Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a DNA damage-associated chronic inflammatory disease; the DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway participates in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer carcinogenesis. The DSB/interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) pathway can induce PD-L1 expression transcriptionally. However, the association of PD-L1/DSB/IRF-1 with sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC), and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer, remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated the significance of the PD-L1/DSB repair pathway using samples from 17 SCRC and 12 UC patients with rare UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer cases by immunohistochemical analysis. We compared PD-L1 expression between patients with SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer and determined the association between PD-L1 and the CD8+ T-cell/DSB/IRF-1 axis in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer. PD-L1 expression in UC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer was higher than in normal mucosa or SCRC, and in CD8-positive T lymphocytes in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer than in SCRC. Moreover, PD-L1 upregulation was associated with γH2AX (DSB marker) and IRF-1 upregulation in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer. IRF-1 upregulation was associated with γH2AX upregulation in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer but not in SCRC. Multicolour immunofluorescence staining validated γH2AX/IRF-1/PD-L1 co-expression in colitic cancer tissue sections. Thus, immune cell-induced inflammation might activate the DSB/IRF-1 axis, potentially serving as the primary regulatory mechanism of PD-L1 expression in UC-associated carcinogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease characterised by persistent inflammation in the colorectal mucosa, described as UC-associated dysplasia that can ultimately progress to UC-associated colorectal cancers (colitic cancer). This carcinogenetic sequence is designated as the “inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma-sequence”1. Treatment of patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer generally includes proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis as metastatic or synchronic lesions are frequent2. In contrast, the pathogenesis of sporadic colon cancer (SCRC), which is sporadic or spontaneous colorectal cancer, is not associated with genetic factors or family history, and the associated carcinogenesis sequence is termed the “adenoma-carcinoma-sequence”3. Moreover, the carcinogenic sequences of colitic cancer and SCRC differ. Inflammatory responses initiated by the infiltrating immune cells and their secreted cytokines can lead to accumulation of DNA damage during UC1. The DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway is, therefore, considered to play an important role in the carcinogenesis of both SCRC patients and rare UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia and colorectal cancers, the condition being referred to as colitic cancer4,5,6. Although DSBs are induced in the UC mucosa, rather than the normal colon mucosa7, the significance of DSBs in SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer remains controversial6,8,9.
Recent advancements in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have improved survival in several cancers, including SCRC, with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD)/high microsatellite instability (MSI)10. The interaction between PD-1 on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and PD-L1 on tumour cells inhibits proliferation, survival, and effector functions in immune cells, including the secretion of inflammatory cytokines11. Hence, PD-L1 levels are considered a marker of sensitivity towards ICIs in several cancers12. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression is upregulated in UC compared with that in the uninflamed colon mucosa13, while PD-L1 upregulation in SCRC is associated with cancer progression and a poor prognosis14. However, differences in PD-L1 expression profiles between SCRC and rare UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer have not yet been investigated.
Several mechanisms underlying PD-L1 expression have been reported, including release of inflammatory cytokines from several immune cells such as CTLs, DNA damage responses, Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling, oncogenic pathways, hypoxic conditions, and microRNAs15. Among these, we focused on the DNA DSB repair pathway, which is important for colitis-associated carcinogenesis16,17. Moreover, Sato et al18 reported that DSBs can upregulate PD-L1, and the mechanism underlying PD-L1 expression is mediated via the activation of the DSB/interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) pathway. Indeed PD-L1 induction and overexpression by IRF-1 activation have been reported in several cancers19,20, with IRF-1 reportedly upregulated in UC compared with the normal colon mucosa in healthy volunteers21. However, limited information is available as to whether differences in PD-L1 expression profiles in SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer are associated with the tumour-infiltrating immune cells/DSB/IRF-1 signalling axis in clinical samples from rare UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer.
This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the associations among PD-L1 expression, immune cells, and the DSB repair pathway, and elucidate the potential mechanism underlying UC carcinogenesis. To this end, we performed immunohistochemistry for surgically resected samples from 17 SCRC patients, 12 UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer, and 10 UC patients without UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer.
