Abstract
Nitrous acid (HONO) is the major precursor of hydroxyl (OH) radicals to initiate tropospheric chemistry leading to formation of secondary pollutants. The sources of atmospheric HONO, however, are not fully understood. Here we show two additional HONO sources that stem from atmospheric oxidation of nitrogen oxide (NOx = NO + NO2). Nitric acid (HNO3) formed from photooxidation of NO2 can be converted into HONO with a yield of ~53%, and dark NO oxidation by NO3 radicals in the presence of H2O produces HONO with a yield of 2%. The diurnal variations of HONO levels from field observations in the urban (Beijing) and rural (Wangdu) areas of the North China Plain can be well reproduced by the WRF-Chem model when the two new HONO sources are taken into account. The findings imply that atmospheric NOx oxidation pathways are the major sources for HONO, which can significantly accelerate ozone formation in polluted regions as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Atmospheric nitrous acid (HONO) can be quickly photolyzed to produce hydroxyl (OH) radicals under weak sunlight irradiation in the early morning, and thus it has long been recognized as the initiator for triggering daytime atmospheric chemistry in the lower atmosphere1. A large number of studies further reveal that daytime HONO over polluted areas also acts as the major or even dominant source for OH radicals, accounting for 20–90% of the total OH primary production2,3. However, the sources of HONO were not fully understood, e.g., there exist a large missing HONO source in daytime based on the field measurements4,5,6. To explain the missing source of daytime HONO, several potential HONO sources have been proposed, including the photo-enhanced reduction of NO2 by organic materials7,8,9, the photolysis of adsorbed nitric acid (HNO3) or particulate nitrate10,11,12,13, soil emission through biogenic production14,15, displacement of strong acids on soil surface16,17, the reaction of excited gaseous NO2 with water18,19, the photolysis of nitrophenols20,21, and the reaction of HO2·H2O complexes with NO222. Among the proposed HONO sources, the photo-enhanced reduction of NO2 by organic materials on ground surface is commonly considered as the dominant HONO source in daytime2,23. Nevertheless, there are still large gaps in daytime HONO levels between the observations and model simulations after the proposed HONO sources are taken into consideration4,24,25.
Considering that NOx (NO and NO2) is the predominant precursor for HONO formation26,27, the unknown HONO sources might be related to some additional NOx reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to further investigate the possible HONO formation from the atmospheric oxidation of NOx. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted in a smog chamber to reveal the possible HONO formation channels from photo- and dark-oxidation of NOx. Finally, the contributions of the potentially proposed mechanisms to atmospheric HONO and O3 were also assessed by the Weather Research and Forecasting coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) model.
Results and discussion
HONO formation from photooxidation of NOx
The variations of HONO and the key species (NO, NO2 and O3) in six gas mixtures of NOx under both dark and light conditions are illustrated in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1, respectively. Before the irradiation, HONO concentration in each mixture was relatively stable within the one-hour duration (Fig. 1), implying the heterogeneous reactions of NOx on the inherent chamber wall made ignorable contribution to HONO production. The relatively high initial HONO concentrations (0.7–1.7 ppb) in the chamber were mainly ascribed to HONO formation from heterogeneous reactions of the standard gases (NO2 and NO) in the cylinders, e.g., HONO concentration in the chamber could be reduced by 85.6% when the same amount of NO2 standard gas was introduced into the chamber through a tube filled with and without particulate sodium hydrate. In contrast to the relatively stable HONO concentration before the irradiation, HONO levels displayed evidently increasing trends after stopping the irradiation (Fig. 1), indicating that the photochemical products formed during the irradiation were involved in the dark HONO formation. During the irradiation, HONO levels in all the mixtures initially displayed quickly decreasing trends due to HONO photolysis. Subsequently, HONO levels became relatively stable in the mixtures of NOx + air and NO2 + O2, whereas they exhibited remarkably increasing trend in the mixture of NO2 + N2 after a period of irradiation (Fig. 1a). Additionally, there was significant difference in HONO levels between the two air mixtures of 300 ppb NO2 + 200 ppb NO with and without the existence of H2O during the irradiation although their initial HONO concentrations were almost identical (Fig. 1b).
