Abstract
On the 28 December 2014, a violent and short paroxysmal eruption occurred at the South East Crater (SEC) of Mount Etna that led to the formation of huge niches on the SW and NE flanks of the SEC edifice from which a volume of ~3 × 106 m3 of lava was erupted. Two basaltic lava flows discharged at a rate of ~370 m3/s, reaching a maximum distance of ~5 km. The seismicity during the event was scarce and the eruption was not preceded by any notable ground deformation, which instead was dramatic during and immediately after the event. The SO2 flux associated with the eruption was relatively low and even decreased few days before. Observations suggest that the paroxysm was not related to the ascent of volatile-rich fresh magma from a deep reservoir (dyke intrusion), but instead to a collapse of a portion of SEC, similar to what happens on exogenous andesitic domes. The sudden and fast discharge eventually triggered a depressurization in the shallow volcano plumbing system that drew up fresh magma from depth. Integration of data and observations has allowed to formulate a novel interpretation of mechanism leading volcanic activity at Mt. Etna and on basaltic volcanoes worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Among the volcanological community, a well-defined distinction between closed system and open-conduit volcanoes has long been accepted1, 2. It is common understanding that volcanoes can behave either as closed systems with batches of magma residing at crustal depth and able, all of a sudden, to break the volcanic edifice and cause violent explosive eruptions3,4,5 or open conduit volcanoes that are persistently filled with magma degassing from the summit vents3, 6,7,8. Degassing in basaltic magma is relatively easy because of the low viscosity of the melt and therefore vesicle coalescence may create bubbles large enough to decouple from the melt and reach the surface9, 10. On the contrary, in closed-systems typically associated with evolved magmas, such as andesite and rhyolite, high viscosity prevents efficient bubble coalescence and gas transport mainly occurs via permeable flow through fractures or connected vesicles6, 11,12,13. In such systems, the low permeability can often produce sealing of the pathways thereby preventing gas escape and causing pressure build-up14, 15.
Mount Etna is a basaltic open conduit volcano whose terminal conduit is formed of four summit vents: the Voragine (VOR), the oldest and main crater; the Bocca Nuova (BN), located on the same cone of the VOR and by two sub-terminal cones the North-East Crater (NEC) and the South-East Crater (SEC) (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Video V1). In recent years, most of the open conduit summit eruptions have occurred at SEC and consisted of tens of “paroxysms” (44 since 2011), which are short-lived, high-energy explosive events, often culminating in lava fountaining, characterized by the emission of fresh gas-rich basaltic magma (e.g. Behncke et al.16; Patanè et al.17, De Beni et al.18). Since 2007, this significant activity at the SEC has shifted its main emission point of few hundred meters to the east of the SEC summit. This has been interpreted by some authors as the development of an independent eruptive axis and named as New South East Crater (NSEC, e.g. Behncke et al.19; Acocella et al.20). In this work, we will study the paroxysm occurred at the SEC the 28 December 2014. This eruption was previously studied by Bonforte & Guglielmino21 and Gambino et al.22, who classically interpreted the event as fed by a magmatic dyke. However, the event was marked by an extremely high discharge rate (~370 m3/s) and the two eruptive vents, at the base of SEC (Fig. 1a), were located at the bottom of large avalanche scallops (Fig. 1b,c; Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2); months before the paroxysm on the summit of the SEC we detected a complex network of incandescent fractures (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S3). Moreover, the ground deformations measured by Continuous GPS (CGPS) were very sizeable during and after the event (not immediately before); seismic events, often characterizing the opening of eruptive fractures23 occurred only during the event (not before)22; the gas release was considerable days after the event (not during or before). The integrated data from field observations, geophysics, gas geochemistry and rock petrochemistry, allow inferring that the eruptive mechanism of the event of 28 December 2014, differs from open conduit paroxysms and dyke-fed eruptions but instead points to the behaviour of an exogenous dome. Such a behaviour, anomalous for basaltic systems, is physically detailed here for the very first time on Mt. Etna.
