Abstract
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (tUS) is a promising non-invasive approach to modulate brain circuits. The application is gaining popularity, however the full effect of ultrasound stimulation is still unclear and further investigation is needed. This study aims to apply optical intrinsic signal imaging (OISI) for the first time, to simultaneously monitor the wide-field cerebral hemodynamic change during tUS on awake animal with high spatial and temporal resolution. Three stimulation paradigms were delivered using a single-element focused transducer operating at 425 kHz in pulsed mode having the same intensity (ISPPA = 1.84 W/cm2, ISPTA = 129 mW/cm2) but varying pulse repetition frequencies (PRF). The results indicate a concurrent hemodynamic change occurring with all actual tUS but not under a sham stimulation. The stimulation initiated the increase of oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) and decrease of deoxygenated hemoglobin (RHb). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found in the amplitude change of hemodynamics evoked by varying PRF. Moreover, the acoustic stimulation was able to trigger a global as well as local cerebral hemodynamic alteration in the mouse cortex. Thus, the implementation of OISI offers the possibility of directly investigating brain response in an awake animal during tUS through cerebral hemodynamic change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Brain stimulation plays an important role in both general neuroscience as well as in clinical applications1,2,3. It has been shown to be an effective therapeutic application for treating neurological disorders including Parkinson’s disease4, major depressive disorder5, Tourette syndrome6, and obsessive-compulsive disorder7, among others8. However, most current stimulation approaches suffer from shortcomings: (i) transcranial direct current stimulation and (ii) transcranial magnetic stimulation are both powerful, non-invasive modalities to innervate cortical neurons that are, however, limited by spatial specificity9; (iii) deep-brain stimulation, although able to provide a higher spatial specificity, requires surgical intervention10; (iv) and lastly, optogenetics offers even superior targets of single neuron excitation, but involves genetic modification11. On the other hand, low intensity ultrasound stimulation (US) offers a non-invasive approach to stimulate inside the brain with spatial resolutions of up to several mm.
Previous studies have shown the ability of US to modulate the neural tissue, both ex vivo 12,13 and in vivo 14,15, for animal16 and human subjects17,18. Ultrasound has been demonstrated to reversibly inhibit visual evoked potentials in cats19 and excite the motor cortex of rats prompting a tail motor response20 depending on acoustic pulse parameters. The acoustic stimulation has also been found to increase extracellular levels of serotonin and dopamine when targeting the rat thalamus21. In addition, sonication targeted at the human sensory cortex was able to elicit tactile sensation on the subject’s hand area contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere22. More recently, transcranial ultrasound stimulation (tUS) has been demonstrated to be a powerful technique in clinical application by facilitating the recovery of a patient from coma after severe brain injury using thalamic ultrasound-based stimulation23. While low intensity tUS is considered safe and has already been implemented for human participants, pre-clinical studies that aim to determine the effects of tUS on the brain still need to be carried out.
Several studies have been conducted to measure the effect of tUS by simultaneous recording of electrical activity in the brain using electroencephalogram (EEG)24,25, multi-unit activity (MUA)26 and local field potential (LFP)27, as well as in muscle using electromyography (EMG)28. These approaches provide a direct measure of neural response to US with superior temporal resolution but are unable to offer a broader view of brain activity at high spatial resolution. Whole brain functionality as influenced by tUS has been observed in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Functional MRI studies reveal that tUS excites not only the sonicated region in the human brain, but also other network related regions29,30; while PET on an anaesthetized rat have shown the increase of glucose consumption in the brain is smaller than the sonicated region31. Although fMRI and PET provides 3D information, they are limited by the high cost, bulky size, low temporal resolution and the complexity of implementation particularly for animal models without anaesthesia. Anaesthesia has been shown to significantly alter brain function32,33,34, and the importance of anaesthesia level has been emphasized in many ultrasound stimulation studies showing the necessity of a light anaesthesia state to elicit a motor response during brain stimulation35,36. Thus, we propose to apply optical intrinsic signal imaging (OISI) on an awake mouse model as a low cost, compact, simple neuroimaging technique to provide concurrent mesoscopic functional information during ultrasound brain stimulation.
