicity-unrelated x-component of the momentum and the helicity-related y-component of the momentum density both decay in the z-direction. Thus, we can expect two components of the T-spin as follows:
whereas the L-spin is \({{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{l}={{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}-{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{t}=\hslash \sigma \hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\), which now coincides with that in free space. Aside from the helicity-independent T-spin that was investigated intensively in the past8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18, a hidden T-spin that is helicity-dependent is predicted from the theory. This leads to four spin-momentum locking states for a generic EM field [Fig. 3(b, c)], in which the respective spin properties of the right-handed and left-handed elliptically polarized states propagating in the +x-direction are shown. If the kinetic momentum associated with the flow of photons is reversed, both the helicity-dependent and helicity-independent T-spins are inverted simultaneously. This indicates that the general EM field possesses \({\mathbb{Z}}\)4 topological invariance, which is consistent with the nontrivial spin Chern number of photons17. When the dual symmetry between the electric and magnetic constitutive relations is broken53 and only a linearly polarized state survives, the four spin-momentum locking states downgrade to two helicity-independent states, which are similar to the quantum spin Hall effect of light proposed by Ref. 13
The aforementioned concepts of EM spin can be generalized to an arbitrary EM wave field by expanding it into the superposition of plane waves for either near field or free space. In this study, for simplicity, we only demonstrated two-wave interference of the single evanescent waves as an example [Fig. 4(a, d, g)]. The results can be extended to multiple wave interference and thus an arbitrary EM field. We assume that the two interfering fields are
and are rotated through angles +θ and ‒θ with respect to the x-axis. Ap1/Ap2 and As1/As2 represent the amplitude of wave 1/2, respectively. Then, the total electric field of the superposed field is expressible as
Here, \({\hat{R}}_{z}(\theta )\) denotes the rotational operator with respect to the z-axis, and r = (x, y, z) represents the coordinates. The magnetic field is calculated using Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction, H = ∇×E/iωμ. We can then obtain an energy density containing three parts W = W1 + W2 + Wc, for which
denote the energy densities of Waves 1 and 2, and
denotes the coupling energy density with ks1 = kpsinθ and kp1 = kpcosθ. W1/W2 denotes the energy density of Wave 1/2. Here, Wc is local, and its integral over the whole xy-plane vanishes. Based on this decomposition of the energy density, the mean wavevector of the superposed field is also decomposable to \(\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}={\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{1}+{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{2}+{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{c}\), for which the local wavevectors of Waves 1 and 2 are
and
represents the local wavevector of the coupling energy density by comparing the total energy density and mean wavevector of the superposed field. In this way, the L-spin can be rewritten as \({{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{l}=\hslash {\sigma }_{1}{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{1}+\hslash {\sigma }_{2}{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{2}+\hslash {\sigma }_{c}{\hat{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}_{c}\), where the three helicities are
and
respectively. The helicity of each individual wave is given by the corresponding polarization ellipticity11,28. Thus, the link between the EM helicities and their local wavevectors is intrinsically based on the decomposition of the energy density and mean wavevector. The same conclusion can be reached for waves in free space by calculating the two-wave interference (Supplementary Note 3).
To understand in detail the spin property of an EM field, we first considered the interference of two waves with opposite helicities [Fig. 4(a)]. Thus, the coupling term σc vanishes and is thereby beneficial when analysing the spin property of EM fields. Assuming that Ap1 = Ap2 = 1, As1 = 5 + 2i, As2 = 5‒2i, and that the propagating angles θ of the two plane waves are +45° and –45°, the canonical momentum associated with the mean wavevector is along the +x-direction and varies periodically in the y-direction [Supplementary Fig. 2(b)]. The kinetic momentum [Supplementary Fig. 2(a)] has two components: the helicity-unrelated component along the +x-direction and varying periodically in the y-direction [Fig. 4(b)] and the helicity-related component along the –x-direction and being homogeneous in the xy-plane [Fig. 4(c)]. All the momenta decay exponentially in the z-direction. In this instance, the x-component SAM is absent, and only the z- and y-components of the SAM arise [Supplementary Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 5(a) in main text, respectively]. From our theory, the z-component SAM is a pure helicity-independent T-spin because the helicity-related kinetic momentum is spatially invariant in the xy-plane, whereas the y-component SAM contains both an L-spin and T-spin [Fig. 5(b, c), respectively].