Results
Clinical significance of PD-L1 expression in tissues from patients with SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer
Membrane and cytoplasmic PD-L1 expression was detected in colorectal tissue samples harvested from patients with SCRC and those with UC (Fig. 1). Membrane PD-L1 expression levels in tissues of UC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer were significantly higher than that in the tissues of SCRC and the corresponding normal mucosa (P < 0.001; Table 1). The association between PD-L1 expression and clinical and pathological factors of patients with SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer is summarised in Table 2. Membrane PD-L1 expression levels differed significantly between male and female SCRC patients (P = 0.028; Table 2). However, the pattern of PD-L1 expression did not differ between UC mucosa with or without dysplasia/colitic cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics of UC patients with and without UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer are summarised in Supplementary Table 1. There was no significant difference between the expression of PD-L1 and p53/Ki-67, which are useful for the diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer, in UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 2).
Correlation between PD-L1 and CD8+ CTLs, DSB marker γH2AX, and IRF-1 in SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer
Figure 1 shows representative sections immunostained for γ-H2AX, IRF-1, and PD-L1 in the respective tissues. Figure 2 shows tumoural CD8 + CTLs in representative sections of SCRC and colitic cancer. PD-L1 expression in SCRC was significantly associated with IRF-1 expression (P = 0.035); however, no association was observed between PD-L1 expression in SCRC tissues and levels of CD8 or γH2AX (Table 3). Moreover, PD-L1 upregulation in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer was significantly associated with γH2AX (P = 0.024) and IRF-1 (P = 0.002) upregulation but not with CD8 expression (P = 0.103; Table 3). IRF-1 upregulation in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer was significantly associated with CD8 (P = 0.032) and γH2AX (P = 0.001) upregulation (Table 3). Furthermore, the expressions of CD8 as a CTL marker (P = 0.001), γH2AX as a DSB marker (P = 0.031), IRF-1 as a transcriptional factor for PD-L1 (P = 0.005), and PD-L1 (P = 0.003) in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer were significantly higher than that noted for SCRC (Table 4). Meanwhile, the expression pattern of CD8, IRF-1, γH2AX, and PD-L1 between UC mucosa with and without dysplasia/colitic cancer was comparable (Supplementary Table 1). The expression patterns of target proteins in each UC patient with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer are summarised in Table 5.
Associations among γH2AX, IRF-1, and PD-L1 expression in colitic cancer
Using multicolour immunofluorescence analysis, we were able to validate the co-expression of γH2AX, IRF-1, and membrane PD-L1 in seven UC patients with colitic cancer and dysplasia. Consequently, cancer cells expressing membrane PD-L1 showed nuclear γH2AX and IRF-1 expression, in contrast to those with low PD-L1 expression, which did not show co-expression of γH2AX, IRF-1, and PD-L1 (Fig. 3). Furthermore, in SCRC tissue sections, γH2AX and IRF-1 were observed to be co-expressed in cells expressing PD-L1 as well as those that did not, suggesting that PD-L1 regulation in SCRC may not be dependent on the DNA damage response/PD-L1 signalling axis (Supplementary Fig. 3). These findings are consistent with the data presented in Table 3.
The association of MMRD with SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer
The MMRD status was not significantly different between SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer (Table 5, Supplementary Table 4).
Discussion
This study showed that PD-L1 expression levels were significantly upregulated in UC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer tissues compared with that in SCRC tissues and the corresponding non-cancerous mucosa. Moreover, PD-L1 expression was higher in tumoural CD8-positive T lymphocytes in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer tissues than that in SCRC tissues. PD-L1 upregulation was found to be associated with increased expression of γH2AX (a DSB marker) and IRF-1 (a PD-L1 inducer) in clinical UC-associated dysplasia and colitic cancer tissues but not in SCRC tissues or the corresponding non-cancerous UC mucosa.
