Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe global health and economic crisis, with significant consequences for human mortality and morbidity. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more studies on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, both to enhance its effectiveness and prevent its deleterious effects. This study presents the chronology of antibodies during six months after infection in hospitalized patients and the kinetics of serum soluble mediators of the cellular response triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Samples and clinical data from 330 patients hospitalized at the Hospital da Baleia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, who were suspected of having COVID-19, were collected at the time of hospitalization and during 6 months after infection. The immune response was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry. There was a significant difference in IgM specific antibody titers from the 7th to 60th days after infection between COVID-19 negative and positive patients. Soon after 60 days after infection, antibody levels started to reduce, becoming similar to the antibody levels of the COVID-19 negative patients. IgG specific antibodies started to be detectable after 9 days of infection and antibody levels were comparatively higher in positive patients as soon as after 7 days. Furthermore, IgG levels remained higher in these patients during the complete period of 180 days after infection. The study observed similar antibody profiles between different patient groups. The soluble systemic biomarkers evaluated showed a decrease during the six months after hospitalization, except for CCL11, CXCL8, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, IL-6, IFN-g, IL-17, IL-5, FGF-basic, PDGF, VEGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF. The results indicate that IgM antibodies are more prominent in the early stages of infection, while IgG antibodies persist for a longer period. Additionally, the study identified that patients with COVID-19 have elevated levels of biomarkers after symptom onset, which decrease over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
New scientific and clinical evidence is being evaluated regarding subacute and long-term effects after SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may affect multiple systems and lead to sequelae1,2. Reports from infected patients suggest residual effects of the infection, such as fatigue, dyspnea, chest pain, neurological disorders, arthralgia, and a decline in the quality of life2,3,4,5. Periods of intensive hospitalization, cell damage, intense innate immune response with exacerbated production of inflammatory cytokines, and a procoagulant state induced during infection by the virus may contribute to these observed sequelae6,7,8.
Studies show that COVID-19 is marked by dysregulation of myeloid cells9, and that critically ill patients have high serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins IL-6, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)10. However, further research is needed on the long-term behavior of these serum soluble mediators after infection with SARS-CoV-2, as data are scarce in the literature, especially in relation to unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors who presented moderate or severe illness requiring special care and hospitalization.
Our current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity is based mainly on previous experiences with other corona viruses including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viral infections11 and needs to be supplemented with studies of patients who were infected and recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. To clarify the chronology of IgG and IgM antibodies and the kinetics of serum soluble mediators after acute infection by SARS-CoV-2, this work evaluated the immune response to the infection of unvaccinated and hospitalized patients, with suspected diagnosis of COVID-19. Molecular diagnoses were performed for COVID-19 confirmation. Blood samples were collected at the beginning of hospitalization and up to six months after the appearance of the first symptoms, determining the maintenance of the innate and humoral response.
Methods
Three hundred and thirty unvaccinated patients who were suspected to have COVID-19 and were hospitalized at the Hospital da Baleia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between May 2020 and May 2021, were invited to participate in the study for a period of 6 months. Confirmation of COVID-19 was done by RT-qPCR after nasopharyngeal swab was collected between the third and seventh days after symptoms onset. Peripheral blood samples were collected from each patient on the first day of hospitalization until the fifteenth day after the onset of symptoms, every two days, followed by one collection per month for six months. Peripheral blood samples in the volume of 10 ml were collected by venipuncture, adhering to biosafety norms, and centrifuged at 3000 g/5 min for serum collection.
The clinical course of COVID-19 was classified based on the WHO classification12, and the severity was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Medical reports and records were used to monitor demographic information, primary symptoms, treatment protocols, molecular diagnosis results, comorbidities, and other individual information for each patient.
This study was analyzed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation and the National Research Ethics Committee (CONEP 30428720.3.0000.5091), and all the patients provided informed consent.
The serum samples from the whole study population were tested for specific IgM and IgG antibodies against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1). The antigen protein used was produced in stable recombinant HEK293 cells13, and antibody detection was measured by ELISA14. The antibodies used for the ELISA assays were both from the Sigma-Aldrich brand, Anti-Human IgM A0420 (Lot: 124M4811V) and Anti-Human IgG A0170 (Lot: 0181901), following the protocol by Grenfell et al., 202214, considering a detection limit (cut off) of 0.35 and 0.1508 for IgM and IgG detection, respectively.
