Abstract
Sex bias is known in the prevalence/pathology of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sex-dependent differences of the certain brain areas are known to emerge perinatally through the exposure to sex hormones, while gene expression patterns in the rodent embryonic brain does not seem to be completely the same between male and female. To investigate potential sex differences in gene expression and cortical organization during the embryonic period in mice, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of gene expression for the telencephalon at embryonic day (E) 11.5 (a peak of neural stem cell expansion) and E14.5 (a peak of neurogenesis) using bulk RNA-seq data. As a result, our data showed the existence of notable sex differences in gene expression patterns not obviously at E11.5, but clearly at E14.5 when neurogenesis has become its peak. These data can be useful for exploring potential contribution of genes exhibiting sex differences to the divergence in brain development. Additionally, our data underscore the significance of studying the embryonic period to gain a deeper understanding of sex differences in brain development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
Sexual reproduction is a highly successful strategy for the survival of vertebrate species, allowing them to adopt to environmental changes. One intriguing aspect of sexual dimorphism is the presence of differences between males and females in various organs, including the brain. Studies have consistently revealed that males generally possess a larger brain volume, whereas females exhibit a relatively larger ratio of gray-to-white matter1,2,3. Additionally, specific regions of the cerebral cortex have been found to be thicker in females, further highlighting the existence of sexual dimorphism1,3,4,5. Rodents, as a valuable model system, have played a crucial role in investigating sexually dimorphic brain regions associated with sexual behavior, such as the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the medial nucleus of the amygdala, and the medial preoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus6,7. Despite these advances in identifying genetic and molecular mechanisms contributing these sex differences in brain structures remains incomplete.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a prominent neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) characterized by its distinct features including communication deficits and repetitive behaviors as well as other comorbid symptoms. There are a few studies reporting the presence of subtle abnormalities in brain architectures associated with ASD8,9. Interestingly, cognitive and social behaviors have been shown to exhibit sex differences10,11,12. Moreover, it has been well-documented that ASD is more prevalent among boys, while major depressive disorder exhibits a higher incidence in girls13,14. Therefore, it is plausible that the minor differences in brain structure contributing to the development of ASD may also be influenced by sex differences. Thus, it becomes crucial to consider the role of sex differences in brain development when examining the broader context of NDDs, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of these conditions and their underlying mechanisms.
The embryonic period plays a pivotal role in brain development, as most neurons are generated during this critical phase, while their subsequent positioning occurs over the postnatal period15,16,17. The vertebrate central nervous system originates from the neural plate, an ectodermal tissue that undergoes a transformative process, folding and rolling up to form the neural tube. In the mouse, the rostral portion of the neural tube expands, giving rise to two bulges and forming the telencephalic vesicles by embryonic day (E) 10.5. Initially, the vesicle consists solely of neural stem cells (NSCs), and their population expands through active cell division between E10.5 and E11.5. Around E11.5, NSCs begin to generate neurons, which migrate to the basal side of the telencephalon to establish the layered structure of the cerebral cortex18 (Fig. 1A). Neurogenesis, i.e., production of neurons, reaches its peak activity at E14.5 and gradually decreases by E17.5, while the migration of neurons to their appropriate positions continues19 (Fig. 1A). The maturation of adult brain organization is completed around postnatal day (P) 1018,20.
Traditional beliefs have long suggested that the brain follows a default pathway towards developing a female phenotype, and it undergoes masculinization through exposure to male sex hormones, specifically testosterone, during the perinatal stage (around E18.5 in mice)21,22. Among the brain regions that exhibit sexual dimorphism, the hypothalamus has garnered significant attention due to its association with reproductive behavior. Recent groundbreaking studies have shed light on the role of a specific gene, Ptf1a, expressed in the embryonic hypothalamus before the surge of sex hormones, as evidenced by the loss of reproductive behavior observed in Ptf1a knockout mice following sexual maturity23,24. However, it is important to note that these investigations have primarily focused on sexual differentiation in the hypothalamus, leaving open questions regarding the existence of similar genetic mechanisms in other brain regions, such as the cerebral cortex, which is responsible for higher brain functions. Further exploration in these areas is necessary to comprehensively understand the genetic mechanisms underlying sexual differentiation in the brain.