To explore the reasons for the distinct difference in HONO variations among the irradiated mixtures, HONO loss and formation rates in each mixture were analyzed based on the key reactions (Eqs. 1–3) that are often considered as the basis for judging the daytime unknown HONO sources in many areas6. JHONO was calculated to be about 1.0 × 10–3 s−1 according to the first-order decay law of HONO in the chamber (See Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 2), and the levels of OH radicals were estimated based on the assumption that OH radicals in the irradiated mixtures were in a steady state through Eqs. 1–428,29 (See Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 3).
As shown in Fig. 2, HONO loss rates via Eqs. 1 and 3 were evidently faster than its formation rate through Eq. 2 in all the mixtures during the irradiation. Obviously, besides Eq. 2, there existed unknown HONO sources to account for the nondecreasing HONO levels in the mixtures of NOx + air, NO2 + O2 and NO2 + N2 during the irradiation (Fig. 1a). The unknown HONO formation rates were calculated according to the following equation (Eq. 5), which showed distinct differences among the irradiated mixtures (Fig. 2).
Additionally, the higher ratio of NO to NO2 during the irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 1) significantly increased HONO formation through the reaction of NO with OH radicals, but evidently suppressed the unknown HONO formation rates (Fig. 2).
As the smog chamber is made of inert Teflon film without conducting any experiments in the presence of organic compounds, the photo-enhanced reduction of NO2 by organic materials7,8,9 could be excluded for the unknown HONO sources in the irradiated mixtures. Although the heterogeneous NO2 conversion on the Teflon surface in the presence of H2O could also contribute to HONO30,31, its reaction rate was too slow to explain the unknown HONO sources due to no photo-enhancement in the kinetics of the reaction32,33. The possible HONO formation through reaction of HO2·H2O complexes with NO222 could be also excluded because HO2 formation rates through reaction of OH with O3 (See Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 4) were at least 2 orders of magnitude slower than the unknown HONO formation rates in the irradiated mixtures (Fig. 2). The quantum yield for ground state oxygen atom (O3P) and NO from photolysis of NO2 is unity under <400 nm ultraviolet irradiation34, and thus HONO formation through the reaction of excited NO2 with water18,19 might be negligible in the irradiated mixtures because the black-light lamps used for the irradiation mainly emit 330–400 nm ultraviolet with the central wavelength of 365 nm (Supplementary Fig. 5). Considering the evident increase of HNO3 levels formed through Eq. 4 in the mixtures of NOx during the irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 6), the unknown HONO formation in the irradiated mixtures was suspected to be related to the reactions involving in HNO3. The above speculation could be supported by the significantly linear correlation (R2 = 0.99) between the average unknown HONO formation rates and the HNO3 formation rates for the five mixtures with the same H2O concentration (~207 ppm) (Fig. 3). It should be noted that the data point for the mixture of NO2 + NO without the existence of H2O was found to evidently deviate from the linear correlation (Fig. 3), implying that H2O is also involved in HONO formation through the reactions associated with HNO3. In addition, less HNO3 formation could be expected for the irradiated mixtures with increasing the NO/NO2 ratio (Supplementary Fig. 1) due to the competition reactions of NO and NO2 with OH radicals, resulting in evident decrease of the unknown HONO formation rates (Fig. 2).
Based on the above photooxidation experiments in the presence of H2O, the unknown HONO formation rate (ppb s−1) associated with HNO3 formation rate (ppb s−1) (Fig. 3) could be overall expressed as:
It should be noted that the interception of 1.2 × 10–4 in Fig. 3 was the average unknown HONO formation rate (ppb s−1) when the average HNO3 formation rate was zero, indicating that there still existed the unknown HONO sources other than the reactions related to HNO3, e.g., the potential contribution from the gas-phase reaction of NO with OH radicals produced from blank Teflon chambers under ultraviolet irradiation35 to HONO.