The application of OISI in brain studies was driven by the similarity in contrast mechanism with fMRI which primarily uses the blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal as an indicator of neural activity through the hemodynamic response function (HRF). In a similar fashion, OISI relies on the distinct light absorption spectra of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin, providing the relative change in oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (RHb) hemoglobin concentration. Monitoring the change in HbO and RHb offers an indirect way of recording brain activity based on the neurovascular coupling mechanism37. Although, OISI may not provide deep brain information, it is an attractive and accessible approach to imaging large areas of the brain with high spatial and temporal resolution. The OISI technique has been used in various neuroscience studies to investigate functional brain connectivity38,39, anaesthetic effect on the brain32, as well as to explore other neuromodulation approaches40,41.
Results
Cerebral hemodynamic change during tUS
A total of seven awake mice were used to explore the tUS effect on cerebral hemodynamics using OISI (Fig. 1). An intact skull cranial window provided a minimally invasive view of the mouse cortex during stimulation. The spatiotemporal hemodynamic change was monitored under three different tUS conditions (Table 1) and sham.
The stimulation was confirmed to elicit a cerebral hemodynamic change for the three actual tUS conditions but not in sham. Figure 2 shows the spatial map of propagation of filtered HbO and RHb over time in a representative mouse (Video 1). The frames labelled 0 and 5 s correspond to the hemodynamic change at the beginning and end of the stimulation, respectively. The three sonication paradigms applied have different PRF but with constant acoustic power. All of which evoked a statistically significant different hemodynamic change compare to the sham stimulation (one-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer post-hoc analysis, p < 0.05), specifically the increase of HbO and decrease of RHb. A similar spatial distribution of hemodynamics was observed from all mice in the study.
The averaged temporal hemodynamic change across all mice in the right side below the bregma (Fig. 3a, inset) is shown in Fig. 3. The area was the same for all the mice and was chosen as it was observed to have the most pronounced amplitude change in the brain, while a prominent difference in shape or delay in phase was not observed in the hemodynamic response over the whole cortex. The increase in HbO emerged shortly after the onset of stimulation, while the corresponding decrease in RHb lags by a fraction of a second (emphasized in the inset in Fig. 3a–c, RHb was inverted) with an initial small increase in concentration reminiscent of the initial dip in the BOLD fMRI response42. The total hemoglobin concentration (THb) indicating the change in cerebral blood volume also increased after the onset of stimulation and tend to return to baseline after the stimulation.
A statistically significant difference in hemodynamics from the presented brain region was found in varying the PRF after stimulation onset over a 3 sec period (repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer post-hoc analysis, p < 0.05). The largest difference in HbO concentration change was observed at 2.7 sec after stimulation indicating the peak of HbO from PRF 1500 Hz. The averaged temporal hemodynamic response over a 1 sec window centered around the time of the peak of HbO and RHb (Fig. 3d) showed a statistically significant difference throughout the cortex.
Decomposed hemodynamic signals
Principal component analysis (PCA), a widely-used feature extraction technique in the image processing field, was applied to separate the signals from different sources including that related to neural activity, and remove motion artefacts and other background noise. Two principal components were consistently observed from the HbO signal from six out of seven mice during all actual stimulation conditions. Similar to the original HbO signal, both components show changes initiated by tUS that have a statistically significant (repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer post-hoc analysis, p < 0.05) difference in peak amplitude depending on PRF (Fig. 4a). The decomposed signals were compared against the HRF corresponding to the given stimulation. Comparison across all tUS paradigms of the correlation coefficients between each component and the HRF does not yield a statistically significant difference (both p > 0.05); consequently, revealing a higher similarity with PC2 (r = 0.80 ± 0.10) than to PC1 (r = −0.17 ± 0.28). The average among different stimulation paradigms of the normalized time series of two components (PC1 and PC2) of a representative animal is illustrated in Fig. 4b. The topographic map of coefficients for the corresponding principal components for each paradigm for the same mouse are shown on Fig. 4c. PC1 was shown to be distributed over the whole mouse cortex, while PC2 was localized with positive and negative coefficients, where the negative coefficient indicates that the component signal is inverted, i.e. the signal decreases rather than increase.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study utilizing OISI on an awake animal model as a neuroimaging tool to support tUS by providing maps of cerebral hemodynamic changes during sonication. The spatial map demonstrated that hemodynamic activity was distributed over the entire mouse cortex, while the time series showed the hemodynamic changes to be initiated shortly after the start of stimulation, reaching the maximum peak after 2.76 ± 0.51 s, with no changes observed during the sham stimulation.