Previous studies have investigated gene expression profiles in the mammalian brain, specifically in male and female mouse whole brain or whole heads, prior to the surge of sex hormones at E10.5 and E11.525,26. These studies have identified a limited number of candidate genes on the sex chromosomes that exhibit sex difference in the expression. Additionally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the whole mouse brain at E13.5 has shown the specific expression of six genes on the Y chromosome in males, while their homologous genes on the X chromosome display robust expression in females27. Despite these findings, the precise involvement of these genes in the sexual differentiation of the brain remains unclear.
Based on the aforementioned background, the current study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of gene expression analysis in the cortical primordium of wild-type mice at E11.5 and E14.5. The objective was to identify differences in gene expression profiles between males and females prior to the surge of sex hormones. To investigate potential sex differences in gene expression prior to the sex hormone surge during mouse development, we conducted a comprehensive gene expression analysis using bulk RNA-seq data of the developing telencephalons at two crucial time points: E11.5 (characterized by NSC proliferation) and E14.5 (marked by massive neurogenesis) (Fig. 1A,B)28,29. To relate the transcriptomic differences, we validated expression of the genes of interest by in situ hybridization and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). We also analyzed cytoarchitecture of the embryonic cortex at E11.5, E14.5 and E17.5.
Methods
Experimental animals
Wild-type C57BL/6 J mice, bred and housed at the Experimental Animal Facility of the Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, were used for the experiments in this study. Female mice were mated with male mice, and embryos at E11.5, E14.5, and E17.5 were analyzed, with the day of vaginal plug confirmation considered as embryonic day 0.5. The mice were purchased from CLEA Japan Inc. All animal experiments conducted in this study were performed in accordance with the “Regulations for Animal Experiments at Tohoku University” and complied with ARRIVE guidelines. The study was approved by the Specialist Animal Experimentation Environment and Safety Committee of Tohoku University (2020 Medical Research and Development −109-10). The animals were treated according to the National Institutes of Health guidance for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Sex determination
The sex of mouse embryos was determined using a combination of genomic PCR and morphological observation of gonadal primordia. For E14.5 embryos, after sample acquisition, the embryos were dissected, and the gonadal primordia located on the dorsal surface of the hind limb were isolated to determine the sex based on morphological differences, following a previously reported method30. The sex of the samples at the other developmental stages were determined only by genomic PCR. Tails from embryos were isolated at the time of sample acquisition and added to 50 µL of tissue lysate (1× Mg2+-free GoTaq buffer (Promega), 0.8 mg/mL Proteinase K, 1% NP40), then incubated overnight at 57 °C on a hot plate. Proteinase K was inactivated by heating the lysate at 95 °C for 15 minutes using an incubator. The lysate was then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 minutes, and the supernatant was collected as the genomic extract for PCR. The following PCR conditions were used: 1 μL of the supernatant was added to the GoTaq PCR reaction mixture (1 × Mg2+-free PCR buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM Sry forward primer: 5′-tgaatgcatttatggtgtgtc-3′, 0.5 μM Sry reverse primer: 5′-aatctctgtgcctcctggaa-3′, 1 unit of Taq polymerase). The PCR amplification was performed as follows: 95 °C for 2 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds, 55 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 1 minute, with a final extension at 72 °C for 2 minutes.
