Abstract
Withania (Solanaceae, Solanoideae) is a widespread genus. Comparative macro-, micro-morphological, anatomical, and molecular features of this genus in Egypt were examined using light and scanning electron microscopy to reassess the conflicted taxonomic relationships between the two studied species. The most significant morphological differences that have been found were: the shape of the lamina, apex, anther, and stigma, and the ratio of calyx tube/lobe; anatomical examination of taxonomic interest are as follows: number of vascular bundles, presence of ears and distribution of accessory vascular bundles in petiole and shape of spongy cells, and number of lower parenchyma in the midrib region of the leaf; trichomes of both species showed no significant differences; pollen, and seed characters are of taxonomic significance in differentiation and characterization between them. Protein profiling revealed that W. somnifera has only conserved proteins, while W. obtusifolia possessed both conserved and additional proteins in their SDS-PAGE banding patterns. Eleven starts codon-targeted (ScoT) primers were applied and produced 96 amplicons with an average of 70.83% polymorphism/primer. W. obtusifolia generated more polymorphic bands and maintained monomorphic ones. SDS-PAGE disclosed that both Withania species were 50% related. While Scot-Dendrogram revealed that both Withania species were poorly related. So, protein and molecular analyses showed considerable genetic variations between these two species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solanaceae is a globally distributed mega-diverse family that includes 98 genera and 2700 species1,2,3,4, which are distributed throughout the world except for Antarctica. It is represented in the flora of Egypt by 30–33 wild species belonging to eight genera viz. Datura, Hyoscyamus, Lycium, Nicandra, Nicotiana, Petunia, Physalis, Solanum, and Withania5,6,7,8,9,10. Moreover11, reported 25 genera and about 91 species including cultivated species.
Withania Pauquy, 1825 is a small genus belonging to the subfamily Solanoideae Kostel, tribe Physaleae D'Arcy subtribe Withaninae contains 10–20 species3. It is a naturally occurring plant in drier and more humid environments, spread from the Mediterranean region to South Africa and throughout tropical Africa, as well as from the Cape Verde Islands and the Canary region to Arabia and Middle East regions like India, southern China and Sri Lanka12. The generic name is derived from Henry Witham who was a nineteenth-century Scottish palaeobotanist. Withania was known to the ancient Egyptians by its fruit which was included in their garlands especially the gorgeous floral collar of Tutankhamun13.
At present in Egypt, Withania is represented by two species; W. somnifera (L.) Dunal14,15 and W. obtusifolia Tackh.5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Withania somnifera commonly known as Ashwagandha, is considered one of the most precious shrubs in Indian Traditional Systems of Medicine, Ayurveda, and Unani as well as Modern Systems of Medicine16,17. All its various parts (leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, and roots) have been reported to have huge health-promoting activities18 such as vitality and fertility of men19,20, anti-tumor, anti-inflammation, and anticancer21 as well anti-stress effects22. It is also used as a tonic, hypotonic, sedative, and diuretic23. Some indigenous people of South Africa apply this plant for the treatment of sexually transmitted infections, and asthma and as an anti-inflammatory agent24. In Egypt, people widely use the plant in combination with other plants to treat neurological conditions, Alzheimer’s disease, bronchitis, and malaria25,26.
Numerous investigations on the morphological27,28,29, anatomical30,31,32,33, pollen and seed29,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 traits in some genera of the Solanaceae have shown the use of such information at various taxonomic ranks.
There are several studies on morphology41,42,43, pollen27,34,44, seed sculpture29,44,45,46,47, anatomy30,48,49 and trichome50,51 of Withania species.
The work on Withania by42,52 remains a major treatment of the genus. According to13, the relationship between these two species is so close that many herbarium specimens are difficult to name. In his opinion, the specimens treated as W. obtusifolia are just forms of W. somnifera with unusually obtuse and long petiolate leaves.
It is extremely difficult to taxonomize a specific genus due to man's interference with selection, cultivation, interspecific hybridization, polyploidization, and the presence of chemotypes, which causes the high divergence of the species' morphology and chemistry53,54. Many molecular techniques have been developed as powerful tools for studying genetic relationships and genetic diversity helping the morphological markers to fulfill the accurate identification and discrimination of species55,56. Because physiological conditions and environmental stresses rarely affect DNA-based molecular markers, they are used to distinguish genotypes/forms of different genera by detecting DNA polymorphisms56,57. Due to its reproducibility, low cost, and powerful ability to reveal polymorphism, start codon targeted (SCoT) analysis received considerable interest based on its universal short conserved region flanking the start codon “ATG”. SDS-PAGE-Protein electrophoresis was also used as a powerful tool for detecting genetic diversity58,59.
Therefore, the major goal of this study is to update the earlier knowledge about the Withania species in the flora of Egypt based on the revision of materials kept in Egyptian herbaria as well as field studies, the thorough investigation of the macro- and micromorphology and the anatomy of the stem, petiole, and leaf of the genus using light and scanning electron microscopy. In addition, highlighting the evaluation degree of genetic divergence between W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera using SDS-PAGE and Scot-PCR techniques to gather solid proof regarding whether these forms should be treated as multiple species or as one species with infraspecific taxa for the sake of taxonomy.
Materials and methods
Sampling
Fresh materials were collected from natural habitats in Egypt.
Prof. Dr. Rim S. Hamdy, Professor of Taxonomy and Flora in the Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University and Member of Cairo University Herbarium performed the formal identification and the comparison of the collected species in the study with authenticated specimens kept in Cairo University Herbarium (CAI) using keys of local flora6,9. The studied specimens are arranged in Table 1 according to their phytogeographical territories60.