To confirm that the observed optical changes are indeed due to cerebral hemodynamics rather than the ultrasound wave affecting the optical characteristics of the medium43,44, we performed additional experiment on two other mice. Considering the profound effect of anaesthesia on tUS, we performed an identical ultrasound experiment with the PRF 1500 Hz paradigm on mice under deep anaesthesia (1.8–2% isoflurane). The absence of hemodynamic changes evoked by sonication under deep anaesthesia (Supplementary Figure S2) likely excluded the concern of possible interference of acousto-optic effect with our results.
The hemodynamics under three different sonication conditions were compared with the hope to introduce OISI as a potential technique to unravel one of the main challenges in the ultrasound stimulation field, that is, to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a desired application45,46. Even though the acoustic intensity within the pulse (ISPPA) and the total sonication time (ISPTA), was kept similar, our results showed a significant difference in amplitude of hemodynamic changes in the first 2.5 s after stimulation caused by the varying pulse width and repetition rate. The stimulation with the shortest pulse and highest PRF elicited the largest amplitude change of hemodynamics, while the sonication with longest pulse and lowest repetition rate induced the smallest change. The results supported the discussion of a previous work47 emphasizing the importance not only of the acoustic intensity itself but also of the pulse duration and repetition period. The finding might also be important for neuroprotection to minimize the effect of ischemic stroke as it relates directly to blood flow48.
The peak of the observed hemodynamic change was reached within the sonication period, while the typical neural activity-related hemodynamic change described by the HRF is expected to reach its maximum after the stimulation49. Previous neurovascular coupling reports indicated localized responses correlated to the HRF may be quenched by a dominant global response that could be extracted by blind source separation techniques50. The implementation of PCA revealed that the HbO change during tUS consisted of a stimulus-triggered global (PC1) and local (PC2) hemodynamic change. The global signal has a dominant influence to the original hemodynamic amplitude change, while the weaker localized response was found to be strongly correlated to the HRF. In six out of seven animals, each of these components have similar waveform regardless of stimulation condition, but statistically differing significantly in amplitude. Although the PCA-decomposed signals from the seventh mouse include the global response, the localized component correlated to the HRF was not found. While the global response can be described as a dramatic increase and gradual decrease of HbO concentration over the whole cortex, the tUS-triggered hemodynamic response likely related to neural activity was interestingly localized, and either increasing or decreasing in regions distributed symmetrically within the left and right hemispheres. The observed symmetry and activation of one region of the brain while suppressing the activity of another is consistent with previous studies38. The robustness of these findings was evident in the consistency of results across six mice.
In order to support the hypothesis that the high correlation of PC2 with HRF is related to neural activity, changes in the cerebral blood flow (CBF) were measured in a separate experiment during tUS using laser speckle imaging (see Supplementary Information). The spatial map of CBF changes during sonication (Fig. 5a) shows an initial increase throughout the brain, but a CBF constantly above baseline level was observed only in the regions that overlap with the spatial map corresponding to PC2 (Fig. 4c), reinforcing the notion of neuronal activation due to tUS. The observed temporal evolution of CBF (Fig. 5b) during tUS is in agreement with a previous report51.
The source of the initial global increase in CBF along with the observed global hemodynamic change is still unclear. However, the absence of the global hemodynamic response in the sham stimulation and difference in amplitude depending on PRF imply that tUS might be affecting the brain in a manner other than focal neuromodulation52. A direct measure of neural activity concurrent with the measurement of hemodynamic change could be useful in elucidating the cause of the global response and contribute to the full understanding of the neurovascular response to tUS.