Library preparation and RNA sequencing
The whole telencephalon, including the primordia of the cerebral cortex and the basal ganglia, was dissected from E11.5 and E14.5 WT C57BL/6 J mouse embryos during the light phase of the day. To minimize potential developmental variations between male and female samples, an equal proportion of male and female samples from the same littermates was selected (Supplementary Table S3). For precise dissection of the telencephalon, fine forceps (REGINE #5) and the microscissors (Leprex, LMB-50-7) were utilized31. At E11.5, the eye primordium was removed first to prevent contamination of the brain sample with the eye tissue. The border between the telencephalon and diencephalon was cut using fine forceps, and only the telencephalon was collected. Any excess tissue along the border was also excised to clearly expose the lateral ventricles32. At E14.5, the skull tissue was carefully removed from the entire brain, and the whole brain was dissected from the head of the embryo. The whole telencephalon of E14.5 embryos was dissected following the previously described method33. The dissected tissues were immediately placed in the tubes filled with the RNAlater™ Stabilization Solution (Invitrogen) and stored at −80 °C by following the guidelines of the solution for long-term preservation. At the same time as the brain dissection, tail samples were collected from the embryos for sex determination using PCR (refer to ‘Sex determination’ section). Following sex determination, RNA was extracted from the telencephalon using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN). Sequencing of expression products (RNA-seq) for a total of 12 animals was commissioned by Takara Bio Inc. using samples from three male and three female telencephalons at E11.5 and E14.5, respectively. cDNA was synthesized with TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) using XT-Auto System (Agilent). Subsequently, the generated libraries were then sequenced on HiSeq. 2500 platform (Illumina) with 100 bp paired end modules. The resulting sequenced reads were aligned to mouse reference genome GRCm38 (mm10) using STAR (v2.6.0c) and annotated using Genedata Proflier Genome (v13.0.11), which yielded mapped reads ranging from 46 to 75 million per sample.
qRT-PCR
Samples were collected from the telencephalon of each embryo at E14.5. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, reverse transcription (RT) was carried out with the SuperScript™III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR was conducted as previously described34, in duplicate with TaqPro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme). The relative expression levels of the target genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method, with Sdha serving as internal control. Primers were designed with Primer3Plus (https://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi) and listed in Supplementary Table S1. At least eight embryos of each sex were examined.
Brain tissue sampling
To ensure consistent fluorescence immunostaining and fixation, perfusion fixation was performed on mouse embryos at E14.5 and E17.5. After removing the embryos from the pregnant mother, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma) dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 1.34 mM KCl, 10.1 mM Na2HPO4, 1.76 mM KH2PO4) was used for perfusion fixation. A borosilicate glass capillary (outer diameter: 1.5 mm, inner diameter: 0.86 mm) was attached to a peristaltic pump (ATTO). A 23-G needle (Terumo) was inserted through the left ventricle and then the right atrium was subsequently incised. Finally, 4% PFA was perfused at a flow rate of 3 mL per minute through the left ventricle of the embryo until no visible blood remained in the head35. The capillaries were prepared using a puller (PB-7, NARISHIGE), and the tips were sharpened with a forceps. Perfusion fixation was not performed on E11.5 mouse embryos.
For E11.5 mouse embryos, whole bodies were removed from pregnant mothers. For E14.5 and E17.5 mouse embryos, brain primordia were removed and then fixed overnight under 4 °C with 4% PFA while being gently shaken. The tissue was subsequently washed three times with PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Next it was immersed in 10% sucrose/PBS and 20% sucrose/PBS overnight at 4 °C, respectively. After these steps, the tissue was embedded in O. C. T Compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura), gently frozen on dry ice, and sectioned. The sections were stored in a −80 °C deep freezer until further preparation.
Fluorescence immunohistochemistry
Fluorescence immunohistochemistry was employed to examine the tissue architecture of the embryonic brain, following the method described in previous papers36 with necessary modifications. First, 14 µm thick frozen coronal sections of the embryonic brain was prepared using a cryostat (CM3050S, Leica). Sections taken at approximately 140 µm intervals for embryos at E11.5 and at approximately 200 µm intervals for embryonic brains at E14.5 and E17.5 were mounted on MAS-coated glass slides (Matsunami) and air-dried at room temperature for 15 minutes using a negative pressure device (Kartell). The prepared glass slides with the sections were stored in a −80 °C deep freezer until ready for use.