Macro-morphological investigations
Macro-morphological characters were recorded either directly from about 10–15 fresh specimens before preservation as voucher specimens or from deposited herbarium material, for examination, a binocular stereo light microscope (Leica Wild M3C, Heerbrugg Switzerland) was used. All photographs were taken using a digital camera (Mobile Samsung A 50).
Pollen and seed micro-morphological investigations
The macro morphological characters of pollen and seeds of about 40 specimens mainly obtained from deposited specimens and fresh material were studied with the aid of a Light-microscope. For scanning electron microscope (SEM), dried samples pollen and seed were mounted on brass stubs and coated with a thin layer of gold using JEOL JSM 530P SEM at an electron microscopic unit, The Applied Center for Insect Nematodes Experimental Station—Giza and a JEOL JSM-IT200 Scanning Electron Microscope (at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV) at the Electron Microscope Unite at Alexandria University, Egypt.
The terminology used to describe the micromorphological characteristics of pollen is consistent with numerous earlier publications35,61,62,63,64. As for the spermoderm of both species65,66,67,68,69,70, were used.
Anatomical investigations
Sections of the vegetative organs (stem, petiole, and leaves) were chosen from fresh material. All assessments were made on all plants at similar developmental stages (fruiting stages) and in comparable positions on each plant. Samples were taken from 4th internodes from the apex about 2–3 (cm) and then fixed in FAA (Formalin-glacial acetic acid-70% ethyl alcohol, 5:5:90 V/V). After 24-h fixation, the specimens were transformed into ethyl alcohol series and then embedded in paraffin wax. The specimens were sectioned by a rotary microtome at 10–15 μm; sections were dehydrated in alcohol-xylol series. Sections were stained by safranin and light green according to71. The anatomical characters were examined with a Zeiss light stereomicroscope and photographed with a digital camera (OPTIKA). A planimeter was used for the estimation of the percentage of each tissue to the total section area. Terminology according to72,73,74.
Electrophoresis technique for protein fractionation
SDS-PAGE of soluble whole-cell proteins
Protein extractions were performed on 100 mg of frozen tissues collected in triplicate from two Withania plants (W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera). Each sample was ground separately in liquid nitrogen before being mixed with 300 µl of saline and properly vortexed for 30 s. Ten µl of each homogenate was mixed with 20 µl of buffer [10% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS), 20% Glycerol, 0.2 M Tris (pH6.6), 10 mM beta-mercapto-ethanol, and 0.05% bromophenolblue] and incubated for 5 min in a 95 °C water bath. Both samples were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min and kept on ice until it is used.
Electrophoresis of proteins (PAGE)
The gel was produced according to the method of75. It comprised 15% separating gel and 4% stacking gel, respectively. The separating gel is composed of 5 ml (29.2% acrylamide and 0.8% bis-acrylamide), 2.5 ml 1.5 M Tris (pH8.8), 100 µl 10% SDS, 100 µl 10% ammonium persulfate (APS), 100 µl Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) and 2.4 ml distilled water. The stacking gel contained 1.3 ml (29.2% acrylamide and 0.8% bis-acrylamide), 2.5 ml 0.5 M Tris (pH 6.8), 100 µl 10% SDS, 100 µl 10% APS and 100 µl TEMED and 6.1 ml distilled water. BLUeye prestained protein ladder (Cat No. PM007-0500, GeneDireX) with 12 pre-stained proteins of Mwt ranges from 10 to 245 kDa was applied. The two samples and the ladder (180 kDa) were carefully loaded into the wells.
Electrophoresis was accomplished in a vertical slab mold filled with [25 mM Tris–Hcl, 200 mM glycine, and 0.1% (w/v) SDS] running buffer at 80 V for 4 h. After the run, the gel was stained with Coomassie solution for 20 min with agitation to recognize the protein bands. Coomassie solution was composed of 50% distilled water, 40% methanol, 10% glacial acetic acid, and 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue. The gel was finally destained with a mixture of distilled water, methanol, and glacial acetic acid in a ratio of 5:4:1, respectively, then photographed and stored.
Molecular analyses
Whole genomic DNA was extracted from 50 mg of frozen tissues collected in triplicate from the two Withania plants using the CTAB (Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) extraction method of76. CTAB buffer comprised 1M Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 5 M NaCl, 0.5 M EDTA, and 20 g CTAB. Polyvinylpyrrolidone and β-mercaptoethanol were freshly mixed into the buffer before extraction. Each tissue was ground separately using liquid nitrogen before mixing with 500 µl CTAB extraction buffer. Each homogenate was incubated for 3 h in a 55 °C water bath. Then, 1.5 µl RNaseA was added to both samples and left for 15 min at 37 °C. At room temperature, chloroform (500 µl) was added to both samples, mix gently, and centrifuged at 16000×g for 7 min. Cold ammonium acetate (7.5 M) and cold isopropanol (1:6, v/v) were added to the aqueous phases of both samples. The samples were gently inverted several times, incubated on ice for 30-40 min, and centrifuged at 16000 xg for 3 min. Throw away the supernatant carefully and washed the pellets with 700 µl (70%) ethanol. The tubes were centrifuged at 16000 xg for 1 min, then the supernatants were poured and the pellets were air dried. Finally, the pellets were re-suspended with 50 µl (1×) TE buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 mM EDTA].
PCR amplifications were performed using eleven start codon-targeted (Scot) primers, Table 2, according to the methods of76 with minor modification. In an iced PCR tube, the reaction mixture comprised 12.5 µl DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×), 2µl primer, and 1µl (50 ng) template DNA forming a 25 μl total volume. The amplification was achieved using Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler: initial denaturation of 5 min at 95 °C; 40 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 95 °C, 1 min annealing at 56 °C and 2 min extension at 72 °C; and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis (3 hours, 80 v) through 1.5 % (m/v) agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris base, 20 mM acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Band sizes were visualized and evaluated using Gel-Documentation (G: BOX) (SYNGENE model 680XHR, UK) based on a 3000 bp DNA ladder.
