Abstract
Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant development and growth, and the deposition of N has increased in recent decades. Legumes that fix N can also provide N for nearby species. However, N in soil inhibits N fixation. We tested the effects of N fertilisation on one N-fixing (Robinia pseudoacacia) and two non-N-fixing (Sophora japonica and Senna surattensis) woody legume species, which were subjected to five different N levels (0, 1.5, 2.9, 5.9 and 11.4 mg N per plant day−1) under greenhouse conditions. The growth of the two non-N-fixing species was promoted by N supply, while that of R. pseudoacacia was unaffected. Among the three species, R. pseudoacacia had the largest specific leaf area and chlorophyll concentration, S. japonica had the largest root-to-shoot ratio and main root-to-lateral root ratio, and S. surattensis had the largest leaf N and phosphorus concentrations. The N-fixing species was mostly unaffected by N supply. The growth, leaf chlorophyll concentration, and leaf number in the non-N-fixing species were promoted by N supply. The N-fixing species showed better growth in low-N environments, while under increased N deposition, its growth was similar to that of the non-N-fixing species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Nitrogen (N) deposition has been an important part of global environmental change in recent decades1. Since the industrial revolution, industrial processes, agricultural development, and greater human activity have accelerated the emission of N oxides (NOx) and ammonia (NH3)2,3, thus increasing N deposition4. Nitrogen deposition in the global ecosystem was 34 Tg year−1 in the 1860s and 100 Tg year−1 in 1995 and it is projected to increase to 200 Tg year−1 by 20501,5. Nitrogen enrichment has affected global ecosystems drastically6,7. Nitrogen is an essential macronutrient for plants in soil8 and also a key limitation to plant growth in most terrestrial forests9. Contrarily, excess N may lead to better growth of invasive or alien species thereby chang the biodiversity and structure of communities in particular ecosystems6,10,11,12.
Nitrogen derived from biological N fixation provides another N resource to plants13,14,15, through decomposition of the root fraction and root exudation by legumes16. Nitrogen fixation, however, is quite costly as compared with absorbing N from soil17, and can be inhibited by soil N18 and N deposition19. Legumes that can fix atmospheric N can alleviate N limitation in soil20. This can be seen in agricultural ecosystems, in which annual N fixation input from oilseed legumes is estimated to be 18.5 Tg21. Nitrogen-fixing plants can even increase the productivity of nearby plants when planted in combination with certain other species22. Having the ability to fix N, many legumes are less sensitive to N supply than other species23,24, and their photosynthetic rates are seldom affected by leaf N25. Therefore, the effects of N deposition on legumes are increasingly attracting the attention of ecologists26.
Many studies have primarily focused on herbaceous N-fixing legumes21,27,28,29, although studies on N-fixing and non-N-fixing woody legumes are also important elements in forestry and revegetation. Studies examining the differences between woody legumes under various levels of N help to clarify the effect of N supply on the N fixation process. To test the effect of N supply on N-fixing and non-N-fixing woody legume species, we chose Robinia pseudoacacia as the N-fixing species, and one native species, Sophora japonica, and one alien species, Senna surattensis, as the non-N-fixing species; both S. japonica and S. surattensis do not form nodules30,31,32 and cannot fix N33.
To test the effect of increased N supply on non-N-fixing and N-fixing legumes, five different levels of N supply were applied to seedlings of the three tree species in a greenhouse. We hypothesised that N will promote the growth of the three legume tree species, although to a lesser extent in the N-fixing species than in the non-N-fixing species.
Results
Plant growth
No significant effects of N were observed on any of the growth parameters of R. pseudoacacia (Fig. 1). The plant height (p = 0.000), relative growth rate in height (RGRH) (p = 0.000), crown area (p = 0.003), basal diameter (p = 0.010), total biomass (p = 0.000), and number of compound leaves (p = 0.004) of S. japonica significantly increased under an elevated nitrogen supply (Fig. 1).Increased N supply significantly increased the crown area (p = 0.008), basal diameter (p = 0.000), total biomass (p = 0.023), and compound leaf number (p = 0.000) of S. surattensis (Fig. 1).
