Abstract
4-aminopyridine (4AP) is a potassium (K+) channel blocker used clinically to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). 4AP binds to exposed K+ channels in demyelinated axons, reducing the leakage of intracellular K+ and enhancing impulse conduction. Multiple derivatives of 4AP capable of blocking K+ channels have been reported including three radiolabeled with positron emitting isotopes for imaging demyelinated lesions using positron emission tomography (PET). However, there remains a demand for novel molecules with suitable physicochemical properties and binding affinity that can potentially be radiolabeled and used as PET radiotracers. In this study, we introduce 3-fluoro-5-methylpyridin-4-amine (5Me3F4AP) as a novel trisubstituted K+ channel blocker with potential application in PET. 5Me3F4AP has comparable potency to 4AP and the PET tracer 3-fluoro-4-aminopyridine (3F4AP). Compared to 3F4AP, 5Me3F4AP exhibits comparable basicity (pKa = 7.46 ± 0.01 vs. 7.37 ± 0.07, P-value = 0.08), greater lipophilicity (logD = 0.664 ± 0.005 vs. 0.414 ± 0.002, P-value < 0.0001) and higher permeability to an artificial brain membrane (Pe = 88.1 ± 18.3 vs. 31.1 ± 2.9 nm/s, P-value = 0.03). 5Me3F4AP is also more stable towards oxidation in vitro by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2E1 (IC50 = 36.2 ± 2.5 vs. 15.4 ± 5.1, P-value = 0.0003); the enzyme responsible for the metabolism of 4AP and 3F4AP. Taken together, 5Me3F4AP has promising properties as a candidate for PET imaging warranting additional investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
4-aminopyridine (4AP) is a potassium channel blocker commonly used in the symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS)1,2,3. Its mechanism of action involves binding to voltage-gated K+ (Kv) channels exposed due to demyelination, reducing the aberrant efflux of K+ ions and enhancing axonal conduction4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Additionally, 4AP has demonstrated potential clinical utility for spinal cord injury14,15,16,17,18,19, traumatic brain injury20, and other diseases involving demyelination21. Based on the mechanism of action of 4AP, it has been proposed that upregulated K+ channels in demyelinated axons could be targeted for imaging demyelination using positron emission tomography (PET)22,23. Thus, a radiofluorinated derivative of 4AP, [18F]3-fluoro-4-aminopyridine ([18F]3F4AP), was synthesized and evaluated for imaging demyelination22,24,25. In those studies, [18F]3F4AP displayed high sensitivity in detecting demyelinated lesions in rodent models of MS22 and non-human primates26. Furthermore, [18F]3F4AP has shown acceptable radiation dosimetry in healthy human volunteers27 and it is currently undergoing evaluation in MS patients28 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04699747). Furthermore, since PET uses tracer doses pharmacological toxicity of these compounds is not a concern. Nevertheless, in humans [18F]3F4AP has shown lower metabolic stability (< 50% plasma parent fraction (PPF) remaining, 30 min post injection27) than in monkeys (> 90% PPF 2 h post injection26), which resulted in lower brain uptake in humans than expected from monkey studies29. This reduction in metabolic stability was found to arise from the inhibitory effect of isoflurane on the metabolism of [18F]3F4AP as evidenced by the fact that awake mice metabolize the tracer faster than anesthetized mice, with 17.7 ± 1.7 PPF (n = 11) vs 74.8 ± 1.6 PPF (n = 10) respectively 35 min post-injection29. Additional studies indicate that [18F]3F4AP is oxidized at the 5-position to 5-hydroxy-3F4AP by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2E130, which prompted us to look for more stable derivatives with suitable binding affinity and brain permeability.
Studies on 4AP derivatives including 3,4-diaminopyridine, 4-aminopyridine-3-methanol and others demonstrate that small substituents in the 3-position do not significantly impair binding to K+ channels22,31,32,33,34,35. Based on this, several 4AP derivatives labeled with carbon-11, namely [11C]3-trifluoromethyl-4AP31, [11C]3-methoxy-4AP32, and [11C]3-methyl-4AP33, have also been investigated (Fig. 1A). Although some of these derivatives possess advantages such as higher binding affinity and specific binding compared to [18F]3F4AP31, fluorine-18 labeled tracers are generally preferred due to their longer half-life (110 min vs. 20.3 min)34. Furthermore, [18F]3F4AP displays excellent characteristics for PET imaging including a fast entry and washout from the brain mediated by a pKa value close to physiological (pKa = 7.65) and a positive logD (logD = 0.41)35. In addition, recent studies have shown that 3-methyl-4AP has good binding affinity towards K+ channels, and thus, we hypothesized that a trisubstituted derivative of 3F4AP with a methyl group at the 5-position, 5Me3F4AP, would retain its ability to block Kv channels and have adequate brain permeability while exhibiting improved stability against metabolism. Herein, we characterized the pharmacological and biophysical properties of 5Me3F4AP and evaluated its in vitro metabolic stability towards CYP2E1 to investigate its potential as a PET tracer candidate for imaging demyelination.