The sections were washed three times at room temperature for 5 minutes each in a staining bath containing 0.1% Triton X-100/TBS (TBST, Tris-buffered saline: 137 mM NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 24.8 mM Tris-base, pH 7.4). After the washes, excess water was gently drained, and a water-repellent line was drawn around the sections using a PAP Pen (Cosmo Bio). Next, a blocking solution composed of 3% bovine serum albumin (SIGMA) in 0.1% TBST was added onto the sections, and blocking was performed at room temperature for 30 minutes in a humidified chamber. The primary antibody solution was added to the sections and incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber (see Supplementary Table S2 for the dilution ratios of the antibodies).
Following the primary antibody reaction, the sections were washed three times with TBST for 5 minutes each at room temperature in a staining glassware. Secondary antibody solution was added to the sections and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 1 hour (see Supplementary Table S2 for the dilution ratios of the antibodies). After completion of the secondary antibody reaction, the sections were washed three times with TBST for 5 minutes each at room temperature in a staining glassware. Excess water was removed, and the sections were sealed and stored using VECTASHIELD (VECTOR). Immunostaining images were captured using an all-in-one fluorescence microscope (BZ-X710, KEYENCE) and a confocal microscope (LSM800, Zeiss).
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization using frozen sections was performed as previously described32,36. The E14.5 WT telencephalon samples were used for RNA extraction using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN). The extracted RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the SuperScript™III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen). The cDNA fragments of Eif2s3x (NM_012010, nucleotides 1–600), Eif2s3y (NM_012011, nucleotides 18–618), Kdm6a (NM_009483, nucleotides 1284–2005) or Kdm5d (NM_011419, nucleotides 1298–1897) were cloned into pBluescript II SK (–) (Stratagene). The RNA probes were synthesized using the cloned plasmids by the DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche). The antisense RNA probes for four genes were generated with T3 RNA polymerase (Promega). The sense RNA probes for Eif2s3y and Kdm5d were generated with T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) and were used to confirm the specificity of hybridization signals using antisense probes. For observation, sections were visualized with a microscopy system (BZ-X710, KEYENCE).
Quantitative analysis of tissue architecture of the embryonic mouse cortical primordium
The histological structure of the cortical primordium of the mouse embryo was categorized into four regions: ventricular zone (VZ, positive for Pax6), subventricular zone (SVZ, Pax6 negative and Tbr2 positive), intermediate zone (IZ, Tuj1 positive nerve fibers), and cortical plate (CP, Tuj1 positive cell bodies)37. To analyze the area of the cortical primordium, a method described in a previous study was employed. A 200 µm wide segment was created at the midpoint of a straight line drawn from the dorsoventral border of the telencephalon to the dorsal and medial border of the mantle38. The area of the four brain regions within this segment was measured. The statistical test was carried out for both raw values and relative area of the four regions adjusted to total area of the cortex.Manual area measurements were conducted using the region of interest (ROI) manager tool of Fiji software. This approach allowed for the quantitative analysis of the tissue architecture of the cortical primordium in mouse embryo, providing valuable insights into its structural organization. The experimenter was not blinded to the sex of the samples.
Statistics
All the statistics were performed using Python. The results of the statistical tests are summarized in “a dataset of results for statistical test.xlsx” in figshare28.
Data Records
The following eight files related to RNA-seq and histological analysis data derived from male and female embryonic telencephalons have been deposited in figshare28.
a dataset of detailed descriptions of each file in figshare and GEO.docx
a dataset of expression_fpkm_counts.xlsx
a dataset of differentially expressed genes in the E14.5 telencephalons.xlsx
a dataset of gene list in Fig. 3A .xlsx
a dataset of HistologicalAnalysis.xlsx
a dataset of Immunohistochemistry_images.zip
a dataset of Immunohistochemistry_images_ScaleBar.zip
a dataset of Immunohistochemistry_images_analysis_ScaleBar.zip
a dataset of results for statistical test.xlsx
The following 24 files of raw RNA-seq data and one file of expression counts using RNA-seq FPKM derived from male and female embryonic telencephalons have been deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)29.