Colitic cancer is caused by UC-induced persistent chronic inflammation, and the carcinogenic sequence of colitic cancer is suggested to differ from that of SCRC1. Chronic inflammation in UC frequently results in DSB through the generation of reactive oxygen species, with a dysfunctional DNA damage repair system suggested to lead to carcinogenesis during UC6,7,8. However, PD-L1 is regulated by various inflammation-associated transcription factors, including STAT1/3, IRF-1, and NF-κB19,22. Among these, DSB-induced-IRF-1 activates PD-L118. The present findings showed that PD-L1 expression in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer was positively correlated with γH2AX and IRF-1 expression. These results indicated that PD-L1 expression in UC-associated dysplasia and colitic cancer was potentially associated with the activation of the DSB/IRF-1 signalling axis. Moreover, in cancer cells, PD-L1 is associated with the activation of DNA damage repair kinases such as ATR and ATM23. Therefore, DNA damage-induced-PD-L1 in dysplasia/colitic cancer may work not only as a mere biomarker for inflammatory DNA damage but also as a regulator of DNA repairment.
ICIs have recently attracted increasing attention as an innovative cancer treatment strategy24. However, the beneficial effects of ICI treatment in SCRC patients are often limited to MMRD/MSI-high cancers25,26, and it remains unknown whether ICIs are effective in rare cases of UC with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer. Studies have reported that MMRD/MSI-high status is a promising biomarker for predicting the sensitivity to ICIs27, with tumours exhibiting high PD-L1/high CD8+ CTLs designated as “immune-inflamed tumours” or “hot tumours” displaying positive responses compared with ICI-resistant uninflamed tumours or ‘cold tumours’ without PD-L1 expression/CD8+ CTLs28. In contrast, enterocolitis is known as one of the most common adverse events associated with ICIs, and it is distinct with clinical and pathological characteristics similar to that of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)29,30. A recent study showed patients with pre-existing IBD to be at an increased risk for several gastrointestinal adverse events associated with ICIs, and the safety of ICI treatment for patients with pre-existing IBD is undetermined31. However, TNF-α blockade treatment in patients with IBD strongly inhibits inflammation in the colorectal mucosa by suppressing several pro-inflammatory pathways, including the TNF-α pathway32, and immunosuppressive therapy, including TNF-α blockade and vedolizumab, which is an α4β7 integrin inhibitor blocking the migration of gut-specific lymphocytes into the gut, is administered for treating not only IBD, but also ICI-induced colitis33,34. Particularly, vedolizumab has been administered concurrently with ICIs in patients with ICI-induced colitis35. Furthermore, TNF-α blockade does not inhibit the antitumour effect of ICIs in experimentally induced melanoma36. Perez-Ruiz et al37 reported the therapeutic effect of TNF-α blockade against ICI induced-colitis in tumour-bearing mouse models. Several studies have demonstrated that ICIs can be administered without occurrence of serious adverse events in a small number of patients with IBD38,39,40, and Frohne et al41 reported that the combination of vedolizumab and ICI could be successfully used in treating a patient having metastatic melanoma with active Crohn's disease and suppressed Crohn’s disease flares and ICI-induced colitis. This study showed that PD-L1 and IRF-1 expression levels, as well as CD8+ CTLs in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer increased significantly compared with that in the SCRC samples, suggesting that UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer, rather than SCRC, was potentially associated with the “hot tumour” phenotype. Furthermore, patients with melanoma having high IRF-1 expression levels exhibit a significantly higher sensitivity towards ICI treatment than those with low IRF-1 expression42. These results suggested that ICI treatment may be more effective in patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer with distant metastases after total colectomy who are not at a risk for ICI-induced colitis than in patients with SCRC, because patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer exhibit clinical characteristics including favourable ICI responses, “hot tumour” immune phenotypes, including high PD-L1/high CD8+ CTLs, and high IRF-1 expression. Moreover, the combinatorial treatment with ICIs and immunosuppressive therapy such as TNF-α blockade-vedolizumab may suppress ICI-induced colitis in patients with UC-related dysplasia/colitic cancer and exert antitumour effects.
