Abstract
Human infections with Plasmodium knowlesi, a malaria parasite of Macaca fascicularis and Macaca nemestrina (long-tailed and pig-tailed macaques respectively), occur throughout Southeast Asia, especially Malaysian Borneo. Other naturally-acquired human infections with malaria parasites from macaques in Southeast Asia are P. cynomolgi, P. inui-like, P. coatneyi and P. simiovale. In Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo, M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina from only the Kapit Division have been examined previously for malaria parasites. In order to determine the distribution of P. knowlesi and other zoonotic malaria parasites, 73 macaque blood samples derived from 7 other administrative divisions in Sarawak were studied. Of 45 blood samples from M. fascicularis and 28 from M. nemestrina tested by nested PCR assays, 23 (51.1%) M. fascicularis and 15 (53.6%) M. nemestrina samples were positive for Plasmodium DNA. Thirty-two of these macaques from 7 divisions sampled, harboured either single (n = 12), double (n = 9), triple (n = 7) or quadruple (n = 4) infections of P. knowlesi, P. inui, P. cynomolgi and P. coatneyi, while the infecting species of Plasmodium could not be identified for 6 samples. P. knowlesi was detected in 15.5% (7/45) M. fascicularis and in 7.1% (2/28) M. nemestrina sampled. Despite the small number of samples analysed from each administrative division, the current study indicates that macaques infected with the zoonotic malaria parasites P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui and P. coatneyi are widely distributed throughout Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. Travelers to forested areas in Sarawak should be made aware of the potential risk of acquiring zoonotic malaria.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Non-human primates are reservoir hosts for malaria parasites and many other infective agents including Hepatitis B, Simian retroviruses, Macacine herpesvirus 1 and Brugia malayi1, 2. There are more than 30 species of Plasmodium which are capable of infecting primates out of over 200 species of Plasmodium identified to date3, 4. Human infections with simian malaria parasites were thought to be extremely rare until a large focus of human infections with P. knowlesi was reported in 2004 in the Kapit division of Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo5. Since then, human P. knowlesi infections have been reported throughout Malaysia and in all countries in Southeast Asia except Timor Leste6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Human knowlesi malaria cases are of public health concern in Malaysia, where from 2018 to 2020 they constituted all the 8,500 indigenous cases of malaria, mainly in the states of Sabah and Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo (Ministry of Health Malaysia, unpublished data)15, 16. In Sarawak, knowlesi malaria cases have continued to increase from the 120 cases first described in the Kapit Division in 2004 to between 759 and 1,247 annual cases from 2016 to 2020, with 14 deaths (Ministry of Health Malaysia, unpublished data). There have also been case reports of tourists acquiring knowlesi malaria following visits to forested areas in Sarawak17,18,19 and Southeast Asia20.
The natural hosts for P. knowlesi are primarily Macaca fascicularis (long-tailed macaque) and M. nemestrina (pig-tailed macaque)4. P. knowlesi infections in these species, the most common non-human primates in Southeast Asia, have been reported from Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines and Laos7, 21,22,23,24,25,26. There have also been reports of natural infections of P. knowlesi in a Presbytis melalophos (banded leaf monkey) in Peninsular Malaysia27, and in Trachypithecus obscurus (dusky leaf monkey) and Macaca arctoides (stump-tailed macaque) in Thailand26, 28. Apart from P. knowlesi, there are other malaria parasites of M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina which can infect humans. A case of naturally-acquired P. cynomolgi was reported in Peninsular Malaysia in 201429. This was followed by descriptions of other human P. cynomolgi infections in Cambodia, Malaysia and Thailand30,31,32,33. More recently, human infections with P. inui, P. coatneyi, P. simiovale and P. inui-like parasites have been described in Malaysia34, 35. In South America, zoonotic malaria cases originating from other non-human primates have been reported; P. brasilianum acquired from Alouatta seniculus (red howler monkey)36 and P. simium from Alouatta guariba (brown howler monkey)37, 38.
Previous studies on malaria parasites of M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina in Sarawak State were confined to the Kapit Division21, 39. In order to determine the distribution of P. knowlesi and other zoonotic malaria parasites, macaque blood samples collected from 7 other administrative divisions in Sarawak were examined with molecular detection assays.