Volcano-tectonic setting of Mt Etna and the eruptive event of 28 December 2014
The SEC originated as a pit crater during the 1971 eruption. It has been highly active since 197824, 25 and has grown, over the last 10-12 years16, 26 to reach a height comparable to that of the Central Crater (3280 m a.s.l.). The last eruption at the SEC, before the event of 28 December 2014, occurred in August and consisted of strombolian activity lasting one week (from 8 to 15 August, 2014). It was accompanied by a lava flow issuing from the eastern flank of the SEC directed towards the Valle del Bove18. At the end of this activity, the summit of the SEC was affected by progressive fracturing, which became more intense in time and developed a network of large gas releasing fractures. Those fractures were coated by sulphur sublimates and showed incandescence months before the paroxysm (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S3). The eruption of 28 December 2014 started, according to the sharp increase of volcanic tremor, at ~16:15 (all times are in GMT), when the volcano was entirely covered with clouds and direct observations could not be made. The paroxysm lasted more than two hours and its ending was revealed by a sharp decrease in volcanic tremor at 18:30. During the eruption, two distinct lava flows, for a total volume of ~3 million m3, as estimated by INGV-OE26, were emitted from the two tips of a fracture, both located at an elevation of about 3050 m a.s.l. (Fig. 1a). Considering the short time of the event, the discharge rate that can be inferred is ~370 m3/s; the two lava flows expanded for a distance of ~5 km from the SW tip and ~3.5 km from the NE tip, into the Valle del Bove. The thickness of the lava flows was around one meter close to the vents, increasing at the very distal front of the flows. The lava field was “aa” type, totally breached and clinkery, without any “pahoehohe” morphology and most important the lava flow was almost lacking the massive portion. The petrochemical features of the lava emitted do not differ from the high-K trachybasaltic lavas ordinarily produced by Etnean activity, except for a slightly higher Ca tenor and for the extremely low H2O content (see Tab 2). One peculiar feature of this paroxysm is the newly opened fracture, characterized by the alignment of huge niches similar to avalanche scallops; two of which broke apart the SW flank of the SEC (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Figs S1 and S2) and one broke the NE flank (Fig. 1c), for a total length of about 1200 m. Moreover, a network of minor fractures, cutting the erupted products, accompanied the main niches (Supplementary Fig. S3, Supplementary Video V1). A few days after the event (January 2, 2015), the emission of dense clouds of brown ash started from the SEC summit (Supplementary Fig. S7). On 5 January, a strombolian activity took place at the VOR, which had been inactive for years (Supplementary Fig. S5). This strombolian activity ended on 9 January.
Results
Deformation and modelling of volcanic sources
CGPS network (Supplementary Fig. S5) data were used to: (i) explore and model the source of the ground deformation pattern preceding the paroxysm of 28 December 2014; (ii) explore and model the displacements following the paroxysm. The length increase (~15 mm since 21 August 2014) of the baseline between EMSG and ESLN CGPS stations, crossing the volcanic edifice from North to South indicates the inflation of the volcanic edifice (Supplementary Fig. S6a). This is also marked by the southward displacement of the EINT station (Supplementary Fig. S6b), located in the upper portion of the southern flank of the volcano, and by the summit station ECPN (Supplementary Fig. S6c). From 28 to 29 December 2014, the EMSG-ESLN baseline and the EINT and ECPN time series, showed a displacement due to the opening of the eruptive fractures (Supplementary Fig. S6). Supplementary Fig. S6c also shows the north-westward displacement of the ECPN station by ~102 mm. The displacement increased until the following day, with a variation in the North component of ~56 mm. Conversely, EINT station moved southwards by ~7 mm on 28 December and by ~4 mm the next day (Supplementary Fig. S6b). The ground deformation patterns in the period between 21 August–26 December and 27–29 December 2014 are shown in Fig. 3a,c and in Fig. 3b,d respectively. The CGPS displacements in the first period display a radial pattern (Fig. 3a), testifying the inflation of the plumbing system. Between 27 and 29 December, displacements were observed only in the summit area (Fig. 3b). In particular, EPLU and ECNE stations displaced toward NNW by ~47 and 44 mm respectively, ECPN moved NWward by ~102 mm and EINT, moved to the south by ~17 mm.
The deformation patterns of Fig. 3a,c,b and d were interpreted with analytical time-invariant models. We obtained spatial coordinates and geometrical parameters from data inversions and the uncertainties of each optimized source parameters have been evaluated using the Jack-knife re-sampling methodology27 (Table 1). For the first period, we modelled an inflating pressure source, associated with a volume of 9.6 × 106 m3 (Table 1), at a depth of 4029 ± 654 m (b.s.l.) underneath the summit craters area (Fig. 4a,b). On 28 December the eruptive event occurred, right after which we observe a dramatic deformation of the summit area, lasting until 29 December (Supplementary Fig. S6b,c). We modelled the deformation source as tensile dislocation 795 ± 30 m long and 502 ± 17 m wide underneath the area just to the SE of the SEC, at a depth of 2672 ± 180 m (a.s.l.).
Our model differs from the one proposed in Gambino et al.22. Although most parameters are similar, our modelled source contains the area where seismic events occurred. But the most important difference lies in the interpretation of the role that these syn-post eruptive deformations played (see Discussion section).
