Abstract
As the most numerous group of animals on Earth, insects are found in almost every ecosystem. Their useful role in the environment is priceless; however, for humans, their presence may be considered negative or even harmful. For years, people have been trying to control the number of pests by using synthetic insecticides, which eventually causes an increased level of resistance to applied compounds. The effects of synthetic insecticides have encouraged researchers to search for alternatives and thus develop safe compounds with high specificity. Using knowledge about the physiology of insects and the functionality of compounds of insect origin, a new class of bioinsecticides called peptidomimetics, which are appropriately modified insect analogues, was created. One promising compound that might be successfully modified is the thirteen amino acid peptide alloferon (HGVSGHGQHGVHG), which is obtained from the hemolymph of the blue blowfly Calliphora vicinia. Our research aimed to understand the physiological properties of alloferon and the activity of its peptidomimetics, which will provide the possibility of using alloferon or its analogues in the pharmaceutical industry, as a drug or adjuvant, or in agriculture as a bioinsecticide. We used alloferon and its three peptidomimetics, which are conjugates of the native peptide with three unsaturated fatty acids with various chain lengths: caprylic, myristic, and palmitic. We tested their effects on the morphology and activity of the reproductive system and the embryogenesis of the Tenebrio molitor beetle. We found that the tested compounds influenced the growth and maturation of ovaries and the expression level of the vitellogenin gene. The tested compounds also influenced the process of egg laying, embryogenesis, and offspring hatching, showing that alloferon might be a good peptide for the synthesis of effective bioinsecticides or biopharmaceuticals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The most numerous group of animals in the world, whose representatives can be found in almost every ecosystem on Earth, providing its broadly understood biodiversity, are insects1. Many species, such as bees and silkworms, play useful roles in human life, e.g., from an economic point of view2,3. Nevertheless, insects are also harmful to humans because they are vectors of pathogens of serious diseases, damage forestry or cause great losses in agriculture4. In addition, some insects, such as mosquitoes and blackflies, are burdensome for human function5.
To control the number of insects harmful to the human economy, spraying or fumigation with synthetic insecticides is used6. They impair functions of nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs), gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABARs), and glutamate receptors (NMDARs), which act on the nervous system or affect the activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), are the most common7. However, one of the drawbacks of using synthetic insecticides is increasing level of resistance in pest populations8. Moreover, these compounds are often harmful to the environment, e.g., due to their low selectivity and biodegradability, ability to penetrate through different ecosystems, and ability to accumulate in tissues of other organisms, which often negatively affects them9. These negative effects of synthetic insecticides prompted researchers to search for alternative methods for controlling insect pests and thus to develop new, safe compounds that can affect specific insect species, physiological processes, or cellular and molecular structures other than those of the nervous system10,11. Using knowledge about the functionality of compounds of insect origin, a new class of bioinsecticides called peptidomimetics, i.e., appropriately modified insect analogs, was created. The process of creating peptidomimetics begins with the initial selection of the compound. Then, several chemical modifications, which aim to increase the chemical stability of newly designed compounds, e.g., by lowering their sensitivity to UV radiation, high temperature, or strong redox factors, are made, mainly within the core fragment12,13,14,15. It is also important to increase resistance to biological agents, such as proteases present in the digestive tract of insects, for which new compounds can be used. It also applies the addition of hydrophobic residues, e.g., fatty acids or their derivatives, to facilitate penetration through the insect cuticle16,17,18,19. The results of studies carried out on mosquitoes, beetles, locusts, and moths thus far are very promising20. Nevertheless, despite these studies, the mechanism of action and broader spectrum of biological activity of this large and diverse group are still not fully understood21.
One promising compound is the thirteen amino acid peptide alloferon (HGVSGHGQHGVHG), which was first isolated from the hemolymph of the blue blowfly Calliphora vicinia22,23. The name given to the peptide is also not accidental and indicates functional similarity to interferon, which also has an immunostimulating effect23,24. Additionally, research conducted by Kuczer et al.25 showed that it also possesses weak cardiostimulatory properties when applied to the beetle Zophobas atratus. However, its exact physiological function has not been described thus far.
Lee et al.26 showed that alloferon reduces the process of replication of herpesvirus type 8, which causes Kaposi's sarcoma, increasing the effectiveness of NK lymphocytes, which is marked by more effective eradication of virus-infected cells. It also has activity against H1N1 type A influenza virus27. Antiviral properties were also described by research on alloferon and its N-terminally truncated analogs conducted by Kuczer et al.28. Studies have shown that these peptides inhibit the replication of human herpesvirus type 8, Coxsackie virus type B2 in Vero cells, a laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma cell line (HEp-2), and an epithelial cell line (LLC-MK2) obtained from monkey kidneys. The anticancer activity of the peptide was also tested in a mouse model designed to determine the activity of cytostatic drugs; mice of the DBA/2 strain were inoculated with P388 leukemia cells. It has been shown that 20 days after the administration of an alloferon, a longer latency was observed23. A few years later, Chernysh and Kozuharova29 showed that emerging tumors were significantly smaller than tumors in a mouse control group.