Sophora japonica had the lowest height (p = 0.000), RGRH (p = 0.000), crown area (p = 0.000) and basal diameter (p = 0.001), while R. pseudoacacia had the greatest height, RGRH, crown area, basal diameter and total biomass (p = 0.000), but the least number of compound leaves (p = 0.000) among the three species under the average N supply (Fig. 1).
Biomass allocation
Nitrogen treatment did not significantly affect the root-to-shoot ratio and main root-to-lateral root ratio of any of the three species (Fig. 2C,D). Sophora japonica had higher root-to-shoot ratio than the other two species (p = 0.000) (Fig. 2A). The main root-to-lateral root ratio was the highest in S. japonica and the lowest in S. surattensis (p = 0.000) (Fig. 2B).
Leaf traits
Chlorophyll concentration in S. japonica significantly increased with increasing N supply (p = 0.000), while leaf phosphorus (P) concentration significantly decreased under elevated N levels (p = 0.005) (Fig. 3). Chlorophyll concentration in R. pseudoacacia also significantly increased with the addition of more N (p = 0.016), while non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) decreased (p = 0.020) (Fig. 3). The leaf P concentration in R. pseudoacacia was also slightly affected by N. None of the leaf traits of S. surattensis were significantly affected by N (Fig. 3).
Among the three species, R. pseudoacacia had the highest specific leaf area (p = 0.000), while S. surattensis had the lowest specific leaf area (Fig. 4A). Robinia pseudoacacia had higher chlorophyll concentration than the other two species (p = 0.000) (Fig. 4B). Senna surattensis had the highest leaf N (p = 0.000) and relatively high P concentration, while S. japonica and R. pseudoacacia had the lowest N concentrations (Fig. 4C,D). Leaf N:P ratios of all three species were similar (Fig. 4E).
Discussion
Increased N supply promoted the growth of S. japonica and S. surattensis, but not the growth of R. pseudoacacia. During the entire experimental period no root nodules were found on plants of S. japonica and S. surattensis while R. pseudoacacia had root nodules under all N levels. Given that legumes cannot fix nitrogen without root nodules33, our data confirm that R. pseudoacacia was the only of the three species that fixed N. Previous studies have reported that growth of non-N-fixing plants is mostly promoted by elevated N supply34,35,36. However, in species that can fix N (e.g., soybean or lupin), growth is often less or even not affected by N fertilization37,38; this was confirmed in our study. Previous studies have shown that N fertiliser can inhibit N fixation18,39,40, which explains a similar growth of R. pseudoacacia at both high and low N supplies. The growth of R. pseudoacacia under low soil N levels was not limited because the plant was able to fix the required N from the atmosphere.
Nitrogen did not affect biomass allocation, leaf N concentration, or leaf N:P ratio of the three species. Biomass allocation is affected by N in many plant species34,41,42,43,44, but it is independent of N in many N-fixing legumes24. In our study, N did not affect biomass allocation in the three species, suggesting that this trait may be unrelated to N fixation and is specific to legumes. However, this remains to be tested in other N-fixing and non-N-fixing species from this plant group. Increased chlorophyll concentrations in S. japonica and R. pseudoacacia at higher N levels suggests higher photosynthetic rate45,46. Leaf N concentrations were not affected by soil N in our experiment, it has been reported that leaf N is unrelated to photosynthesis in most N-fixing legumes25, and this may also be the same in non-N-fixing legumes. Leaf P concentration in S. japonica decreased under higher N levels and was the lowest of the three species, suggesting that the ability of S. japonica for absorbing P from soil was weaker than that in the other two species. This was also evident from the main root-to-lateral root ratio, which was the lowest in S. japonica owing to its lower nutrient exploiting efficiency when compared with the other two species47.