Although photolysis of adsorbed HNO3 (HNO3(ad)) (Eq. 7) has been proposed to be an important source for atmospheric HONO, it might be negligible in the irradiated mixtures because it usually occurs under the irradiation with wavelengths less than 320 nm11. Considering the relatively fast increase of HONO levels for the irradiated mixtures with relatively high NO concentrations just after turning off the UV lamps (Fig. 1), the possible reaction of NO with HNO3 was suspected to contribute to HONO formation. Therefore, the possible HONO formation from the reaction of NO with HNO3(ad) was further investigated in the chamber by using long path absorption photometer (LOPAP) for HONO measurement under dark condition. As shown in Fig. 4a, b, the HONO concentration quickly increased from zero to about 50 ppt after adding 100 ppb NO into the chamber containing the purified air, whereas HONO concentration kept zero when the same amount of NO was introduced into the chamber containing the air mixture in the presence of 6 ppm HNO3 and 200 ppm H2O. The high HNO3 concentration could greatly reduce HONO absorption efficiency in the stripping coil of the LOPAP due to decrease of pH in the absorption solution, which might mask the possible HONO formation in the chamber. As expected, HONO concentration sharply increased from zero to more than 3 ppb when the same amount of NO was introduced into the chamber that has been exposed to 6 ppm HNO3 and 200 ppm H2O for one week and then cleaned with the purified air for four times (Fig. 4c, the green data points). The HONO concentration could still increase from zero to ~500 ppt for the second introduction of NO after the chamber being cleaned again (Fig. 4c, the blue data points), which was at least a factor of 5 higher than that of the chamber experiment with NO addition before introducing HNO3 (Fig. 4a). Because the gas phase reaction of NO with HNO3 is extremely slow36 and a certain amount of HNO3 might be absorbed on the chamber wall after the exposure of the high HNO3 concentration due to its viscosity, the HONO formation might be from the heterogeneous reaction of NO with HNO3(ad) (Eq. 8) on the chamber wall.
Based on the quick increase of HONO concentration just after addition of NO for the chamber experiments, the heterogeneous reaction of NO with HNO3(ad) might be very fast. The HNO3(ad) on the chamber wall might be in multiple layers and only the HNO3(ad) at the uppermost layer could be involved in HONO formation, resulting in the stable HONO level after its pulse increase owing to the quick termination of the heterogeneous reaction with depleting the HNO3(ad) at the uppermost layer. The HNO3(ad) at the inner layers could be exposed again to the surface layer after cleaning the chamber by the purified air, explaining the significant increase of HONO level for the second experiment with NO addition. As for the irradiated gas mixtures of NOx, the continuous HNO3 formation through the photochemical reaction of NO2 with OH could guarantee that the fresh HNO3(ad) on the wall surface was always exposed to NO, resulting in the high HONO yield (~53%) from the HNO3 conversion through the heterogeneous reaction (Eq. 8).
HONO formation through the heterogeneous reaction of NO with HNO3(ad) on particles has also been proposed to account for significant overestimation of [HNO3]/[NOx] ratio by photochemical models in comparison with measurements performed in the free troposphere37 and over the boundary layer of polluted urban atmospheres38. Quick increase of HONO levels was also observed after exposing NO to the HNO3(ad) on soot by a previous study in a low-pressure flow reactor (Knudsen cell)39. Based on a small quantity of HNO3(ad) consumption in the presence of NO, the heterogeneous reaction (Eq. 8) was considered as a slow reaction by the above study39. However, the heterogeneous reaction rate might be largely underestimated because of the multiple layers of HNO3(ad) on the soot.
HONO formation from dark-oxidation of NOx
The dark-oxidation of NOx by O3 can also produce HNO3 through Eqs. 9–1229, and thus HONO formation is also expected to occur during the dark-oxidation process. To verify the conjecture, a series of chamber experiments under dark condition were conducted by continuously introducing the NO standard gas (403 ppm in N2) at a fixed flow rate of 20 mL min−1 (2.7 ppb min−1 equally) into air mixtures with different initial O3 concentrations (0, ~100, ~220, and ~280 ppb). As shown in Fig. 5a, HONO levels were almost identical in the air mixtures with initial O3 concentrations of 0 ppb and ~100 ppb during the entire period, whereas they significantly increased in the air mixtures with initial O3 concentrations of ~220 ppb and ~280 ppb after introducing NO.