Methods
Ethics statement and collection of blood samples
In Sarawak, permits are required from the Sarawak Forestry Department and the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre for the collection of samples from animals and for the use of these samples for research. The protocols for capture, collection of blood samples and release of wild macaques, together with collection of blood samples from captive macaques were approved by the Sarawak Forestry Department (Permits Numbers: NPW.907.4.2-32, NPW.907.4.2-97, NPW.907.4.2-98, 57/2006 and 70/2007). In addition, a permit to access and collect animal blood samples was obtained from the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre (Permit Number: SBC-RP-0081-BS). All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
A veterinarian collected blood samples from the femoral vein of each wild macaque following anaesthesia by intramuscular injection of tiletamine and zolazepam (Zoletil® 100, Virbac, France) at a dose of 5 mg/kg. The blood collection was performed using 21G × 1” eedle attached to a 5 ml syringe (Terumo, Japan), where not more than 5 ml blood was drawn from each macaque for the study purposes. Blood samples were collected at the trap sites and the animals were released after they had recovered from anaesthesia. Similar procedures were employed when venous blood samples were obtained from captive macaques at Matang Wildlife Centre and Semenggoh Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre in the Kuching division. For macaques kept as pets, blood spots on filter paper were collected by pricking the end of the tails of the animals by staff of the Sarawak Health Department during their visits to malaria affected communities. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Universiti Malaysia Sarawak and was performed in concordance with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.
Blood samples were obtained from 45 M. fascicularis and 28 M. nemestrina that were either wild (n = 21) or captive (n = 52). The wild macaques were sampled at the following administrative divisions in Sarawak, with the number collected and dates of sampling in brackets: Sarikei (n = 7, January 2007 to February 2008), Kuching (n = 2, June 2008), Limbang (n = 1, June 2008), Miri (n = 8, June 2007 to June 2008) and Sri Aman (n = 3, September 2012 to October 2012) (Fig. 1). Samples from 12 captive macaques were obtained from the Kuching Division; 10 at the Matang Wildlife Centre from October 2003 to August 2012 and 2 from Semenggoh Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre in October 2004. The remaining 40 blood samples were from captive macaques that had been kept as pets by residents of rural communities in the following divisions, with the number collected and dates of sampling in brackets: Sibu (n = 5, June 2007 to July 2007), Samarahan (n = 4, June 2007 to July 2007), Limbang (n = 27, October 2003 to July 2008), Miri (n = 4, May 2007 to June 2007). The macaques at the wildlife centres were not born in captivity and were kept in enclosures that were not netted. No information was collected regarding the period of captivity of the macaques at the wildlife centres or at the rural communities. Each of the wild and captive macaques was only sampled once. The macaques were identified by the veterinarians and by the staff of the Sarawak Health Department based on the length of the tails of the macaques; M. fascicularis have long tails (32–75 cm) and M. nemestrina have very short tails (< 25 cm). The veterinarians at the wildlife centres were informed which macaques were malaria-positive and were advised to treat them with antimalarial drugs. None of the wild macaques that were trapped nor those kept as pets were treated with antimalarial drugs.
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from dried blood spots on filter paper using InstaGene Matrix (BioRad Laboratories) and from frozen blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN) as described previously41.
Nested PCR assays
DNA samples were initially analysed using nested-PCR assays for detecting Plasmodium DNA42. All Plasmodium-positive samples were then analysed by nested PCR assays with PCR primers specific for P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui, P. fieldi and P. coatneyi as described previously21.
Results
Of the 73 macaque blood samples examined with nested PCR assays, 51.1% (23/45) M. fascicularis and 53.6% (15/28) M. nemestrina) were positive for Plasmodium DNA (Fig. 1). The prevalence of malaria parasites was higher in wild than in captive M. fascicularis; 84.2% (16/19) of wild M. fascicularis and 26.9% (7/26) of captive ones were Plasmodium-positive. For M. nemestrina, both samples from the wild and 50% (13/26) of those from captive animals were Plasmodium-positive.
The 23 Plasmodium-positive M. fascicularis samples were collected from all the 7 administrative divisions sampled (Fig. 1). For M. nemestrina, 20 samples were collected for analysis from 5 administrative divisions and 15 macaques from Limbang, Kuching, and Miri divisions harboured malaria parasites while 5 from Sibu and Samarahan were found to be Plasmodium-negative.
In 84% (32/38) Plasmodium-positive samples from macaques, P. knowlesi, P. inui, P. cynomolgi, and P. coatneyi were detected either as single (n = 12), double (n = 9), triple (n = 7) or quadruple (n = 4) infections (Table 1). P. knowlesi was detected in 15.5% (7/45) M. fascicularis and in 7.1% (2/28) M. nemestrina sampled. For 6 of these samples (3 each from M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina), the species of Plasmodium could not be identified with PCR primers specific for P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui, P. fieldi and P. coatneyi.