With respect to potential, less toxic, and more specific insecticides, attempts have been made to use, with greater or lesser success, bacteria and their toxins, viruses, entomopathogenic fungi, secondary plant metabolites, and transgenic plants producing "repellents". Based on the knowledge about peptidomimetics and the described cytotoxic action of alloferon against intensively and rapidly dividing cancer cells, we started research on the possibility of using it as a potential bioinsecticide directed at the reproductive system, which, similar to cancer cells, is a place of intensive and rapid cell division. Considering the above, the following research goals were set in this work: to determine the effect of alloferon and its three peptidomimetics, which are conjugates of the native peptide with three unsaturated fatty acids of various chain lengths—caprylic (C8-alloferon), myristic (C14-alloferon) and palmitic (C16-alloferon)—on the morphology and function of reproductive system insects and to understand the foundation for the process of embryonic development of beetles. As a research model, we chose the beetle Tenebrio molitor L. as a cosmopolitan, synanthropic pest of stored grain products occurring in grain warehouses, mills, barns, etc., against which an approach using bioinsecticides could be applied.
Materials and methods
Insects
Tenebrio molitor beetle stock cultures were maintained at the Department of Animal Physiology and Developmental Biology at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, as described by Rosiński et al.30 and Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.31. Briefly, insects were bred in transparent, clear plastic containers with a diameter of 10 cm, and volume of 549.5 cm3. The containers were kept in breeding chambers with a constant temperature of + 28 °C, a relative humidity of 65%, 8 h of access to light, and, importantly, constant access to food, which included flour (10 g per container) and carrots, which are also a source of water (5 slices per container).
Insects from the test and control groups were provided with identical living conditions. The sex of the insects was determined at the pupal stage, and the males were marked32. Both sexes were kept in one container at a 1:1 ratio (10 insects per container). In experiments, only virgin females in the first gonadotropic cycle were used, which is dictated by the biology of this beetle and the resulting asynchrony of its ovarian cycles, which makes it impossible to properly assess the ongoing processes in subsequent ovarian cycles. Insect pupae for breeding appropriate for the experiment were selected randomly. Research ethics committee approval was not required to achieve the objectives of this study.
Tested compounds
Alloferon and its analogues were synthesised and purified in the Peptide Engineering Research Group at the Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław. Solutions of alloferon and its analogues with caprylic, myristic, and palmitic acids (C8-, C14-, and C16-alloferon respectively) were always prepared under sterile conditions by dissolving the peptides in physiological saline solution (PS) for T. molitor (containing NaCl at a concentration of 274 mM, KCl—19 mM, CaCl2—9 mM, pH 7.0) as described by Walkowiak-Nowicka31. The prepared stock solutions were stored at − 80 °C. Only in the case of experiments with local application of compounds to eggs (on the surface) were the peptides dissolved in ultrapure water before use to avoid salt crystallization on the egg surface, which could disturb the results.
Peptide applications and timeline of experiments
The peptide solution was made according to the procedure described by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.31. Before injection, insects were anaesthetized with CO2, disinfected, washed with double-distilled water, and dried. Through the ventral membrane, a Hamilton syringe (Model 87908, Hamilton Company) was used between the thorax and abdomen for injection. The insects in the control group were injected with 2 μL of physiological saline (PS), and those in the tested group were injected with 2 μL of peptide solutions at three concentrations of peptides, 10–11, 10–7, and 10–3 M11.
In the experiments with topical application, we used 10–12, 10–8, and 10–4 M compounds to compare the results with those obtained after injection. The development of ovaries, as they work asynchronously, was assessed after injecting females, which was conducted on the day following the ecdysis of females. The day of ovary isolation to assess the degree of development and the degree of development of the follicular epithelium were selected based on Ullmann's data32 on the development of the ovary of the beetle T. molitor and observations of our own culture.
In experiments involving the topical application of compounds (20 μL), we used only fertilized eggs (10 eggs per repetition in each variant; repeated 10 times) before reducing the number of false-negative effects. Because T. molitor beetles start to copulate on the 2nd day after ecdysis and considering that the time needed for the development of eggs is approximately 6 days, we collected eggs on the 8th day after the imago transition (Supplement Figure S1).