24 raw RNA-seq files are named as follows e11/14 (E11 or E14, developmental stages) _male/female_1/2/3_R1/2.fastq. RNA-seq data are three replicates. The name of excel file is a dataset of expression_fpkm_counts.xlsx. “A dataset of detailed descriptions of each file in figshare and GEO.docx” is available in figshare for detailed descriptions and deposition website of each file.
Technical Validation
Sample information
Three embryos per each of four groups (E11.5 male, E11.5 female, E14.5 male, and E14.5 female) were used for the analyses of bulk RNA-seq; three male and three female embryos were selected from two litters for E11.5 groups. For E14.5 groups, two embryos were originated from the same litter and an additional one embryo came from another litter (Supplementary Table S3). For immunohistochemistry, we analyzed six groups including three male and female telencephalic samples at E11.5, ten male and female samples at E14.5, and four male and female samples at E17.5. We used more sample for E14.5 embryos since we expected there might be cytoarchitectural difference at this stage in consistent with the sex difference in gene expression profile at E14.5 (Fig. 4B,C, Supplementary Table S4). For E17.5 embryos where we found cytoarchitectural difference, we additionally quantified six sections per embryo with four samples to check the reproducibility of the results.
RNA quality check
The quality of total RNA was assessed using the 2200 TapeStation (Agilent) by evaluating the RNA concentration, total amount, and the ratios of 260/280 and 260/230. All samples of RNA Integrity Number (RIN) values were 9.8 and more, which is sufficient to perform the RNA-seq analyses (Supplementary Table S3).
Principal component analysis
To validate the data-collection procedure, inter-group comparisons were conducted between females and males. This involved performing a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using the R programming language, specifically the “prcomp” command. Prior to the PCA, certain genes were deemed unreliable and thus excluded based on predefined criteria. These criteria included genes with zero variance of expression values within both male and female telencephalons groups or with a count value less than 16 in each group. As a result of PCA clustering, samples from same biological group were clustered closely (Fig. 1C) indicating validity of our RNA-seq data.
Volcano plot
A volcano plot was generated using Python with the seaborn.scatterplot command. This plot visually represented the ratio of gene expression between males and female telencephalons (Log2(female expression (FPKM)/male expression)) on the horizontal axis and the confidence level based on statistical analysis (Log10(q-value)) on the vertical axis. Specific details regarding q-values can be found in the “Statistical Processing” section. Genes meeting the conditions of q-value < 0.05 and an absolute Log2(female expression level/male expression level) > 0.5 were identified as Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in both males and females, and their count was determined. Most of the DEGs appeared with the criteria at E11.5 and a part of DEGs at E14.5 (Fig. 1D,E, Supplementary Table S5–9, ‘List of differentially expressed genes in the E14.5 telencephalons’ in figshare28) were consistent with prior studies utilizing microarray analysis and RT-PCR of the entire mouse brain at E10.5, E11.5 and E14.525,26,27, indicating validity of our RNA-seq data28,29.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization showed the reproducibility of the RNA-seq data. DEGs showing high fold change were selected: Kdm6a and Eif2s3x (female dominant expression), Kdm5d and Eif2s3y (male dominant expression). As a result, Kdm6a and Eif2s3x showed stronger signal in the telencephalon of the female samples, while Kdm5d and Eif2s3y showed stronger signal in the male samples, which is in consistent with RNA-seq data (Fig. 1F), indicating the reproducibility and validity of the RNA-seq data.