Although dark reactions (Eqs. 9–14) can occur in all the air mixtures, the reaction extent largely depends on the initial O3 concentrations. For the air mixture with initial O3 concentration of ~100 ppb, O3 was mainly consumed by reaction with NO (Eq. 9), which suppressed NO3 formation from the reaction of O3 with NO2 (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8), resulting in negligible N2O5 accumulation (Fig. 5b). As for the air mixtures with higher initial O3 concentrations, the reaction of O3 with NO2 (Eq. 10) was significantly accelerated because of their relatively high concentrations during introduction of NO (Supplementary Fig. 7c and d), leading to remarkable formation of NO3 (Supplementary Fig. 8) and evident accumulation of N2O5 (Fig. 5b). The quick decrease of N2O5 levels after their peak values in the two mixtures with high initial O3 concentrations were attributed to the reaction of NO with NO3 which suppressed N2O5 formation rate through Eq. 11 and accelerated N2O5 consumption rate through Eq. 13. More HNO3 could be formed with increasing N2O5 levels in the chamber because of the heterogeneous reaction of N2O5 with the absorbed H2O on the chamber wall (Eq. 12). The evidently faster increase of HONO levels with increasing the initial O3 concentrations (Fig. 5a) further indicated that HONO formation was possibly associated with the forementioned heterogeneous reaction involving in HNO3. Compared with the period after depletion of N2O5, the increase of HONO level was evidently faster during the period when obvious N2O5 was present (Fig. 5a, b), implying that other reactions besides Eq. 8 might also make contribution to HONO formation.
The reaction of NO3 with NO was suspected to produce HONO because NO3 concentration was relatively high during the period in the presence of N2O5 (Supplementary Fig. 7). To certify the suspicion, dark experiments were further conducted by introducing NO into air mixtures of N2O5 (See Supplementary Methods). The variations of HONO and N2O5 levels in the air mixture are shown in Fig. 5c and those of NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 9. As shown in Fig. 5c, after introducing NO into the chamber, the abrupt increase of HONO level was well accompanied with quick decrease of N2O5 concentration. Additionally, the increase of HONO level displayed a turning point when N2O5 concentration approached zero. Due to small O3 concentration in the air mixture of N2O5 before introducing NO (Supplementary Fig. 9), the introduced NO mainly reacted with NO3 leading to fast decrease of N2O5 and quick increase of NO2 through Eqs. 13–14. Based on the significantly linear correlation (R2 = 0.997) between the increment of HONO and the decrease of N2O5 with the slope of 0.02 (Supplementary Fig. 10), HONO yield of ~2% could be obtained due to NO3 consumption.
To account for the above phenomenon, the reaction (Eq. 15) was proposed.
The proposed reaction (Eq. 15) was verified to be feasible through Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations (See Supplementary Methods), which is barrierless in comparison with the extremely higher energy barrier for the reaction of NO3 with H2O (Fig. 5d).
Atmospheric implication
Atmospheric NOx could also experience the same oxidation processes as the cases of the simulation in the chamber, and hence the unknown HONO sources identified through the chamber experiments are also expected to occur in the real atmosphere. To assess the contribution of atmospheric NOx oxidation to HONO, atmospheric HONO levels at two sampling sites of a rural area (Station of Rural Environment, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, SRE-RCEES40,41,42) and Beijing city (Institute of Atmospheric Physics, IAP43) in the NCP were simulated by the WRF-Chem model with incorporation of the two HONO formation pathways identified in this study (See Supplementary Methods).