Protein and DNA analyses
The BioRad Gel documentation system (Image lab V6.1.0 build 7) provided image analysis software for protein and DNA analyses. MvSP software (V3.22) [www.KoVcomp.com] was used to create a phylogenetic tree using the nearest neighbor with Jaccard’s coefficient, and PyElph (V1.3) was used to identify the similarity matrix between the plants by rating the presence (1)/absence (0) of each amplicon.
Results and discussion
Macro-morphology
Withania Pauquy, Belladone: 14 (1825).
Description: Perennial herbs or shrubs with woody texture. Stems are erect, heavily branched with dense hairs. Leaves are solitary or paired, simple, alternate and petiolated. The leaf blade is entire, symmetrical-asymmetrical, hairy or pubescent, often with dendritic hairs. Inflorescences are numerous in congested axillary clusters. The pedicel is short with campanulate and dentate calyx as well as narrowly campanulate, parted to halfway yellowish-green corolla. The stamens are five equal epipetalous, which are inserted near the base of corolla tube. Their filaments are slightly compressed carrying anthers, which sometimes connivent, disc annular surrounded the ovary base. Ovary has 2-locular with numerous ovules and slender style. Fruiting calyx becoming enlarged, surrounding berry, closed at apex. Fruit is globose berry that carries compressed reniform seeds. The significant morphological variations among the two species represented in Egypt are illustrated in Fig. 1 and summarized as follows:
W. obtusifolia: Leaf ovate-elliptic with obtuse apex and truncate base. Inflorescence 1–6(8) flowers, calyx with tube longer than lobe, calyx lobe ovate. The Corolla tube is longer than the lobe. Filament without cushions at the base. Stigma clavate. Fruit orange-red with 23–25 seeds and seed diameter 1.8–2.2 × 1.6–2 mm.
W. somnifera: Leaf broadly ovate with acute apex and attenuate base. Inflorescence 7–10 flowers, calyx tube shorter than lobe, calyx lobe deltoid-lanceolate. The Corolla tube is shorter than the lobe. Filament with cushions at the base. Stigma bilobed. Fruit bright red with 25–30 seeds and seed diameter (2.3-) 2.5–3 × 1.9–2.5 mm. The detailed morphological variations are listed in Table 3.
Distribution in Egypt: W obtusifolia: Sinai and Gebel Elba, W. somnifera: Sinai, Isthmic desert, Nile land bordering Nile Delta and Nile Valley and Oasis, Fig. 2.
The morphological variations such as the shape of the leaf and the number of seeds were reported between W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera by41,77. The current investigation validated their results; leaf ovate-elliptic with obtuse apex and truncate base in W. obtusifolia while leaf broadly ovate with acute apex and attenuate base in W. somnifera, each berry has 23–25 seeds in W. obtusifolia and 25–30 seeds in W. somnifera. In addition to the previously mentioned feature, there are newly employed characters to distinguish between the Withania species under study, such as calyx lobe shape; ovate in W. obtusifolia even though deltoid-lanceolate in W. somnifera, calyx tube/lobe ratio; tube longer than lobe in W. obtusifolia while tube shorter than lobe in W. somnifera, hairiness of the interior side of the petal lobe; smooth in W. obtusifolia while hairy in W. somnifera, filament without cushions at the base in W. obtusifolia, while with cushions in W. somnifera, anther oblong in W. obtusifolia, ovate in W. somnifera and seed; 1.8–2.2 × 1.6–2 mm diameter in W. obtusifolia while (2.3-) 2.5–3 × 1.9–2.5 mm in W. somnifera. Ultimately, the morphological characteristics under examination are distinguishable and diagnostic between the Withania species under study.
Micro-morphology
Pollen
Pollen features through LM and SEM are a good source of taxonomic information that can help the species and genera delimitation, and identification and strengthen their systematic position78, usually tricolporate rarely 4-colporate in Solanaceae47.
In W. obtusifolia, the pollen class type is tricolporate, sub-spheroidal in shape, with a bridge in the middle of the colpus, while in W. somnifera, the pollen class type is tricolporate and tetracolporate, prolate in shape, with or without a bridge in it, and the bridge at the middle or lateral position (Table 3 and Fig. 3).
Pollen morphology of the studied species shows considerable variation in exine pattern which agreed with34. Significant pollen characteristics are important in differentiating the investigated Withania species; pollen shape subspheroidal in W. obtusifolia even though prolate in W. somnifera, shape in equatorial view; spheroidal in W. obtusifolia while oblong in W. somnifera, colpus length/width ratio; 9–20 in W. obtusifolia while 14.5–31.3 in W. somnifera. Additional characteristics, such as polar and equatorial diameter, shape in polar view, exine surface, bridge prescience and position, reveal overlaps between the species under study.
Seeds
The seed characters of the genus Withania were investigated using SEM. In both species, the seed shape is quite stable, reniform to sub-reniform with apical not protruding concave (sunken) hilum. The gross overall seed coat sculpture is reticulate. The shape of epidermal cells is irregular and not isodiametric, the cells near the margin are smaller than the others. The walls of anticlinal cells are broadly and evenly thickened, with a sinuate cell margin.