The similar growth of R. pseudoacacia at different N levels is related to photosynthesis and carbon cost. It has long been reported that under low N conditions plants tend to have a higher photochemical efficiency of the photosystem II (PSII) and photochemical quenching (qP), but lower NPQ48,49,50,51,52. In the present study, higher N levels decreased the NPQ, but N supply had no effect on qP and PSII photochemical efficiency. This absence of correlation between N levels and PSII photochemical efficiency and higher chlorophyll concentrations suggested that the photosynthetic rate in R. pseudoacacia was similar at high and low N levels. This similar photosynthetic rate at different N levels may be attributed to the presence of reactive oxygen species. Namely, qP and NPQ may contribute to the decreased formation of singlet oxygen, a type of reactive oxygen species53. Therefore, similar qP and a decreased NPQ under high N levels may indicate increased production of singlet oxygen, which can damage PSII54. At low N supply, R. pseudoacacia may have higher N fixation rate thus expending more energy and carbon17, while at higher N levels, the plants may have similar or higher photosynthetic rates and may also produce more singlet oxygen that can damage PSII. Thus, despite having higher chlorophyll concentration, the photosynthetic rate in R. pseudoacacia at higher N levels, owing to PSII damage, may be similar or even lower than that in plants at low N levels55.
Different source activities were observed in the three species. Nitrogen has increased sink capacity56, which in turn, promotes source strength57,58. Sophora japonica at high N levels tended to increase the strength of the source (photosynthetic rate) and the number of sources (number of compound leaves) to get a higher relative growth rate and biomass accumulation. Robinia pseudoacacia under high N levels seemed to increase the strength of the source although incurring PSII damage. Senna surattensis at higher N levels increased only the number of sources to enhance their growth.
The difference among species and the varied response to N may be related to different ecological strategies of plant species. Robinia pseudoacacia, which was dominant under low N conditions in our experiment, has the ability to fix N59. Its higher biomass use efficiency in leaves, when compared with other species, was reflected in its large specific leaf area, and its predicted high photosynthetic rate (high chlorophyll concentration)45,46, as well as its ability to fix N, make it a more invasive species that can adapt to different soil types60. Invasion by R. pseudoacacia may lead to an increase of soil N thus may cause biodiversity loss61. The relatively low leaf P concentration in R. pseudoacacia may be due to the strong sink of P in its nodules62,63. Senna surattensis had the lowest main root to lateral root ratio, which shows that its roots have a higher exploitation efficiency47. The N and P concentration was relatively high in the leaves of S. surattensis, which also demonstrated its high absorption rate of nutrients from the soil64. This was confirmed as S. surattensis is mainly distributed in South Asia65, where lower soil P concentrations are observed66. Unlike R. pseudoacacia, which is an early successional species with high foliar efficiency, S. surattensis and S. japonica are more likely to be late successional species67. Sophora japonica in our study was never dominant under any N conditions; it is also observed to be non-dominant in China, especially the northern regions68. Its large main root-to-lateral root ratio revealed its low exploitation efficiency of nutrients from the soil. This may explain its distribution in northern China, where there are higher nutrient levels in the soil66. Studies at the molecular level are still needed to quantify the difference of N-fixing and non-N-fixing legumes.
Our study showed that the growth of the N-fixing species Robinia pseudoacacia was not affected by different levels of N supply. In contrast, the growth of the non-N-fixing legume species was promoted by increased N supply. Similar growth in both the non-N-fixing species and R. pseudoacacia was observed under high N supply. Matured leaves, which are the source part of plants, increased in number in non-N-fixing species under increased N supply. The leaf number in R. pseudoacacia as well as total biomass, were similar under all N levels. Biomass allocation and leaf N, that were not affected by N supply, may have been legume-specific properties, rather than being specific to N-fixing species. The traits’ difference between species may reveal a different adaptation ability, which might affect their distribution in the future, characterised by increased N supply. The non-N-fixing species grew better under high N supply conditions than under low N supply, which provides evidence for planted forestry and garden greening when choosing woody species and managing fertilisation. Further studies are required on the effect of N on matured woody legumes.
Materials and Methods
Study site
Our experiments were conducted at the Fanggan Research Station of Shandong University (36°26′ N, 117°27′E) in Laiwu, Shandong Province, China. The study site is characterized by warm temperate monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature of 13 ± 1 °C and a mean annual precipitation of 700 ± 100 mm. Most of the rainfall is concentrated in summer and early autumn69. The entire experiment was carried out in a greenhouse during the growing season.