For the scenarios BASE (only considering the gas-phase HONO formation) and E (BASE plus direct HONO emissions), the simulated HONO levels were about one order of magnitude lower than the observed values (Fig. 6), which was in agreement with previous modeling results44,45. The simulation was significantly improved after further considering the major highlighted HONO sources for the scenario EPLA (E plus the photolysis of particulate nitrate, and the (photo-enhanced) heterogeneous reactions of NO2 on land and aerosol surfaces), but the simulated daytime HONO levels were only about half of the observed values. The scenario ELAN1 (E plus the heterogeneous reactions of NO2 on land and aerosol surfaces, and the NOx photooxidation in daytime) could well reproduce the daytime HONO levels even if the photo-enhanced heterogeneous reactions of NO2 and the photolysis of particulate nitrate were not taken into consideration, implying the significant role of the NOx photooxidation in HONO formation over the polluted areas. Additionally, the HONO formation from the reaction of NO3 with NO also made great contribution to nighttime HONO, as shown in Fig. 6 for the scenario ELAN1N2 (ELAN1 plus NO oxidation by NO3 in nighttime).
Many field studies reported that the daytime missing HONO sources showed significant correlations with the product of NO2 photolysis rate coefficient (JNO2) and NO2 concentration (CNO2), and thus photo-enhanced reductions of NO2 on the surfaces of aerosols and ground were proposed to be the major source of daytime HONO6,46. As the diurnal variation of JNO2 is in line with OH concentration (COH) at ground level47, the daytime missing HONO sources could also be expected to significantly correlate with the product of k4 × COH × CNO2, namely HNO3 formation rates. The photo-enhanced conversion of NO2 to HONO identified in the flow tube experiments7,8 might also be partially viewed as the contribution from the forementioned heterogeneous reaction associated with HNO3 because HNO3 could be formed through reactions of NOx with HOx (OH + HO2) radicals that are recently found to be produced by irradiating atmospheric particles48,49 and organic mixtures50.
Compared with the scenario BASE, the simulated O3 levels by the scenario ELAN1N2 had noticeable enhancements (~38.4%) and were in good agreement with the observations at multiple monitoring stations across the NCP (Supplementary Fig. 11), implying the additional HONO sources over the NCP could play an important role in the regional O3 formation. Therefore, HONO formation from atmospheric oxidation of NOx should be taken into consideration for formulating O3 control strategies in polluted areas.
Methods
Smog chamber experiments
The experiments were conducted in a 3-m3 collapsible Teflon environmental chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, which was irradiated by 63 black-light lamps with a central wavelength of 365 nm (Supplementary Fig. 5). Detailed information for the chamber was described in our previous studies51,52. The buffer gas (ultrapure N2, ultrapure O2 or synthetic air with the purity of ≥ 99.999 %) was introduced into the chamber at a flow rate of 70 L/min through a mass flow controller (Beijing Sevenstar Electronic Technology Co. Ltd., China). To achieve the target concentrations for each mixture, NOx obtained from the standard gases (584 ppm NO in N2 and 591 ppm NO2 in N2) and O3 generated by an electrical discharge generator were directly introduced into the chamber with glass syringes. Additionally, water vapor was introduced into the chamber through bubbling a bubbler containing ultrapure water by 3 L/min N2. Before each experiment, the chamber was flushed at least 3 times with the ultrapure N2 to avoid possible interfering substances in the chamber.
NOx (NO and NO2) and O3 were measured by the NOx and O3 analyzers (Model 42i and 49i, Thermo-fisher Scientific Inc, USA), respectively. HONO, HNO3 and N2O5 were measured based on a wet chemical method53. In brief, they were absorbed by a stripping coil with 25 μM sodium carbonate solution. The gas and liquid flow rates were set to be 2 L min−1 and 0.25 mL min−1, respectively. After sampling, NO2− and NO3− in the absorption solution were measured by an ion chromatography54,55 (IC, WAYEAL IC6200, China). The wet chemical method for HONO and HNO3 measurement has been systematically evaluated and widely used in the previous studies11,53,56. It should be mentioned that the measured NO3− in the absorption solution represented the sum of HNO3 and N2O5 levels. Considering that N2O5 formation can be obviously suppressed when NO levels began to accumulate in the chamber, the measured NO3− in the absorption solution with the existence of excess NO should be attributed to HNO3 which had been formed from hydrolysis of N2O5 on the chamber wall. N2O5 concentrations before introduction of NO were roughly calculated by subtracting HNO3 concentration from the sum NO3- concentration in the absorption solution collected from the chamber.