Nonetheless, our study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study with a small patient cohort because UC-associated dysplasia and colitic cancer are rare types of cancer; this may have introduced a bias in our results. Hence, prospective studies with a larger patient cohort may be challenging for clearly elucidating the UC carcinogenesis mechanisms, considering the rarity of the disease. Currently, biological data on UC with UC-associate dysplasia/colitic cancer have been obtained from small-scale clinical cohort studies. This study provides further valuable insights into the importance of PD-L1 expression in patients with UC with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer. Second, this study discussed the potential use of ICIs for colitic cancer treatment; however, we only enrolled patients that did not receive ICI treatment targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 signalling axis. Therefore, future studies are required to evaluate the potential of DSB/IRF-1/PD-L1 as a biomarker for rare cases of UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer to be treated with ICIs. Lastly, only three target markers were assessed, which may not be sufficient to clarify the complexity of the interactions between PD-L1 and the DSB repair response. Therefore, in the future we plan to examine the importance of and relationship among these three markers in an experimental animal model43 of inflammatory colorectal carcinogenesis.
In conclusion, this study showed that PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in UC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer than in the normal mucosa and SCRC. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with high levels of tumoural CD8+ CTLs, γH2AX as a DSB marker, and IRF-1 as a transcriptional factor for PD-L1 in UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer compared with SCRC. Therefore, our findings suggested that immune cell induced-chronic inflammation might activate the DSB/IRF-1 signalling axis, which might serve as the primary regulatory mechanism for regulating PD-L1 expression in UC carcinogenesis.
Methods
Patients and samples
Twelve patients (nine male and three female) with UC, who underwent surgical resection for UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer at Gunma University Hospital (Maebashi, Gunma, Japan), Maebashi Red Cross Hospital (Maebashi, Gunma, Japan), and Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center (Ohta, Gunma, Japan) between 1999 and 2014, were included in this retrospective study. The median age of the patients was 54 years (range, 37–76 years). One patient only had UC-associated dysplasia. Three patients harboured two or more tumours, and all dysplastic and cancerous lesions were evaluated. All dysplastic lesion samples were obtained from patients with high-grade dysplasia, while patients with low-grade dysplasia were not included in the study. Additionally, 17 SCRC patients (12 male and five female) who underwent partial colectomy at the Gunma University Hospital between 1999 and 2014 were randomly selected and included in the study. Ten control UC patients (seven males and three females) who underwent surgical resection for reasons other than UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer at Gunma University Hospital were also included in the analysis. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 summarise the clinical characteristics of the patients. Supplementary Table 3 shows the characteristics of the clinical course in UC patients with UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer. We evaluated the severity of UC as previously reported44. For an accurate pathological diagnosis of dysplastic and cancerous lesions among patients with UC, all histological cancer tissue sections were evaluated by a specialised pathologist, Dr. Yao T (Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine). This study conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research at the Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan (approved number: HS2018-092). Owing to the retrospective nature of this study, need for informed consent was waived, and participants were given the opportunity to decline participate in this study via opt-out method. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded blocks of all surgically resected specimens obtained from the patients were cut into 4 µm thick sections and mounted on glass slides. Sections were deparaffinised with xylene and dehydrated in alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited using 0.3% H2O2/methanol for 30 min at approximately 26 °C. After rehydration through a graded ethanol series, antigen retrieval was performed using Immunosaver (Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan) at 98–100 °C for 45 min, and PD-L1 was retrieved using Universal HIER antigen retrieval reagent (Abcam, ab208572) at 120 °C for 20 min in an autoclave. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked through incubation with Protein Block Serum-Free (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 30 min. Thereafter, sections were probed with primary anti-PD-L1 (Abcam, 28-8 Rabbit mAb, 1:200), anti-γH2AX (Abcam, 9F3, Mouse mAb, 1:200; DSB marker)45, anti-IRF-1 (Abcam, EPR 18301, Rabbit mAb, 1:300), anti-CD8 (Dako C8/144B, Mouse mAb, 1:100), anti-p53 (DAKO, DO-7, Mouse mAb, 1:100), anti-Ki67 (DAKO, MIB-1, Mouse mAb, 1:300), anti-MLH1 (DAKO, ES05, Mouse mAb), anti-MSH2 (DAKO, FE11, Mouse mAb), anti-MSH6 (DAKO, EP49, Rabbit mAb), and anti-PMS2 (DAKO, EP51, Rabbit mAb) antibodies at 4 °C for 24 h. The slides were then stained using rabbit-specific IHC polymer detection kit HRP/DAB (Abcam, ab209101) containing the secondary antibody for PD-L1-stained sections, and with the Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (Multi) Kit (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) for other markers, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The chromogen 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was applied as a 0.02% solution, containing 0.005% H2O2 in ammonium acetate-citrate acid buffer (50 mM, pH 6.0). Finally, nuclear counterstaining was performed using Mayer’s haematoxylin solution. In the negative control sections, primary antibodies were replaced with phosphate-buffered saline in 0.1% bovine serum albumin, thus confirming a lack of staining.
Assessment of immunohistochemistry staining
Immunostained sections were evaluated by two experienced researchers blinded to the clinical data. We evaluated tumour cells and non-cancerous cells displaying membrane PD-L1 staining as positive when at least 1% of the cells were stained46. The staining intensity for γH2AX was scored as follows: 0, no staining; 1+, weak staining; 2+, moderate staining; and 3+, strong staining. The percentage of nuclear-stained cells was determined by examining three sections with the highest staining intensity. The percentage of nuclear γH2AX staining was scored as follows: 0, no staining; 1+, 1–25%; 2+, 26–50%; and 3+, 51–100%. The final score was defined as the percentage score multiplied by the intensity score (0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 6+, and 9+). Nuclear immunoreactivity of γH2AX was scored as 0–4+ and 6–9+, which were defined as low and high nuclear expression, respectively47. We evaluated nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for IRF-1 using almost the same method as that for γH2AX described above. The staining percentage for IRF-1 was scored as follows: 0, no staining; 1+, 1–25%; 2+, 26–75%; and 3+, 76–100%48. The final score was defined as the percentage score multiplied by the intensity score (0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 6+, and 9+). IRF-1 immunoreactivity was scored as 0–4+ and 6–9+ , which were defined as low and high expression, respectively. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the representative low or high expression of γH2AX, IRF-1, and PD-L1 in SCRC and UC-associated dysplasia/colitic cancer tissues. Tumoural CD8-positive CTLs, defined as CD8 cells infiltrating the cancer stroma, were scored as low or high when the mean number of cells in a microscopic field at ×200 magnification was < 200 or ≥ 200, respectively49.
p53‑positive cells were defined as previously reported50. The Ki-67 labelling index was scored as a percentage of positively stained cells. MMRD was defined as the complete absence of the expression of at least one mismatch repair protein (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2).
Multicolour immunofluorescence staining for PD-L1, γH2AX, and IRF-1
Multicolour immunofluorescence staining was performed for seven patients with UC on a total of seven colitic cancer and two dysplasia tissue sections, and three SCRC tissue sections using a PerkinElmer Opal kit (Catalogue# NEL810001KT, PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. γH2AX staining was visualised using the Opal 520 Fluorophore, IRF-1 staining with the Opal 690 Fluorophore, and PD-L1 staining with the Opal 570 Fluorophore. All sections were then counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and examined under an FV10i-LIV system (Olympus Life Science, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis
The JMP Pro 14.0 software package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Mann‒Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were performed to analyse the associations among PD-L1 expression, immune cells, and the DSB repair pathway. All differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ullman, T. A. & Itzkowitz, S. H. Intestinal inflammation and cancer. Gastroenterology 140, 1807–1816 (2011).