Peptide synthesis
Individual stages of synthesis and purification of alloferon, as well as its caprylic (C8-), myristic (C14-), and palmitic (C16-) conjugates, were performed manually using the solid phase method involving a standard 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) procedure33. Briefly, Fmoc-Gly-Wan resin was used to assemble amino acids. 2(1Hbenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU), in the presence of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt), was used as a coupling reagent. The Fmoc protecting groups were removed using 20% piperidine in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The Kaiser test was used to assess the completeness of each coupling reaction. Peptides separated from the substrate were obtained after 2 h of treatment with a trifluoroacetic mixture (trifluoroacetic acid/water/triisopropylsilane 95:2.5:2.5) at room temperature. The obtained peptides were then dissolved in water, lyophilized, and purified using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC, Varian ProStar chromatograph, TOSOH Bioscience C18 column [21.5 mm × 300 mm, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan], UV detector – λ = 210/254 nm). For cleaning, a mixture of water and acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was used in a gradient at a flow rate of 7 ml/min. After purification, lyophilized peptides with a purity > 95% were obtained. Purity was assessed using HPLC (Thermo Separation Product, column: Vydac Protein RP C18 [4.6 mm × 250 mm, [Grace, Deerfield, IL, USA]; conditions: linear gradient from 0 to 100% B in 60 min, a flow rate of 1 mL/min−1, solvent A = 0.1% TFA in water, solvent B = 0.1% TFA in 80% acetonitrile/water, and UV detection at λ = 210 nm). The chemical composition of the peptides was confirmed by electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) using a MicrOTOF-Q mass spectrometer or Apex-Qe Ultra 7T Fourier transform–ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) (Bruker Dalton, Bremen, Germany).
Isolation of ovaries with oviducts
Ten female insects from each tested group were anesthetized. The ovaries with oviducts were isolated under a stereomicroscope using microsurgical instruments. Dissected reproductive organs were cleaned from fat body tissue residues, trachea, and Malpighian tubules were removed, and finally, the cleaned organs were placed in physiological saline or 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) as described in Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.11.
Gonadotropic effects of alloferon and its analogs on the morphology of reproductive organs
The general morphology, maturation, growth, and follicular epithelium development of the organs were assessed using an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope on the 3rd day after injection (Supplement Figure S1). The assessment of volume was preceded by the formula in which it was assumed that the terminal oocyte takes the shape of a rotational ellipsoid; therefore, to calculate its volume, the formula for the volume of this solid was used. Observation of the intercellular spaces between follicular cells was possible following the procedure described by Czarniewska et al.34, with the use of the Stereo Lumar. V12 stereomicroscope (Zeiss). In the test, 10 insect females per tested variant were used.
Vitellogenin expression level
The expression level of the vitellogenin gene (Vg) was assessed in samples of fat body tissue obtained from females previously injected with alloferon and its analogs on the 1st day after ecdysis. The concentration of 10–7 M was chosen because it had the strongest effect on the development of terminal oocytes. PS was used as a control. Tissue was isolated 24 h after injection. Fat body tissue from 10 females was pooled to obtain one biological sample. The tissues were placed in a lysis buffer (Zymo Research) and homogenized with an automatic pestle at room temperature. RNA isolation, according to the manufacturer’s protocol, was subsequently conducted using a ready-made Quick-RNA™ MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research). After the remaining genomic DNA was removed from the RNA samples with DNase I (Thermo Scientific), the purity was checked, and the concentration was measured with a Synergy H1 Hybrid Plate Reader spectrophotometer (BioTek). The samples were frozen and stored at -80 °C before use. A ready-made RevertAid™ Reverse Transcriptase kit from Thermo Scientific was used to obtain cDNA. For PCR, we used primers that were designed based on NCBI public databases (accession number: AY714212.2) with Primer3 software (Geneious 9.1.8 package; Prime Group Academic Subscription No. 1865698) and specific primers described by Lord (2010)35 (Supplement Table S1). PCR conditions after determination and optimization were described previously by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.31 and Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.11. Product purity was checked using electrophoresis (with ethidium bromide) and confirmed by sequencing the obtained PCR product, which was made in the Sequencing and Molecular Biology Laboratory of the Faculty of Biology at the University of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. The product sequence was confirmed based on sequences deposited in public databases using the Chromas Lite 2.01 and basic alignment search tool (BLAST) programs (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). To conduct the qPCR, the suitability of the primers (Supplement Table S1), the stability of the reference gene (syntaxin-1), and the reaction conditions were validated and normalized a priori. The amplification of the investigated vitellogenin and syntaxin-1 separately via qPCR was performed in a RotorGene 6000 (Corbett Research) thermocycler in the presence of SYBR-Green I fluorescent dye (Power SYBR Green Master Mix; Applied Biosystems). qPCRs of the samples as well as “no template control” and “no RT control” reactions were prepared as described by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.31,36. For quantification of the products, we used the 2−ΔΔCt method. The results are presented in a bar graph in which error bars refer to the original Ct values. Each biological sample (4 independent samples for each variant) consisted of tissues isolated from ≥ 10 females. Three technical repetitions were performed.