Hierarchical clustering and Gene Ontology analysis
Hierarchical clustering and heatmap generation were performed using Python with the seaborn.clustermap command. These analyses aimed to characterize groups of DEGs in males and females. Additionally, a Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/)39 was utilized to provide functional insights into these DEGs. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), as described in previous studies by40,41,42, was employed. As a result, genes associated with the suppression of the Notch signaling pathway displayed elevated expression levels in the female telencephalon at E14.5 (Fig. 2B–D, Supplementary Table S10). Notch signal is activated in the undifferentiated NSCs and inhibited in neurons and neural precursor cells34,43, and we found suppression of Notch signaling pathway as indicated by GSEA analysis (Fig. 3A,B). Consistently, Tuj1 (Tubb3, a neuronal marker), Fezf2 (a marker for layer V neurons), and Cux2 (a marker for layer II-IV neurons) demonstrated higher expression levels in the female telencephalon at E14.5 (Fig. 3B). At E14.5, Tuj1 is expressed in immature neurons44, and Fezf2 and Cux2 are expressed in early differentiated neurons45,46. These results support the consistency of our data.
qRT-PCR
qRT-PCR was conducted to verify the reproducibility of the sex differences in the expression levels of the eight genes involved in GO term “NEGATIVE_REGULATION_OF_NOTCH_SIGNALING_PATHWAY”: Dll1 (Delta like canonical Notch ligand 1), Bmp7 (Bone morphogenetic protein 7), Tcim (transcriptional and immune response regulator), Mettl3 (methyltransferase 3, N6-adenosine-methyltransferase complex catalytic subunit), Arrb1 (Arrestin beta 1), Mmp14 (Matrix metallopeptidase 14), Dll4 (Delta like canonical Notch ligand 4) and Notch3 (Notch receptor 3). Additional qRT-PCR assays were performed for Kdm5d, Uty (Y-linked genes), as well as Kdm6a and Xist (X-linked genes), to validate our qRT-PCR technique. These assays were conducted on new cohort of samples, with eight biological replicates for male and female at E14.5. The results confirmed clear sex difference in expression of Kdm5d, Uty, Kdm6a and Xist in consistent with RNA-seq data (Fig. 2E). Among the GO term, Dll1, Bmp7 and Tcim showed higher expression in female than that of male, as in the case of the RNA-seq analysis (Fig. 2E). These findings support the reliability of our qRT-PCR data and RNA-seq data.
Histological analysis
We checked whether there are sex differences in the cytoarchitecture of the developing cortex by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4A, also refer to the “Quantitative analysis of tissue architecture of the embryonic mouse cortical primordium” section for a detailed explanation of the defined neuroanatomical areas). As a result, there were no significant differences in the thickness of VZ, SVZ, IZ and CP between males and females at E11.5 and E14.5 (Fig. 4B,C), while the SVZ consistently showed greater thickness in the female telencephalon at E17.5 in both the raw values and the relative values normalized to the whole cortex size (Fig. 4D). This finding supports the exist of sex difference in gene expression levels at E14.5 that might result in the sex difference in the cytoarchitecture at the later stages. These experimental and analytical procedures were carried out to ensure the technical rigor and reliability of the dataset used in this study.
Code availability
The open access software and versions mentioned in the main text were utilized for quality control and data analysis as described in the methods.
1. The University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Genome Browser was used to annotate mouse genetic information47,48: http://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/goldenPath /mm10/database/
2. The R command ‘prcomp’ was utilized for inter-group comparisons of PCA in male and female telencephalons.
3. The Python command ‘seaborn.scatterplot’ was utilized for generating a Volcano plot in males and female telencephalons.
4. The Python command ‘seaborn.clustermap’ was utilized for generating hierarchical clustering and heatmap.
5. The Gene Ontology (GO) gene set from the Molecular Signatures Database was utilized39: https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/.
All code and scripts used for data analysis in this study can be found in the following links and articles: http://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/goldenPath /mm10/database/, https://www.r-project.org/help.html, https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/39,47,48.
References
Allen, J. S., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Bruss, J. & Zhang, W. Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum. Neuroimage. 18, 880–894 (2003).
Chen, X., Sachdev, P. S., Wen, W. & Anstey, K. J. Sex differences in regional gray matter in healthy individuals aged 44–48 years: a voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroimage. 36, 691–699 (2007).
Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M. & Staley, J. K. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biol Psychiatry. 62, 847–855 (2007).
Im, K. et al. Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods. Neuroimage. 31, 31–38 (2006).
Ruigrok, A. N. et al. A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 39, 34–50 (2014).