Results
Basicity, lipophilicity and membrane permeability of 5Me3F4AP
Measurements of these pharmacological parameters of 5Me3F4AP were taken and compared to those of its predecessors (Fig. 1B). As indicated in left bar graph, 5Me3F4AP demonstrates comparable basicity in comparison to 3F4AP (7.46 ± 0.01 vs. 7.37 ± 0.07). Both compounds have pKa values that are close to the physiological pH, indicating their coexistence in both protonated and neutral forms under physiological conditions. In contrast, 4AP and 3Me4AP display greater basicity (pKa values above 9), indicating that the protonated form is predominant at physiological pH.
In terms of lipophilicity, 5Me3F4AP shows an octanol/water partition coefficient value at pH 7.4 of 0.664 ± 0.005 (Fig. 1B, middle), which is higher than that of 3F4AP (logD = 0.414 ± 0.002). This result indicates that both compounds preferentially partition into the octanol layer, potentially facilitating faster permeation through a lipophilic membrane like the BBB via passive diffusion. Conversely, 4AP and 3Me4AP exhibit a preference for partitioning in the water layer (logD4AP = − 1.478 ± 0.014, logD3Me4AP = − 1.232 ± 0.008), suggesting slower permeation rates. This trend was further validated through a parallel artificial membrane permeability assay, which demonstrated that 5Me3F4AP permeates approximately three times faster than 3F4AP (Fig. 1B, right).
As it may be expected, the compounds with lower pKa exhibited higher logD and higher membrane permeability. If generalizable, this observation could lead to development of predictive models for 4AP derivatives and other basic compounds under physiological pH conditions36.
Affinity towards K+ channels
The blocking potency at different pH conditions (6.4, 7.4 and 9.1) and voltages (− 100 to 60 mV) of 5Me3F4AP was evaluated by measuring the K+ currents generated by Shaker voltage-gated potassium channel from D. melanogaster heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Fig. 2). Specifically, Fig. 2A shows three representative recordings elicited as a response to the voltage stimulus before and after the application of 1 mM of 5Me3F4AP under three extracellular pH conditions. From these recordings, it is clear that 1 mM 5Me3F4AP efficiently blocks the channels. Figure 2B shows the dose–response plot (relative K+ currents at 40 mV vs. 5Me3F4AP concentration) and the fitting of the experimental values to the Hill equation to calculate IC50. This plot shows that blocking is dose and pH dependent with less efficient blocking at higher pH. Figure 2C shows the calculated IC50 values using the Hill equation at different values of pH. This plot shows that the IC50 of 5Me3F4AP increases with voltage and pH indicating a drop in potency. Figure 2D compares the IC50 values calculated at 40 mV using the Hill equation of the newly characterized 5Me3F4AP at different pHs with the IC50 values of the related compounds 4AP, 3F4AP and 3Me4AP. These values confirm that at pH 7.4, the blocking potency of 5Me3F4AP to Kv channels is similar to that of 4AP and 3F4AP previously reported22,35. In addition, when the pH was increased to 9.1, the IC50 of 5Me3F4AP (and 3F4AP) increased around three-fold indicating lower potency. Conversely, the IC50 from 4AP and 3Me4AP decreased by approximately four- and three-fold, respectively, indicating higher potency at higher pH. These differences in pH dependence confirm that it is the protonated form that preferentially binds to channel, since 4AP and 3Me4AP exist mostly in their protonated state at this pH range, whereas 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP are mostly protonated at pH 6.4 and predominantly neutral at pH 9.1. In addition, we used the equation used by Hermann to analyze the voltage-dependence of 4AP37 to determine the IC50(at V=0 mV) and the electric fraction (δ), which represents the fraction of the electric field that the compound must cross through the channel pore to reach its binding site (Table 1). A δ value of \(\hspace{0.17em}\sim \hspace{0.17em}\)0.4 was obtained for 5Me3F4AP; this value is consistent with the δ values of 4AP, 3F4AP and 3Me4AP previously reported35, and it suggests that this novel blocker binds at the same site within the Shaker pore traversing ~ 40% of the electric field generated across the lipid bilayer. Taken together, these findings suggest that the blocking potencies of these KV Shaker-related channel blockers produce a trend as follows: 3Me4AP > 3F4AP ~ 4AP ~ 5Me3F4AP.