Discussion
Molecular detection methods such as nested PCR assays have proved to be more sensitive and specific than microscopy for the detection of malaria parasites in humans, non-human primates and mosquitoes5, 7, 23, 39, 43,44,45,46. In the current study, for 6 macaque samples that were Plasmodium-positive in nested PCR assays, the species of Plasmodium could not be identified with nested PCR assays using species-specific primers for P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui, P. fieldi and P. coatneyi. Similar observations have been reported in studies of blood samples from macaques28, 47 and humans34, and during entomological studies to incriminate vectors of malaria45,46,47. For these 6 samples the approximately 240 bp fragments that were amplified by PCR with the Plasmodium-specific primers, rPLU3 and rPLU4, were not sequenced. Previously, we sequenced these fragments from a number of samples that were Plasmodium-positive but negative with the species-specific PCR primers and found through the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) searches that they had high similarity to species of Plasmodium, including P. inui and P. knowlesi. However, it was not possible to confirm the identity of the infecting species by phylogenetic analyses of these and referral sequences since the bootstrap values were low and it was not possible to differentiate between the various species of Plasmodium. It is possible that the parasite counts in these 6 macaques were low but were sufficiently amplified by the genus-specific primers which target all the copies of both the A- and S-forms of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA genes41, 42. However, with the species-specific primers that target either the S- or the A-type SSU rRNA genes, sufficient PCR amplification was probably not attained and no amplicons were detected by gel electrophoresis. An alternative explanation is that these macaques may have been infected by P. simiovale, which has been demonstrated in M. fascicularis in Sarawak39, and/or by one or more species of Plasmodium for which PCR primers are currently unavailable.
The complex nature of infections with Plasmodium was noted in the current study where 84.2% (32/38) of the Plasmodium-positive macaques had either double, triple or quadruple infections with P. knowlesi, P. inui, P. cynomolgi and P. coatneyi. Similar observations were made in our previous study in the Kapit Division of Sarawak where 101 of 108 wild macaques were Plasmodium-positive and 91% (91/101) had mixed species infections21. Multiple species of Plasmodium in each macaque host, as reported in that21 and other studies28, 39, may not accurately reflect the actual number of species of Plasmodium harboured by each macaque, since blood samples at only a single time point were obtained and analysed. It has been noted that parasite counts fluctuate and can even change daily in non-human primates that have been kept in captivity4. In addition, erythrocytes containing late asexual stages of certain parasites like P. coatneyi sequester4, so the infection would not be detected by PCR analysis of blood samples if the sample was collected when the majority of the parasites were late stages. Sequential samples would provide more accurate information on the prevalence of each species of Plasmodium in a host in nature but it would not be possible to undertake these investigations on wild macaques due to ethical and logistic reasons.
It is important to determine the geographical range of M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina infected with zoonotic malaria parasites to inform the public of the risks of acquiring zoonotic malaria. Previous studies in Sarawak were confined to the Kapit Division and in the current study macaques from another 7 divisions were examined21, 39. A total of 32 macaques infected with either single or multiple species of the zoonotic malaria parasites P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui and P. coatneyi were found in all the 7 administrative divisions of Sarawak studied, from the southernmost division of Kuching to the northernmost division of Limbang. A limitation of the current study is the relatively small number of samples examined, involving between one to 14 macaques from each administrative division. There is a need for more extensive studies, involving a larger number of samples from varied locations at each administrative division to determine accurately the prevalence of malaria infection among macaques at these locations. Furthermore, these studies should focus on sampling wild macaques rather than captive ones. In the current study, the prevalence of malaria was much higher in wild than in captive macaques. This difference is primarily due to the mobility of the macaques, greater abundance of the mosquito vectors of P. knowlesi and other simian malaria parasites in the forests rather than close to human habitats, and to the feeding behaviour of the vectors. The vectors of P. knowlesi in Sarawak, Sabah, Peninsular Malaysia and Vietnam are forest-dwelling mosquitoes and a study in Sarawak, found that the vector, Anopheles latens, feeds predominantly in the forest and the forest fringe, rather than in longhouse communities48, 49. Due to the forest habitats and feeding behaviour of the vectors, wild macaques would be at risk of acquiring malaria while foraging for food or while resting at night on trees in the forest. In contrast, some of the captive macaques in the current study were housed in wildlife centres situated away from malaria transmission areas, and those kept as pets by residents of rural communities would have limited exposure to mosquito vectors as they were tethered. Therefore, examination of blood samples from wild as opposed to captive macaques would provide more accurate information on zoonotic malaria parasites that are present at areas surrounding each sampling site. Such information would be essential for informing the local population and visitors to rural areas of Sarawak of the risks of acquiring zoonotic malaria. Combined with data from concurrent entomological and community-based studies, they would provide valuable information on malaria transmission and assist in the implementation of appropriate prevention and control measures for zoonotic malaria.