Yamanouchi, K. & Arai, Y. Possible role of cingulate cortex in regulating sexual behavior in male rats: effects of lesions and cuts. Endocrinol Jpn. 39, 229–234.
Paredes, R. G. Medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus and sexual motivation. Scand J Psychol. 44, 203–212 (2003).
Courchesne, E. et al. Mapping early brain development in autism. Neuron. 56, 399–413 (2007).
Pucilowska, J. et al. The 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism exhibits altered cortical progenitor proliferation and brain cytoarchitecture linked to the ERK MAPK pathway. J Neurosci. 35, 3190–3200 (2015).
An, X. L. et al. Strain and sex differences in anxiety-like and social behaviors in C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ Mice. Exp Anim. 60, 111–123 (2011).
Yokota, S., Suzuki, Y., Hamami, K., Harada, A. & Komai, S. Sex differences in avoidance behavior after perceiving potential risk in mice. Behav Brain Funct. 13, 1–10 (2017).
Bredewold, R. & Veenema, A. H. Sex differences in the regulation of social and anxiety-related behaviors: insights from vasopressin and oxytocin brain systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 49, 132–140 (2018).
Werling, D. M. & Geschwind, D. H. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 26, 146–153 (2013).
Bangasser, D. A. & Cuarenta, A. Sex differences in anxiety and depression: circuits and mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 22, 674–684 (2021).
Paridaen, J. T. & Huttner, W. B. Neurogenesis during development of the vertebrate central nervous system. EMBO Rep. 15, 351–364 (2014).
Toma, K. & Hanashima, C. Switching modes in corticogenesis: mechanisms of neuronal subtype transitions and integration in the cerebral cortex. Front Neurosci. 9, 1–18 (2015).
Mukhtar, T. & Taylor, V. Untangling Cortical Complexity During Development. J Exp Neurosci. 12, 1–12 (2018).
Takeuchi, A. & O’Leary, D. D. Radial migration of superficial layer cortical neurons controlled by novel Ig cell adhesion molecule MDGA1. J Neurosci. 26, 4460–4464 (2006).
Levers, T. E., Edgar, J. M. & Price, D. J. The fates of cells generated at the end of neurogenesis in developing mouse cortex. J Neurobiol. 48, 265–277 (2001).
Hoshiba, Y. et al. Sox11 Balances Dendritic Morphogenesis with Neuronal Migration in the Developing Cerebral Cortex. J Neurosci. 36, 5775–5784 (2016).
Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A. & Young, W. C. Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology. 65, 369–382 (1959).
Arnold, A. P. Mouse models for evaluating sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues. J Neuroendocrinol. 21, 377–386 (2009).
Hoshino, M. et al. Ptf1a, a bHLH transcriptional gene, defines GABAergic neuronal fates in cerebellum. Neuron. 47, 201–213 (2005).
Fujiyama, T. et al. Forebrain Ptf1a Is Required for Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. Cell Rep. 24, 79–94 (2018).
Dewing, P., Shi, T., Horvath, S. & Vilain, E. Sexually dimorphic gene expression in mouse brain precedes gonadal differentiation. Mol Brain Res. 118, 82–90 (2003).
Wolstenholme, J. T., Rissman, E. F. & Bekiranov, S. Sexual differentiation in the developing mouse brain: contributions of sex chromosome genes. Genes Brain Behav. 12, 166–180 (2013).
Xu, J., Burgoyne, P. S. & Arnold, A. P. Sex differences in sex chromosome gene expression in mouse brain. Hum Mol Genet. 11, 1409–1419 (2002).
Ochi, S. et al. A Transcriptomic Dataset of Embryonic Murine Telencephalon, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6761124.v1 (2024).
Manabe, S. et al. GEO. https://identifiers.org/geo/GSE252922 (2024).
Ohinata, Y., Sano, M., Shigeta, M., Yamanaka, K. & Saitou, M. A comprehensive, non-invasive visualization of primordial germ cell development in mice by the Prdm1-mVenus and Dppa3-ECFP double transgenic reporter. Reproduction. 136, 503–514 (2008).