Metabolic stability towards CYP2E1 of 5Me3F4AP
To estimate the metabolic stability of 5Me3F4AP towards CYP2E1, we conducted an in vitro investigation utilizing a competitive inhibition assay. The protocol used for this study followed a previously established method38. According to the principle of this assay outlined in the method section, compounds that are good substrates of CYP2E1 result in greater reduction in the rate of formation of a fluorescent reporter than compounds that are poor substrates. In this study, we measured the reaction rates without competitor (blank) as well as in the presence of tranylcypromine (positive control), 4AP, 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the addition of tranylcypromine, a widely recognized potent substrate of CYP2E1, resulted in the most pronounced reduction in fluorogenic emission when compared to the reaction conducted without any addition of enzyme substrates (red vs. blue lines). In comparison, 4AP exhibited a minor reduction in fluorogenic emission (cyan vs. blue lines) indicating that it is a poor substrate of CYP2E1. 3F4AP demonstrated a substantial decrease in rate (yellow vs. blue lines) indicating 3F4AP is a good substrate of CYP2E1, undergoing metabolism at a much faster rate than 4AP. In comparison, 5Me3F4AP demonstrated a reaction rate between 4AP and 3F4AP, bearing a higher resemblance to 3F4AP (Fig. 3A, green vs. cyan and yellow lines). To further quantify the inhibition potency of 5Me3F4AP towards CYP2E1, we measured the CYP2E1-mediated reaction rate in the presence of varying concentrations of 5Me3F4AP and 3F4AP and performed the dose–response fitting (Fig. 3B). We also compared these results with our previous results for 4AP, 3F4AP and the positive control tranylcypromine30. This analysis showed that 5Me3F4AP has an IC50 about two times higher than 3F4AP and about 23 times lower than 4AP (Fig. 3C), indicating that it is a weaker competitive inhibitor of CYP2E1 than 3F4AP, bus stronger than 4AP. Given the previously stablished role of CYP2E1 in the in vivo metabolism of this family of compounds and the direct correlation between inhibitory potency and CYP2E1 affinity for the substrate, this finding suggests that 5Me3F4AP may be metabolized slower than 3F4AP but not as slow as 4AP.
Discussion
This study identified 5Me3F4AP as novel trisubstituted K+ channel blocker with potential application for PET and examined critical pharmacological properties including lipophilicity, basicity, membrane permeability, in vitro target binding affinity and in vitro metabolic stability. While multiple disubstituted 4-aminopyridine derivatives are known to efficiently block K+ channels22,35,37,39,40,41, to our knowledge this is the first example of a trisubstituted derivative that can efficiently block K+ channels.
In comparison to its predecessor 3F4AP, 5Me3F4AP was found to have comparable basicity (pKa 7.46 vs. 7.37, P-value = 0.08) and higher lipophilicity (logD of 0.66 vs. 0.41, P-value < 0.0001). The lower pKa values of 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP compared to 4AP and 3Me4AP (pKa 9.19 and 9.82) indicate that these compounds exist both in the neutral and protonated forms at physiological pH. The protonated form readily binds to the active sites of potassium channels37, facilitating its pharmacological action. While the neutral form, which exhibits higher lipophilicity, can effectively penetrate the BBB through passive diffusion, enabling entry into the brain. Consequently, it is anticipated that both 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP will have higher BBB permeability than 4AP. Furthermore, since 5Me3F4AP was found to permeate an artificial brain membrane approximately three times faster than 3F4AP it is expected that 5Me3F4AP will have higher brain uptake than 3F4AP, potentially being a better PET tracer.