In conclusion, despite the small number of macaques sampled at each administrative division, the current study indicates that that the zoonotic malaria parasites P. knowlesi, P. cynomolgi, P. inui and P. coatneyi, are found in M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina that are widely distributed throughout Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. P. knowlesi is the main cause of malaria in Sarawak and has the potential to cause fatalities5, 15, 44, 50, 51 so the local rural population and travelers to habitats of these macaques in Sarawak should be made aware of the potential risk of acquiring P. knowlesi and other zoonotic malaria parasites.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
OIC. Manual of Diagnostics Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. (World Organization for Animal Health; 1–5, 2017).
Orihel, T. & Pacheco, G. Brugia malayi in the Philippine Macaque. J. Parasitol. 52, 394 (1966).
Faust, C. & Dobson, A. P. Primate malarias: Diversity, distribution and insights for zoonotic Plasmodium. One Health. 1, 66–75 (2015).
Coatney, G. R., Collins, W. E., Warren, M. & Contacos, P. G. The primate malarias. (Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1971).
Singh, B. et al. A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet 363, 1017–1024 (2004).
Jongwutiwes, S. et al. Naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in human, Thailand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 2211–2213 (2004).
Jongwutiwes, S. et al. Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans and macaques, Thailand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 1799–1806 (2011).
Lubis, I. N. D. et al. Contribution of Plasmodium knowlesi to multispecies human malaria infections in North Sumatera, Indonesia. J. Infect. Dis. 215, 1148–1155 (2017).
Luchavez, J. et al. Human infection with Plasmodium knowlesi, the Philippines. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 811–813 (2008).
Ng, O. T. et al. Naturally acquired human Plasmodium knowlesi infection, Singapore. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 814–816 (2008).
den Eede, P. V. et al. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infection in young children in central Vietnam. Malar. J. 8, 249 (2009).
Khim, N. et al. Plasmodium knowlesi infection in humans, Cambodia, 2007–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 1900–1902 (2011).
Iwagami, M. et al. First case of human infection with Plasmodium knowlesi in Laos. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12 (2018).
Jiang, N. et al. Co-infections with Plasmodium knowlesi and other malaria parasites Myanmar. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16, 476–478 (2010).
Hussin, N. et al. Updates on malaria incidence and profile in Malaysia from 2013 to 2017. Malar. J. 19, 55 (2020).
World Health Organization. WHO World Malaria Report 2020. Malaria Report 2020 (2020).
Bronner, U., Divis, P. C., Farnert, A. & Singh, B. Swedish traveller with Plasmodium knowlesi malaria after visiting Malaysian Borneo. Malar J. 8, 15 (2009).
Van Hellemond, J. J. et al. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infection detected by rapid diagnostic tests for malaria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15(9), 1478–1480 (2009).
Link, L. et al. Molecular detection of Plasmodium knowlesi in a Dutch traveler by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Micobiol. 50, 2523–2524 (2012).
Crammer, J. P. Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: Overview focussing on travel-associated infections. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 17, 8–18 (2015).
Lee, K. S. et al. Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 7 (2011).
Zhang, X. et al. Distribution and prevalence of malaria parasites among long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in regional populations across Southeast Asia. Malar. J. 15, 450 (2016).
Gamalo, L. E. et al. Plasmodium knowlesi and other malaria parasites in long-tailed macaques from the Philippines. Malar. J. 18, 147 (2019).
Lambrecht, F. L. & Dunn, F. L. Isolation of Plasmodium knowlesi from Philippine macaques. Nature 191, 1117–1118 (1961).
Eyles, D. E., Laing, A. B. G. & Dobrovolny, C. G. The malaria parasites of the pig-tailed macaque, Macaca nemestrina nemestrina (Linnaeus), Malaya. Ind. J. Malariol. 16, 285–298 (1962).
Putaporntip, C. et al. Ecology of malaria parasites infecting Southeast Asian macaques: evidence from cytochrome b sequences. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3466–3476 (2010).
Eyles, D. E., Laing, A. B. G., Warren, M. W. & Sandocham, A. A. Malaria parasites of Malayan leaf monkeys of the genus. Presbytis. Med. J. Malaya. 17, 85–86 (1962).
Fungfuang, W. et al. Malaria parasites in macaques in Thailand: stump-tailed macaques (Macaca arctoides) are new natural hosts for Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium inui, Plasmodium coatneyi and Plasmodium fieldi. Malar. J. 19, 350 (2020).
Ta, T. H. et al. First case of a naturally acquired human infection with Plasmodium cynomolgi. Malar. J. 13, 68 (2014).