To verify this, we then considered the interference of these two waves by changing the propagating angles to +135° and –135° [Fig. 4(d)] so that the propagating direction given by the canonical momentum [Supplementary Fig. 2(d)] is opposite to that given in Supplementary Fig. 2(b). The helicity-unrelated kinetic momentum is inverted [Fig. 4(e)], whereas the helicity-related kinetic momentum remains unchanged [Fig. 4(f)]. Thus, we found that the z-component of the SAM in Supplementary Fig. 3(f) is exactly inverted to that in Supplementary Fig. 3(a). This is a manifestation of the spin-momentum locking of the helicity-independent T-spin. The L-spin present in the y-component of the SAM [Fig. 5(d)] can be determined from a vector analysis based on Eq. (2). The identity of the spins in Fig. 5(b, e) demonstrates that the L-spin is independent of the propagating direction given by the canonical momentum and does not possess the spin-momentum locking property. The result found by subtracting the L-spins from the overall y-component of the SAMs thus yields the properties of the T-spin [Fig. 5(f)]. Moreover, the variation in the colour bar values in Fig. 5(e, f) indicates that the resultant T-spins should contain both helicity-independent and helicity-dependent T-spins because a pure helicity-independent T-spin is reversed exactly when the propagation direction is reversed. From Eq. (3), the helicity-independent y-component of T-spins [Supplementary Fig. 3(c, h)] was generated through the decay of the helicity-unrelated kinetic momentum [Fig. 4(b, e)] along the z-direction and was opposite when reversing the propagating direction of the field. In contrast, the y-component helicity-dependent T-spins [Supplementary Fig. 3(d, i)] are induced by the helicity-related component of kinetic momenta [Fig. 4(c, f)], which, although invariant in the xy-plane, decays in the z-direction. The helicity-dependent T-spins remain unchanged when changing the propagating direction because the helicity-related kinetic momentum remains unchanged.
Furthermore, to illustrate the helicity-dependent property of the EM spins, we considered the interference of two waves exchanging their helical properties [Fig. 4(g)]. In this instance, the direction of the canonical momentum [Supplementary Fig. 2(f)] is similar to that in Supplementary Fig. 2(b) except for a translation in the y-direction. Here, we shifted the calculation region of the SAMs to eliminate the effect of this translation. Compared with the case in Fig. 4(a), the helicity-unrelated kinetic momentum remains unchanged [Fig. 4(h)], whereas the helicity-related kinetic momentum is reversed [Fig. 4(i)]. Thus, the helicity-independent T-spin in Supplementary Fig. 3(k) is the same as that in Supplementary Fig. 3(a), whereas the L-spin in Fig. 5(h) from the vector analysis is inverted to that in Fig. 5(b). By subtracting the L-spins from the y-component of the SAM [Fig. 5(g)], we obtained the T-spin in the y-direction [Fig. 5(i)] as well as the corresponding extracted helicity-independent and helicity-dependent T-spins [Supplementary Fig. 3(m, n)]. Under this circumstance, the helicity-independent T-spin remains unchanged, whereas the helicity-dependent T-spin is reversed. For a clear comparison, we summarized the primary properties of these three types of EM spins in Table 1.
Helicity-dependent transverse spin and Berry curvature
The T-spin is closely related to the Berry curvature of an optical system. For a linearly polarized EM field, the kinetic momentum is expressed as \({{{{{\mathbf{\Pi }}}}}}\propto \left\langle \Psi |i\nabla |\Psi \right\rangle\), with |Ψ〉 representing the potential54. The T-spin is then given by \({{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{t}\propto \nabla \times {{{{{\mathbf{\Pi }}}}}}\propto \left\langle \nabla \Psi |\times i|\nabla \Psi \right\rangle\), which has a similar form to the Berry curvature of the potential2,16,38. Moreover, for a generic EM field, the T-spin determined by ∇ × Π also has a similar structure as the quantum 2-form55 that generates the Berry phase associated with a circuit in real space (Supplementary Note 4). For a linearly polarized EM field, the circulation integral of the Berry curvature defining the geometric phase vanishes, and thus, the helicity-independent T-spin is unrelated to the geometric phase. However, from Eq. 7, the helicity-dependent T-spin is found to be antiparallel to the local wavevector in a general EM field. This is indeed a general property of the helicity-dependent T-spin and widely exists in a generic EM field. Previously, the generation of this inverted helical component was explained based on the evolution of the geometric phase in EM systems2,27. This may reveal that the helicity-dependent T-spin is closely related to the evolution of the geometric phase in EM systems such as focused CP beams (Supplementary Note 5). Based on the former considerations, we formulated four Maxwell-like spin-momentum equations and a Helmholtz-like equation in Supplementary Note 4 that can be utilized to analyse the spin-orbit coupling properties for general EM fields.