A high-throughput 27-plex Luminex assay (Bio-Rad) was used to quantify a range of immune soluble mediators in the sera of 61 participants confirmed for COVID-19 subgroup (Appendix 2), including chemokines (CXCL8, CCL11, CCL3, CCL4, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-12, IFN-γ, IL-15, IL-17), regulatory cytokines (IL-1Ra, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13), and growth factors (FGF-basic, PDGF, VEGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-7, IL-2). Measurements were performed on a Bio-Plex 200 instrument (Bio-Rad). Samples were selected from these positive COVID-19 patients, collected between 30, 90, and 180 days after the onset of symptoms and hospital admission. As a control for this particular analysis, 37 serum samples from healthy volunteers (age from 22 to 54 years old, median 40 years) with negative RT-qPCR and no symptoms of COVID-19 were used. The selection of these samples was based on inclusion criteria for this group, with an effort to achieve age and gender matching with the patient group.
Inclusion criteria for patients
Patients aged 18 or older, unvaccinated against COVID-19, with suspected or molecularly confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, hospitalized and in isolation at Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from May 2020 to May 2021, who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form (ICF).
Exclusion criteria for patients
Patients who did not agree to participate in the research and did not sign the ICF; Patients who received the primary COVID-19 vaccination protocol; Patients under 18 years of age.
Inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers
Individuals aged 18 or older without known comorbidities and without a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form (ICF).
Exclusion criteria for healthy volunteers
Individuals under 18 years of age; presence of comorbidities and/or a previous diagnosis of COVID-19; Individuals who did not agree to participate in the study and did not sign the informed consent form (ICF).
Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism® software. The results obtained with the quantification of antibodies titers were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney normality tests with a significance level of p < 0.05. Signatures of soluble mediators were designed by converting the serum levels, originally expressed as continuous variables (pg/mL), into categorical data (percentage proportion) using the global median values as the cut off to identify the proportion of subjects with high levels of mediators. The proportion of subjects with increased levels (above the 50th percentile, gray zone) was underscored.
Results
Demographic data of the patients
A total of 330 unvaccinated patients with a suspected of COVID-19 who were hospitalized at the Hospital da Baleia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between May 2020 and May 2021, were separated into two groups based on RT-qPCR results: positive or negative for COVID-19 RT-qPCR. Among the 165 patients that were positive for COVID-19 (from 10 to 91 years, median age 59 years), 99 (60%) were male and 66 (40%) were female, as shown in Appendix 1. Hypertension (95, 57.6%), diabetes (53, 32.1%), chronic kidney disease (38, 23%) and cancer (24, 14.5%) were the most common comorbidities observed in this group. Sixteen (9.7%) presented no comorbidities. The main primary symptoms reported were dyspnea (89, 53.9%), fever (81, 49.1%), dry cough (41, 24.8%), myalgia (30, 18.2%), diarrhea (25, 15.2%), desaturation (23, 13.9%) and prostration (23, 13.9%). Regarding the medication protocol used, 107 patients (64.8%) made use of antibiotics, 70 (42.4%) nasal oxygen cannula, 37 (22.4%) corticosteroids, 23 (13.9%) antivirals and 14 (8.5%) anticoagulants. One hundred and thirty-three (80.6%) of the positive patients in the molecular diagnosis did not present clinical severity, however, 32 (19.4%) individuals required intensive treatment, and 17 (10.3%) of the patients evolved to death.
Among the 165 patients that were negative for COVID-19 (ranging from 1 to 88 years, median age 58 years), 88 (53.3%) were female and 77 (46.7%) were male. The most common comorbidities observed in this group were hypertension (84, 50.9%), chronic kidney disease (76, 46.1%), diabetes (46, 27.9%), and cancer (32, 19.4%). Seven (4.2%) of the hospitalized patients had no comorbidities. The primary symptoms reported were dyspnea (83, 50.3%), fever (66, 40%), dry cough (28, 17%), desaturation (27, 16.4%), myalgia (19, 11.5%), and odynophagia (17, 10.3%). Antibiotics (158, 95.8%), oxygen administration through nasal cannula (67, 40.6%), corticosteroids (33, 20%), anticoagulants (23, 13.9%), and antivirals (19, 11.5%) were the main resources used for medication during hospitalization. One hundred and forty-seven (89.1%) of the negative patients did not have clinical severity, while 18 (10.9%) required intensive treatment, and 10 (6.1%) of the patients died.