Impact of alloferon and its analogs on reproductive parameters
The parameters of reproduction related to offspring occurrence were determined by the method described by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.11 (Supplement Figure S1). Briefly, males and females were placed in the same ratio in a plastic box. On the 7th day after ecdysis, alloferon and its analogs were injected into 10 females, which were next placed with non-injected males31. The experiments were repeated 10 times. Each day, laid eggs were collected from the breeding medium and counted as described previously by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.11.
Eggs obtained on the 8th day (one day after female injection) were collected and used to assess the duration of embryonic development. To eliminate false-negative results, in the experiments, only well-developed and undamaged eggs were used. After visual assessment under a stereomicroscope, the eggs were collected, mixed with flour, and kept in an incubator (Memmert INE 400) under the conditions described by Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.31. The number of occurred offspring was counted daily for the next 10 days.
Impact of direct application of alloferon and its analogs on embryogenesis
Noninjected males and noninjected females were placed in plastic boxes at the same ratio. Eggs laid on the 8th day were collected and cleaned from a flour medium as described in the patent (PL No. 217868B1) and according to Walkowiak-Nowicka et al.11 and Rosinski et al. (2011), briefly by sieving flour with eggs through a sieve with a hole diameter of 1.15 mm and then washing with a gentle stream of water at room temperature. Next, the cleaned, undamaged eggs were taken to the experiment. Twenty microliters of each tested peptide was topically applied to 10 properly developed eggs transferred to plates using a single-use plastic inoculation loop11. Fifteen seconds later, the excess fluid was delicately removed, and the eggs were dried on paper. In the described experiment, instead of saline, a water solution of peptides or water was used as a control. This allowed us to avoid salt crystallization on the chorion or aeropyle of the eggs. Prepared dishes with eggs were placed in an incubator under constant conditions11. The number of offspring was counted daily for the next 10 days. The experiments were conducted 10 times.
Analysis of concentration–inhibition of egg-laying and concentration-inhibition of hatching dependence
The inhibition parameters were calculated based on the three concentrations of compounds used. The final number of eggs laid and hatched larvae were calculated, and inhibition lines, correlation coefficients (R2), curve equations, and IC50, IC60, IC70, and IC80 values were determined using a spreadsheet calculator37.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the data was performed with GraphPad Prism software (version 8) (Department of Animal Physiology and Developmental Biology AMU licence). Before analysis, outliers were identified, and the Shapiro‒Wilk test was used to assess the normality of distributions. The homogeneity of variance was checked with Levene’s test. Groups with a normal distribution and homogeneous variance were compared with ordinary one-way analysis of variance (changes in Vg transcript level). Nonparametric data were tested with the Kruskal‒Wallis (changes in the volume, length, and width of the terminal oocytes and hatchability of larvae in two variants), and Friedman (number of eggs laid by females) tests. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare methods of administration. The data are shown as the mean value of the parameter ± SD.
Results
Gonado- and oocytotropic effects of alloferon and its analogs
Data from measuring the length and width of terminal oocytes were used to calculate the volume of terminal oocytes. As the data indicate (Fig. 1B and C), each increase in the volume of terminal oocytes (Fig. 1A) was an effect of both longitudinal and cross-stage oocyte growth. The greatest increase in the volume of terminal oocytes was observed after injection of alloferon and C14-alloferon at a concentration of 10–7 M (in the case of the control, the average oocyte volume was 21.375 μm3, and after injection, it was greater than 90.566 μm3) (Kruskal‒Wallis t = 74.77, p < 0.0001). An increase, which was also statistically significant, was observed after injection of C8- and C16-alloferon at a concentration of 10–7 M and alloferon at a concentration of 10–3 M (in each case over 57.240 μm3).
Vg expression level
Injection of alloferon and its analogs caused changes in the Vg transcript level (ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test F = 3.328, p = 0.0173) (Fig. 2). Twenty-four hours after the injection of C8-alloferon (p = 0.0072) and C14-alloferon (p = 0.0287), the expression level of Vg increased statistically significantly in comparison to that in the control.
Parameters of reproduction after injection
Injection of alloferon and its analogs at concentrations of 10–11, 10–7, and 10–3 M impacted the number of eggs laid by females (Fig. 3); however, the changes were not statistically significant (Friedmann’s test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test). The tested peptides did not change the time at which oviposition started—in each variant, females started laying eggs between the 4th and 5th days after ecdysis (Fig. 3A, B, C). The control females injected with PS for 10 days in the experiment duration laid 114 eggs (calculated per one female). C8-alloferon in concentrations of 10–11 and C14-alloferon at concentrations of 10–3 M reduced the number of eggs to 49. After injection of C14-alloferon at a concentration of 10–7 M the opposite effect was caused, so the increase in the number of eggs laid to 126 in ten days. The correlation between the concentration of the tested substances and the inhibition of egg laying was very high (> 0.9) for alloferon, C8-alloferon, and C14-alloferon but low for C16-alloferon (< 0.5). The concentration-inhibition equations were y = 0.1455x + 5.743, y = -0.0221x + 4.473, y = 0.0221x + 5.2873 and y = -0.1007x + 3.3321, respectively. As the equations show, the bias of the line is very low, and the inhibition increases very slowly.