Regarding blocking potency, it was found that at pH 7.4 the potency of 5Me3F4AP is very similar to that of 4AP and 3F4AP. At higher pH the potency of 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP dropped significantly but not that of 4AP supporting that only the protonated form is able to block the channel15 since 3F4AP and 5Me3F4AP exist predominantly in the neutral form at basic pH. These findings suggest that 5Me3F4AP will bind to demyelinated lesions with similar sensitivity as 3F4AP. These findings suggest that 5Me3F4AP will bind to demyelinated lesions with similar sensitivity as 3F4AP. Nevertheless, the blocking potency measurements were made using the D. melanogaster Shaker channel and should be confirmed in human channels. The Shaker channel was used because it is easily accessible and it is an ortholog of the human channels Kv1.1, Kv1.2, Kv1.3 and Kv1.4. In addition, the Shaker channel offers the opportunity to compare our results against previous results of 4AP derivatives obtained using this channel22,35.
In terms of metabolic stability, 5Me3F4AP was found to undergo CYP2E1-mediated oxidation about two times slower than 3F4AP (Fig. 3A, green vs. yellow lines), which was further confirmed by calculating the IC50 (35.9 vs. 17.0). Although the oxidation rate of 5Me3F4AP was still significantly faster than 4AP (Fig. 3A, green vs. cyan lines), this reduction in the rate of oxidation suggests that 5Me3F4AP will have greater in vivo stability than 3F4AP. A limitation of this study is that we did not test other possible metabolic enzymes, which may play a role in vivo. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to test CYP2E1 given that prior studies strongly suggest this enzyme is primarily responsible for the metabolism of 3F4AP and 4AP27,30. Furthermore, the high in vivo stability of 4AP (~ 70% parent fraction in plasma 24 h post oral administration42) compared to 3F4AP (< 50% parent fraction in plasma 60 min post intravenous administration27) is consistent with the measured CYP2E1 oxidation rates in vitro for these compounds30.
In sum, the favorable in vitro characteristics of 5Me3F4AP position it as an intriguing candidate worthy of further investigation as a potential alternative to [18F]3F4AP for PET imaging. Nevertheless, since in vitro behavior may not accurately predict in vivo behavior, future efforts should aim to develop the radiolabeled form of this compound, testing its in vivo stability of the compound and evaluating its imaging performance. To synthesized radiolabeled [18F]5Me3F4AP, one may consider using similar methods to the ones previously developed to synthesize [18F]3F4AP such as 18F/19F exchange of a fluorinated electron-deficient pyridine N-oxide derivative followed by palladium-mediated reduction24 or denitroradiofluorination of a 4-methylester pyridine derivative followed by conversion of the ester group to an amino group through rearrangement25. In order to test the in vivo stability of [18F]5Me3F4AP, one can consider collecting blood at certain times post injection and analyzing for radiometabolites using a radioHPLC26,30. Finally, to assess the imaging properties of the tracer, one could consider performing PET imaging studies in rodent models of demyelination and comparing the binding to the lesioned areas with that of [18F]3F4AP22.
Methods
Animal studies compliance
Female adult frogs (Xenopus laevis) (acquired from Aquanimals SA de CV, Querétaro, México) were used to harvest oocytes for the studies. The animals were not euthanized as part of this study. All procedures involving frogs were performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and with the approval of the Comité Institucional del Cuidado y Uso de Animales en el Laboratorio at the University of Guadalajara (protocol: CUCEI/CINV/CICUAL-03/2023). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Materials
5Me3F4AP was purchased from Ambeed Inc. (Arlington Hts, IL, USA). Characterization data were provided by the vendor (see spectroscopy in SI). 1H NMR (400 MHz, dmso-d6) δ 7.95 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 7.78(s, 1H), 5.91 (s, 2H), 2.05(s, 3H); melting point: 90.9–93.8 °C.
All other chemical compounds used for this study were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Merck (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) or as otherwise indicated.
Partition coefficient determination
The octanol–water partition coefficient (logD) at pH 7.4 was determined according to our previous reported protocol35. Briefly, PBS (900 μL), 1-octanol (900 μL), and a 10 mg/ mL aqueous solution of each compound (2 μL) were added to a 2 mL HPLC vial. The compounds were partitioned between the layers via vortexing and centrifuged at 1000 g for 1 min to allow for phase separation. A 10 μL portion was taken from each layer (autoinjector was set up to draw volume at two different heights) and analyzed by HPLC. The relative concentration in each phase was determined by integrating the area under each peak and comparing the ratio of the areas from the octanol and aqueous layers. A calibration curve was performed to ensure that the concentrations detected were within the linear range of the detector (see Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting Information). This procedure was repeated four times for each compound.