Immunogenicity
In order to evaluate the longitudinal profile of IgM and IgG antibodies among negative and positive RT-qPCR patients, graphs using the median optical density (OD) from the first day to 6 months after the onset of symptoms were constructed. There was a significant difference (p = 0.022) in IgM specific antibody titers from the 7th to 60th days after infection between COVID-19 negative and positive patients (Fig. 1A). During this period, positive patients presented high levels of IgM. Soon after 60 days after infection, antibody levels started to reduce, becoming similar to the antibody levels of the COVID-19 negative patients. Differently, IgG specific antibodies started to be detectable after 9 days of infection and antibody levels were comparatively higher in positive patients as soon as after 7 days (p = 0.0232). IgG levels remained higher in these patients during the complete period of 180 days after infection (Fig. 1B). An evaluation of the IgM and IgG antibodies profile in the COVID-19 positive patients separately by age, biological sex, presence or absence of cancer, and by clinical severity of COVID-19 presented no differences between groups (Figs. 2 and 3).
When quantifying systemic soluble biomarkers using Luminex Bio-Plex Pro™ human cytokines in serum samples of COVID-19 positive patients at 30, 90, and 180 days after symptom onset, an important difference was observed between the healthy volunteers and positive patients. The mediators CCL3, CCL4, CCL2, CCL5, IL-12, IL-15, IL-1Ra, and PDGF were higher in healthy volunteers, while the mediators CCL11, CXCL10, IL-1b, IL-6, TNF-a, IFN-g, IL-17, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, FGF-basic, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-7, and IL-2 were increased in COVID-19 positive patients (Fig. 4).
The kinetics of the evaluated biomarkers among positive COVID-19 patients showed a significant reduction in most soluble mediators from the first evaluation after 30-days of SARS-CoV-2 infection to 180 days after symptom onset, except for CCL11, CXCL8, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, IL-6, IFN-g, IL-17, IL-5, FGF-basic, PDGF, VEGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF (Figs. 4 and 5).
Considering the establishment of the general signature of serum soluble mediators after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, it was identified that most patients had biomarkers levels above the global median 30 days after the onset of symptoms. However, these levels were reduced in relation to the global median after six months of infection (Fig. 5A).
Discussion
The clinical manifestations of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 can be predominantly characterized by a set of flu-like symptoms, such as shortness of breath, fever, cough, and myalgia, which were reported by most patients in this study as well as in other previously published research15,16,17. The development of more severe symptoms of COVID-19 and the need for hospitalization are mainly associated with elderly patients (> 60 years old) with one or more pre-existing comorbidities18,19,20,21. The presence of underlying chronic diseases in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 such as hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease increases the risk of developing moderate to severe COVID-19 with the need for medical intervention up to 10 times compared to individuals without any comorbidity, which corroborates the results of this research, where the vast majority of hospitalized patients who required intensive treatment were elderly with at least one pre-existing comorbidity17,22,23.
Regarding the adaptive immune response, previous studies have shown that circulating antibodies against SARS-CoV reach their peak 4 months after the onset of the disease and persist for at least 2 years24. In addition, neutralizing antibodies against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus remain detectable for at least 34 months after the outbreak25.
In a study conducted by Hsueh et al. (2004)26 to evaluate the chronological evolution of IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies after SARS-CoV infection using immunofluorescent antibody assays, it was found that seroconversion for IgG occurred on average at 10 days, simultaneously or one day before IgM and IgA, which had an average seroconversion of 11 days. It was also described that patients whose lung condition was not severe had IgG profiles like those patients who later developed severe respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support26.