Imwong, M. et al. Asymptomatic natural human infections with the simian malaria parasites Plasmodium cynomolgi and Plasmodium knowlesi. J. Infect. 219, 695–702 (2018).
Grignard, L. et al. Natural human infections with Plasmodium cynomolgi and other malaria species in an elimination setting in Sabah, Malaysia. J. Infect. 220, 1946–1949 (2019).
Nada-Raja, T. et al. Naturally acquired human Plasmodium cynomolgi and P. knowlesi infections. Malaysian Borneo. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, 1801–1809 (2020).
Putaporntip, C. et al. Plasmodium cynomolgi co-infections among symptomatic malaria patients, Thailand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 590–593 (2021).
Yap, N. J. et al. Natural human infections with Plasmodium cynomolgi, P. inui, and 4 other simian malaria parasites, Malaysia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, (2021).
Liew, J. W. K. et al. Natural Plasmodium inui infections in humans and Anopheles cracens mosquito Malaysia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 2700–2703 (2021).
Lalremruata, A. et al. Natural infection of Plasmodium brasilianum in humans: man and monkey share quartan malaria parasites in the Venezuelan Amazon. EBioMedicine 2, 1186–1192 (2015).
Brasil, P. et al. Plasmodium simium causing human malaria: a zoonosis with outbreak potential in the Rio de Janeiro Brazilian Atlantic Forest. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/122127 (2017).
de Alvarenga, D. A. M. et al. An assay for the identification of Plasmodium simium infection for diagnosis of zoonotic malaria in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Sci. Rep. 8, 86 (2018).
Nada Raja, T. et al. Malaria parasites of long-tailed macaques in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo: a novel species and demographic and evolutionary histories. BMC Evol. Biol. 18, 49 (2018).
Lee, K. S. et al. Plasmodium knowlesi from archival blood films: Further evidence that human infections are widely distributed and not newly emergent in Malaysian Borneo. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 1125–1128 (2009).
Cox-Singh, J. et al. Increased sensitivity of malaria detection by nested polymerase chain reaction using simple sampling and DNA extraction. Int. J. Parasitol. 27, 1575–1577 (1997).
Singh, B. et al. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60, 687–692 (1999).
Coutrier, F. N. et al. Laboratory challenges of Plasmodium species identification in Aceh Province, Indonesia, a malaria elimination setting with newly discovered P. knowlesi. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12(11), e0006924 (2018).
Singh, B. & Daneshvar, C. Human infections and detection of Plasmodium knowlesi. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 165–184 (2013).
Ang, J. X. D. et al. New vectors in northern Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo, for the zoonotic malaria parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi. Parasites Vectors 13, 472 (2020).
Ang, J. X. D. et al. New vectors that are early feeders for Plasmodium knowlesi and other simian malaria parasites in Sarawak Malaysian Borneo. Sci. Rep. 11, 7739 (2021).
Hawkes, F. et al. Evaluation of electric nets as means to sample mosquito vectors host-seeking on humans and primates. Parasites Vectors. 10, 338 (2017).
Vythilingam, I., Wong, M. L. & Wan-Yussof, W. S. Current status of Plasmodium knowlesi vectors: a public health concern? in Parasitology 145(1), 32–40 (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
Tan, C. H. et al. B. Bionomics of Anopheles latens in Kapit, Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo in relation to the transmission of zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Malar. J. 7, 52 (2008).
Cox-Singh, J. et al. Severe malaria - a case of fatal Plasmodium knowlesi infection with post-mortem findings: a case report. Malar. J. 9, 10 (2010).
Rajahram, G. S. et al. Deaths from Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: Case series and systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 69, 1703–1711 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Sarawak Forestry Department and the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre for permits to access and collect macaque blood samples, and the staff from the Sarawak Health Department and Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) for their assistance in collecting these samples. This study was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (Grant No. FRGS/ST03(05)/966/3013(07)) and UNIMAS (Grant No. F05/TDG/1734/2018).
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.S. and T.N.R. designed the study, analysed the results and wrote the manuscript. K.A.K., P.C.S.D. and D.S.A.M. carried out laboratory analysis. A.M. organised and supervised staff from Sarawak Department of Health involved in sample collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nada-Raja, T., Kadir, K.A., Divis, P.C.S. et al. Macaca fascicularis and Macaca nemestrina infected with zoonotic malaria parasites are widely distributed in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. Sci Rep 12, 10476 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14560-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14560-9
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The prevalence of simian malaria in wild long-tailed macaques throughout Peninsular Malaysia
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
A survey of simian Plasmodium infections in humans in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Scientific Reports (2022)