Abstract
The cellular ability to react to environmental fluctuations depends on signaling networks that are controlled by the dynamic activities of kinases and phosphatases. Here, to gain insight into these stress-responsive phosphorylation networks, we generated a quantitative mass spectrometry-based atlas of early phosphoproteomic responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to 101 environmental and chemical perturbations. We report phosphosites on 59% of the yeast proteome, with 18% of the proteome harboring a phosphosite that is regulated within 5 min of stress exposure. We identify shared and perturbation-specific stress response programs, uncover loss of phosphorylation as an integral early event, and dissect the interconnected regulatory landscape of kinase–substrate networks, as we exemplify with target of rapamycin signaling. We further reveal functional organization principles of the stress-responsive phosphoproteome based on phosphorylation site motifs, kinase activities, subcellular localizations, shared functions and pathway intersections. This information-rich map of 25,000 regulated phosphosites advances our understanding of signaling networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The MS proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE82 partner repository with the dataset identifiers PXD035029 for the ultradeep reference phosphoproteomic DDA data, PXD035050 for the quantitative phosphoproteomic DIA data, and PXD034997 for the quantitative proteomics DIA data.
Code availability
The code for processing and analyzing the phosphoproteomic data is available at https://github.com/Villen-Lab/YeastPhosphoAtlasAnalysis. The code for the web resource is available at https://github.com/Villen-Lab/YeastPhosphoAtlas.
References
Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257 (2000).
Costanzo, M. et al. Environmental robustness of the global yeast genetic interaction network. Science 372, eabf8424 (2021).
Causton, H. C. et al. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 323–337 (2001).
Hohmann, S. & Mager, W. H. Yeast Stress Responses (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).
Gutin, J., Sadeh, A., Rahat, A., Aharoni, A. & Friedman, N. Condition-specific genetic interaction maps reveal crosstalk between the cAMP/PKA and the HOG MAPK pathways in the activation of the general stress response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 829 (2015).
Bahn, Y.-S. et al. Sensing the environment: lessons from fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 57–69 (2007).
Schulz, J. C., Zampieri, M., Wanka, S., von Mering, C. & Sauer, U. Large-scale functional analysis of the roles of phosphorylation in yeast metabolic pathways. Sci. Signal. 7, rs6 (2014).
Oliveira, A. P. et al. Dynamic phosphoproteomics reveals TORC1-dependent regulation of yeast nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis. Sci. Signal. 8, rs4 (2015).
Paulo, J. A., O’Connell, J. D., Gaun, A. & Gygi, S. P. Proteome-wide quantitative multiplexed profiling of protein expression: carbon-source dependency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 4063–4074 (2015).
Gutin, J., Joseph-Strauss, D., Sadeh, A., Shalom, E. & Friedman, N. Genetic screen of the yeast environmental stress response dynamics uncovers distinct regulatory phases. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8939 (2019).
Hillenmeyer, M. E. et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320, 362–365 (2008).
Brauer, M. J. et al. Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 352–367 (2008).
Viéitez, C. et al. High-throughput functional characterization of protein phosphorylation sites in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 382–390 (2022).
Gruhler, A. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 4, 310–327 (2005).
Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S.-H. & Zhou, H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10364–10369 (2007).
Saleem, R. A. et al. Integrated phosphoproteomics analysis of a signaling network governing nutrient response and peroxisome induction. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 9, 2076–2088 (2010).
Oliveira, A. P. et al. Regulation of yeast central metabolism by enzyme phosphorylation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 623 (2012).
Vaga, S. et al. Phosphoproteomic analyses reveal novel cross-modulation mechanisms between two signaling pathways in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 767 (2014).
Kanshin, E., Bergeron-Sandoval, L.-P., Isik, S. S., Thibault, P. & Michnick, S. W. A cell-signaling network temporally resolves specific versus promiscuous phosphorylation. Cell Rep. 10, 1202–1214 (2015).
Kanshin, E., Kubiniok, P., Thattikota, Y., D'Amours, D. & Thibault, P. Phosphoproteome dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under heat shock and cold stress. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 813 (2015).
MacGilvray, M. E. et al. Network inference reveals novel connections in pathways regulating growth and defense in the yeast salt response. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1006088 (2018).
Leutert, M., Rodríguez‐Mias, R. A., Fukuda, N. K. & Villén, J. R2‐P2 rapid‐robotic phosphoproteomics enables multidimensional cell signaling studies. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e9021 (2019).
Lanz, M. C. et al. In-depth and 3-dimensional exploration of the budding yeast phosphoproteome. EMBO Rep. 22, e51121 (2021).
Holt, L. J. et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325, 1682–1686 (2009).
Soste, M. et al. A sentinel protein assay for simultaneously quantifying cellular processes. Nat. Methods 11, 1045–1048 (2014).
Plank, M. et al. Chemical genetics of AGC-kinases reveals shared targets of Ypk1, protein kinase A and Sch9. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19, 655–671 (2020).
Dokládal, L. et al. Phosphoproteomic responses of TORC1 target kinases reveal discrete and convergent mechanisms that orchestrate the quiescence program in yeast. Cell Rep. 37, 110149 (2021).