Determination of pK a
The pKa was determined using titration according to our previously described protocol35. A 1 mg/mL solution of 5Me3F4AP was prepared, of which 5 ml was titrated with 0.01 M HCl solution beyond the equivalence point. After each incremental addition of titrant, the sample was stirred and the pH reading was taken with a pH meter. The Gran plot of the titration was analyzed to obtain the pKa (see the plot in Supporting Information, Fig. S3). A similar protocol was used to titrate 3F4AP and 4AP, respectively (Figs. S4 and S5). The titration was repeated four times each for each compound.
Permeability rate determination
The permeability rates of 5Me3F4AP and derivatives were determined using parallel artificial membrane permeability assay-blood–brain barrier (BBB) kit (BioAssay systems, Hayward, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Initially, solutions of each test compound were prepared in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM. These stock solutions along with the stock solutions of control compounds (high control: promazine hydrochloride, low control: diclofenac) were then diluted with PBS (pH = 7.2) to obtain the donor solutions with a final concentration of 500 μM. At the same time, 200 μM of equilibrium standards for each compound and a DMSO blank control solution were prepared.
In the experimental setup, 300 μL of PBS was added to the desired well of the acceptor plate, and 5 μL of BBB lipid solution in dodecane was added to membranes of the donor plate. Next, 200 μL of the donor solutions of each test compound and each permeability control were added to the duplicate wells of the donor plate. The donor plate was carefully placed on the acceptor plate and incubator for 18 h at room temperature. After incubation, UV absorption measurements were conducted using 100 μL of the resulting solutions from the acceptor plate and the equilibrium standards. UV absorption of the controls was measured by running a UV scan in the range of 200–500 nm. UV absorption of 5Me3F4AP and derivatives was measured using HPLC equipped with a UV detector and C18 column. The calibration curve, demonstrating the relationship between the area under the curve (AUC) in the HPLC chromatogram and concentration, is presented in the Supporting Information (Figs. S1, S2).
Cut-open voltage clamp electrophysiology
Blocking potency of 5Me3F4AP was evaluated on the voltage-gated Shaker (homologous to mammalian Kv1.2) ion channel expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, as previously described35. Briefly, each oocyte expressing the Shaker channel was voltage-clamped in a cut-open voltage clamp (COVC) station in order to elicit K+ currents in response to the voltage stimulus protocol, which entailed steps of 50 ms from − 100 to 60 mV in increments of 10 mV. For COVC measurements, the external recording solution was composed (in mM) of 12 KOH, 2 Ca(OH)2, 105 NMDG-MES (n-methyl-d-glucamine)-methylsufonate, 20 HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid). The internal recording solution was composed of 120 KOH, 2 EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid), and 20 HEPES. All measurements were carried out with symmetrical (both internal and external) pH solutions of 6.4, 7.4 and 9.1. Each pH solution was adjusted with MES (2-(n-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid). For measurements at pH = 9.1, HEPES was substituted by CHES (2-(cyclohexylamino)-ethanesulfonic acid). Each oocyte expressing the Shaker ion channel was voltage-clamped to record K+ currents, first in the absence of 5Me3F4AP, and subsequently with the addition of 5Me3F4AP, from 0.0001 to 10 mM. Relative current (Irel) was quantified as the ratio of the current in the absence and in the presence of the indicated concentration of 5Me3F4AP. Finally, K+ currents were amplified with the oocyte clamp amplifier CA-1A (Dagan Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and digitized with the USB-1604-HS-2AO Multifunction Card (Measurement Computing, Norton, MA, USA). All systems were controlled with the GpatchMC64 program (department of anesthesiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA) via a PC. Electrophysiology recordings were sampled at 100 kHz and filtered at 10 kHz.
Electrophysiology data analysis
Data analysis was performed as previously described35. Briefly, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 5Me3F4AP (IC50) was determined by fitting the Irel curve to the Hill equation at each value of V and pH. A Hill coefficient (h) in the range of 0.9 < h < 1.1 was used. Voltage and pH dependence of IC50 was analyzed by fitting the IC50(V) at each pH with a simple one step binding model of 5Me3F4AP to reach its binding site (S) as previously analyzed the voltage dependence of binding of 4AP by Hermann and Gorman (Eq. 1) which allowed the determination of the fractional distance through the membrane electrical field (δ) that 5Me3F4AP has to cross to reach its binding site43:
where IC50(V = 0) is the value of IC50 at V = 0 mV, F is the Faraday constant, R is the gas constant, T is the room temperature, and z is the apparent charge.