SO2 Flux
In order to better constrain the eruptive event of 28 December 2014, we have also examined the bulk SO2 flux released by the Etnean summit craters from the end of the previous eruptive event (15 August, 2014) to 09 January 2015 (Fig. 5). In the first 67 days (14 August-20 October), the daily flux remained stable at ~2000 tons per day (t/d). Since 21 October, the flux increased, leading to values up to 6500 t/d; this trend continued until the 7 December, when it gradually changed, decreasing to a mean value of 1800 t/d, down to the minimum of 440 t/d recorded on Christmas Day; this is the lowest flux measured in the studied period. In the three following days, the flux increased steadily to reach the value of 4500 t/d on the day of the eruption. It is worth mentioning that the SO2 flux recorded during the eruption was lower than the peaks recorded in November. Right after the eruption, the flux dropped to ~1100 t/d on 31 December, to increase again dramatically up to the 8000 t/d on 2 January 2015. This flux value is the maximum value of the time series and was measured in correspondence of the short but significant strombolian activity at the VOR, which lasted until 9 January.
Discussion
Although the eruptive activity at Mt. Etna has prevalently been effusive, in the last few years the SEC has displayed a switch to short-lasting explosive eruptions. Since its formation as a pit crater in 1971, the SEC has undergone an articulated growth18, mainly due to its explosive-oriented eruptive style, which strongly increased since 201117, 19, 28. Due to this intense activity in particular since 2013, its crater morphology has dramatically changed18, with the lack of a proper deep chasm replaced instead by a shallow and flat hollow constellated of fumaroles. The process behind this change has not been investigated yet; nevertheless, it must be considered that morphology on volcanoes is generally controlled by endogenous factors. As an example, a deep chasm within a crater is originated by the collapse, at the end of the eruption, of the magma filling the conduit. However, in order to be literally drawn back and leave a conduit empty, the magma needs to be fluid enough. It follows that the lack of a deep chasm at the SEC is likely due to the recurrent formation of viscous/rigid plugs of magma. A useful analogy can be found in Ferlito et al.29, who reported, during the 2001 eruption at the Laghetto parasitic cone, a sudden increase in viscosity and yield strength of the flowing lava, without any compositional variation. This behaviour was explained by invoking an in-conduit crystallization of microlites owing to magma undercooling in response of gas loss. Similar conditions could have occurred at the SEC, as evidenced by the large gas emissions associated with paroxysms of these last years. The 28 December 2014 eruption displayed features diverging from the classic basaltic unrest17, 30, 31, resembling instead those expected in a “dome-like” scenario. One of these features relates to ground deformations, which consisted in only a moderate inflation powered by a source located at about 5 km b.s.l., months prior to the onset of the eruption (Fig. 3a,c), and not associated to the ascent of fresh magma from depth. Interesting considerations can be made by looking at the borehole strainmeter data32, which revealed variations of the strain field with opposite polarity and diverse magnitude two hours before (13:50) and at the onset of the eruption (16:15), respectively. We interpreted these variations as: 1) an earlier positive strain (contraction), associated with the rapid vesiculation and pressurization of the plug of magma at the shallow level of the volcanic edifice; followed by 2) a negative strain (dilatation), associated with removal of the plug.
Noteworthy is the magnitude of the strain at the four stations (Supplementary Fig. S5). Both positive (contraction) and negative (dilatation) strains show the highest values at the Pizzi Deneri station (DPDN), the closest to the SEC summit (about 2.5 km northwards). Values rapidly drop with increasing distance from the SEC at the Monte Scavo, Monte Egitto and Monte Ruvolo (DMSC, DEGI and DRUV, respectively) stations (Fig. 6). This behaviour testifies to a rapid decay of the measured volumetric strain, which can only be originated by a very shallow source, likely within the uppermost 1300 m of the Etnean edifice. SO2 flux emission also showed peculiar features, since mid-October 2014, bulk SO2 emission increased, to drop to a minimum value of 440 t/d three days before the eruption. The day of the eruption the flux increased up to 4500 t/d, which is lower than observed in November (Fig. 4). This syn-eruptive flux is anomalously low if compared with what was measured during SEC paroxysms (~15000 t/d17, 33).