WRF-Chem configuration
The WRF-Chem model (ver. 4.0.3)57 was adopted to explore the relative contributions of various HONO sources to atmospheric HONO. Carbon Bond Mechanism version-Z (CBMZ) scheme58 coupled with the 4-bin sectional Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) scheme59 were used as the gas and aerosol chemical mechanisms in the model, respectively. The anthropogenic emission data were obtained from the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China with base year of 2017 (MEIC-2017) with a resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° (http://www.meicmodel.org/)60. The biogenic emissions were estimated online by the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN v2.1)61.
The major HONO sources, including the direct emission, the heterogeneous reactions and the photo-enhanced reductions of NO2 on aerosol and ground surfaces, and the photolysis of particulate nitrate, were incorporated into the emission module and MOSAIC chemical mechanism in WRF-Chem model, respectively. The new HONO sources identified by this study were added into MOSAIC chemical mechanism and CBMZ chemical mechanism, respectively. Other WRF-Chem configurations adopted in this study were listed in Supplementary Table 2. The simulations were performed from 1st to 22nd June 2017 with 7-day spin-up period on a domain covering the North China Plain (NCP), centered at 39.5 °N, 114.8 °E, with 9 km horizontal resolution, 223 × 202 grid cells, and 30 vertical levels from the ground level of 17 m to the maximum pressure of 50 hPa. For more details, see Supplementary Methods.
Data availability
Raw data used in this study are archived at Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy Sciences, and are available on request by contacting the corresponding authors (pfliu@rcees.ac.cn; yjmu@rcees.ac.cn).
References
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. Atmospheric Chemistry: Fundamentals and Experimental Techniques (Wiley, 1986).
Xue, C. et al. HONO budget and its role in nitrate formation in the rural North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 11048–11057 (2020).
Kim, S. et al. The primary and recycling sources of OH during the NACHTT‐2011 campaign: HONO as an important OH primary source in the wintertime. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 119, 6886–6896 (2014).
Lee, J. et al. Detailed budget analysis of HONO in central London reveals a missing daytime source. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 2747–2764 (2016).
Kleffmann, J. et al. Measured and simulated vertical profiles of nitrous acid-Part I: field measurements. Atmos. Environ. 37, 2949–2955 (2003).
Su, H. et al. Nitrous acid (HONO) and its daytime sources at a rural site during the 2004 PRIDE‐PRD experiment in China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 113, D14312 (2008).
George, C., Strekowski, R., Kleffmann, J., Stemmler, K. & Ammann, M. Photoenhanced uptake of gaseous NO2 on solid organic compounds: a photochemical source of HONO? Faraday Discuss 130, 195–210 (2005).
Stemmler, K., Ammann, M., Donders, C., Kleffmann, J. & George, C. Photosensitized reduction of nitrogen dioxide on humic acid as a source of nitrous acid. Nature 440, 195–198 (2006).
Han, C., Yang, W., Wu, Q., Yang, H. & Xue, X. Heterogeneous photochemical conversion of NO2 to HONO on the humic acid surface under simulated sunlight. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 5017–5023 (2016).
Zhou, X. et al. Nitric acid photolysis on forest canopy surface as a source for tropospheric nitrous acid. Nat. Geosci. 4, 440–443 (2011).
Laufs, S. & Kleffmann, J. Investigations on HONO formation from photolysis of adsorbed HNO3 on quartz glass surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 9616–9625 (2016).
Ye, C., Gao, H., Zhang, N. & Zhou, X. Photolysis of nitric acid and nitrate on natural and artificial surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3530–3536 (2016).