Mean values of data ± standard deviation (s.d.) are given or plotted and the number of experiments is denoted by n. Upper and lower limits of the 95% of confidence interval (CI95) are denoted as \({10}^{\left({{\text{log}}IC}_{50}+s.d\right)}\) and \({10}^{\left({{\text{log}}IC}_{50}-s.d\right)}\), respectively.
CYP2E1-mediated metabolic stability assessment
The relative metabolic stability towards CYP2E1 was assessed with the competitive CYP2E1 inhibition assay utilizing the life technologies™ vivid® CYP2E1 screening kit, as described in previous studies44. In this assay, fluorescence emitted by the metabolic product of a specific CYP2E1 substrate included in the kit, was measured in the absence and presence of substrate competitors. Consequently, the highest fluorescence values were obtained from the blank experiments, lacking any competitors. As the concentration of competitors increased, or more potent competitors were introduced, the fluorogenic emission decreased accordingly.
Specifically, 40 µL of 2.5× (final concentration 25 µM) solution of test compounds (4AP, 3F4AP, 5Me3F4AP, and positive control, i.e., tranylcypromine) in 1× vivid® CYP2E1 reaction buffer was added to desired wells of a falcon black/clear 384-well plate in three replicates. Afterwards, 50 µL master pre-mix 2× (40 nM) CYP2E1 BACULOSOMES® and 2× (0.6 units/mL) vivid® regeneration system in 1× reaction buffer) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 10 min at room temperature to allow the compounds to interact with the CYP2E1 in the absence of enzyme turnover. Next, the reaction was initiated by adding 10 µL per well of 10× (100 μM) Vivid® substrate (2H-1-benzopyran-3-carbonitrile,7-(ethoxy-methoxy)-2-oxo-(9Cl)) and 10× (300 μM) Vivid® NADP+ mixture. Immediately (in less than 2 min), the plate was transferred into the fluorescent plate reader and fluorescence was monitored over 60 min (reads in 1 min intervals) at 415 nm as excitation wavelength and 460 nm as emission wavelength. The obtained reads were plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.
Determination of the IC 50 of 5Me3F4AP to CYP2E1
A similar vivid® CYP2E1 assay was conducted as described above. Instead of testing a single concentration of 5Me3F4AP (final concentration 15 µM), a series of concentrations (4.0 mM, 1.2 mM, 400 µM, 120 µM, 40 µM, 12 µM, 4.0 µM, 1.2 µM) were tested with three replicates for each concentration. The plate fluorescence was monitored over 60 min (reads in 1 min intervals) at 415 nm as excitation wavelength and 460 nm as emission wavelength. The reads at 60 min (recalculated by the linear trend line equation) of each concentration were used and fitted with GraphPad Prism9 dose-response-inhibition (concentration is log) curve fitting with weighting method (weighted by 1/Y2) to calculate the IC50 values. A similar procedure was used for determining the IC50 of 3F4AP.
Data availability
The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are contained within the paper.
References
Stefoski, D., Davis, F. A., Faut, M. & Schauf, C. L. 4-Aminopyridine improves clinical signs in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 21, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410210113 (1987).
Jensen, H. B., Ravnborg, M., Dalgas, U. & Stenager, E. 4-Aminopyridine for symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 7, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285613512712 (2014).
Goodman, A. D. et al. Sustained-release oral fampridine in multiple sclerosis: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 373, 732–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60442-6 (2009).
Sherratt, R. M., Bostock, H. & Sears, T. A. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. Nature 283, 570–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/283570a0 (1980).
Bostock, H., Sears, T. A. & Sherratt, R. M. The effects of 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium ions on normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 313, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013666 (1981).
Kirsch, G. E., Shieh, C. C., Drewe, J. A., Vener, D. F. & Brownt, A. M. Segmental exchanges define 4-aminopyridine binding and the inner mouth of K+ pores. Neuron 11, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(93)90154-J (1993).
Fehlings, M. G. & Nashmi, R. Changes in pharmacological sensitivity of the spinal cord to potassium channel blockers following acute spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 736, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(96)00667-1 (1996).
Rasband, M. N. et al. Potassium channel distribution, clustering, and function in remyelinating rat axons. J. Neurosci. 18, 36–47 (1998).