Such geophysical and geochemical features suggest that the 28 December eruption was not associated with fresh volatile-rich magma migrating from depth but, conversely, was related to the removal of a plug of semisolid and degassed magma placed in the uppermost portion of the Etnean plumbing system, probably after the previous eruptive event of August 201434, 35. Moreover, it is reasonable to suppose that, due to the typically low thermal conductivity of basalt, this degassed-magma might have still been hot and slightly below its Solidus temperature (ca. 900 °C). Once emplaced and solidified, lava undergoes fracturing due to volume contraction and/or tectonics. Fractures are escape routes for the huge amounts of gas feeding the persistent plume36. In the shallowest portion of the volcano (the last 1300 m, in our instance), the most significant gas species are already exsolved (e.g. exsolution pressure of H2O ca. 250 MPa; SO2 ca. 140 MPa; CO2 > 400 MPa37), and cannot therefore modify the chemical behaviour of magma as in the case of gas flushing38. However, the gas are very hot and its continuous passage through the rock can lead to a notable heat release, which can trigger eruptions. The thermal contribution of the gas flux in originating the 28 December eruption can be tested starting from the observation that during the 134 days following the previous eruptive event (ended the 15th of August, 2014), gas emitting, incandescent fractures (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S3) were observed on the edges of SEC, proving that the gas, through its passage, was heating the lava plug underneath the summit craters. The heat carried by gasses represents the sum of the translational kinetic energy of its atoms and molecules and is therefore independent of the gas species, depending only from its absolute T; it can therefore be evaluated as:
where n is moles number; Cv is specific heat at constant volume; T is the absolute temperature. One mole of gas at initial temperature of 1200 °C can supply an energy amount of 18412.5J. Considering that on those 134 days the cumulative amount of SO2 (Fig. 5) was 3.2 × 105 tons and considering SO2/H2O = 0.1 and CO2/SO2 = 0.6 (in Aiuppa et al.39), adding 6.1 × 104 tons of HCl (daily average from Gambino et al.22), and 8.4 × 103 tons of HF (pers. comm. A. La Spina) in 134 days (from 15 August to 28 December 2014) then ~1.9 × 1011 moles of gas have passed through the plug and the summit craters, providing a ∆εg of 3.5 × 1015 J.
Due to the low conductivity of the basaltic lava (k~1 W/mK), the basalt in the plug remaining after the August eruption, even though solid, had to be still hot. A useful example of solid Etnean lava levees at 900 °C can be found in Barberi & Carapezza40 and Wright et al.41. Considering 1000 °C as a plausible temperature for melting onset, the volume of basalt (Wv), whose temperature could be raised by 100 °C and brought to melting by the heat supplied by the gas in 134 days (∆εg), can be calculated as follows:
Where c = 1.4 × 103 J/(kgK) is the specific heat of an Etnean basalt calculated using MELTS42, Tm ≈ 1000 °C is a lower limit for the onset of melting and Tl ~900 °C is a likely temperature of the basalt remaining in the plug. With a basalt density ρ = 2800 kg/m3 and a latent heat of L = 5.0 × 105 J/kg (typical values for Etnean basaltic lavas43,44,45), melting fraction f = 0.7 (assuming a large partial melting of 70%), a magma volume of 2.5 million m3 is found. The lava emitted on 28 December was ~3.0 million m3, so most of the lava erupted could have been driven to melt by the heat carried by the gas flux. The estimate of ∆εg is fairly robust, against variations due to uncertainties, and demonstrates that the gas flux is thermally able to drive basalt melting. Indeed, the heat provided by the gas is released within a time span (134 days in the example), but the eruptive outburst is sudden and short lasting, as caused by a “threshold triggering”. The process could be envisaged as follows: the heating of the basalt in the viscous/rigid plug could have led to the softening at first and then to the very melting of the basalt (Fig. 7a). The melting needed for triggering the eruption was partial; we used a 70% estimate in the above thermodynamic calculation only to be conservative, but probably a lower degree of melting (50-30%) may have sufficed to trigger the eruption. The “critical” threshold was reached when the plug stopped behaving as a rigid body and became a plastic blob, less permeable than fractures on the rigid plug, to the upward migrating gasses (Fig. 7b). In fact, from 10 December the flux decreased, dropping to its minimum value of 440 t/d three days before the event. We might consider this lowermost value as the minimum permeability threshold. In this condition, in order to pass through the newly molten viscous basalt, the gas had to boil and produce bubbles. These bubbles generated, in the relatively short time of 2 hours, enough overpressure to break the resistance of the SEC plug and edifice and produce the violent outburst (Fig. 7c). We may speculate that the slight gas flux increment (~2000 t/d) observed on 26 and 27 December, might have supplied the critical energy to trigger the event.