Regarding COVID-19, most individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 seroconvert within 5 to 15 days after the onset of symptoms, with approximately 90% seroconversion by the tenth day27,28,29,30,31. In addition, estimates of seroconversion in the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein antibodies can vary from 91 to 99% in large studies32,33, where IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies develop within a few days in infected individuals29,31,34, as observed in this study, where COVID-19 positive patients had a seroconversion of IgM and IgG antibodies, respectively, on the seventh and ninth day after symptom onset. Data from two large studies with more than a thousand participants reported that IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 are well maintained up to 4 months after symptom onset32,33. In this study, patients had high levels of IgG throughout the 6-month period analyzed. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies can be detected in most infected patients from 4 days after symptom onset, except in severe patients who may present these antibodies up to 3 weeks later35.
Long et al. (2020)27 validated a magnetic chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for the detection of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 285 infected patients. They found that IgM-type antibody levels varied widely among patients, as did IgG. Furthermore, they observed that antibody titers, in general, in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 were higher than those in the group that did not show clinical severity of the disease27. KOWITDAMRONG and collaborators (2020)36 analyzed the correlation between the level of antibodies and age in the severe group and no significant correlation was found. Patients who had the severe form of the disease in the present study did not show such a difference during the antibody chronology performed, nor did other evaluated groups, such as the difference between age group, biological sex, and presence or absence of neoplasia.
The host immune response to COVID-19 determines susceptibility to the progression of infection as well as being a major determinant of recovery orchestrated by coordinated cell an antibody responses11. Furthermore, data concerning the durability of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection can assist in the continued development of successful vaccines and therapeutics for control of the infection. When quantifying systemic soluble biomarkers of surviving COVID-19 positive patients, it was observed that chemokines, pro-inflammatory cytokines, regulatory cytokines, and growth factors showed a decrease during the six months of follow-up, except for some particular biomarkers: CCL11, CXCL8, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, IL-6, IFN-g, IL-17, IL-5, FGF-basic, PDGF, VEGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF.
The cytokines produced during an infection by SARS-CoV-2 exert antiviral and inflammatory activities and are also directly associated with the pathological processes of the disease, such as cell death and immunothrombosis37. The multisystemic immune dysregulation observed in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 includes an increase in various pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), interferon-gamma (IFNγ), and IL-17, compared to healthy volunteers10,37,38,39,40, as also observed in this study.
While an effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2 requires the involvement of both innate and adaptive immune cells, patients with COVID-19 present some variations in their immune response, such as a reduction in lymphocyte count (lymphopenia) and an increase in the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, which are considered disease markers41,42,43.
To better clarify the relationship between changes in the peripheral immune system and the severity of COVID-19, Walter et al. (2022)44 quantified the levels of inflammatory mediators during acute COVID-19. They observed that infected patients presented an increase in myeloperoxidase, interleukins IL-12, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-8, accompanied by a reduction in IL-17A and nitric oxide levels. IL-10 levels ≥ 14 pg/ml were strongly related to worse disease outcomes, with a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 79.1%. Among the cytokines evaluated, IL-6 was the most related to a worse prognosis in patients with COVID-19, as it was increased in most patients, especially in those with more severe disease44. Exacerbated IL-6 responses can lead to a systemic pro-inflammatory response, as this interleukin is involved in several mechanisms such as the acute phase response, inflammation, proliferation of B and T cells, hematopoiesis, and neutrophil chemotaxis45.
The irregular innate immune response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the development of post-infection sequelae. Published studies have shown that some inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, are elevated in patients with Long Covid46. Additionally, cytokines such as IFN-β and IFN-λ1 may remain elevated for 8 months after acute infection in these patients compared to recovered individuals. Furthermore, cytokines IL-6, IFN-γ, IFN-β, PTX3, IFN-γ, and IFN-λ2/3 was associated with Long Covid with 78.5 to 81.6% accuracy47.