Nashmi, R. & Fehlings, M. G. Mechanisms of axonal dysfunction after spinal cord injury: With an emphasis on the role of voltage-gated potassium channels. Brain Res. Rev. 38, 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00134-5 (2001).
Devaux, J., Gola, M., Jacquet, G. & Crest, M. Effects of K+ channel blockers on developing rat myelinated CNS axons: Identification of four types of K+ channels. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00646.2001 (2002).
Arroyo, E. J., Sirkowski, E. E., Chitale, R. & Scherer, S. S. Acute demyelination disrupts the molecular organization of peripheral nervous system nodes. J. Comp. Neurol. 479, 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20321 (2004).
Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S., Eftekharpour, E. & Fehlings, M. G. Temporal and spatial patterns of Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 protein and gene expression in spinal cord white matter after acute and chronic spinal cord injury in rats: Implications for axonal pathophysiology after neurotrauma. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 577–589 (2004).
Sinha, K., Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S., Velumian, A. A. & Fehlings, M. G. Functional changes in genetically dysmyelinated spinal cord axons of shiverer mice: Role of juxtaparanodal KV1 family K+ channels. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00899.2005 (2006).
Hayes, K. C. et al. Preclinical trial of 4-aminopyridine in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 31, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.40 (1993).
Choquet, D. & Korn, H. Mechanism of 4-aminopyridine action on voltage-gated potassium channels in lymphocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 99, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.99.2.217 (1992).
Segal, J. L. et al. Safety and efficacy of 4-aminopyridine in humans with spinal cord injury: A long-term controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 19, 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.19.9.713.31540 (1999).
Wolfe, D. L., Hayes, K. C., Hsieh, J. T. C. & Potter, P. J. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on motor evoked potentials in patients with spinal cord injury: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial. . J. Neurotrauma 18, 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1089/089771501316919120 (2001).
Grijalva, I. et al. Efficacy and safety of 4-aminopyridine in patients with long-term spinal cord injury: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 23, 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.23.7.823.32731 (2003).
Grijalva, I. et al. High doses of 4-aminopyridine improve functionality in chronic complete spinal cord injury patients with mri evidence of cord continuity. Arch. Med. Res. 41, 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2010.10.001 (2010).
Radomski, K. L. et al. Acute axon damage and demyelination are mitigated by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) therapy after experimental traumatic brain injury. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-022-01366-z (2022).
Hayes, K. C. The use of 4-aminopyridine (fampridine) in demyelinating disorders. CNS Drug Rev. 10, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2004.tb00029.x (2006).
Brugarolas, P. et al. Development of a PET radioligand for potassium channels to image CNS demyelination. Sci. Rep. 8, 607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18747-3 (2018).
Brugarolas, P., Reich, D. S. & Popko, B. Detecting demyelination by PET: The lesion as imaging target. Mol. Imaging 17, 1536012118785471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012118785471 (2018).
Brugarolas, P., Freifelder, R., Cheng, S.-H. & Dejesus, O. Synthesis of meta-substituted [18F]3-fluoro-4-aminopyridine via direct radiofluorination of pyridine n-oxides. Chem. Commun. 52, 7150–7152. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc02362b (2016).
Basuli, F., Zhang, X., Brugarolas, P., Reich, D. S. & Swenson, R. E. An efficient new method for the synthesis of 3-[18F]fluoro-4-aminopyridine via Yamada–Curtius rearrangement. J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm. 61, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3560 (2018).
Guehl, N. J. et al. Evaluation of the potassium channel tracer [18F]3F4AP in rhesus macaques. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 41, 1721–1733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20963404 (2021).
Brugarolas, P. et al. Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the demyelination tracer [18F]3F4AP. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 50, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05980-w (2022).
Guehl, N. et al. First-in-human brain imaging with [18F]3F4AP, a PET tracer developed for imaging demyelination. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 2485 (2022). [Conference Abstract]
Ramos-Torres, K., Sun, Y., Takahashi, K., Zhou, Y.-P. & Brugarolas, P. Common anesthetic used in preclinical PET imaging inhibits metabolism of the PET tracer [18F]3F4AP. J. Neurochem. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16118 (2023).
Sun, Y., Ramos-Torres, K. M. & Brugarolas, P. Metabolic stability of the demyelination positron emission tomography tracer [18F]3-fluoro-4-aminopyridine and identification of its metabolites. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 386, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.122.001462 (2023).