Such a reconstruction of the eruption triggering explains well the data of the borehole strainmeters, showing a two-hour long contraction phase, corresponding to the overpressure build up due to the magma boiling; followed by the dilatational phase, associated to the eruptive discharge of the plug. Our reconstruction also accounts for the nature of the seven LP (long period) events from 16:11 and 16:5022 (Fig. 4a), which we relate to the overpressure build up in the plug. In fact, the timing and characteristics of these seismic events suggest that they were likely associated with a process of fluid-bubbles pressurization in a viscous magma. One exception is the seismic event recorded at 16:50 (local magnitude - Ml = 3.0), which can be classified as a “hybrid” (seismic events with a pronounced high frequency onset and a coda dominated by low frequency wave train, e.g. White et al.46). This could have been produced by rock volume failure at very shallow levels of the SEC edifice or by violent degassing into adjacent thermally induced cracks47. Furthermore, if to be erupted was the partially re-molten old degassed magma, the H2O content in the erupted lava (expressed as Loss On Ignition - L.O.I. Table 2) is expected to be low, as it is in the 3 samples taken on two lava flows. But also the lava must have been highly viscous and with remarkable yield strength, and in fact, the lava emitted has “aa” morphology, totally breached up in clinkers, very thin (~1 m thick or less) and almost lacking of the massive portion. Moreover, the entire edifice of SEC was broken apart from SW to NE, by a very peculiar eruptive fracture, which displayed huge niches similar to avalanche scallops on the NE and SW sides from 3050 m (a.s.l.) to the summit (see Fig. 1b,c; Supplementary Figs S1 and S2). These avalanche niches, together with the extremely high effusion rate >370 m3/s, indicate that on 28 December 2014 the ~3 million m3 of lava were not simply erupted but literally discharged from the SEC, similarly to what happens in andesitic exogenous lava domes.
Such a massive discharge, very rapid (~2 hours and 15 minutes), had probably induced a sudden decompression of the shallow plumbing system, thus triggering the ascent of rich-volatile magma from depth, which, exsolving at lower pressure, determined the observed syn-post eruptive dramatic deformation of the uppermost portion of the volcanic edifice (Supplementary Fig. S6b,c; Fig. 3b,d). Eventually, this magma fed the eruption at VOR, characterized by violent Strombolian activity (Supplementary Fig. S7) and by a sustained SO2 flux (Fig. 5).
The peculiarities observed in the unrest and on 28 December 2014 at Mount Etna are somewhat dissimilar to typical basaltic volcanoes behaviour. The geophysical, gas geochemistry and field observations found a balanced explanation if we interpret the eruption as the discharge of a re-melted basalt plug together with the uppermost portion of the SEC edifice, rather than the classic eruptive dynamics fed by fresh magma rising from depth. In this reconstruction, the role of the volatiles extraneous to the erupting magma and coming from below is determinant in triggering the eruption38. The proposed eruptive mechanism envisages a scenario that is similar to what commonly observed on evolving exogenous domes usually associated with andesitic or more acidic magmas. Obviously, the SEC cannot be defined as a “dome”, neither can the event described here be ascribed to a typical felsic dome collapsing. This process, which lacks a proper terminology, represents a novel eruptive mechanism at Mount Etna. Whether this mechanism is unique or indeed could be more common than expected at basaltic volcanoes, is an open issue for further studies. There have been other eruptive events at the SEC characterized by high discharge rates in limited time18, 19, in the light of our considerations, the eruptive mechanisms behind these events might be revisited. We believe that this work represents a significant step forward in understanding eruptive unrest at Mount Etna and it might be an example to re-evaluate eruptive unrest at basaltic volcanoes worldwide.
Methods
Deformation and modelling of volcanic sources
The Continuous GPS (CGPS) network of Mt. Etna volcano, managed by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Etneo (INGV-OE), consists of 38 stations located on the summit area and flanks of the volcanic edifice. Raw data collected between August 2014 and March 2015 have been processed using the GAMIT/GLOBK software packages48, 49, applying the method discussed in Bruno et al.50. The deformation patterns were also interpreted with analytical time-invariant models. In order to estimate spatial coordinates and geometrical parameters of the magmatic source in the pre-eruptive phase, we used the Yang et al.51 model, while we modelled a rectangular tensile dislocation52 for the intrusion of the evening of December 28. Both models take into account the influence of topography on the final deformation pattern by applying the method proposed in Williams & Wadge53. The applied procedure is described in Bruno et al.54.
Petrochemical analysis
Whole-rock analyses were carried out at the laboratories of the Department of Physics and Earth Science of the University of Ferrara (Italy) on powdered aliquots of rocks. Whole-rock major concentrations were measured by X-ray fluorescence (Thermo ARL Advant XP). Intensities were corrected for matrix effects using the method of Lachance & Traill55. Loss on ignition (L.O.I.) was determined by gravimetric method assuming Fe2O3 as 15% FeO. Accuracy and precision are better than 2–5% for all major elements (Table 2).