W. obusifolia confined to Sinai, Gebel Elba characterized by rather small seeds (1.6)1.8–2.2 × 1.6–2(× 103) mm drying to brown with polygonal (7–10-gonal) or oblong large cells. The basal portion of the anticlinal wall (lumen) was relatively thick with characteristic holes, smooth over the entire inner surface of the cell, and a broad ribbon-like appendage, finely papillate at the summit of the cell. While the cosmopolitan W. somnifera is characterized by large seeds (2.3-) 2.5–3 × 1.9–2.5 (× 103) mm drying to brown with polygonal (5–6-gonal) small cells. The basal portion of the anticlinal walls is strongly thickened, the thickness covering the whole bottom, densely papillate, and fibrils present over the lateral inner surface of the cells. At the summit of the cell slender ribbon-like appendages were observed in Table 3 and Fig. 4.
The variability in seed surface patterns is seemingly very useful in the recognition of the studied species79,80. SEM analysis of the seeds in the present study showed that W. somnifera had a deeply protruding hilum, whereas W. obtusifolia had a shallow, slightly protruding hilum, In W. obtusifolia, the relief of the cell boundary is narrow and ribbon-like, with small papilla at the cell's summit; in W. somnifera, it is broad and densely papillate, outer periclinal wall is concave and has characteristic perforations through the thickening and lateral wall without fibrils in W. obtusifolia while the bottom area is covered by concave thickenings and lateral wall with fibrils in W. somnifera. In brief many spermodermal features are proven to be the diagnostic features that can be used to distinguish Withania species which agree with80.
Stem anatomy
In cross-sections, the outline of the stems is more or less circular to angular, with moderate-densely hairy. The epidermis is composed of a single layer of isodiametric-radially elongated cells covered by a very thin wavy cuticle. The cortex differentiated into 4–5 outer collenchymatous composed of isodiametric-tangentially elongated cells, followed by inner parenchymatous with isodiametric cells, filled with sand crystals. The vascular bundles are bicollateral with outer and inner phloem. Xylem with 2–5 vessels mainly in radial groups of 5–7 arches. A large central pith, composed of 16–25 layers with hexagonal and mostly isodiametric parenchymatous cells present in the center, occasionally sand crystals are present (Table 3 and Fig. 5).
Petiole anatomy
The outline is more or less oval with a shallow indentation in the adaxial portion. Epidermis formed of minute radially elongated cells, covered with an evident undulating cuticle and glandular, non-glandular (multicellular, and dendritic) hairs.
Stomatal pores on both epidermal tissue facing loose parenchyma. The cortex is differentiated into outer and inner regions; the outer collenchymatous layers are formed of isodiametric-radially elongated cells and inner parenchymatous layers with radially-irregular cel. The vascular system is represented by a central elongated, arc-shaped bi-collateral vascular bundle, in which the xylem arches are ± 35, each in 2–6 series, in addition to 1–4 accessory vascular bundles at each end of the main vascular bundle (Table 4 and Fig. 6).
Leaf anatomy
Leaf blade dorsiventral. Epidermis covered with wavy cuticle, 1-layered with isodiametric-radially elongated cells. The main vascular bundle is bicollateral; Mesophyll usually differentiated into palisade and spongy parenchyma; with palisade cells usually markedly elongated, 1-layered; spongy parenchyma has 4–5 layers of tangentially- radially elongated cells.
In W. obtusifolia, the midrib has a broad, dome-shaped adaxial part and a tangentially extended semicircular abaxial part. The vascular system consists of a broad boat-shaped bicollateral strand of xylem band and small broken patches of phloem outside xylem arc. The size of the vascular is 372–435 μm thick. But in W. somnifera the midrib has a broad adaxial hump and still broader, semicircular abaxial part and continuous phloem outside the xylem. The size of the vascular is 506–538 μm thick.
Leaf anatomy is bifacial, dorsiventral with a u-shaped midrib region; upper epidermal cell isodiametric-radially elongated and covered with wavy cuticle and glandular, non-glandular (multicellular, and dendritic) trichomes. Collenchyma1- 2 layers, radially elongated cells. Parenchyma tissue 6–9 layers, iso-radially elongated cells. The main vascular bundle is bicollateral; phloem 4–7 layers upper and lower xylem region and the number of xylem arches is 32–36 each with 3–6 vessels.
Under the main vascular bundles, 5–9 layers of parenchymatous tissue with isodiametric radially elongated cells. Followed the parenchymatous tissue, 1–3 collenchyma layers with isodiametric-radially elongated cells. The parenchyma that faces the stomatal pore has wide cellular space. Lower epidermal tissue isodiametric- radially elongated cells covered with wavy cuticle. In the wings region, the mesophyll is distinguished into palisade and spongy tissues, palisade 1 layer. Spongy tissue has 4–5 layers with tangentially- radially elongated cells (Table 4 and Fig. 6).
Trichomes characteristics
Two main types of trichomes are observed on the stem, petiole, and leaf blade; non-glandular and glandular. The non-glandular trichomes can be divided into unicellular, bicellular, multicellular, and dendritic trichomes with various stalk cell numbers. The glandular trichomes with unicellular stalk and multicellular head, Fig. 7. This result agrees with50. The density of trichomes is more abundant in W. obtusifolia.
While6 asserts that Withania species differ in their morphological characteristics and49,81viewed the relevance of anatomical traits in distinguishing Withania species; stem with a circular outline in W. obtusifolia while circular with shallow ridges and furrows in W. somnifera and the number of vascular bundles; 14–15 in W. obtusifolia while 17–19 in W. somnifera, ovate petiole without ears in W. obtusifolia even though cat-face with ears in the other species, and leaf with tangentially elongated spongy cells in W. obtusifolia while radially elongated in W. somnifera. Other features have a limited role in characterizing the studied species which agrees with46 who claims that it is difficult to differentiate them by anatomical features.