Ramos-Torres, K. M. et al. Syntheses of [11C]2- and [11C]3-trifluoromethyl-4-aminopyridine: Potential PET radioligands for demyelinating diseases. RSC Med. Chem. 11, 1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0md00190b (2020).
Guehl, N. J. et al. Radiochemical synthesis and evaluation in non-human primates of 3-[11C]methoxy-4-aminopyridine: A novel PET tracer for imaging potassium channels in the CNS. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 12, 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00791 (2021).
Sun, Y. et al. Radiochemical synthesis and evaluation of 3-[11C]Methyl-4-aminopyridine in rodents and nonhuman primates for imaging potassium channels in the CNS. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 13, 3342–3351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00364 (2022).
Pike, V. W. PET radiotracers: Crossing the blood–brain barrier and surviving metabolism. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 30, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2009.05.005 (2009).
Rodriguez-Rangel, S., Bravin, A. D., Ramos-Torres, K. M., Brugarolas, P. & Sanchez-Rodriguez, J. E. Structure-activity relationship studies of four novel 4-aminopyridine K+ channel blockers. Sci. Rep. 10, 52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56245-w (2020).
Zheng, C. et al. A metabolically stable PET tracer for imaging synaptic vesicle protein 2A: Synthesis and preclinical characterization of [18F]SDM-16. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. I(49), 1482–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05597-5 (2022).
Caballero, N. A., Meléndez, F. J., Niño, A. & Muñoz-Caro, C. Molecular docking study of the binding of aminopyridines within the K+ channel. J. Mol. Model 13, 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-007-0184-9 (2007).
Marks, B. D. et al. A high throughput screening assay to screen for CYP2E1 metabolism and inhibition using a fluorogenic vivid® P450 substrate. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 1, 73–81 (2002).
Kirsch, G. E. & Narahashi, T. 3,4-diaminopyridine. A potent new potassium channel blocker. Biophys. J. 22, 507–512 (1978).
Berger, S. G., Waser, P. G. & Hofmann, A. Effects of new 4-aminopyridine derivatives on neuromuscular transmission and on smooth muscle contractility. Arzneimittel-forschung 39, 762–765 (1989).
Sun, W. et al. Novel potassium channel blocker, 4-AP-3-MeOH, inhibits fast potassium channels and restores axonal conduction in injured guinea pig spinal cord white matter. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00154.2009 (2009).
Caggiano, A. & Blight, A. Identification of metabolites of dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine) in human subjects and reaction phenotyping of relevant cytochrome P450 pathways. J. Drug Assess. 2, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3109/21556660.2013.833099 (2013).
Hermann, A. & Gorman, A. L. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on potassium currents in a molluscan neuron. J. Gen. Physiol. 78, 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.78.1.63 (1981).
Sun, Y., Ramos-Torres, K. & Brugarolas, P. Metabolic stability of the demyelination PET tracer [18F]3F4AP and identification of its metabolites. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.122.001462 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant R01NS114066 (P.B.); Harvard College Research Program (L.L.Z.); PROSNI-UdeG 2022, Mexico (J.E.S.R.) and CONAHCyT, Mexico (886951) (S.R.R.).
Funding
This work was funded by CONAHCyT, Mexico, 886951, Harvard College Research Program, 2023, PROSNI-UdeG, Mexico, 2022 and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, R01NS114066.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.S. performed the logD, artificial membrane permeability and CYP2E1 metabolic stability experiments and analyzed the data. S.R.R performed the COVC experiments and analyzed the data. L.L.Z. performed the pKa experiments and analyzed the data. P.B. and J.E.S.R. conceived and supervised the project. All authors wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
PB has a financial interest in Fuzionaire Theranostics (f.k.a. Fuzionaire Diagnostics) and the University of Chicago. PB is a named inventor on patents related to [18F]3F4AP owned by the University of Chicago and licensed to Fuzionaire. Dr. Brugarolas’ interests were reviewed and are managed by MGH and Mass General Brigham in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies. A provisional patent application related to 5Me3F4AP has been filed. PB, JESR, YS and SRR are listed as inventors on this provisional patent. The other authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Rodríguez-Rangel, S., Zhang, L.L. et al. Chemical and biophysical characterization of novel potassium channel blocker 3-fluoro-5-methylpyridin-4-amine. Sci Rep 14, 11105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61465-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61465-w
- Springer Nature Limited