Bao, F., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, C. & Zhao, J. Photochemical aging of Beijing urban PM2.5: HONO production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 6309–6316 (2018).
Su, H. et al. Soil nitrite as a source of atmospheric HONO and OH radicals. Science 333, 1616–1618 (2011).
Oswald, R. et al. HONO emissions from soil bacteria as a major source of atmospheric reactive nitrogen. Science 341, 1233–1235 (2013).
VandenBoer, T. C. et al. Nocturnal loss and daytime source of nitrous acid through reactive uptake and displacement. Nat. Geosci. 8, 55–60 (2015).
Donaldson, M. A., Bish, D. L. & Raff, J. D. Soil surface acidity plays a determining role in the atmospheric-terrestrial exchange of nitrous acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18472–18477 (2014).
Li, S., Matthews, J. & Sinha, A. Atmospheric hydroxyl radical production from electronically excited NO2 and H2O. Science 319, 1657–1660 (2008).
Amedro, D., Parker, A. E., Schoemaecker, C. & Fittschen, C. Direct observation of OH radicals after 565 nm multi-photon excitation of NO2 in the presence of H2O. Chem. Phys. Lett. 513, 12–16 (2011).
Bejan, I. et al. The photolysis of ortho-nitrophenols: a new gas phase source of HONO. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 2028–2035 (2006).
Yang, W. et al. Photolysis of nitroaromatic compounds under sunlight: a possible daytime photochemical source of nitrous acid? Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 8, 747–752 (2021).
Li, X. et al. Missing gas-phase source of HONO inferred from Zeppelin measurements in the troposphere. Science 344, 292–296 (2014).
Liu, Y. et al. A comprehensive model test of the HONO sources constrained to field measurements at rural North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 3517–3525 (2019).
Wang, Y. et al. Agricultural fertilization aggravates air pollution by stimulating soil nitrous acid emissions at high soil moisture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 14556–14566 (2021).
Xing, L. et al. Wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH): contributions of HONO sources and heterogeneous reactions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 2343–2359 (2019).
Neuman, J. A. et al. HONO emission and production determined from airborne measurements over the Southeast U.S. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 121, 9237–9250 (2016).
Ye, C. et al. Tropospheric HONO distribution and chemistry in the southeastern US. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 9107–9120 (2018).
Mollner, A. K. et al. Rate of gas phase association of hydroxyl radical and nitrogen dioxide. Science 330, 646–649 (2010).
Atkinson, R. et al. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: volume I-gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 1461–1738 (2004).
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., Wingen, L. M., Sumner, A. L., Syomin, D. & Ramazan, K. A. The heterogeneous hydrolysis of NO2 in laboratory systems and in outdoor and indoor atmospheres: An integrated mechanism. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 223–242 (2003).
Pitts, J. N. Jr et al. An investigation of the dark formation of nitrous acid in environmental chambers. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 16, 919–939 (1984).
Zádor, J., Turányi, T., Wirtz, K. & Pilling, M. J. Measurement and investigation of chamber radical sources in the European Photoreactor (EUPHORE). J. Atmos. Chem. 55, 147–166 (2006).
Rohrer, F. et al. Characterisation of the photolytic HONO-source in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2189–2201 (2005).
Gardner, E. P., Sperry, P. D. & Calvert, J. G. Primary quantum yields of NO2 photodissociation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 92, 6642–6652 (1987).
Schwantes, R. H. et al. Advances in Atmospheric Chemistry: Ch. 1, 1–93 (World Scientific, 2017).
Svensson, R. & Ljungström, E. A kinetic study of the decomposition of HNO3 and its reaction with NO. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 20, 857–866 (1988).
Hauglustaine, D., Ridley, B., Solomon, S., Hess, P. & Madronich, S. HNO3/NOx ratio in the remote troposphere during MLOPEX 2: Evidence for nitric acid reduction on carbonaceous aerosols? Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 2609–2612 (1996).
Saliba, N., Yang, H. & Finlayson-Pitts, B. Reaction of gaseous nitric oxide with nitric acid on silica surfaces in the presence of water at room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 10339–10346 (2001).