Although the ultrasound transducer was consistently placed on the right side of the head for all the mice, a stark difference in hemodynamics between the hemispheres was not observed. Considering the fact that the selected central frequency of 425 kHz, has a relatively large focal area in comparison with the mouse brain, along with the arising complexity of the acoustic pattern inside the animal skull53, we are not able to affirm the origin of localization and symmetry of the associated hemodynamic change. Likewise, a number of studies have demonstrated the ability of tUS to elicit a motor response even during sonication of brain regions other than the motor cortex36,54. We believe these observations are related to brain functional connectivity29, and the implementation of OISI with a higher central frequency of tUS that can provide a smaller stimulation region52 might be critical tools for studies in brain connectivity.
The inability to extract a highly correlated HRF component from one mouse could be related to the limitation of PCA to assume the orthogonality of the source signals. Application of an advanced blind source separation technique considering nonorthogonal sources such as independent component analysis (ICA), and extended spatial decorrelation (ESD) could be beneficial55. The results of PCA-decomposed RHb data were not presented due to insufficient SNR and inconsistencies in extracting the HRF-correlated signal.
In summary, OISI was shown to be a reliable neuroimaging tool providing spatiotemporal cerebral information during tUS. The results showed global and local hemodynamic response due to brain changes during sonication. A significant difference in the amplitude of the hemodynamic change was observed by varying the acoustic pulse width and repetition frequency. Thus, the technique has been shown to offer the capability to obtain insight into the effects of different tUS parameters on the brain through simultaneous measurement of cerebral hemodynamics.
Methods
Animal preparation
All animals were cared for in accordance with the guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The protocols used in the study has been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology. A total of twelve female BALB/c mice weighing 17–20 g (9–10 weeks old) were used for the experiments (n = 7, awake; n = 2, anaesthetized; n = 3, laser speckle imaging). The number of animals was selected through the resource equation method56 with the intention of minimizing the sample size with enough thoroughness to accomplish the objectives of the study.
The mesoscopic wide-field cranial window for awake mouse was implemented according to the procedure described by Murphy’s group57. The mice were anaesthetized using an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine – xylazine cocktail (80:10 mg/kg, respectively) for cranial window surgery. The scalp fur was shaved and a midline incision was made along the top of the head and the skull was exposed. A clear dental cement and cover glass was placed on top of the intact skull to provide transparent access to brain tissue. A metal bar was glued to back of the head (4 mm posterior from bregma) to restrain the head of the awake mouse during image acquisition. Moreover, the mouse body was enclosed in a small plastic tube to restrict movement. The animals were allowed to recover for 24 hours before the actual experiment.
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation
The tUS was achieved using a focused acoustic beam from a single element ultrasound transducer (V301-SU, Olympus Corp., Japan) operating at 425 kHz as fundamental frequency, having a low acoustic attenuation through the skull. The input signal to the transducer originated from a function generator (33220 A, Agilent, USA) magnified by a linear power amplifier (240 L, ENI Inc., USA). A 3D printed acoustic guide was attached to the end of the ultrasound transducer to provide a convenient access to the mouse head, and additionally restricting the acoustic wave propagation. A thin paraffin film (Parafilm M®, Sigma-Aldrich Corp, US) lined the edge of the acoustic guide to electrically insulate the mouse from the transducer. The ultrasound intensity and beam profile was measured from the tip of the waveguide using an acoustic intensity measurement system (AIMS III, ONDA, USA).
Optical intrinsic signal imaging
The cortex was sequentially illuminated with 465 and 560 nm light using two LEDs (LED465E, Thorlabs, Inc., USA; high power white LED with optical band pass filter, FB560-10, Thorlabs, Inc., USA). The reflected light from the brain was collected using an sCMOS camera (Prime, Photometrics, USA) with an objective lens (5x Mitutoyo Plan APO, Edmund Optics Ltd, UK) at a frame rate of 66 Hz. The camera exposure was synchronized with the LEDs using a built-in multi-trigger output function from the camera which gives a final sampling rate of 33 Hz for each light source, and image size of 1024 × 1024 with a spatial resolution of 7.1 µm per pixel.