Protein and DNA profiles
The SDS-protein patterns of Withania obtusifolia and Withania somnifera allowed the identification of 5–7 major bands per lane, within molecular weights (Mwt) ranging from 20 to 67 Da (Table 5 and Fig. 8). Table 5 represented the Mwt, and the rate of flow (RF) of the formed bands of the two Withania plants. The highest Mwt (> 60 Da) and the lowest Mwt proteins (20 Da) were recorded in both plants. Five protein bands appeared to be conserved in both plants. The highest amounts of protein bands were recorded in W. obtusifolia showing the appearance of two new protein bands (at about 34 Mwt and 47 Mwt). Similarities and dissimilarities of protein bands between the two Withania plants were inscribed in Table 6. Results revealed that W. obtusifolia differed from W. somnifera by inducing 28.57% polymorphism. The SDS-Dendrogram (Fig. 9) clarified the subordination relationship of the proteins obtained from the two W. somnifera plants. SDS-Dendrogram declared that the Jaccard’s similarity coefficient of the cluster analysis of the 2 plants was 0.5, which indicated that W. obtusifolia was moderately related to W. somnifera.
Scot-DNA analysis was used to evaluate and compare the genetic variation of the two plants and was summarized in Tables 7 and 8 and Fig. 10. Table 7 revealed the generation of 96 total bands via the usage of 11 primers with an average of 70.83% polymorphism per primer. Scot-24, Scot-31, and Scot-52 primers possessed complete discrimination ability between the two Withania sp. Also, Scot-70 and Scot-34 primers revealed the highest differentiation potentiality with 9 (81.82%) and 8 (80%) polymorphic bands, respectively. However, Scot-71 has the lowest discrimination ability as it exhibited 4 polymorphic bands (40%) between the plants. In addition, the other employing primers produced special banding patterns ranging from 3–7 amplicons [3 (using Scot-61), 4 (using Scot-66), 5 (using Scot-33), 6(using Scot-13), and 7 (using Scot-14)]. Similarities and dissimilarities of Scot-DNA-bands between the two plants were elucidated in Table 8 and Fig. 10. Results revealed that W. obtusifolia generated more polymorphic bands than those of W. somnifera, recording 36 (72%) and 32 (69.57) polymorphic bands, respectively. Also, both Withania plants owned the same conserved monomorphic bands (14). The Scot-DNA-Dendrogram illustrated the hierarchical relationship of the DNA-banding obtained from the two plants via 11 primers, Fig. 11. The Dendrogram manifested that the Jaccard’s similarity coefficient of the cluster analysis of the two plants was 0.357, which indicated that W. obtusifolia was poorly related to W. somnifera.
In the present study, SDS-protein results revealed that W. obtusifolia had both conserved and additional proteins in its profile, whereas W. somnifera had only conserved proteins (Tables 5 and 6). Scot-DNA analyses confirm the same protein trend for DNA that W. obtusifolia produced more polymorphic bands while retaining monomorphic ones (Tables 7 and 8).
According to41, there are intraspecific variations and polymorphism phenomena in Solanaceae. Because of their coexistence in a mixed population, the two morphologically similar species W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera were frequently misinterpreted.
Genetic studies are essential for studying inter and intra-species genetic variability, in which the use of protein profiles and molecular markers are powerful and useful tools. Different studies worked on assessing the genetic variation of W. somnifera plants. Indian W. somnifera plants were genetically assessed using SDS-PAGE and RAPD markers82, RAPD and AFLP markers83, RAPD and ISSR57,84, RAPD55,85,86, ISSR87,88 and EST-SSR89, however; the Egyptian genotype was assessed with only RAPD marker by90. All those studies suggest the valuableness of using SDS-PAGE and molecular markers in detecting variation among W. somnifera plants. No studies were recorded on assessing the genetic variation of W. obtusifolia using protein and molecular markers analyses until77, who analyzed the interspecific relationship between Withania obtusifolia and Withania somnifera using morphological, anatomical, and phytochemical identification in association with SDS-PAGE and RAPD analyses and found considerable variations between both species. Finally, this investigation found that morphological (Table 3 and Figs. 1, 3, 4), and anatomical (Table 4 and Figs. 5, 6) identifications of the two species highlight slight variation between these two species, while protein (Tables 5, 6 and Fig. 8), molecular analyses (Tables 7, 8 and Fig. 10) and phylogenetic analyses (Figs. 9, 11) showed considerable genetic variations between these two species. Those findings confirmed the whole divergences found between W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera.
Conclusion
In highlight of geographical, morphological, anatomical, pollen, and seed characteristics, the SDS-PAGE and Scot-PCR analyses of W. obtusifolia and W. somnifera confirmed the significant genetic divergence between these two species highlighted by their taxonomic analyses. Therefore, this study provided evidence that SDS-PAGE and Scot-PCR-based molecular analyses can be used as efficient tools for detecting and confirming similarity and phylogenetic relationships among the genus Withania.
Data availability
No data were taken from any database. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Supplementary information files during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Knapp, S., Bohs, L., Nee, M. & Spooner, D. M. Solanaceae-a model for linking genomics with biodiversity. Comp. Funct. Genom. 5, 285–291 (2004).
Olmstead, R. G., & Bohs, L. A summary of molecular systematic research in Solanaceae: 1982–2006 Solanaceae IV: Genomics meets biodiversity. In Proceedings of the VIth International Solanaceae Conference, Madison, WI, USA. 2006; 23–27, 255–268.
Olmstead, R. G. et al. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon. 57, 1159–1181 (2008).
Dupin, J. et al. Bayesian estimation of the global biogeographical history of the Solanaceae. J. Biogeogr. 44(4), 887–899 (2017).
Montasir, A. H. & Hassib, M. Illustrated Manual Flora of Egypt. Part 1, Dicotyledons (Imprimerie Misr S.A.E., 1956).