Alloferon and its peptidomimetics caused changes in the number of occurring offspring (Kruskal‒Wallis test, t = 52.10, p < 0.0001). After the injection of peptides at each concentration (except for C16-alloferon at a concentration of 10–3 M), a decreasing trend in the number of hatching larvae was observed (Fig. 4). Injection of C8-alloferon at a concentration of 10–11 M caused the most significant reduction, and only 20.3% of the larvae hatched after its application, whereas in the control, 99.3% of the larvae hatched (p = 0.0029). Hatchability decreased to 55.0% after the injection of C14- and C16-alloferon at a concentration of 10–11 M (p = 0.0368, p = 0.0368) and to 54.1% after the application of C8-alloferon at a concentration of 10–7 M (p = 0.0064). No changes in embryogenesis duration were observed (Supplement Figure S3). For each variant, embryogenesis lasted a minimum of 6 days. All the compounds inhibited hatchability in a concentration-dependent manner. The correlation was greater than 0.8 in all cases. However, as in the case of egg laying, the cure grows very slowly.
Parameters of reproduction after topical application
The application of alloferon and its peptidomimetics to the egg surface caused changes in the number of hatched larvae (Kruskal–Wallis test, t = 34.91, p < 0.0005), as indicated by a trend toward a reduced number of hatched larvae (Fig. 5). The application of C16-alloferon at a concentration of 10–4 M caused the most significant reduction, from 88.04% in the case of the control to 46.67% (p = 0.003). Hatchability decreased to 50.3% after the application of alloferon at the same concentration (p = 0.0012) and to 53% after the application of C14- and C16-alloferon at a concentration of 10–8 M (p = 0.0036, p = 0.0047). No changes in the duration of embryogenesis duration were detected for any of the embryogenesis variants, which lasted for a minimum of 6 days (Supplement Figure S4). On the 6th day, 76.7% of the ‘control’ larvae emerged. In turn, the application of peptides reduced larval emergence from 23.3% to 36.6% range in the case of 10–12 M concentration, from 26.7% to 47% range in the case of concentration 10–8 M, and from 16.7% to 30.0% range in the case of concentration 10–4 M.
Two methods of administration, injection, and topical application, were also compared. The analysis confirmed significant differences between the methods of application of the compounds (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001, F = 16.44).
Discussion
In this work, for the first time, the gonadotropic and oocytotropic properties and effects of alloferon, C8-, C14-, and C16-alloferon on the embryogenesis and larval hatchability of T. molitor beetles were examined. The results of the present study indicate the spectrum of physiological effects of alloferon and its analogs, constituting the basis for the knowledge needed for further research. The physiological effects demonstrated on T. molitor beetles indicated the potential of using alloferon as an active bioinsecticide. However, these studies were mainly aimed at understanding the physiological activity of the peptide, about which little is known and can potentially be used, for example, in the pharmaceutical industry 24,38. Nevertheless, an attempt to administer the compounds topically and thus obtain statistically significant results indicates possible application for pest control, although the research should be extended with additional concentrations and experiments related to, for example, the passage of the compounds through the cuticle—the assessment of the obtained activity will be possible thanks to our research in which the compounds were directly administered into the insect's body. In our research, we used an approach involving the attachment of a fatty acid residue to the native molecule of alloferon. To date, synthesized peptidomimetics of neuropeptides and hormones, in which similar modifications were used, showed increased hydrophobic properties, as well as increased ability to penetrate across the cuticle, prolonged half-time of the active form or increased resistance to proteolytic factors 39,40,41. Our research showed that the attachment of caprylic, myristic, and palmitic fatty acids to the native molecule of alloferon changed the bioinsecticidal potential of the compound. However, the effect was not observed in each experiment and concentration, so further studies are necessary. These compounds influence the functioning of the female reproductive system. Injection of peptides at a concentration of 10–7 M resulted in the stimulation of ovarian development, as indicated by an increase in the length of the ovarioles, and the acceleration of terminal oocyte development, as indicated by a significant increase in volume. The peptides show the greatest effect at an intermediate concentration, which may be adequate to fully saturate the receptor. The lack of effect after the injection of peptides at a higher concentration may be the result of compensation for the action of the compounds—lower or even lack of effect may be the result of activation of different signalling pathways or other mechanisms that in some way limit the action of the applied compounds. It might also be the effect of hormesis—i.e. an effect in which a compound is beneficial in low concentrations, but harmful in high concentrations. The amount of compound provided may also be appropriate to maximize the proteolytic effect of the compounds found in the haemolymph. In turn, low concentrations may not be sufficient to produce the maximum effect. It should also be emphasized that time may also be an important factor; changing this parameter could indicate that peptides at lower concentrations are also effective 39. The observed changes in the ovarian growth rate, morphology, and oocyte maturation may be due to the effect of the injected peptides on the levels of hormones, e.g., ecdysone, which acts through the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and has a direct effect on the development of ovarioles, vitellogenesis and oocytes42. Studies conducted on ovaries isolated from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) have shown that changes in the transcript levels of genes responsible for both the regulation of maturation and the degeneration of oocytes may be the result of increased levels of ecdysone, resulting in the initiation of oocyte apoptosis43. This could suggest that alloferon, C8-, C14-, and C16-alloferon caused a decrease in the level of ecdysone, thus accelerating oocyte maturation.