SO2 flux
The daylight bulk sulphur dioxide (SO2) flux from the summit craters of Mt. Etna was measured by the FLAME-Etna (FLux Automatic MEasurements) network. The network consists of ten ultraviolet scanning spectrometer stations spaced ~7 km apart and installed at an altitude of ~900 m a.s.l. on the flanks of Mt. Etna56, 57. Each station scans the sky for almost 9 h, intersecting the plume at a mean distance of ~14 km from the summit craters and acquires a complete plume-scan in ~5 min. Open-path ultraviolet spectra are reduced on site applying the DOAS technique and using a modelled clear-sky spectrum57, 58. Inverted data are in real-time transmitted to the INGV, Osservatorio Etneo, where SO2 emission rates are computed; uncertainty in flux range between –22 and +36%59, 60. A detailed description of plume SO2 flux measurement method can be found in Calvari, et al.56, Salerno et al.59.
References
Mangan, M. & Sisson, T. Delayed, disequilibrium degassing in rhyolite magma: Decompression experiments and implications for explosive volcanism. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 183, 441–455 (2000).
Mangan, M., Mastin, L. & Sisson, T. Gas evolution in eruptive conduits: Combining insights from high temperature and pressure decompression experiments with steady-state flow modeling. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 129, 23–36 (2004).
Jaupart, C. & Allègre, C. J. Gas content, eruption rate and instabilities of eruption regime in silicic volcanoes. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 102, 413–429 (1991).
Jaupart, C. Gas loss from magmas through conduit walls during eruption. In The Physics of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions (eds. Gilbert, J. S. & Sparks, R. S. J.) 145, 73–90 (Geological Society, London, 1998).
Melnik, O. & Sparks, R. S. J. Dynamics of magma ascent and lava extrusion at Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. In The eruption of the Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat from 1995 to 1999 (eds. Druitt, T. H. & Kokelaar, B. P.) 21, 153–171 (Geological Society. London, Memoirs 2002).
Eichelberger, J. C., Carrigan, C. R., Westrich, H. R. & Price, R. H. Non-explosive silicic volcanism. Nature 323, 598–602 (1986).
Eichelberger, J. C. Silicic volcanism: ascent of viscous magmas from crustal reservoirs. Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc 23, 41–63 (1995).
Jaupart, C. Physical models of volcanic eruptions. Chem. Geol. 128, 217–227 (1996).
Sparks, R. S. J. The dynamics of bubble formation and growth in magmas: a review and analysis. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 3, 1–37 (1978).
Gonnermann, H. M. & Manga, M. Dynamics of magma ascent in the volcanic conduit. In: Modeling volcanic processes: The physics and mathematics of volcanism (eds. Fagents, S. A., Gregg, T. K. P. & Lopes, R. M. C.) 55-84 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).
Gonnermann, H. M. & Manga, M. The fluid mechanics inside a volcano. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 39, 1–496 (2007).
Tuffen, H. & Dingwell, D. Fault textures in volcanic conduits: evidence for seismic trigger mechanisms during silicic eruptions. Bull. Volcanol. 67, 370–387 (2005).
Rust, A. C., Cashman, K. V. & Wallace, P. J. Magma degassing buffered by vapor flow through brecciated conduit margins. Geology 32, 349–352 (2004).
Fischer, T. et al. Correlation between SO2 flux and long-period seismicity at Galeras volcano. Nature 308, 135–137 (1994).
Young, S. R., Voight, B. & Duffell, H. J. Magma extrusion dynamics revealed by high-frequency gas monitoring at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. In Volcanic Degassing (eds. Oppenheimer, C., Pyle, D. M. & Barclay, J.) 213, 219–230 (Geological Society, London, 2003).
Behncke, B., Neri, M., Pecora, E. & Zanon, V. The exceptional activity and growth of the Southeast Crater, Mount Etna (Italy), between 1996 and 2001. B. Volcanol. 69, 149–173 (2006).
Patanè, D. et al. Insights into magma and fluid transfer at Mount Etna by a multiparametric approach: A model of the events leading to the 2011 eruptive cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3519–3539 (2013).
De Beni, E. et al. The continuing story of Etna’s New Southeast Crater (2012–2014): Evolution and volume calculations based on field surveys and aerophotogrammetry. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 303, 175–186 (2015).
Behncke, B. et al. The 2011–2012 summit activity of Mount Etna: Birth, growth and products of the new SE crater. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 270, 10–21 (2014).