Täckholm, V. Student’s Flora of Egypt 2nd edn, 474–476 (Cairo University, 1974).
El Hadidi, M. N. & Fayed, A. A. Material for Excursion Flora of Egypt. Taeckholmia 15, 1–223 (1994).
Boulos, L. Flora of Egypt, Checklist 283 (Al-Hadara Publishing, 1995).
Boulos, L. Flora of Egypt. Verbenaceae-Compositae 41–43 (Al Hadara Publishing, 2002).
Boulos, L. Flora of Egypt: Checklist Revised Annotated Edition 199–200 (Al-Hadara Publishing, 2009).
Hepper, F. N. Flora of Egypt. Family 159: Solanaceae. Tãeckholmia Additional Series. 6, 1–168 (1998).
Govindaraju, B. et al. High frequency plant regeneration in ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal): An important medicinal plant. Pl. Cell Biotech. Mol. Bio. 4, 49–56 (2003).
Hepper, F. N. In Solanaceae III: Taxonomy, Chemistry, Evolution (eds Hawkes, J. G. et al.) 211–227 (Royal Botanic Gardens, 1991).
Forsskål, P. Flo Erdtman ra Aegyptiaco-Arabica. Copenhagen. (Posthumous work, ed. C. Niehbuhr). 1775.
Ascherson, P. & Schweinfurth, G. Illustration de la Flore d’Egypte. Mem. Inst. Egypte 2, 23–260 (1887).
Datta, A. K., Das, A., Bhattacharya, A., Mukherjee, S. & Ghosh, B. K. An Overview on Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal – The „Indian ginseng‟. Med Aro Pl Sci Biotech. 5, 1–15 (2010).
Gurav, S. et al. Ethnological validation of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) ghrita as ‘Vajikarana Rasayana’: In-silico, in-vitro and in-vivo approach. J. Ethnopharmacol. 304, 116064 (2023).
Mikulska, P. et al. Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)—Current research on the health-promoting activities: A narrative review. Pharmaceutics 15, 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041057 (2023).
Azgomi, R. N. D. et al. Effects of Withania somnifera on reproductive system: A systematic review of the available evidence. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 4076430 (2018).
Bashir, A., Nabi, M., Tabassum, N., Afzal, S. & Ayoub, M. An updated review on phytochemistry and molecular targets of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Ashwagandha). Front. Pharmacol. 14, 1049334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1049334 (2023).
Leyon, P. V. & Kuttan, G. Effect of Withania somnifera on B16F–10 melanoma induced metastasis in mice. Photother. Res. 18, 118–122 (2004).
Haripriya, M., Vijaya, T. & Mouli, K. C. Effect of water stress on growth, metabolic activities of Withania somnifera-an important phytoceutical plant: Ameliorative effects of VAM. J. Global Pharma Technol. 2(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.1234/jgpt.v2i3.106 (2010).
Jain, S. K. & DeFillips, R. A. Medical Plants of India Reference Publications (Algonac Inc., 1991).
Van Wyk, B. E. A broad review of commercially important southern African medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 119, 342–355 (2008).
Afewerky, H. K. et al. Critical review of the Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal: Ethnobotany, pharmacological efficacy, and commercialization significance in Africa. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 45(1), 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00635-6 (2021).
Hashem, H. A., Nabil, Z. I. & Gad EL-Hak, H. N. A review on: Ashwagandha root extract phenolic compounds counteract Alloxan’s effects on oxidative stress, inflammation, and peripheral nerve injury. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. C Physiol. Mol. Biol. 15(1), 429–437 (2023).
AL-Allaq, S. A. J., Mousawi, A. H. & Musawi, A. H. Morphological study of sex organs and pollen grain of chosen wild species from Solanaceae family in Iraq. Om Salmaa. 4(4), 512–520 (2007).
Zhigila, D. A., Abdul Rahaman, A. A., Kolawole, O. S. & Oladele, F. A. Fruit morphology as taxonomic features in five varieties of Capsicum annuum L. Solanaceae. J. Bot. 2014, 1–6 (2014).
Khafagi, A. A. F., El-Ghamery, A. A. & Ragab, O. G. Taxonomic implication of pollen morphology and seed protein Electrophoresis of some species of Solanaceae In Egypt. Al Azhar Bull. Sci. 29(1), 43–56 (2018).
Jadeja, B. A., Krumpa, J., Patel, A. & Moodhvadia, A. R. Study of vascular system and nodal structure in some members of family Solanaceae. Plant Arch. 8(2), 741–745 (2008).
Mbagwu, F. N., Nwachukwu, C. U. & Okoro, O. O. Root anatomical studies on Solanum macrocarpum and Solanum nigrum (Solanaceae). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8(17), 4137–4139 (2009).
Satil, F., Aslan, M., Erdoğan, E., Polat, R. & Selvi, S. Comparative Anatomical Studies on some species of Hyoscyamus L. (Solanaceae) growing In Turkey. Bangladesh J. Bot 44(1), 37–43 (2015).
Al-Hadeethi, M. A., Ali, T., Al-Taie, A. T. & Al-Rawi, A. A. F. Anatomical study of Solanum nigrum L. from Solanaceae family growing in Iraq. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1879, 022003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1879/2/022003 (2021).
Perveen, A. & Qaiser, M. Pollen morphology of family Solanaceae from Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 39(7), 2243–2256 (2007).
Hayrapetyan, A. M. Features of the exine ornamentation of pollen grains in the family Solanaceae Juss. I. The simple types of ornamentation. Nat. Sci. 2(11), 46–50 (2008).
Al-Quran, S. Pollen morphology of Solanaceae in Jorden. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 7(9), 1586–1593 (2004).