Seeds of R. pseudoacacia, S. japonica, and S. surattensis were germinated in late April. Subsequently 35 healthy, similar-sized seedlings of each species were transplanted into pots filled with 6 kg of loam and 2 kg of sand on May 5 (one plant per pot for each species). The substrates, which were thoroughly mixed, had the following chemical properties: 50.20 mg kg−1 available N, 31.14 mg kg−1 available P, and pH 6.51. The plants were watered every 2 days. After being transplanted into pots, the plants were treated with different amounts of N on June 15th.
Experimental design
Each species was treated with five N levels: 0, 1.5, 2.9, 5.9 and 11.4 mg N per plant day−1 (N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5, respectively). Ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) was used as the source of N. Nitrogen application began on June 15th and the NH4NO3 solution was added to the pots five times at 15-day intervals. No inoculation was performed, and root nodules were formed with natural rhizobia present in the unsterilized soil. All the plants were harvested on September 10th, i.e. the second week after the last N application. There were seven replicates of each treatment for each species. All pots were randomly arranged in the greenhouse. All plants were watered every 2 days during the experiment.
Measurements
Seedling height and crown area (calculated as crown area = 0.5ab, where a and b are the vertical diagonals of the crown area) were measured at the beginning and the end of N treatments. The relative growth rate in height (RGRH) was calculated with the formula: RGRH = (lnH2−lnH1)/t, where H2 and H1 are the seedling height at the end and the beginning of the N treatment, respectively, and t is the duration of the experiment. The basal diameter was measured before harvest. Flower number (if present) and leaf number were counted at harvest time. Before harvest, the fourth mature leaf from the top was sampled to determine the specific leaf area of plants using the formula: specific leaf area = leaf area/leaf dried biomass, where leaf area was calculated by WinFOLIA Pro 2009a software (Regent Instruments, Inc., Quebec, Canada). Before harvest, the fifth fully expanded mature leaf from the top was collected to measure chlorophyll concentration, using a spectrophotometric method70. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured using a pulse amplitude modulation chlorophyll fluorometer (Mini-PAM; Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). The parameters were measured as follows: maximum quantum yield of PSII in dark-adapted leaves, Ymax = (Fm − Fo)/Fm; effective quantum yield of PSII, Y = (Fm′ − F)/Fm′; photochemical quenching, qP = (Fm′ − F)/(Fm′ − Fo′); and non-photochemical quenching, NPQ = (Fm − Fm′)/Fm′, where Fm and Fm′ are maximum fluorescence and peak value of fluorescence; Fo is minimum fluorescence after dark adaptation and Fo′ = Fo/((Fm − Fo)/Fm + Fo/Fm′). During harvest, compound leaf numbers of each plant were recorded, plants were cut at ground level, and the underground parts were carefully washed with tap water. All plants were separated into five parts: main root, lateral root, stem, leaf blade, and leaf petiole. The parts of each plant were packed in separate envelopes and oven dried for 48 h at 80 °C. Once the material was completely dried, all parts were weighed. Plant biomass allocation was calculated, based on dried biomass, as follows: total biomass = main root biomass + lateral root biomass + leaf blade biomass + petiole biomass + stem biomass; root to shoot ratio = (main root biomass + lateral root biomass)/(leaf blade biomass + petiole biomass + stem biomass); main root to lateral root ratio = main root biomass/lateral root biomass. Leaf N and P concentrations were measured using the Kjeldahl method71 and colorimetric determination72, respectively.
Statistical analyses
The data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s tests at p ≤ 0.05. Data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variance before performing ANOVA. Log transformation was applied when data did not meet the criteria for normality and homogeneity. Transformed data that still did not meet the criteria for normality and homogeneity of variance were analysed by non-parametric tests. All the data were analysed using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Figures were drawn using Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab Co., Northampton, MA, USA).
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Galloway, J. N. et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).