Experimental design
Each animal was initially anaesthetized with 3% isoflurane to restrain the animal in the stereotaxic frame. Once fixed, the animal is given at least 30 minutes to recover from anaesthesia before the start of data acquisition. All animals received four different stimulation conditions, including sham, within a single image acquisition experiment. The stimulation paradigms were selected in a way to keep the same spatial peak pulse average (ISPPA = 1.84 W/cm2) as well as spatial peak time average intensity (ISPTA = 129 mW/cm2) but with different pulse durations and repetition rates. The sonication parameters selected are considered safe and below the limits set by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for diagnostic ultrasound imaging (ISPTA of 720 mW/cm2, ISPPA of 190 W/cm2, MI of 1.9)58. Furthermore, the maximum peak negative pressure of 0.53 MPa used in the study is far below the threshold for thermal effects or cavitation related brain tissue damage59.
The experiment on the awake animals consisted of 100 randomly shuffled trials, with 25 trials for each paradigm. Each trial image acquisition lasts for a total of 17 s including 5 s of stimulation containing ten ultrasound pulse trains with a repetition rate of 2 Hz. The interval between the beginning of each trial was fixed to 1 minute. The ultrasound was applied non-invasively to the brain through an acoustic guide filled with gel coupled to the skin on the right side of the mouse head, avoiding the whisker pad, and directed towards the bregma to provide a full image of the cortical brain. The gel provides a 2 mm distance between the skin and the edge of the guide. Sham trials were applied using the same protocol and setup as stimulation trials but without any input to the transducer.
The anaesthetized measurements were performed with an identical protocol as in the awake animal experiments but applying only the PRF 1500 Hz stimulation. A heating pad was used to maintain the mouse body temperature while under anaesthesia.
Signal processing
The original images were resized to 128 × 128 using the Image Processing Toolbox from Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., USA) to decrease shot noise and to avoid overfitting for further data analysis. The time series analysis begins by converting the image intensity from each wavelength into relative concentration changes of HbO and RHb using the modified Beer-Lambert law60, along with a 1D zero-phase low pass filter applied at 1 Hz to reduce the higher frequency respiratory and cardiac noises. The total hemoglobin (THb) change was obtained by summation of HbO and RHb. The results of HbO and RHb of the 25 trials from each paradigm were averaged to increase SNR.
In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) (Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, Matlab, Mathworks Inc., USA) was applied to remove motion artefacts and decompose the signal into different sources61. One-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis (α = 0.05) was performed to compare hemodynamic response within and (repeated measures) between mice. The averaged signal over the whole cortex from 25 individual trials were used for the statistical analysis within mice, while the averaged hemodynamics over all trials from the indicated cortical area from all the mice were utilized for the between-group analysis.
References
Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E. R., Sandrini, M. & Cohen, L. G. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 838–844 (2013).
Hummel, F. C. & Cohen, L. G. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 5, 708–712 (2006).
Reynolds, D. V. Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. Science 164, 444–445 (1969).
Plaha, P. & Gill, S. S. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus for Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport 16, 1883–1887 (2005).
Nahas, Z., Kozel, F. A., Li, X., Anderson, B. & George, M. S. Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of depression in bipolar affective disorder: a pilot study of acute safety and efficacy. Bipolar Disord. 5, (40–47 (2003).
Servello, D., Porta, M., Sassi, M., Brambilla, A. & Robertson, M. M. Deep brain stimulation in 18 patients with severe Gilles de la Tourette syndrome refractory to treatment: the surgery and stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 79, 136–142 (2008).
Abelson, J. L. et al. Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 510–516 (2005).
Fregni, F. & Pascual-Leone, A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 3, 383–393 (2007).
Wagner, T., Valero-Cabre, A. & Pascual-Leone, A. Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 527–565 (2007).
Perlmutter, J. S. & Mink, J. W. Deep brain stimulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 229–257 (2006).
Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics. Nat. Methods 8, 26–29 (2011).
Tyler, W. J. et al. Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound. PLoS ONE 3, e3511 (2008).
Menz, M. D., Oralkan, Ö., Khuri-Yakub, P. T. & Baccus, S. A. Precise neural stimulation in the retina using focused ultrasound. J. Neurosci. 33, 4550–4560 (2013).
Ye, P. P., Brown, J. R. & Pauly, K. B. Frequency dependence of ultrasound neurostimulation in the mouse brain. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 42, 1512–1530 (2016).