Experimental demonstrations of the properties of the EM spins
After establishing the unified spin-based field theory for general EM fields, we can utilize this field theory to construct topological spin quasiparticles. For example, for the linearly polarized surface wave at the air/metal interface, the cylindrically symmetric mode excited by circularly polarized light only possesses azimuthal kinetic momentum, and this kinetic momentum is helicity-unrelated. Therefore, from Eq. (3), the gradient of the azimuthal kinetic momentum in the normal direction leads to the radial SAM, and the gradient of azimuthal kinetic momentum in the radial direction results in the SAM in the normal direction, which is a manifestation of a Néel-type spin skyrmion20. On the other hand, for the focused field of circularly polarized light in free space, there are two kinetic momentum components in the axial and azimuthal directions. The gradient of the axial kinetic momentum in the azimuthal direction is zero due to the cylindrical symmetry of the EM field, and the gradient of the axial kinetic momentum in the radial direction leads to the azimuthal T-spin. Moreover, the gradient of the azimuthal kinetic momentum in the axial direction is zero in the focal plane, and the gradient of azimuthal kinetic momentum in the radial direction leads to an axial T-spin. The combination of this axial T-spin and L-spin constitutes the total SAM component in the axial direction. Overall, the presence of SAMs in the azimuthal and axial directions produces Bloch-type spin skyrmions.
Finally, to validate the above intriguing topological properties of EM spins, we built a scanning imaging system to map the three SAM components for optical spin skyrmions by focused CP light propagating in the x-direction (Supplementary Note 6). Figure 6(a, b) exhibit the theoretical calculated results of Sy and Sz for left-handed circular polarization (LCP) focused light, and the corresponding experimental results are shown in Fig. 6(d, e) (The theoretical and experimental results of the right-handed circular polarization (RCP) can be found in Supplementary Fig. 8). The experimental results match well with the theoretically calculated results and reveal that these two SAM components of a focused field remain unchanged when the incident light is converted from LCP to RCP. These results correspond to the helicity-independent T-spin. Moreover, through the coordinate transformation, we can find that the combination of Sy and Sz results in the azimuthal SAM Sφ (the small radial SAM component originates from the experimental errors). On the other hand, Fig. 6(c) exhibit the theoretically calculated result of the axial SAM for focused LCP light and the corresponding experimental result is given by Fig. 6(f) (The theoretical and experimental results of the right-handed circular polarization (RCP) can be found in Supplementary Fig. 11). From the experimental results, we observed that the x-component SAMs are helicity-dependent and inverted when the incident light is converted from LCP to RCP. As analysed above, the x-components of SAM contain both L-spins and helicity-dependent T-spins. From the experimental results, we can find that the azimuthal and axial SAM densities exist in the focusing field, which is a manifestation of Bloch-type spin skyrmions. In addition, by further considering the reversal of the propagation direction, four momentum-locked T-spin states are found in the focused CP light systems, which is consistent with the nontrivial spin Chern number of an optical wave packet and reveals that these T spins possess ℤ4 topological invariance13,17.
Discussions and conclusions
To summarize, we derived a unified theory that involves the decomposition of EM spin and uncovered the underlying physical difference between T-spins and L-spins. L-spins are determined by the EM helicity, but coupling effects need to be considered. However, T-spins originate from the spatial inhomogeneity of the kinetic momentum density and undergo universal spin-momentum locking. Here, we emphasize that the T-spin is locked with the kinetic momentum rather than with the canonical momentum given by the mean wavevector. Indeed, T-spins can be oriented parallel to the mean wavevector. Furthermore, T-spins decompose into helicity-independent and helicity-dependent components, which are determined separately by the vorticities of a helicity-unrelated and a helicity-related kinetic momentum. Thus, four spin-momentum locking states exist, with the number being consistent with the nontrivial topological spin Chern number. Moreover, the T-spin bearing the curl-relationship with the kinetic momentum is closely related to the Berry curvature of an EM system. Specifically, the helicity-dependent T-spin, which is associated with the inverted helical component, can be explained based on the evolution of the geometric phase in EM systems.