Fowler, D. et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 368, 20130164, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164 (2013).
Zhan, X. et al. Inorganic nitrogen wet deposition: Evidence from the North-South Transect of Eastern China. Environ. Pollut. 204, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.03.016 (2015).
Jia, Y. et al. Spatial and decadal variations in inorganic nitrogen wet deposition in China induced by human activity. Sci. Rep. 4, 3763, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03763 (2014).
Vitousek, P. M. et al. Human alteration of the global nigrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7, 737–750 (1997).
Bai, Y. et al. Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands. Global Change Biol. 16, 358–372, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01950.x (2010).
Zhang, Y. et al. Nitrogen enrichment weakens ecosystem stability through decreased species asynchrony and population stability in a temperate grassland. Global Change Biol. 22, 1445–1455, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13140 (2016).
Crawford, N. M. Nitrate: nutrient and signal for plant growth. Plant Cell 7, 859–868 (1995).
Laliberté, E. et al. Experimental assessment of nutrient limitation along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence in the south-western Australia biodiversity hotspot. J. Ecol. 100, 631–642, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01962.x (2012).
Carpenter, S. R. et al. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 8, 559–568 (1998).
Pitcairn, C. E. R., Fowler, D. & Grace, J. Deposition of fixed atmospheric nitrogen and foliar nitrogen content of bryophytes and Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. Environ. Pollut. 88, 193–205 (1995).
Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).
Chaer, G. M., Resende, A. S., Campello, E. F. C., de Faria, S. M. & Boddey, R. M. Nitrogen-fixing legume tree species for the reclamation of severely degraded lands in Brazil. Tree Physiol. 31, 139–149, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq116 (2011).
Graham, P. H. & Vance, C. P. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 131, 872–877, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.017004 (2003).
Zahran, H. H. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol. Biol. R. 63, 968–989 (1999).
Fustec, J., Lesuffleur, F., Mahieu, S. & Cliquet, J.-B. Nitrogen rhizodeposition of legumes. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30, 57–66, https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009003 (2010).
Lambers, H., Atkin, O. K. & Millenaar, F. F. In Plant roots. The hidden half (eds Waisel Y., Eshel,A. & Kafkaki U.) 521–552 (Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002).
Smith, V. H. Effects of nitrogen: phosphorus supply ratios on nitrogen fixation in agricultural and pastoral ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 18, 19–35 (1992).
Regus, J. U. et al. Nitrogen deposition decreases the benefits of symbiosis in a native legume. Plant Soil 414, 159–170, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3114-8 (2017).
Wurzburger, N. & Hedin, L. O. Taxonomic identity determines N2 fixation by canopy trees across lowland tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 19, 62–70, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12543 (2016).
Herridge, D. F., Peoples, M. B. & Boddey, R. M. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3 (2008).
Forrester, D. I., Bauhus, J., Cowie, A. L. & Vanclay, J. K. Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: a review. Forest Ecol. Manag. 233, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012 (2006).
Guo, Y., Yang, X., Schob, C., Jiang, Y. & Tang, Z. Legume shrubs are more nitrogen-homeostatic than non-legume shrubs. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1662, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01662 (2017).
Markham, J. H. & Zekveld, C. Nitrogen fixation makes biomass allocation to roots independent of soil nitrogen supply. Can. J. Bot. 85, 787–793, https://doi.org/10.1139/b07-075 (2007).
Adams, M. A., Turnbull, T. L., Sprent, J. I. & Buchmann, N. Legumes are different: Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4098–4103, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523936113 (2016).
Chen, H. et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems of China: A meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 206, 352–360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.033 (2015).
Sprent, J. I. & Parsons, R. Nitrogen fixation in legume and non-legume trees. Field Crop. Res. 65, 183–196 (2000).
Crews, T. E. & Peoples, M. B. Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agroecosystems? A review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 72, 101–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-004-6480-1 (2005).
Harper, J. E. & Gibson, A. H. Differential nodulation tolerance to nitrate among legume species. Crop Sci. 24, 797–801 (1984).