King, R. L., Brown, J. R., Newsome, W. T. & Pauly, K. B. Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 312–331 (2013).
Lin, W.-T., Chen, R.-C., Lu, W.-W., Liu, S.-H. & Yang, F.-Y. Protective effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on aluminum-induced cerebral damage in Alzheimer’s disease rat model. Sci. Rep. 5, 9671 (2015).
Legon, W. et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 322–329 (2014).
Lee, W. et al. Image-guided transcranial focused ultrasound stimulates human primary somatosensory cortex. Sci. Rep. 5, 8743 (2015).
Fry, W. J. Use of intense ultrasound in neurological research. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 37, 143–147 (1958).
Yoo, S.-S., Kim, H., Filandrianos, E., Taghados, S. J. & Park, S. Non-invasive brain-to-brain interface (BBI): establishing functional links between two brains. PLoS ONE 8, e60410 (2013).
Min, B. K. et al. Focused ultrasound modulates the level of cortical neurotransmitters: Potential as a new functional brain mapping technique. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 21, 232–240 (2011).
Legon, W., Rowlands, A., Opitz, A., Sato, T. F. & Tyler, W. J. Pulsed ultrasound differentially stimulates somatosensory circuits in humans as indicated by EEG and FMRI. PLoS ONE 7, e51177 (2012).
Monti, M. M., Schnakers, C., Korb, A. S., Bystritsky, A. & Vespa, P. M. Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report. Brain Stimul. 9, 940 (2016).
Mueller, J., Legon, W., Opitz, A., Sato, T. F. & Tyler, W. J. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates intrinsic and evoked EEG dynamics. Brain Stimul. 7, 900–908 (2014).
Min, B.-K. et al. Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity. BMC Neurosci. 12, 23 (2011).
Tufail, Y., Yoshihiro, A., Pati, S., Li, M. M. & Tyler, W. J. Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1453–1470 (2011).
Yi, Y., Cheng-Biao, L. & Xiao-Li, L. Effect of focused ultrasound stimulation at different ultrasonic power levels on the local field potential power spectrum. Chin. Phys. B 24, 088704 (2015).
Lee, W. et al. Image-guided focused ultrasound-mediated regional brain stimulation in sheep. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 42, 459–470 (2016).
Lee, W. et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016).
Ai, L., Mueller, J. K., Grant, A., Eryaman, Y. & Legon, W. Transcranial focused ultrasound for BOLD fMRI signal modulation in humans. in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2016–October, 1758–1761 (2016).
Kim, H., Lee, S. D., Chiu, A., Yoo, S.-S. & Park, S. Estimation of the spatial profile of neuromodulation and the temporal latency in motor responses induced by focused ultrasound brain stimulation. Neuroreport 25, 475–479 (2014).
Sharp, P. S. et al. Comparison of stimulus-evoked cerebral hemodynamics in the awake mouse and under a novel anesthetic regime. Sci. Rep. 5, 12621 (2015).
Heinke, W. & Koelsch, S. The effects of anesthetics on brain activity and cognitive function. Curr. Opin. Anesthesiol. 18, 625–631 (2005).
Peltier, S. J. et al. Functional connectivity changes with concentration of sevoflurane anesthesia. Neuroreport 16, 285–288 (2005).
Tufail, Y. et al. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 66, 681–694 (2010).
Mehić, E. et al. Increased anatomical specificity of neuromodulation via modulated focused ultrasound. PLoS ONE 9, e86939 (2014).
Attwell, D. et al. Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature 468, 232–243 (2010).
White, B. R. et al. Imaging of functional connectivity in the mouse brain. PLoS ONE 6, e16322 (2011).
Guevara, E., Pouliot, P., Nguyen, D. K. & Lesage, F. Optical imaging of acute epileptic networks in mice. J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 076021–076021 (2013).
Lee, S. et al. Depth-dependent cerebral hemodynamic responses following Direct Cortical Electrical Stimulation (DCES) revealed by in vivo dual-optical imaging techniques. Opt. Express 20, 6932–6943 (2012).
Suh, M., Bahar, S., Mehta, A. D. & Schwartz, T. H. Blood volume and hemoglobin oxygenation response following electrical stimulation of human cortex. NeuroImage 31, 66–75 (2006).