Kikkawa, T., Takahashi, M. & Osumi, N. Electroporation in the Rodent Embryonic Brain Using Whole Embryo Culture System. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 78(3.30), 1–3.30.16 (2017).
Kikkawa, T. et al. Dmrt genes participate in the development of Cajal-Retzius cells derived from the cortical hem in the telencephalon. Dev Dyn. 249, 698–710 (2020).
Rehen, S. K. A new method of embryonic culture for assessing global changes in brain organization. J Neurosci Methods. 158, 100–108 (2006).
Ochi, S., Imaizumi, Y., Shimojo, H., Miyachi, H. & Kageyama, R. Oscillatory expression of Hes1 regulates cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation in the embryonic brain. Development. 147, 1–13 (2020).
Saçma, M., Fast and high-fidelity in situ 3D imaging protocol for stem cells and niche components for mouse organs and tissues. STAR Protoc. 3(3):101483, 1–20 (2022).
Kikkawa, T. et al. Dmrta1 regulates proneural gene expression downstream of Pax6 in the mammalian telencephalon. Genes Cells. 18, 636–649. 2013 Aug;18(8):636–49. Epub 2013 May 16 (2013).
Iwashita, M., Kataoka, N., Toida, K. & Kosodo, Y. Systematic profiling of spatiotemporal tissue and cellular stiffness in the developing brain. Development. 141, 3793–3798 (2014).
Harlan De Crescenzo, A. et al. Deficient or Excess Folic Acid Supply During Pregnancy Alter Cortical Neurodevelopment in Mouse Offspring. Cereb Cortex. 31, 635–649 (2021).
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
Mootha, V. K. et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 34, 267–273 (2003).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Yoshizaki, K. et al. Paternal age affects offspring via an epigenetic mechanism involving REST/NRSF. EMBO Rep. 22, 1–18 (2021).
Kageyama, R., Ochi, S., Sueda, R. & Shimojo, H. The significance of gene expression dynamics in neural stem cell regulation. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 96, 351–363 (2020).
Menezes, J. R. & Luskin, M. B. Expression of neuron-specific tubulin defines a novel population in the proliferative layers of the developing telencephalon. J Neurosci. 14, 5399–5416 (1994).
Eckler, M. J. et al. Multiple conserved regulatory domains promote Fezf2 expression in the developing cerebral cortex. Neural Dev. 9(6), 1–11 (2014).
Zimmer, C., Tiveron, M. C., Bodmer, R. & Cremer, H. Dynamics of Cux2 expression suggests that an early pool of SVZ precursors is fated to become upper cortical layer neurons. Cereb Cortex. 14, 1408–1420 (2004).
Karolchik, D. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 51–54 (2003).
Nassar, L. R. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1188–D1195 (2023).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to S. Makino and Y. Nishimura for maintaining experimental animals, and to S. Kawaoka and N. Osada for providing guidance on NGS data analysis. S. Manabe is supported by Neuro Global Program, Tohoku University. The immunostaining images were acquired in the Biomedical Research Core of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine. This research was funded by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas) under grant number 16H06530 (to N.O.), the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists) under grant number JP30884217 (to S.O.), the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows) under grant number JP23KJ0193 (to S.M.) and AMED under grant number JP21wm0425003 (to N.O.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, S.O. and N.O.; preparation for RNA-seq, T.K. R.K. and K.Y.; data process, S.M.; data deposition, S.O., S.M. and T.K.; immunohistochemical analysis, S.O. and S.M.; qRT-PCR, S.M; in situ hybridization, S.E.; figure preparation, S.O. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, S.O., S.M., T.K. and N.O.; supervision, N.O.; project administration, S.O. and N.O.; funding acquisition, S.O., S.M. and N.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ochi, S., Manabe, S., Kikkawa, T. et al. A Transcriptomic Dataset of Embryonic Murine Telencephalon. Sci Data 11, 586 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03421-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03421-x
- Springer Nature Limited