The spin angular momentum density of the EM field given in Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) can be considered the local behaviour of many photons. To understand the global behaviour of photons, we employed the integral of the spin angular momentum density on the two-dimensional transverse plane. Regarding physical reality, the EM field is bounded (decaying to zero at infinity), and the integral of T-spin on the transverse plane is
The integral of L-spin on the transverse plane is
Here, \({\iint }_{\infty }\frac{{W}_{i}}{\hslash \omega }{d}^{2}{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}_{\perp }\) is evaluated to obtain the number of photons. \({{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}_{\perp }\) represents the coordinates in the transverse plane, and the integral boundary of the transverse plane is infinite. Therefore, although the photons suffer from spin-orbit couplings, the integral properties of photons remain unchanged in a homogeneous space.
Our theory has an interdisciplinary impact and is extendible to other classical wave fields. For example, the spin-momentum locking relationship of the longitudinal acoustic wave (identified with Subscript A) can be expressed as \({{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}}={{{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\times }}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\Pi }}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}}/{k}_{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}}^{2}\)15\(,\) where SA and ΠA are the total SAM and kinetic momentum of a monochromatic time-harmonic acoustic wave, respectively. Now, we demonstrate that for a deep-water gravity wave (identified with Subscript G)6, a similar spin-momentum relationship \({{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}={{\nabla }_{2}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\times }}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\Pi }}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}/2{k}_{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}^{2}\) is valid. This relation reveals that the SAM of a surface water wave is locked with the kinetic momentum and obeys the right-hand rule and that the total SAM may be considered the T-spin. Here, SG and ΠG are the total SAM and kinetic momentum, respectively, of monochromatic time-harmonic gravity water waves; \({\nabla }_{2}=({\partial }_{x},{\partial }_{y})\); \({\omega }_{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}^{2}=g{k}_{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}\) with ωG and kG being the angular frequency and wavenumber of the water wave; and g denotes the gravitational acceleration. We note that longitudinal spin is absent because longitudinal acoustic waves (σA = 0) and surface water waves (σG = 0) can be considered spin-0 phonons. These results reveal the physical origins and topological properties of spin in diverse classical wave fields and illuminate the universality of spin-momentum locking. They motivate explorations of field theory based on spin degrees of freedom and constructions of chiral spin textures56,57. For a clear comparison, we summarized the primary dynamic properties of diverse types of wave fields in Table 2.
For applications, this spin-momentum locking property of T-spin in a generic EM field can be utilized to construct diverse photonic topological spin structures, such as Néel-type skyrmions in confined EM fields and Bloch-type skyrmions in free space. Moreover, we performed numerical simulations (Supplementary Note 7) to demonstrate the properties of momentum-locked transverse optical forces by considering the interactions between metallic helical nanostructures and Bloch-type skyrmions in free space. These simulations suggest further applications in chiral sorting using photonic topological spin structures. Overall, the findings reveal a unified field theory to describe the spin–orbit coupling of light based on the spin degrees of freedom and wave–matter interactions in interdisciplinary research and motivate explorations of applications in optical manipulation, chiral quantum optics, and electronics58,59.
Methods
Experimental details
The experimental setup for mapping the SAM components perpendicular to the optical axis (Supplementary Fig. 6) comprises an incident beam (wavelength: 632.8 nm) that is tightly focused by an objective lens (Olympus, NA = 0.5, 50×) onto a PS nanoparticle (diameter: 201 nm) sitting on a silver film (thickness: 45 nm). The focusing field and the scattering field of the PS particle (the far-field radiation field and part of the near-field evanescent field) radiate downward by coupling with the silver film. The signal was collected by an oil-immersed objective lens (Olympus, NA = 1.49, 100×). Using a high-precision piezo-stage (Physik Instrumente, P-545), we moved the PS particle through the focal plane of the tightly focused beam. Each time the position is moved, the back focal plane intensity (far-field intensity) distribution is imaged using a four-quadrant detector. From dipole theory and similar techniques described in Ref. 13, the transverse components of the SAM density can be reconstructed.
The setup of the tip-fibre-based measurement system that maps the SAM component parallel to the optical axis (Supplementary Fig. 9) comprises a He–Ne laser (operating wavelength: 632.8 nm) used as a light source. The light beam is expanded and collimated via a telescope system and then passed through a linear polarizer (LP) and a quarter wave plate (QWP) to produce the desired LCP or RCP light. The beam is then focused using an objective lens (Olympus, NA 0.7, 60×) onto a silica coverslip for further image scanning by a self-assembly near-field scanning optical microscopic system. The system’s probe has a nanohole and is controlled using a tuning fork feedback system for mapping the in-plane field distributions of the focused beams. The near-field signal, which couples via the nanohole to the fibre, is split and then analysed using a combination of QWP and LP to extract the individual circular polarization components of the signal (ILCP: LCP component and IRCP: RCP component). These components are then directed to two photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) to measure the intensity of the two signals. This then enables a quantification of the out-of-plane SAM component (i.e., along the optical axis) of the focused beams using the relation
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Fert, A. Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1517–1530 (2004).