Al-Quran, S. Pollen morphology of Hyoscyamus L. (Solanaceae) attracts hymenoptera species as pollen visitors in Jordan. Pak. Entomol. 30(1), 83–92 (2008).
Adedeji, O. & Akinniyi, T. A. Pollen morphology of some species in the family Solanaceae. J. Adv. Lab. Res. Biol. 6(4), 124–128 (2015).
Dhanya, C. & Devipriya, V. Pollen morphological studies on two solanaceous genera Brugmansia Pers. and Datura L. Int. J. Adv. Res. 4(9), 1879–1887 (2016).
Khosromehr, F., Jafari, A. & Hamdi, M. M. Comparative stem anatomical and palynological studies on Hyoscyamus L. species (Solanaceae) in northeast of Iran. Bangladesh J. Bot. 46(2), 761–765 (2017).
Sundari, G. T., Sudhakaran, S. & Ganapathi, A. On the occurrence of an additional diploid taxon Withania obtusifolia TACKH. (Solanaceae) from the natural population of South India. Feddes Repertorium. 110(5–6), 419–422 (1999).
Thulin, M. Notes on Withania (Solanaceae) in Somalia. - Nord. J. Bot. 22, 385–389 (2002).
Naveen, G. et al. Morphology of Withania somnifera distribution, morphology, phytosociology of Withania somnifera L. Dunal. Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. 1(7), 164–173 (2015).
Ghimire, B., Ghimire, B. K. & Heo, K. Seed characteristics of Withania somnifera (Solanaceae) Korean. J. Pl. Taxon. 41(2), 103–107 (2011).
Hadad, D. Y. & Pharm, B. Wihania obtusifolia (V. Tackhom n.sp.)(Solanaceae) 41–47 (Report of Pharmaceutical Society of Egypt, 1934).
Fahmy, I. R. Wihania somnifera (Dunal)(Solanaceae) 48–52 (Report of Pharmaceutical Society of Egypt, 1934).
Alwadie, H. M. Ultrastructure of the pollen grains of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Solanaceae), A study from Saudi Arabia. Taeckholmia. 22(1), 115–119 (2002).
Al-Nowaihi, A. S. & Khalifa, S. F. A numerical classification of Solanaceae in Egypt. J. Indian. Bot. Soc. 53, 224–248 (1974).
Calalb, T., Ciorchina, N., Cutcovschi-Mustuc, A. & Matveiciuc, L. Macroscopilcally and microscopically study of Aswagandha plant Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. J. Bot. VII, NR. 2 (2015).
Munien, P., Naidoo, Y. & Naidoo, G. Micromorphology, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the foliar trichomes of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Solanaceae). Planta 242, 1107–1122 (2015).
Saidulu, C. H., Venkateshwar, C., Gangadhar Rao, S. & Ramkrishna, N. Foliar epidermal study of Withania somnifera grown in heavy metal treated soil. Res. Rev. Biosci. 11, 107 (2016).
Gonçalves, A. E. Solanaceae. In Flora Zambesiaca 8 (Part 4) (ed. Launert, E.) 1–124 (Flora Zambesiaca Managing Committee, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew-London, 2005).
Simon, J. E. & Bubenheim, D. R. Field performance of American basil varieties. Herb Spice Med. Plant Dig. 6(1), 1–4 (1987).
Grayer, R. J. et al. Intraspecific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry. 43, 1033–1039 (1996).
Bhat, T. M., Rajdeep, K. & Sabzar, A. D. Evaluation of genetic diversity among accessions of Withania somnifera L. (Dunal) using biochemical analysis and molecular markers. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 12(7), 983–990 (2012).
Fouad, A. S., Hafez, R. M. & Hamdy, R. Authentication of Cordia dentate Poir. Growing in Egypt using ISSR and DNA barcoding. Biosci. Res. 16(2), 1474–1484 (2019).
Chauhan, S. et al. Early selective strategies for higher yielding bio-economic Indian ginseng based on genotypic study through metabolic and molecular markers. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 29(4), 3051–3061 (2022).
Abdalla, N. A., Ragab, M. E., El-Miniawy, S. M., Arafa, N. M. & Taha, H. S. A new aspect for in vitro propagation of Jerusalem artichoke and molecular assessment using RAPD, ISSR and SCoT Marker Techniques. Egypt. J Bot. 61(1), 203–218 (2021).
Jacob, R. H., Afify, A. S., Shanab, S. M. M., Shalaby, E. A. & Hafez, R. M. Biotechnological studies on Arthrospira platensis biomass cultivated in enriched culture with chelated leather waste and chelated glycinate. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03473-2 (2022).
El Hadidi, M. N. Geomorphology, climate and phytogeographic affinities. In Flora Aegyptiaca 1, Part 1 (ed. El Hadidi, M. N.) (The Palm Press and Cairo University Herbarium, 2000).
Erdtman, G. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy-Angiosperms (Almquist and Wiksell, 1952).
Wang, F. X., Qian, N. F., Zhang, Y. L. & Yang, H. Q. Pollen Flora of China (Science Press, 1997).
Punt, W., Hoen, P. P., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. & Le Thomas, A. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 143, 1–81 (2007).
Hesse, M. et al. Pollen Terminology: An Illustrated Handbook (Springer, 2009).
Lersten, N. R. Testa topography in Leguminoseae subfamily Papilionoideae. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 88(4), 180–191 (1981).
Barthlott, W. Scanning electron microscopy of the epidermal surface in plants. In Application of the Scanning EM in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology. Systematics Association’s Special Vol. 41 (ed. Claugher, D.) 69–94 (Clarendon Press, 1990).
Brochmann, C. Pollen and seed anatomy of Nordic Draba (Brassicaceae) phytogenetic and ecological implications. Nordic J. Bot. 12(6), 657–673 (1992).