Bodenmiller, B. et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci. Signal. 3, rs4 (2010).
Li, J., Paulo, J. A., Nusinow, D. P., Huttlin, E. L. & Gygi, S. P. Investigation of proteomic and phosphoproteomic responses to signaling network perturbations reveals functional pathway organizations in yeast. Cell Rep. 29, 2092–2104.e4 (2019).
van Wageningen, S. et al. Functional overlap and regulatory links shape genetic interactions between signaling pathways. Cell 143, 991–1004 (2010).
da Silveira Dos Santos, A. X. et al. Systematic lipidomic analysis of yeast protein kinase and phosphatase mutants reveals novel insights into regulation of lipid homeostasis. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3234–3246 (2014).
Lawrence, R. T., Searle, B. C., Llovet, A. & Villén, J. Plug-and-play analysis of the human phosphoproteome by targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 13, 431–434 (2016).
Searle, B. C., Lawrence, R. T., MacCoss, M. J. & Villén, J. Thesaurus: quantifying phosphopeptide positional isomers. Nat. Methods 16, 703–706 (2019).
Searle, B. C. et al. Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 9, 5128 (2018).
Beausoleil, S. A., Villén, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S. P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292 (2006).
Ochoa, D. et al. The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 365–373 (2020).
Pentony, M. M., Ward, J. & Jones, D. T. in Proteome Bioinformatics (eds Hubbard, S. J. & Jones, A. R.) 369–393 (Humana Press, 2010).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Villén, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Gerber, S. A. & Gygi, S. P. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1488–1493 (2007).
Wagih, O. et al. A resource of variant effect predictions of single nucleotide variants in model organisms. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14, e8430 (2018).
Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res. 11, 863–874 (2001).
Studer, R. A. et al. Evolution of protein phosphorylation across 18 fungal species. Science 354, 229–232 (2016).
Byrne, K. P. & Wolfe, K. H. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15, 1456–1461 (2005).
Romanov, N. et al. Identifying protein kinase-specific effectors of the osmostress response in yeast. Sci. Signal. 10, eaag2435 (2017).
Lee, J. & Levin, D. E. Intracellular mechanism by which arsenite activates the yeast stress MAPK Hog1. Mol. Biol. Cell 29, 1904–1915 (2018).
Zimmermann, C. et al. TORC1 inhibits GSK3-mediated Elo2 phosphorylation to regulate very long chain fatty acid synthesis and autophagy. Cell Rep. 5, 1036–1046 (2013).
Uhlinger, D. J., Yang, C. Y. & Reed, L. J. Phosphorylation–dephosphorylation of pyruvate dehydrogenase from bakers’ yeast. Biochemistry 25, 5673–5677 (1986).
Goentoro, L., Shoval, O., Kirschner, M. W. & Alon, U. The incoherent feedforward loop can provide fold-change detection in gene regulation. Mol. Cell 36, 894–899 (2009).
Ariño, J., Velázquez, D. & Casamayor, A. Ser/Thr protein phosphatases in fungi: structure, regulation and function. Microb. Cell 6, 217–256 (2019).
Huang, J., Wu, Z. & Zhang, X. Short-term mild temperature-stress-induced alterations in the C. elegans phosphoproteome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 6409 (2020).
Rigbolt, K. T. et al. Characterization of early autophagy signaling by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Autophagy 10, 356–371 (2014).
Needham, E. J. et al. Phosphoproteomics of acute cell stressors targeting exercise signaling networks reveal drug interactions regulating protein secretion. Cell Rep. 29, 1524–1538.e6 (2019).
González, A. & Hall, M. N. Nutrient sensing and TOR signaling in yeast and mammals. EMBO J. 36, 397–408 (2017).
Usaj, M. et al. TheCellMap.org: a web-accessible database for visualizing and mining the global yeast genetic interaction network. G3 7, 1539–1549 (2017).
Baryshnikova, A. Systematic functional annotation and visualization of biological networks. Cell Syst. 2, 412–421 (2016).
Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, Article17 (2005).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinf. 9, 559 (2008).
Ghosh, C., Sathe, L., Paprocki, J. D., Raicu, V. & Dey, M. Adaptation to endoplasmic reticulum stress requires transphosphorylation within the activation loop of protein kinases Kin1 and Kin2, orthologs of human microtubule affinity-regulating kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 38, e00266–18 (2018).
Yamazaki, H., Takagi, M., Kosako, H., Hirano, T. & Yoshimura, S. H. Cell cycle-specific phase separation regulated by protein charge blockiness. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 625–632 (2022).
Grassetti, A. V., Hards, R. & Gerber, S. A. Offline pentafluorophenyl (PFP)-RP prefractionation as an alternative to high-pH RP for comprehensive LC–MS/MS proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 409, 4615–4625 (2017).
Villén, J. & Gygi, S. P. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1630–1638 (2008).
Pino, L. K., Just, S. C., MacCoss, M. J. & Searle, B. C. Acquiring and analyzing data independent acquisition proteomics experiments without spectrum libraries. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19, 1088–1103 (2020).