Aronson, J., Ovalle, C. & Avendaño, J. Early growth rate and nitrogen fixation potential in forty-four legumes species grown in an acid and a neutral soil from central Chile. Forest Ecol. Manag. 47, 225–244 (1992).
Athar, M. Nodulation of native legumes in Pakistani rangelands. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 70, 49–54 (2005).
Yin, A., Jin, H., Han, Z. & Han, S. Study on the relationship between Chromosome numbers and nodulation of 18 species of leguminous trees. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 42, 26–28 (2006).
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. & Pons, T. L. Plant physiological ecology. (Springer-Verlag, 2008).
Fife, D. N. & Nambiar, E. K. S. Changes in the canopy and growth of Pinus radiata in response to nitrogen supply. Forest Ecol. Manag. 93, 137–152 (1997).
Carroll, J. A., Caporn, S. J. M., Cawley, L., Read, D. J. & Lee, J. A. The effect of increased deposition of atmospheric nitrogen on Calluna vulgaris in upland Britain. New Phytol. 141, 423–431 (1999).
Yang, X.-X., Ren, F., Zhou, H.-K. & He, J.-S. Responses of plant community biomass to nitrogen and phosphorus additions in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 38, 159–166, https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1258.2014.00014 (2014).
Salvagiotti, F. et al. Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. Field Crop. Res. 108, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001 (2008).
White, P. F. & Robson, A. D. Effect of soil pH and texture on the growth and nodulation of lupins. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 40, 63–73 (1989).
Leidi, E. O. & Rodriguez-Navarro, D. N. Nitrogen and phosphorus availability limit N2 fixation in bean. New Phytol. 147, 337–346 (2000).
Gentili, F. & Huss-Danell, K. Phosphorus modifies the effects of nitrogen on nodulation in split-root systems of Hippophaë rhamnoides. New Phytol. 153, 53–61 (2002).
Gong, X. Y., Fanselow, N., Dittert, K., Taube, F. & Lin, S. Response of primary production and biomass allocation to nitrogen and water supplementation along a grazing intensity gradient in semiarid grassland. Eur. J. Agron. 63, 27–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.11.004 (2015).
Guo, H., Xu, B., Shi, F. & Wu, Y. Effects of shading and applying nitrogen on mophological characteristics and biomass allocation of Fritillaria unibracteata. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment 25, 118–120 (2016).
Wang, M. et al. Effects of nitrogen addition on seedling growth and biomass allocation of three rare tree species in the south of China. Guihaia 37, 127–133, https://doi.org/10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201507002 (2017).
Song, S., Liang, D. & Hou, J. Effects of nitrogen addition on the seedling biomass and its allocation of three Pinus tabuliformis provenances. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 39, 50–59 (2017).
Chapman, S. C. & Barreto, H. J. Using a chlorophyll meter to estimate specific leaf nitrogen of tropical maize during vegetative growth. Agron. J. 89, 557–562 (1997).
Evans, J. R. Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. 72, 297–302 (1983).
Fitter, A. H., Stickland, T. R., Harvey, M. L. & Wilson, G. W. Architectural analysis of plant root systems. 1. Architectural correlates of exploitation efficiency. New Phytol. 118, 375–382 (1991).
Verhoeven, A. S., Demmig-Adams, B. & Adams, W. W. Enhanced employment of the xanthophyll cycle and thermal energy dissipation in spinach exposed to high light and N stress. Plant Physiol. 113, 817–824 (1997).
Zhang, H. et al. Effect of planting density and topdressing nitrogen on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluoescence and yield of wheat under apricot-wheat intercropping. Journal of Triticeae Crops 35, 387–393 (2015).
Zhang, Y. et al. Response characteristics of plant growth and leaf photochemical activity of sugar beet seedlings to different nitrogen application leaves. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Science 27, 1391–1400 (2013).
Guo, S.-L., Yan, X.-F., Bai, B. & Yu, S. Effects of nitrogen supply on photosynthesis in larch seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25, 1291–1298 (2005).
Shrestha, S., Brueck, H. & Asch, F. Chlorophyll index, photochemical reflectance index and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of rice leaves supplied with different N levels. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 113, 7–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.04.008 (2012).