Gallo, G., Kotze, P. G. & Spinelli, A. Surgery in ulcerative colitis: When? How?. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 32–33, 71–78 (2018).
Leslie, A., Carey, F. A., Pratt, N. R. & Steele, R. J. C. The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br. J. Surg. 89, 845–860 (2002).
Oka, K. et al. DNA damage signaling is activated during cancer progression in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 9, 246–252 (2010).
Takabayashi, H., Wakai, T., Ajioka, Y., Korita, P. V. & Yamaguchi, N. Alteration of the DNA damage response in colorectal tumor progression. Hum. Pathol. 44, 1038–1046 (2013).
Frick, A. et al. Overt increase of oxidative stress and DNA damage in murine and human colitis and colitis-associated neoplasia. Mol. Cancer Res. 16, 634–642 (2018).
Risques, R. A. et al. Ulcerative colitis is a disease of accelerated colon aging: Evidence from telomere attrition and DNA damage. Gastroenterology 135, 410–418 (2008).
Lessel, W. et al. Inactivation of JNK2 as carcinogenic factor in colitis-associated and sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 38, 559–569 (2017).
De Angelis, P. M. et al. Nondysplastic ulcerative colitis has high levels of the homologous recombination repair protein NUCKS1 and low levels of the DNA damage marker gamma-H2AX. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 24, 593–600 (2018).
Lichtenstern, C. R., Ngu, R. K., Shalapour, S. & Karin, M. Immunotherapy, inflammation and colorectal cancer. Cells 9, 618 (2020).
Zuazo, M. et al. Molecular mechanisms of programmed cell death-1 dependent T cell suppression: Relevance for immunotherapy. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 385 (2017).
Yarchoan, M. et al. PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden are independent biomarkers in most cancers. JCI Insight 4, e126908 (2019).
Beswick, E. J. et al. Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 by human colonic CD90+ stromal cells differs between ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and determines their capacity to suppress Th1 cells. Front. Immunol. 9, 1125 (2018).
Cao, H. et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 and survival in colorectal cancers: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Biol. Mark. 34, 356–363 (2019).
Cha, J. H., Chan, L. C., Li, C. W., Hsu, J. L. & Hung, M. C. Mechanisms controlling PD-L1 expression in cancer. Mol. Cell 76, 359–370 (2019).
Mangerich, A. et al. Infection-induced colitis in mice causes dynamic and tissue-specific changes in stress response and DNA damage leading to colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, E1820–E1829 (2012).
Sharp, S. P. et al. DNA damage response genes mark the early transition from colitis to neoplasia in colitis-associated colon cancer. Gene 677, 299–307 (2018).
Sato, H. et al. DNA double-strand break repair pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1751 (2017).
Garcia-Diaz, A. et al. Interferon receptor signaling pathways regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Cell Rep. 29, 3766 (2019).
Moon, J. W. et al. IFNγ induces PD-L1 overexpression by JAK2/STAT1/IRF-1 signaling in EBV-positive gastric carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 7, 17810 (2017).
Tang, R., Yang, G., Zhang, S., Wu, C. & Chen, M. Opposite effects of interferon regulatory factor 1 and osteopontin on the apoptosis of epithelial cells induced by TNF-alpha in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 20, 1950–1961 (2014).
Zhang, X. et al. PD-L1 induced by IFN-γ from tumor-associated macrophages via the JAK/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways promoted progression of lung cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 1026–1033 (2017).
Escors, D. et al. The intracellular signalosome of PD-L1 in cancer cells. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 3, 26 (2018).
Juneja, V. R. et al. PD-L1 on tumor cells is sufficient for immune evasion in immunogenic tumors and inhibits CD8 T cell cytotoxicity. J. Exp. Med. 214, 895–904 (2017).
Ganesh, K. et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: Rationale, challenges and potential. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 361–375 (2019).
Schrock, A. B. et al. Tumor mutational burden is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 30, 1096–1103 (2019).