In view of the results of this work and other previously discussed studies, the innate and adaptive immune response during COVID-19 is still controversial, which may be closely related to several other specific clinical characteristics of each patient. Therefore, understanding the heterogeneous manifestations of this disease and exploring the relationships between these phenomena and immunity is a priority. Additionally, it is crucial to understand the duration of memory and protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 after infection or vaccination.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study showed that COVID-19 positive patients presented high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies throughout the 6-month period analyzed, with no difference between age, biological sex, and presence or absence of neoplasia groups over time. Soluble biomarkers were increasingly released at the beginning of the infection followed by a decrease during the six months of follow-up on some specific chemokines, pro-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines, and growth factors as: CCL11, CXCL8, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, IL-6, IFN-g, IL-17, IL-5, FGF-basic, PDGF, VEGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF. These findings contribute to understanding of the immune response to COVID-19 and may have implications for the development of effective treatments and vaccines. However, further research is needed to fully understand the long-term immune response and potential implications for reinfection and vaccination strategies.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Halpin, S., O’Connor, R. & Sivan, M. Long COVID and chronic COVID syndromes. J. Med. Virol. 93(3), 1242 (2021).
De Miranda, D. A. P. et al. Long COVID-19 syndrome: A 14-months longitudinal study during the two first epidemic peaks in Southeast Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 116(11), 1007–1014 (2022).
Carfì, A. et al. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. Jama 324(6), 603–605 (2020).
Tenforde, M. W. et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network—United States, March–June 2020. Morbidity Mortality Wkly. Rep. 69(30), 993 (2020).
Huang, C. et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: A cohort study. Lancet 397(10270), 220–232 (2021).
Mcelvaney, O. J. et al. Characterization of the inflammatory response to severe COVID-19 illness. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202(6), 812–821 (2020).
Sungnak, W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 26(5), 681–687 (2020).
Tang, N. et al. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18(4), 844–847 (2020).
Schulte-Schrepping, J. et al. Severe COVID-19 is marked by a dysregulated myeloid cell compartment. Cell 182(6), 1419-1440.e23 (2020).
Leisman, D. E. et al. Cytokine elevation in severe and critical COVID-19: A rapid systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison with other inflammatory syndromes. Lancet Respir. Med. 8(12), 1233–1244 (2020).
Triggle, C. R. et al. A comprehensive review of viral characteristics, transmission, pathophysiology, immune response, and management of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 as a basis for controlling the pandemic. Front. Immunol. 12, 631139 (2021).
World Health Organization. Clinical Management of COVID-19: Interim Guidance, 27 May 2020. 13–5. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332196. Accessed 15 Dec 2021 (2020).
Alvim, R.G.F., Lima, T.M., Rodrigues, D.A.S., Marsili, F.F., Bozza, V.B.T. et al. An Affordable Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike ELISA Test for Early Detection of IgG Seroconversion Suited for Large-Scale Surveillance Studies in Low-Income Countries. Accessed 12 Apr 2021 (2020).
Grenfell, R. F. et al. Immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of inactivated virus (CoronaVac) vaccine in a two-dose primary protocol and BNT162b2 heterologous booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A one year period follow up phase 4 study. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13 (2022).
Mcintosh, K., Hirsch, M. S. & Bloom, A. J. L. I. D. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Epidemiology, virology, and prevention. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 1, 2019–2020 (2020).
Burke, R. M. et al. Symptom profiles of a convenience sample of patients with COVID-19—United States, January–April 2020. Morbidity Mortality Wkly. Rep. 69(28), 904 (2020).
Bajgain, K. T. et al. Prevalence of comorbidities among individuals with COVID-19: A rapid review of current literature. Am. J. Infect. Control 49(2), 238–246 (2021).
Wang, X. et al. Comorbid chronic diseases and acute organ injuries are strongly correlated with disease severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Research (2020).
Hu, Y. et al. Prevalence and severity of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Virol. 127, 104371 (2020).
Yang, J. et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in coronavirus disease 2019 patient: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 91–95 (2020).
Emami, A. et al. Prevalence of underlying diseases in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 8(1), 13 (2020).
COVID, CDCx et al. Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019—United States, February 12–March 28, 2020. Morbidity Mortality Wkly. Rep. 69(13), 382 (2020).
Bommer, W. CDC offers guidance to patients with chronic disease’ living with uncertainty’ during COVID-19. Healio Rheumatol. 4(30), 2020 (2020).
Cao, W.-C. et al. Disappearance of antibodies to SARS-associated coronavirus after recovery. N. Engl. J. Med. 357(11), 1162–1163 (2007).
Payne, D. C. et al. Persistence of antibodies against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22(10), 1824 (2016).