Juvenile hormone (JH) is another regulator of ovarian development and function, particularly during the process of vitellogenesis and oocyte maturation in insects44,45. The effect of this hormone can be altered by the influence of alloferon and its peptidomimetics on the function of the corpora allata glands that produce and release JH46. These compounds did not affect the growth or maturation of follicular cells or intercellular space formation, so the increase in the size of mature oocytes may be the result of changes in the metabolic activity of JH44, as this hormone stimulates the synthesis and release of yolk proteins from cells of the fat body into the haemolymph and increases their uptake by the oocyte. This suggests that the increased dimensions of oocytes may result from the stimulating effect of compounds on the synthesis of vitellogenins and more efficient delivery of this protein during the process of vitellogenesis to oocytes, which in turn is possible due to the accelerated growth of the ovarioles and the correct formation of the follicular epithelium47.
Alloferon, C8-, C14- and C16-alloferon not only presented gonado- and oocytotropic effects but also had an impact on the process of oviposition; the injection of females with alloferon and its analogs reduced the number of emerged offspring. This suggests that despite their accelerating effect on the development of oocytes, peptides do not accelerate the laying of eggs. Further experiments showed that the effects of alloferon and its analogs on T. molitor reproduction are more complex because of the processes of oviposition and embryogenesis as well as larval hatching. After injection of the tested compounds, the females laid eggs from which fewer larvae hatched. Presumably, this may be the result of laying unfertilized eggs, perhaps as an effect of the compounds on the functioning of the complex corpora cardiaca/corpora allata and stimulating them to increase the release of JH48. Soares et al.48 confirmed on the stinkbug Podisus nigrispinus Dallas that an increased level of JH may result in the laying of unfertilized eggs48. Sugime et al.49 indicated that in D. melanogaster, supplying JH with food resulted in the laying of an increased number of ‘virgin’ eggs. Similar relationships between the titer of the juvenile hormone in the haemolymph and the production of unfertilized eggs by Aedes aegypti L. mosquitoes were detected by Van Ekert et al.50. Another potential reason may be the disturbing activity of compounds on the spermatheca, which releases sperm, causing asynchrony with the release of oocytes from ovaries51.
In the analysis of the effects of alloferon and its analogs on reproductive processes in T. molitor during ovulation and/or fertilization, it was necessary to investigate whether these compounds exhibited embryotoxic activity. For this purpose, tests were carried out on eggs laid by noninjected females.
The performed experiments proved that the application of alloferon and its peptidomimetics at each of the concentrations resulted in a reduced number of hatching larvae. The results indicated that the tested compounds applied directly on the fertilized egg surface penetrated the chorion layer or passed through to the egg via the micropyle, causing an embryotoxic effect. Here, the most effective analog was analog with palmitic fatty acid, which resulted in a significant reduction in the number of emerged larvae. These observations can be explained by studies that correlate the mechanism of migration of compounds across the cuticle and the degree of toxicity with both the size of the molecule and the hydrophobic properties resulting from the structure52.
In summary, analysis of the structure-activity relationships of alloferon and its mimetics revealed that they can be considered potential bioinsecticides by combining a long list of peptides and neuropeptides, such as allatostatins, pyrokinins, myosuppressins or trypsin-modulating oostatic factor (TMOF), of insect origin. Each of the compounds described in this paper has potential insecticidal activity and can be used for further research on obtaining active bioinsecticide molecules53,54. The obtained results also fill the gap in knowledge about the physiological activity of the compound in insects and indicate further properties that can be used in the pharmaceutical industry, for example, when using the compound or its analogs as adjuvants. However, to obtain a full picture of the function and activity of alloferon, further studies are needed.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Stork, N. E. How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on earth?. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 (2018).
Nowakowski, A. C. et al. Potential health benefits of edible insects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62(13), 3499–3508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1867053 (2022).
Redhead, J. W. et al. Effects of future agricultural change scenarios on beneficial insects. J. Environ. Manag. 265, 110550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110550 (2020).
Bellekom, B., Hackett, T. D. & Lewis, O. T. A network perspective on the vectoring of human disease. Trends Parasitol 37(5), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2020.12.001 (2021).