Yarchoan, M., Hopkins, A. & Jaffee, E. M. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to PD-1 inhibition. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 2500–2501 (2017).
Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature 541, 321–330 (2017).
Cheung, V. T. F. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis assessment and prognosis: Can IBD scoring point the way?. Br. J. Cancer 123, 207–215 (2020).
Nishida, T., Iijima, H. & Adachi, S. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea/colitis: Endoscopic and pathologic findings. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 10, 17–28 (2019).
Abu-Sbeih, H. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with preexisting inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 576–583 (2020).
Neurath, M. F. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 329–342 (2014).
Abu-Sbeih, H. & Wang, Y. Management considerations for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis based on management of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 26, 662–668 (2020).
Bergqvist, V. et al. Vedolizumab treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 66, 581–592 (2017).
Abu-Sbeih, H. et al. Early introduction of selective immunosuppressive therapy associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 93 (2019).
Bertrand, F. et al. TNFα blockade overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 in experimental melanoma. Nat. Commun. 8, 2256 (2017).
Perez-Ruiz, E. et al. Prophylactic TNF blockade uncouples efficacy and toxicity in dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 immunotherapy. Nature 569, 428–432 (2019).
Menzies, A. M. et al. Anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders or major toxicity with ipilimumab. Ann. Oncol. 28, 368–376 (2017).
Grover, S. et al. Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease and microscopic colitis. JCO Oncol. Pract. 16, e933–e942 (2020).
Johnson, D. B. et al. Ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders. JAMA Oncol. 2, 234–240 (2016).
Frohne, C. C., Llano, E. M., Perkovic, A., Cohen, R. D. & Luke, J. J. Complete response of metastatic melanoma in a patient with Crohn’s disease simultaneously receiving anti-α4β7 and anti-PD1 antibodies. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 1 (2019).
Smithy, J. W. et al. Nuclear IRF-1 expression as a mechanism to assess “capability” to express PD-L1 and response to PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 5, 25 (2017).
Mladenova, D. & Kohonen-Corish, M. R. Review: mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease–insights into the mechanisms of inflammation-associated colorectal cancer. Vivo 26, 627–646 (2012).
Nakase, H. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease 2020. J. Gastroenterol. 22, 1–38 (2021).
Kuo, L. J. & Yang, L. X. Gamma-H2AX—A novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In Vivo 22, 305–309 (2008).
Garon, E. B. et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2018–2028 (2015).
Altan, B. et al. High expression of MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 36, 5237–5247 (2016).
Coppola, D., Parikh, V., Boulware, D. & Blanck, G. Substantially reduced expression of PIAS1 is associated with colon cancer development. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 135, 1287–1291 (2009).
Koganemaru, S. et al. Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 108, 853–858 (2017).
Shigaki, K. et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of chromogranin A and p53 expressions in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia: neuroendocrine differentiation as an early event in the colitis-neoplasia sequence. Hum. Pathol. 44, 2393–2399 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ms. Yukiko Suto, (Laboratory for Analytical Instruments, Education and Research Support Center, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine) for her excellent technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: N.O. T.Y., K.S., H.K., H.S. Acquisition of data: N.O., K.S., H.O., T.M. Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors. Drafting of manuscript: N.O., T.Y., K.S., H.S. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ozawa, N., Yokobori, T., Osone, K. et al. PD-L1 upregulation is associated with activation of the DNA double-strand break repair pathway in patients with colitic cancer. Sci Rep 11, 13077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92530-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92530-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
CBX3 antagonizes IFNγ/STAT1/PD-L1 axis to modulate colon inflammation and CRC chemosensitivity
EMBO Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
PD-L1 deglycosylation promotes its nuclear translocation and accelerates DNA double-strand-break repair in cancer
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Colitis-ulcerosa-assoziierte Karzinogenese
Die Pathologie (2023)
-
PD-1 blockade enhances chemotherapy toxicity in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Inflammation suppresses DLG2 expression decreasing inflammasome formation
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2022)