Bliokh, K. Y., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F. & Zayats, A. V. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nat. Photon 9, 796–808 (2015).
Yuan, W. et al. Observation of elastic spin with chiral meta-sources. Nat. Commun. 12, 6954 (2021).
Wang, S. et al. Spin-orbit interactions of transverse sound. Nat. Commun. 12, 6125 (2021).
Long, Y., Ren, J. & Chen, H. Intrinsic spin of elastic waves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9951–9955 (2018).
Bliokh, K. Y., Punzmann, H., Xia, H., Nori, F. & Shats, M. Field theory spin and momentum in water waves. Sci. Adv. 8, abm1295 (2022).
Xin, S., Long, Y. & Ren, J. Spin angular momentum of gravitational wave interference. N. J. Phys. 23, 043035 (2021).
Aiello, A., Banzer, P., Neugebauer, M. & Leuchs, G. From transverse angular momentum to photonic wheels. Nat. Photon. 9, 789–795 (2015).
Neugebauer, M., Bauer, T., Aiello, A. & Banzer, P. Measuring the transverse spin density of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 063901 (2015).
Neugebauer, M., Eismann, J. S., Bauer, T. & Banzer, P. Magnetic and electric transverse spin density of spatially confined light. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021042 (2018).
Bekshaev, A. Y., Bliokh, K. Y. & Nori, F. Transverse spin and momentum in two-wave interference. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011039 (2015).
Bliokh, K. Y., Bekshaev, A. & Nori, F. Extraordinary momentum and spin in evanescent waves. Nat. Commun. 5, 3300 (2014).
Bliokh, K. Y., Smirnova, D. & Nori, F. Quantum spin Hall effect of light. Science 348, 1448–1451 (2015).
Van Mechelan, T. & Jacob, Z. Universal spin-momentum locking of evanescent waves. Optica 3, 118–126 (2016).
Shi, P., Du, L. & Yuan, X. Strong spin–orbit interaction of photonic skyrmions at the general optical interface. Nanophotonics 9, 4619–4628 (2020).
Shi, P. et al. Intrinsic spin-momentum dynamics of surface electromagnetic waves in dispersive interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 218904 (2022).
Shi, P., Du, L., Li, C., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Transverse spin dynamics in structured electromagnetic guided waves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018816118 (2021).
Shen, Y. et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 90 (2019).
Eismann, J. S. et al. Transverse spinning of unpolarized light. Nat. Photon. 15, 156–161 (2020).
Dai, Y. et al. Plasmonic topological quasiparticle on the nanometre and femtosecond scales. Nature 588, 616–619 (2020).
Du, L., Yang, A., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Phys. 15, 650–654 (2019).
Tsesses, S., Cohen, K., Ostrovsky, E., Gjonaj, B. & Bartal, G. Spin–orbit interaction of light in plasmonic lattices. Nano Lett. 19, 4010–4016 (2019).
Lei, X. et al. Photonic spin lattices: symmetry constraints for skyrmion and meron topologies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 237403 (2021).
Ghosh, A. et al. A topological lattice of plasmonic merons. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041413 (2021).
Dai, Y. et al. Ultrafast microscopy of a twisted plasmonic spin skyrmion. Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011420 (2022).
Shi, P., Du, L. & Yuan, X. Spin photonics: from transverse spin to photonic skyrmions. Nanophotonics 10, 3927–3943 (2021).
Shi, P. et al. Optical near-field measurement for spin-orbit interaction of light. Prog. Quantum Electron. 78, 100341 (2021).
Bliokh, K. Y. & Nori, F. Transverse and longitudinal angular momenta of light. Phys. Rep. 592, 1–38 (2015).
Antognozzi, M. et al. Direct measurements of the extraordinary optical momentum and transverse spin-dependent force using a nano-cantilever. Nat. Phys. 12, 731–735 (2016).
Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J. et al. Near-field interference for the unidirectional excitation of electromagnetic guided modes. Science 340, 328–330 (2013).