Nicholson, G. M. Fighting the global pest problem: preface to the special Toxicon issue on insecticidal toxins and their potential for insect pest control. Toxicon 49(4), 413–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.028 (2007).
Spochacz, M. et al. Plant-derived substances used against beetles–pests of stored crops and food–and their mode of action: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 17(5), 1339–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12377 (2018).
Chowański, S. et al. Synthetic insecticides—Is there an alternative?. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23(2), 291–302 (2014).
Fournier, D. & Mutero, A. Modification of acetylcholinesterase as a mechanism of resistance to insecticides. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 108(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/1367-8280(94)90084-1 (1994).
Aktar, W., Sengupta, D. & Chowdhury, A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7 (2009).
Nachman, R. J. Introduction: Invertebrate neuropeptides XIV. Peptides 53, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2014.03.002 (2014).
Walkowiak-Nowicka, K. et al. Plant secondary metabolites as potential bioinsecticides? Study of the effects of plant-derived volatile organic compounds on the reproduction and behaviour of the pest beetle Tenebrio molitor. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 257, 114951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114951 (2023).
Nachman, R. J. et al. Biostable and PEG polymer-conjugated insect pyrokinin analogs demonstrate antifeedant activity and induce high mortality in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidae). Peptides 34(1), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.11.009 (2012).
Nachman, R. J. et al. Biostable multi-Aib analogs of tachykinin-related peptides demonstrate potent oral aphicidal activity in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidae). Peptides 32(3), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.09.013 (2011).
Nachman, R. J. Peptidomics applied: A new strategy for development of selective antagonists/agonists of insect pyrokinin (FXPRLamide) family using a novel conformational-mimetic motif. EuPA Open Proteomics. 3, 138–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euprot.2014.02.008 (2014).
Scherkenbeck, J. & Zdobinsky, T. Insect neuropeptides: Structures, chemical modifications and potential for insect control. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17(12), 4071–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.061 (2009).
Zhang, Y. M. et al. Peptides, new tools for plant protection in eco-agriculture. Adv. Agrochem. 2(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aac.2023.01.003 (2023).
Mojsoska, B. & Jenssen, H. Peptides and peptidomimetics for antimicrobial drug design. Pharmaceuticals 8(3), 366–415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph8030366 (2015).
Rotem, S. & Mor, A. Antimicrobial peptide mimics for improved therapeutic properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 178(8), 1582–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.020 (2009).
Nowicki, P. et al. Disruption of insect immunity using analogs of the pleiotropic insect peptide hormone Neb-colloostatin: A nanotech approach for pest control II. Sci Rep. 11(1), 9459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87878-5 (2021).
Yu, N., Nachman, R. J. & Smagghe, G. Characterization of sulfakinin and sulfakinin receptor and their roles in food intake in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Gener. Comp. Endocrinol. 188, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.03.006 (2013).
Bonning, B. C. & Chougule, N. P. Delivery of intrahemocoelic peptides for insect pest management. Trends Biotechnol 32(2), 91–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.08.001 (2014).
Zhang, X. et al. Alloferon-1 ameliorates acute inflammatory responses in λ-carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 16689. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20648-z (2022).
Chernysh, S. et al. Antiviral and antitumor peptides from insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(20), 12628–12632. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192301899 (2002).
Appiah, C. et al. Study of alloferon, a novel immunomodulatory antimicrobial peptide (AMP), and its analogues. Front. Pharmacol. 15, 1359261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1359261 (2024).
Kuczer, M. et al. Novel analogs of alloferon: Synthesis, conformational studies, pro-apoptotic and antiviral activity. Bioorg. Chem. 2016(66), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2016.03.002 (2016).
Lee, N. et al. Inhibition of lytic reactivation of Kaposi’S sarcoma-associated herpesvirus by Alloferon. Antivir. Ther. 16(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3851/IMP1709 (2011).
Lee, D. et al. Alloferon and Zanamivir show effective antiviral activity against influenza A virus (H1N1) infection in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(1), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010678 (2022).
Kuczer, M. et al. Mono-and polynuclear copper (II) complexes of alloferons 1 with point mutations (H6A) and (H12A): Stability structure and cytotoxicity. Inorg. Chem. 52(10), 5951–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic400160d (2013).
Chernysh, S. & Kozuharova, I. Anti-tumor activity of a peptide combining patterns of insect alloferons and mammalian immunoglobulins in naïve and tumor antigen vaccinated mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 17(4), 1090–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.10.014 (2013).
Rosiński, G., Wrzeszcz, A. & Obuchowicz, L. Differences in trehalase activity in the intestine of fed and starved larvae of Tenebrio molitor L. Insect. Biochem. 9(5), 485–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(79)90067-2 (1979).