Hu, X. & Yacoub, E. The story of the initial dip in fMRI. NeuroImage 62, 1103–1108 (2012).
Korpel, A. Acousto-optics—a review of fundamentals. Proc. IEEE 69, 48–53 (1981).
Raman, C. & Nagendra Nath, N. In Proc. Indian Acad. Sci 406-412.
Bystritsky, A. et al. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul. 4, 125–136 (2011).
Fini, M. & Tyler, W. J. Transcranial focused ultrasound: a new tool for non-invasive neuromodulation. Int. Rev. of Psychiatry, 1–10 (2017).
Yoo, S.-S. et al. Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity. NeuroImage 56, 1267–1275 (2011).
Murry, C. E., Jennings, R. B. & Reimer, K. A. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 74, 1124–1136 (1986).
Ma, Y. et al. Resting-state hemodynamics are spatiotemporally coupled to synchronized and symmetric neural activity in excitatory neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 201525369 (2016).
Kozberg, M. G., Ma, Y., Shaik, M. A., Kim, S. H. & Hillman, E. M. C. Rapid Postnatal Expansion of Neural Networks Occurs in an Environment of Altered Neurovascular and Neurometabolic Coupling. J. Neurosci. 36, 6704–17 (2016).
Guo, T. et al. Pulsed Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation Immediately After The Ischemic Brain Injury is Neuroprotective. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 2352–2357 (2015).
Pisauro, M. A., Benucci, A. & Carandini, M. Local and global contributions to hemodynamic activity in mouse cortex. J. Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00125.2016 (2016).
Younan, Y. et al. Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation. Med. Phys. 40 (2013).
Li, G.-F. et al. Improved Anatomical Specificity of Non-invasive Neuro-stimulation by High Frequency (5 MHz) Ultrasound. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016).
Schie, I. et al. Blind signal separation from optical imaging recordings with extended spatial decorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 47, 573–577 (2000).
Festing, M. F. & Altman, D. G. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR J. 43, 244–258 (2002).
Silasi, G., Xiao, D., Vanni, M. P., Chen, A. C. & Murphy, T. H. Intact skull chronic windows for mesoscopic wide-field imaging in awake mice. J. Neurosci. Methods 267, 141–149 (2016).
Harris, G. & Branch, R.D. Guidance for Industry and FDA - Staff Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (Food and Drug Adminiastration, 2008).
Dalecki, D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 229–248 (2004).
Ma, Y. et al. Wide-field optical mapping of neural activity and brain haemodynamics: considerations and novel approaches. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150360 (2016).
Stetter, M. et al. Principal component analysis and blind separation of sources for optical imaging of intrinsic signals. NeuroImage 11, 482–490 (2000).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Small Grant for Exploratory Research (SGER) (#2015R1D1A1A02062382) and Brain Research Program (#2016M3C7A1905475) through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, GIST Research Institute (GRI) in 2017; and the Biomedical Integrated Technology Research Project through a grant provided by GIST in 2017. The authors acknowledge the assistance of Prof. Jae Youn Hwang and Jihun Kim of the Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), and Prof. Jonghyun Lee (GIST), for the ultrasound beam measurements and helpful discussions. We also thank Prof. Euiheon Chung (GIST) and Dr. Tae Joong Eom (GIST) for their assistance and valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.K. and E.A. participated in study design, data acquisition and analysis. J.G.K. led the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, E., Anguluan, E. & Kim, J.G. Monitoring cerebral hemodynamic change during transcranial ultrasound stimulation using optical intrinsic signal imaging. Sci Rep 7, 13148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13572-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13572-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
A Soft Housing Needle Ultrasonic Transducer for Focal Stimulation to Small Animal Brain
Annals of Biomedical Engineering (2020)
-
Non-invasive measurement of hemodynamic change during 8 MHz transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation using near-infrared spectroscopy
BMC Neuroscience (2019)
-
The effect of anesthetic dose on the motor response induced by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation
BMC Neuroscience (2018)
-
Modulation of Brain Function and Behavior by Focused Ultrasound
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports (2018)