Hsueh, P.-R. et al. Chronological evolution of IgM, IgA, IgG and neutralisation antibodies after infection with SARS-associated coronavirus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10(12), 1062–1066 (2004).
Long, Q.-X. et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26(6), 845–848 (2020).
Moderbacher, C. R. et al. Antigen-specific adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in acute COVID-19 and associations with age and disease severity. Cell 183(4), 996-1012.e19 (2020).
Premkumar, L. et al. The receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Sci. Immunol. 5(48), eabc8413 (2020).
Ripperger, T. J. et al. Orthogonal SARS-CoV-2 serological assays enable surveillance of low-prevalence communities and reveal durable humoral immunity. Immunity 53(5), 925-933.e4 (2020).
Suthar, M. S. et al. Rapid generation of neutralizing antibody responses in COVID-19 patients. Cell Rep. Med. 1(3), 100040 (2020).
Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(18), 1724–1734 (2020).
Wajnberg, A. et al. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months. Science 370(6521), 1227–1230 (2020).
Isho, B. et al. Persistence of serum and saliva antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens in COVID-19 patients. Sci. Immunol. 5(52), eabe5511 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. Neutralizing antibodies responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 inpatients and convalescent patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).
Kowitdamrong, E. et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with differing severities of coronavirus disease 2019. PloS one 15(10), e0240502 (2020).
Mehta, P. et al. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395(10229), 1033–1034 (2020).
Li, H. et al. SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. Lancet 395(10235), 1517–1520 (2020).
Chen, L. Y. C. & Quach, T. T. T. COVID-19 cytokine storm syndrome: A threshold concept. Lancet Microbe 2(2), e49 (2021).
Paludan, S. R. & Mogensen, T. H. Innate immunological pathways in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Sci. Immunol. 7(67), eabm5505 (2022).
Chen, L. et al. Scoring cytokine storm by the levels of MCP-3 and IL-8 accurately distinguished COVID-19 patients with high mortality. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5(1), 1–3 (2020).
Diao, B. et al. Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Front. Immunol. 3, 827 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Infect. 81(1), e6–e12 (2020).
Walter, L. O. et al. The relationship between peripheral immune response and disease severity in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects: A cross-sectional study. Immunology 165(4), 481–496 (2022).
Covarrubias, A. J. & Horng, T. IL-6 strikes a balance in metabolic inflammation. Cell Metab. 19(6), 898–899 (2014).
Merad, M. et al. The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19. Science 375(6585), 1122–1127 (2022).
Phetsouphanh, C. et al. Immunological dysfunction persists for 8 months following initial mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Immunol. 23(2), 210–216 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to the care team at the Hospital da Baleia for their partnership and exceptional front-line service during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors would like to acknowledge the generous donation of trimeric spike protein of SARS-COV-2 from the Cell Culture Engineering Laboratory of COPPE/UFRJ—Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, as well as the 27-plex Luminex assay provided by Dr. Sergio William Viana Peixoto from the NESPE at the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ). Additionally, we would like to thank the Network Technological Platforms from FIOCRUZ for their support on the Flow Cytometry analyses.
Funding
Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ) (to RFQG and scholarship to CC), The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (scholarships to DM and SG), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (scholarship to NA and JA) and The Minas Gerais Research Funding Foundation (FAPEMIG) (scholarship to PF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.A.C.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection, Writing, Literature Review, Editing. P.S.F.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection. N.B.F.A.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection. D.A.P.M.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection. S.V.C.G.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection. A.J.L.: Patient follow-up, Data Collection. C.M.F.B.: Patient follow-up, Data Collection. J.V.A.: Methodology, Patient follow-up, Data Collection. R.N.H.A.: Patient follow-up. R.A.S.: Patient follow-up, Data Collection. R.V.R.V.: Conceptualization, Methodology. O.A.M.F.: Data analysis, Writing - Review and Editing. A.C.C.A.: Methodology, Data analysis. D.A.O.: Methodology, Data analysis. R.F.G.Q.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Resources, Writing - Review and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Corsini, C.A., Filgueiras, P.S., Almeida, N.B. et al. Antibody response and soluble mediator profile in the first six months following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Rep 13, 18606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43263-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43263-y
- Springer Nature Limited