Walkowiak-Nowicka, K. et al. Antheraea peptide and its analog: their influence on the maturation of the reproductive system, embryogenesis, and early larval development in Tenebrio molitor L. beetle. PLoS ONE. 17(12), e0278473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278473 (2022).
Ullmann, S. L. Oogenesis in Tenebrio molitor: Histological and autoradiographical observations on pupal and adult ovaries. Development 30(1), 179–217. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.30.1.179 (1973).
Wellings, D. A. & Atherton, E. Standard Fmoc protocols. Methods Enzymol. 289, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(97)89043-x (1997).
Czarniewska, E. et al. The pro-apoptotic action of the peptide hormone Neb-colloostatin on insect haemocytes. J. Exp. Biol. 215(24), 4308–4313. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.072579 (2012).
Lord, J. C. et al. Evaluation of quantitative PCR reference genes for gene expression studies in Tribolium castaneum after fungal challenge. J. Microbiol. Methods 80(2), 219–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2009.12.007 (2010).
Walkowiak-Nowicka, K. et al. New activity of yamamarin, an insect pentapeptide, on immune system of mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Bull. Entomol. Res. 108(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485317000839 (2018).
Finney, D. J. (editor). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.3030411125 (1952).
Jo, H. et al. Alloferon affects the chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer by regulating the expression of SLC6A14. Biomedicines 10(5), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051113 (2022).
Al Musaimi, O. et al. Strategies for improving peptide stability and delivery. Pharmaceuticals 15(10), 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15101283 (2022).
Sikorski, J. A. et al. Selective peptidic and peptidomimetic inhibitors of Candida albicans myristoylCoA: Protein N-myristoyltransferase: A new approach to antifungal therapy. Peptide Sci. 43(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(1997)43:1%3c43::Aid-bip5%3e3.0.Co;2-0 (1997).
Qvit, N. et al. Peptidomimetic therapeutics: Scientific approaches and opportunities. Drug Discov. Today 22(2), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.003 (2017).
Benrabaa, S. A., Orchard, I. & Lange, A. B. The role of ecdysteroid in the regulation of ovarian growth and oocyte maturation in Rhodnius prolixus, a vector of Chagas disease. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.244830 (2022).
Terashima, J. et al. Nutritional status affects 20-hydroxyecdysone concentration and progression of oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Endocrinol. 187(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.1.06220 (2005).
Luo, W. et al. Juvenile hormone signaling promotes ovulation and maintains egg shape by inducing expression of extracellular matrix genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(39), e2104461118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104461118 (2021).
Wynants, E. et al. Uncovering the role of juvenile hormone in ovary development and egg laying in bumble bees. J. Insect Physiol. 150, 104557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2023.104557 (2023).
Bellés, X. & Maestro, J. L. Endocrine peptides and insect reproduction. Invertebrate reproduction & development 23–37 (Taylor & Francis, 2005).
Mazurkiewicz-Kania, M., Simiczyjew, B. & Jędrzejowska, I. Differentiation of follicular epithelium in polytrophic ovaries of Pieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)—How far to Drosophila model. Protoplasma 256, 1433–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01391-1 (2019).
Soares, M. A. et al. Ovary development, egg production and oviposition for mated and virgin females of the predator Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Acta Scientiarum. Agron. 33, 597–602. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i4.6694 (2011).
Sugime, Y. et al. Upregulation of juvenile hormone titers in female Drosophila melanogaster through mating experiences and host food occupied by eggs and larvae. Zool. Sci. 34(1), 52–7. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs160150 (2017).
Van Ekert, E. et al. Control of larval and egg development in Aedes aegypti with RNA interference against juvenile hormone acid methyl transferase. J. Insect Physiol. 1(70), 143–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.08.001 (2014).
Dias, G. et al. New findings on the sperm structure of Tenebrionoidea (Insecta, Coleoptera). Insects 13(5), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13050485 (2022).
Winiwarter, S., et al. Use of Molecular Descriptors for Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion Predictions. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II. 5, 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-045044-X/00140-1 (2007).
Smagghe, G. et al. Antifeedant activity and high mortality in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidae) induced by biostable insect kinin analogs. Peptides. 31(3), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2009.07.001 (2010).
Borovsky, D. Trypsin-modulating oostatic factor: A potential new larvicide for mosquito control. J. Exp. Biol. 206(21), 3869–75. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00602 (2003).
Acknowledgements
The authors used Curie software (American Journal Experts (AJE)) for language correction, during the preparation of this work. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KWN, SCh, and GR contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KWN, SCh, ZA, and JPB—synthesis of compounds by MK. KWN wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Walkowiak-Nowicka, K., Chowański, S., Pacholska-Bogalska, J. et al. Effects of alloferon and its analogues on reproduction and development of the Tenebrio molitor beetle. Sci Rep 14, 17016 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68118-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68118-y
- Springer Nature Limited