Acocella V. et al. Why does a mature volcano need new vents? The case of the New Southeast Crater at Etna. Front. Earth Sci. 4, 67 (2016).
Bonforte, A. & Guglielmino, F. Very shallow dyke intrusion and potential slope failure imaged by ground deformation: The 28 December 2014 eruption on Mount Etna. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2727–2733 (2015).
Gambino, S. et al. The unusual 28 December 2014 dike‐fed paroxysm at Mount Etna: Timing and mechanism from a multidisciplinary perspective. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 2037–2053 (2016).
Falsaperla, S. & Neri, M. Seismic footprints of shallow dyke propagation at Etna, Italy. Sci. Rep. 5, 11908 (2015).
Romano, R. & Sturiale, C. The historical eruptions of Mt. Etna (volcanological data). Mem. Soc. Geol. It. 23, 75–97 (1982).
Francis, P. Volcanoes. A planetary perspective. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).
INGV - Osservatorio Etneo. Il parossismo dell’Etna del 28 dicembre 2014 e la susseguente attività ai crateri sommitali. Aggiornamenti sull’attività eruttiva dell’Etna http://www.ct.ingv.it/it/component/content/article/11-notizie/news/1035-etna-20141228-full.html (2015).
Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (Stanford University, 1982).
Spampinato, L. et al. Multiparametric study of the February–April 2013 paroxysmal phase of Mt. Etna New South-East crater. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy. 16, 1932–1949 (2015).
Ferlito, C., Coltorti, M., Cristofolini, R. & Giacomoni, P. P. The contemporaneous emission of low-K and high-K trachybasalts and the role of the NE Rift during the 2002 eruptive event, Mt. Etna, Italy. B. Volcanol. 71, 575–587 (2009).
Bonaccorso, A., Calvari, S., Coltelli, M., Del Negro, C. & Falsaperla, S. Mt. Etna: Volcano Laboratory. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 143 (AGU, 2004).
Carey, R., Cayol, V., Poland, M. & Weis, D. Hawaiian volcanoes: From source to surface. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 208 (AGU, 2015).
Bonaccorso, A., Linde, A., Currenti, G., Sacks, S. & Sicali, A. The borehole dilatometer network of Mount Etna: A powerful tool to detect and infer volcano dynamics. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121 (2016).
Bonaccorso, A. et al. Dynamics of a lava fountain revealed by geophysical, geochemical and thermal satellite measurements: The case of the 10 April 2011 Mt Etna eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L24307 (2011).
Viccaro, M., Zuccarello, F., Cannata, A., Palano, M. & Gresta, S. How a complex basaltic volcanic system works: Constraints from integrating seismic, geodetic, and petrological data at Mount Etna volcano during the July – August 2014 eruption. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 5659–5678 (2016).
D’Aleo, R. et al. Spatially resolved SO2 flux emissions from Mt Etna. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7511–7519 (2016).
Caltabiano, T. et al. Volcanic gas emissions from the summit craters and flanks of Mt. Etna, 1987-2000. In: Mt. Etna: Volcano Laboratory (eds. Bonaccorso, A., Calvari, S., Coltelli, M., Del Negro, C. & Falsaperla, S.) 111–128 (AGU, 2004).
Métrich, N., Allard, P., Spilliaert, N., Andronico, D. & Burton, M. 2001 flank eruption of the alkali- and volatile-rich primitive basalt responsible for Mount Etna’s evolution in the last three decades. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 228, 1–17 (2004).
Ferlito, C., Coltorti, M., Lanzafame, G. & Giacomoni, P. P. The volatile flushing triggers eruptions at open conduit volcanoes: Evidence from Mount Etna volcano (Italy). Lithos 184, 447–455 (2014).
Aiuppa, A. et al. Total volatile flux from Mount Etna. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L24302 (2008).
Barberi, F. & Carapezza, M. L. The control of lava flows at Mt. Etna. In: Mt. Etna: Volcano Laboratory (eds. Bonaccorso, A., Calvari, S., Coltelli, M., Del Negro, C. & Falsaperla, S.), 357–369 (AGU, 2004).
Wright, R., Blake, S., Rothery, D. A. & Harris, A. J. L. A simple explanation for the space-based calculation of lava eruption rates. Earth Planet Sc. Lett. 192, 223–233 (2001).
Ghiorso, M. S. & Sack, R. O. Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Contrib. Mineral. Petr. 119, 197–212 (1995).
Tanguy, J. C., Condomines, M. & Kieffer, G. Evolution of the Mount Etna magma: Constraints on the present feeding system and eruptive mechanism. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 75, 221–250 (1997).