Muñoz, M. S. & Rossi, M. Heterogeneous reactions of HNO3 with flame soot generated under different combustion conditions. Reaction mechanism and kinetics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 5110–5118 (2002).
Li, X. et al. Abiotic degradation of field wheat straw as a notable source of atmospheric carbonyls in the North China Plain. Sci. Total Environ. 811, 151366 (2022).
Peng, X., Wang, W., Xia, M., Chen, H. & Wang, T. An unexpected large continental source of reactive bromine and chlorine with significant impact on wintertime air quality. Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa304 (2021).
Ye, C. et al. Particle-phase photoreactions of HULIS and TMIs establish a strong source of H2O2 and particulate sulfate in the winter North China Plain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 7818–7830 (2021).
Zhang, W. et al. Different HONO sources for three layers at the urban area of Beijing. Environ. Sci.Technol. 54, 12870–12880 (2020).
Zhang, J., An, J., Qu, Y., Liu, X. & Chen, Y. Impacts of potential HONO sources on the concentrations of oxidants and secondary organic aerosols in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China. Sci. Total Environ. 647, 836–852 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. Potential sources of nitrous acid (HONO) and their impacts on ozone: A WRF‐Chem study in a polluted subtropical region. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 121, 3645–3662 (2016).
Qin, M. et al. An observational study of the HONO–NO2 coupling at an urban site in Guangzhou City, South China. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5731–5742 (2009).
Hofzumahaus, A. et al. Amplified trace gas removal in the troposphere. Science 324, 1702–1704 (2009).
Liu, P. et al. Photochemical aging of atmospheric fine particles as a potential source for gas-phase hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 15063–15071 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Photoinduced uptake and oxidation of SO2 on Beijing urban PM2. 5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 14868–14876 (2020).
Corral Arroyo, P. et al. Particle-phase photosensitized radical production and aerosol aging. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 7680–7688 (2018).
Song, M. et al. The influence of OH concentration on SOA formation from isoprene photooxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 951–957 (2019).
Song, M. et al. The influence of UV-light irradiation and stable Criegee intermediate scavengers on secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene ozonolysis. Atmos. Environ. 191, 116–125 (2018).
Xue, C. et al. Development of stripping coil-ion chromatograph method and intercomparison with CEAS and LOPAP to measure atmospheric HONO. Sci. Total Environ. 646, 187–195 (2019).
Liu, P. et al. The possible contribution of the periodic emissions from farmers’ activities in the North China Plain to atmospheric water-soluble ions in Beijing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 10097–10109 (2016).
Liu, P. et al. Fine particle pH and its influencing factors during summer at Mt. Tai: Comparison between mountain and urban sites. Atmos. Environ. 261, 118607 (2021).
Kleffmann, J., Benter, T. & Wiesen, P. Heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid with nitric oxide on glass surfaces under simulated atmospheric conditions. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 5793–5799 (2004).
Grell, G. A. et al. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957–6975 (2005).
Zaveri, R. A. & Peters, L. K. A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 104, 30387–30415 (1999).
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D. & Peters, L. K. Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC). J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 113, D13024 (2008).
Li, M. et al. Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review. Natl. Sci. Rev 4, 834–866 (2017).
Guenther, A. et al. The Model of emissions ofgases and aerosols from nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2. 1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1471–1492 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFC3701102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91544211, 41727805, 21976108, 41905109).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.M. designed the study. P.L. and M.S. designed the chamber experiments. M.S. and J.M. carried out the chamber experiments. X.X.Z. and X.J.Z. performed model simulations. G.H. performed DFT calculation. M.S., P.L. and X.X.Z. draw the figures. S.T. and M.G. provided HONO observation data in Beijing. Y.M., P.L., S.M. and X.X.Z. analyzed the chamber data and wrote the paper with valuable inputs from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, M., Zhao, X., Liu, P. et al. Atmospheric NOx oxidation as major sources for nitrous acid (HONO). npj Clim Atmos Sci 6, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00357-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00357-8
- Springer Nature Limited