Stearn, W. T. Botanical Latin 4th edn. (Timber Press, 1992).
Kirkbride, J. H., Gunn, C. R. & Weitzman, A. L. Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae) Vol. 1208, 1890 (United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin, 2003).
Salimpour, F., Mostafavi, G. & Sharifnia, F. Mircromorphological Study of the Genus Trifolium Section Lotoidea, in Iran. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 10(3), 378–382 (2007).
Sass, J. E. Botanical Microtechnique 3rd edn, 228p (Iowa State University Press, 1961).
Abd El-Rahman, A. A., Ibrahim, A. A. & Hassan, H. T. Contribution to the anatomical characters of some xerophytes. Bull. Fac. Sci. Cairo Univ. 49, 139–162 (1976).
Pandey, B. P. Plant Anatomy, New Delhi (1982).
Abd El-Gawad, M. A., Salem, M. O. & Hegazi, A. M. Anatomy of Alfalfa leaflets as affected by NPK-fertilization and saline irrigation. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor J. 27(3), 1439–1447 (1989).
Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).
Elakbawy, W. M., Shanab, S. M. M., Shalaby, E. A. & Hafez, R. M. Plant growth regulators from microalgae biomass and their impact on the genetic fidelity of canola and tomato plantlets. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02097-2 (2021).
Ramachandran, A., Kumar, M. S., Paneerselvam, K., Vinothkumar, D. & Shajahan, A. Identification of inter species genetic variability between two morphologically similar species of Withania through protein and RAPD markers. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 4(7), 2817 (2013).
Ashfaq, S. et al. Pollen morphology of family Solanaceae and its taxonomic significance. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 92, 3 (2020).
Kong, M. J., Lee, J. S. & Hong, S. P. Comparative seed morphology of Solanaceae in Korea. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 41(1), 35–46 (2011).
El Ghamery, A. A., Khafagi, A. F. & Ragab, O. G. Taxonomic implication of pollen morphology and seed protein electrophoresis of some species of Solanaceae in Egypt. Al-Azhar Bull. Sci. 29, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.21608/ABSB.2018.33757 (2018).
Metcalfe, C. R. & Chalk, L. Anatomy of Dicotyledons (Clarendon Press, 1950).
Chaurasiya, N. D., Sangwan, R. S., Misra, L. N., Tuli, R. & Sangwan, N. S. Metabolic clustering of a core collection of Indian ginseng Withania somnifera Dunal through DNA, isoenzyme, polypeptide and withanolide profile diversity. Fitoterapia. 80(8), 496–505 (2009).
Mir, B. A., Koul, S. & Soodan, A. S. Reproductive biology of Withania ashwagandha sp. novo (Solanaceae). Ind. Crops Prod. 45, 442–446 (2013).
Tripathi, N., Saini, N., Mehto, V., Kumar, S. & Tiwari, S. Assessment of genetic diversity among Withania somnifera collected from central India using RAPD and ISSR analysis. Med. Aromatic Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 6(1), 33–39 (2012).
Tiwari, P. & Shrivastava, A. Efficacy of RAPD markers for molecular diversity analysis of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal in central India. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 3, 126–130 (2016).
Tripathi, N. & Awasthi, A. Molecular diversity analysis among Withania somnifera genotypes collected from Madhya Pradesh using RAPD markers. Ann. Plant Soil Res. 20(4), 416–421 (2018).
Bamhania, K., Khatakar, S., Punia, A. & Yadav, O. P. Genetic variability analysis using ISSR markers in Withania somnifera L. Dunal genotypes from different regions. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 19(1), 22–32 (2013).
Hiremath, C., Philip, R. & Sundaresan, V. Molecular characterization of India Ginseng Withania somnifera (L.) using ISSR markers. Mol. Biol. Rep. 48, 3971–3977 (2021).
Parita, B., Kumar, S. N., Darshan, D. & Karen, P. Elucidation of genetic diversity among ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal] genotypes using EST-SSR markers. Res. J. Biotechnol. 13(10), 52–59 (2018).
Abd El-Twab, M. H., Barakat, N. A. & Abd El-Hafeez, A. A. Cytogenetical and ecological studies of some wild congeneric species in the Solanaceae distributed in Upper Egypt. Chromos. Bot. 5(3), 65–73 (2010).
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Bernadette Simpson, author of “the guide book wandering through wadis” for collecting and photographying the field specimens of Withania obtusifolia.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.A.S., R.H. and R.M.H. conceived and designed the experiments; F.A.S., R.H. and R.M.H. performed the experiments; F.A.S. and R.H. collected the plants; R.H. undertook the formal identification of the plant materials used in Cairo University Herbarium; F.A.S., R.H. and R.M.H. analyzed the data; F.A.S. and R.H. wrote the Anatomical & Taxonomic parts, and R.M.H. wrote the molecular genetic part of the paper F.A.S., R.H. and R.M.H. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Experimental research and field studies on plants (either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant materials, are comply with relevant international guidelines and legislation. The plants were obtained after permission from Cairo University. The voucher herbarium specimens were prepared and matched for identification with the authentic ones at the herbarium of Cairo University (CAI). The plants were identified by the official staff member at Cairo University. As the specimens are not already present in other institutional collections, as scientists, we apply non-lethal sampling techniques to gather the bare minimum of specimens required for the completion of the research, after which the collected specimens are deposited at both Cairo University herbarium (CAI) and Menoufia University herbaria. All the sampling collections process follows the rules present in the IUCN Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of Extinction and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shehata, F.A., Hamdy, R. & Hafez, R.M. Biosystematic studies of genus Withania Pauquy in Egypt. Sci Rep 14, 21754 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71500-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71500-5
- Springer Nature Limited