Kerr, R. C. Thermal erosion by laminar lava flows. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 26453–26465 (2001).
Ferlito, C. & Siewert, J. Lava channel formation during the 2001 eruption on Mount Etna: evidence for mechanical erosion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 028501 (2006).
White, R. A., Miller, D. A., Lynch, L. & Power, J. Observations of hybrid seismic events at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat: July 1995 to September 1996. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 3657–3660 (1998).
Shepherd, J. B. & Aspinall, W. P. Seismological studies of the soufriere of St. Vincent, 1953-79: Implications for volcanic surveillance in the lesser antilles. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 12, 37–55 (1982).
King, R. W. & Bock, Y. Documentation of the MIT GPS Analysis Software: GAMIT, release 10.2, user’s manual. (Mass. Inst. of Technol. Cambridge 2004).
Herring, T. A., King, R. W. & McClusky, S. C. Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK, Release 10.3. Dep. Earth Atmos. Planet Sci. (Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, 2006).
Bruno, V. et al. Ground deformations and volcanic processes as imaged by CGPS data at Mt. Etna (Italy) between 2003 and 2008. J. Geophys. Res. 117 (2012).
Yang, X. M., Davis, P. M. & Dieterich, J. H. Deformation from inflation of a dipping finite prolate spheroid in an elastic half‐space as a model for volcanic stressing. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 4249–4257 (1988).
Okada, Y. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile fault in half-space. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 1135–1154 (1985).
Williams, C. A. & Wadge, G. An accurate and efficient method for including the effects of topography in three-dimensional elastic models of ground deformation with applications to radar interferometry. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 8103–8120 (2000).
Bruno, V. et al. Evidence of a shallow magma intrusion beneath the NE Rift system of Mt. Etna during 2013. Terra Nova 28, 356–363 (2016).
Lachance, G. R. & Traill, J. R. Practical solution to the matrix problem in X-ray analysis. Can. Spectrosc. 11 (1966).
Calvari, S. et al. An unloading foam model to constrain Etna’s 11-13 January 2011 lava fountaining episode. J. Geophys. Res. 116 (2011).
Salerno, G. G. et al. Novel retrieval of volcanic SO2 abundance from ultraviolet spectra. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 181, 141–153 (2009).
Campion, R. et al. Measuring volcanic degassing of SO2 in the lower troposphere with ASTER band ratios. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 194, 42–54 (2010).
Salerno, G. G. et al. Three-years of SO2 flux measurements of Mt. Etna using an automated UV scanner array: Comparison with conventional traverses and uncertainties in flux retrieval. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 183, 76–83 (2009).
Sellitto, P. et al. The impact of Mount Etna sulfur emissions on the atmospheric composition and aerosol properties in the central Mediterranean: A statistical analysis over the period 2000-2013 based on observations and Lagrangian modelling. Atmos. Environ. 148 (2017).
Mattia, M. et al. A comprehensive interpretative model of slow slip events on Mt. Etna’s eastern flank. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy. 16, 635–658 (2015).
Tiampo, K. F., Rundle, J. B., Fernandez, J. & Langbein, J. O. Spherical and ellipsoidal volcanic sources at Long Valley Caldera, California, using a genetic algorithm inversion technique. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 102, 189–206 (2000).
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the personnel of INGV Osservatorio Etneo, and of the Cartography Lab, employed in the volcano monitoring of Mt. Etna. In particular, we acknowledge F. Murè, R. Maugeri and V. Longo for their technical assistance in the FLAME network, M. Pulvirenti and D. Pellegrino for their hard work in maintaining and improving the CGPS network. We are obliged to Antonio Zimbone and Giuseppe Di Stefano (ETNA WALK) for the photo in Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary video of the summit area of Mt. Etna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.B., M.M. and D.S. processed and analysed geodetic data and supervised the modelling of the volcanic sources. G.S. and T.C. processed and discussed geochemical data. C.F. provided the volcanological data. M.C. performed the petrological analysis. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferlito, C., Bruno, V., Salerno, G. et al. Dome-like behaviour at Mt. Etna: The case of the 28 December 2014 South East Crater paroxysm. Sci Rep 7, 5361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05318-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05318-9
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Gas buffering of magma chamber contraction during persistent explosive activity at Mt. Etna volcano
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
New insights on the active degassing system of the Lipari–Vulcano complex (South Italy) inferred from Local Earthquake Tomography
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Variations in CO2 emissions at a mud volcano at the southern base of Mt Etna: are they due to volcanic activity interference or a geyser-like mechanism?
Bulletin of Volcanology (2019)