Petersen, J., Volz, J. & Rauschenbeutel, A. Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light. Science 346, 67–71 (2014).
Söllner, I. et al. Deterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 775–778 (2015).
Guo, Z., Long, Y., Jiang, H., Ren, J. & Chen, H. Anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes using all-electric metasources. Adv. Photon. 3, 036001 (2021).
Araneda, G. et al. Wavelength-scale errors in optical localization due to spin–orbit coupling of light. Nat. Phys. 15, 17–21 (2019).
Zhou, J. et al. Metasurface enabled quantum edge detection. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc4385 (2020).
Zhou, J. et al. Optical edge detection based on high-efficiency dielectric metasurface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11137–11140 (2019).
Yang, A. et al. Spin-manipulated photonic skyrmion-pair for pico-metric displacement sensing. Adv. Sci. 10, 2205249 (2023).
Lei, X., Du, L., Yuan, X. & Zayats, A. V. Optical spin–orbit coupling in the presence of magnetization: photonic skyrmion interaction with magnetic domains. Nanophotonics 10, 3667–3675 (2021).
Lodahl, P. et al. Chiral quantum optics. Nature 541, 473–480 (2017).
Forbes, A., de Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light. Nat. Photon. 15, 253–262 (2021).
Sakurai, J. J. Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, CA, 1994).
Alpeggiani, F., Bliokh, K. Y., Nori, F. & Kuipers, L. Electromagnetic helicity in complex media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243605 (2018).
Bliokh, K. Y., Bekshaev, A. Y. & Nori, F. Optical momentum, spin, and angular momentum in dispersive media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 073901 (2017).
Kemp, B. A. Resolution of the Abraham-Minkowski debate: Implications for the electromagnetic wave theory of light in matter. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 111101 (2011).
Pfeifer, RobertN. C., Nieminen, T. A., Heckenberg, N. R. & Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H. Colloquium: Momentum of an electromagnetic wave in dielectric media. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1197–1216 (2007).
Berry, M. V. Optical currents. J. Opt. Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 094001 (2009).
Shi, P., Du, L., Li, M. & Yuan, X. Symmetry-protected photonic chiral spin textures by spin–orbit coupling. Laser Photonics Rev. 15, 2000554 (2021).
Li, M. et al. Orbit-induced localized spin angular momentum in strong focusing of optical vectorial vortex beams. Phys. Rev. A 97, 053842 (2018).
Yu, P., Zhao, Q., Hu, X., Li, Y. & Gong, L. Orbit-induced localized spin angular momentum in the tight focusing of linearly polarized vortex beams. Opt. Lett. 43, 5677–5680 (2018).
Forbes, K. A. & Jones, G. A. Measures of helicity and chirality of optical vortex beams. J. Opt. 23, 115401 (2021).
Barnett, S. M., Cameron, R. P. & Yao, A. M. Duplex symmetry and its relation to the conservation of optical helicity. Phys. Rev. A 86, 013845 (2012).
Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
Fernandez-Corbaton, I. et al. Electromagnetic duality symmetry and helicity conservation for the macroscopic Maxwell’s equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 060401 (2013).
Wolf, E. A scalar representation of electromagnetic fields: II. Proc. Phys. Soc. 74, 269–280 (1959).
Berry, M. V. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. A 392, 45–57 (1984).
Muelas-Hurtado, R. D. et al. Observation of polarization singularities and topological textures in sound waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 1–6 (2022).
Ge, H. et al. Observation of acoustic skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 144502 (2021).
Ni, J. et al. Gigantic vortical differential scattering as amonochromatic probe for multiscale chiral structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e20200551 (2021).
Chen, Y. et al. Multidimensional nanoscopic chiroptics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 113 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by the Guangdong Major Project of Basic Research grant 2020B0301030009, the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 12174266, 92250304, 61935013, 62075139, 61427819, 61622504, the Leadership of Guangdong province programme grant 00201505, and the Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen grants JCYJ20200109114018750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.S. conceived the concept, performed the theory. A.Y. and X.Yi. performed the experiments. P.S. L.D. and X.L. analyzed the data and wrote the draft. P.S., L.D. and X.Yu. revised the draft and supervised the work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks Sebastian Golat, Hadiseh Alaeian and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, P., Du, L., Yang, A. et al. Dynamical and topological properties of the spin angular momenta in general electromagnetic fields. Commun Phys 6, 283 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01374-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01374-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
A decomposition of light’s spin angular momentum density
Light: Science & Applications (2024)