Müller, P., Li, X.-P. & Niyogi, K. K. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 125, 1558–1566 (2001).
Pintó-Marijuan, M. & Munné-Bosch, S. Photo-oxidative stress markers as a measure of abiotic stress-induced leaf senescence: advantages and limitations. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3845–3857, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru086 (2014).
Kaschuk, G., Kuyper, T. W., Leffelaar, P. A., Hungria, M. & Giller, K. E. Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses? Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1233–1244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.005 (2009).
Cazetta, J. O., Seebauer, J. R. & Below, F. E. Sucrose and nitrogen supplies regulate growth of maize kernels. Ann. Bot. 84, 747–754 (1999).
Patrick, J. W., Botha, F. C. & Birch, R. G. Metabolic engineering of sugars and simple sugar derivatives in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 142–156, https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12002 (2013).
Jones, P. G., Lloyd, J. C. & Raines, C. A. Glucose feeding of intact wheat plants represses the expression of a number of Calvin cycle genes. Plant Cell Environ. 19, 231–236 (1996).
Cierjacks, A. et al. Biological flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. J. Ecol. 101, 1623–1640, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12162 (2013).
Vítková, M., Tonika, J. & Müllerová, J. Black locust—Successful invader of a wide range of soil conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 505, 315–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.104 (2015).
Von Holle, B. et al. Ecosystem legacy of the introduced N2-fixing tree Robinia pseudoacacia in a coastal forest. Oecologia 172, 915–924, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2543-1 (2013).
Israel, D. W. Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol. 84, 835–840 (1987).
Schulze, J., Temple, G., Temple, S. J., Beschow, H. & Vance, C. P. Nitrogen fixation by white lupin under phosphorus deficiency. Ann. Bot. 98, 731–740, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl154 (2006).
Osone, Y. & Tateno, M. Nitrogen absorption by root as a cause of interspecific variations in leaf nitrogen concentration and photosynthetic capacity. Funct. Ecol. 19, 460–470 (2005).
Chew, Y.-L., Goh, J.-K. & Lim, Y.-Y. Assessment of in vitro antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic composition of selected medicinal herbs from Leguminosae family in Peninsular Malaysia. Food Chem. 116, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.091 (2009).
Lynch, J. P. Roots of the second green revolution. Aust. J. Bot. 55, 493–512, https://doi.org/10.1071/bt06118 (2007).
Menalled, F. D. & Kelly, M. J. Crown structure and biomass allocation strategies of three juvenile tropical tree species. Plant Ecol. 152, 1–11 (2001).
Wang, R. & Zhou, G. The vegetation of Shandong province. (Shandong Science and Technology Publisher, 2000).
Zhang, X.-Q. et al. The effects of clonal integration on morphological plasticity and placement of daughter ramets in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Flora 201, 547–554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.12.002 (2006).
Lichtenthaler, H. K. & Wellburn, A. R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. T. 11, 591–592 (1983).
Lang, C. A. Simple microdetermination of Kjeldahl nitrogen in biological materials. Anal. Chem. 30, 1692–1694 (1958).
King, E. J. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Biochem. J. 26, 292–297 (1932).
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor for his or her work on our manuscript and we thank the two reviewers for their comments. We thank Editage for their assistance with the language help of the draft manuscript. We thank Li Shen, Kun Zhang, Prof. Jian Liu, Dr. Yifu Yuan, Dr. Yujie Luo, and Dr. Haijie Zhang for their help with this study. This study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos 31470402, 31770361, 31500264) and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0505905).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X. Wang, R.Q. Wang and W.H. Guo designed experiments; X. Wang, Y. Yu and H. Cui carried out experiments; X. Wang analysed experimental results. X. Wang, X. Guo and W.H. Guo wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Guo, X., Yu, Y. et al. Increased nitrogen supply promoted the growth of non-N-fixing woody legume species but not the growth of N-fixing Robinia pseudoacacia. Sci Rep 8, 17896 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35972-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35972-6
- Springer Nature Limited