Eng, J. K., Jahan, T. A. & Hoopmann, M. R. Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics 13, 22–24 (2013).
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S. & MacCoss, M. J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4, 923–925 (2007).
Barente, A. S. & Villén, J. A Python package for the localization of protein modifications in mass spectrometry data. J. Proteome Res. 22, 501–507 (2023).
Lazar, C., Burger, T. & Wieczorek S. imputeLCMD: a collection of methods for left-censored missing data imputation. R Project https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/imputeLCMD/index.html (2022).
Leek, J. T. et al. sva: surrogate variable analysis. Bioconductor https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/sva.html (2023).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 (2018).
Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).
Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).
Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019).
Dorrity, M. W., Saunders, L. M., Queitsch, C., Fields, S. & Trapnell, C. Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1537 (2020).
Kolde, R. pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R Project https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html (2019).
Ou, J. et al. dagLogo: an R/Bioconductor package for identifying and visualizing differential amino acid group usage in proteomics data. PLoS ONE 15, e0242030 (2020).
Wagih, O. ggseqlogo: a ‘ggplot2’ extension for drawing publication-ready sequence logos. R Project https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggseqlogo/index.html (2017).
Rubenstein, E. M. & Schmidt, M. C. Mechanisms regulating the protein kinases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 6, 571–583 (2007).
Stark, C. et al. PhosphoGRID: a database of experimentally verified in vivo protein phosphorylation sites from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Database 2010, bap026 (2010).
Goldman, A. et al. The calcineurin signaling network evolves via conserved kinase-phosphatase modules that transcend substrate identity. Mol. Cell 55, 422–435 (2014).
Hu, Z. et al. Multilayered control of protein turnover by TORC1 and Atg1. Cell Rep. 28, 3486–3496.e6 (2019).
Velázquez, D. et al. Yeast Ppz1 protein phosphatase toxicity involves the alteration of multiple cellular targets. Sci. Rep. 10, 15613 (2020).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D543–D552 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Berg, K. Hess, A. Hogrebe, J. Ramos, I. Smith, M. Dunham and members of the Villén Lab for useful discussions and feedback. We thank Life Science Editors for editing services (www.lifescienceeditors.com). These studies were supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R35GM119536 and R01AG056359. M.L. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation grants P2ZHP3_181503, P400PB_194379 and P5R5PB_211122. A.S.B. was supported by the NIH training grant T32LM012419. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.L. and J.V. conceived the project. M.L. conducted experiments with assistance from N.K.F. and R.A.R.-M. M.L. and A.S.B. analyzed the data. A.S.B. created the website. M.L. and J.V. wrote the manuscript and all authors edited it.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology thanks Danielle Swaney and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Dimitris Typas, in collaboration with the Nature Structural & Molecular Biology team. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental setup and quality control of sample preparation and mass spectrometry measurements.
(a) Sample randomization and quality control: Cell lysates were scrambled across 96-well plates and biological replicates were assigned to different 96-well plates. On each plate, 4 samples containing the same pooled lysate were included to assess sample preparation reproducibility between 96-well plate batches. Quantitative LC-MS/MS measurement: Proteomic and phosphoproteomic sample preparation controls in each batch were assessed first and then individual sample batches were measured. Performance of LC-MS/MS was regularly assessed between and within batches using a pooled phosphopeptide sample. DIA-MS was performed on an Orbitrap Exploris mass spectrometer using a method with a 60-min effective gradient and staggered wide-window DIA as depicted. (b) Overview of data processing workflow for DIA files that includes spectral library searches, application of a global precursor FDR ( < 0.01) and a PTM localization filter (>0.75) using Spectronaut. Quantifications were aggregated to the phosphopeptide and phosphosite level. (c) Overview of different quality control parameters tracked across all DIA-MS runs for phosphoproteomic sample injections in chronological order. The dashed red lines show all injection medians. The black line shows injection mean values and the gray area shows the 25th–75th percentile. Numbers of phosphopeptide identification are shown as a bar plot. The two bottom panels show sample preparation batches and different colors in heatmap denote different cycles of LC-MS/MS maintenance (for example the analytical column was changed 6 times). (d) Missed cleavage rates of identified peptides and phosphopeptides across the different sample preparation batches. (e) Boxplots of Pearson’s correlation coefficients from pairwise comparisons of individual injections. Pooled lysate controls processed within (n = 36 intra batch comparisons) or between different 96-well plates (n = 240 inter batch comparisons) for the proteome (left) and phosphoproteome (middle) and phosphoproteomic control measurements of the same pooled sample across the whole experiment (right) (n = 240 MS control comparisons) are shown. Hinges represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, the bar denotes the median, and whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the hinges.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Missing data imputation and batch correction of the core phosphoproteome.
(a) Proportion of all samples where a phosphosite was detected vs the median log2 intensity of the phosphosite in the remaining samples before imputation and batch correction. Color indicates phosphosite count. The weak logistic trend suggests low peptide abundance contributes to missing quantifications. Red line indicates imputation threshold. (b) Number of phosphosites in the dataset after increasingly strict cutoffs on the percent of samples with phosphosites. Red line indicates imputation threshold. (c) Percentage of imputed phosphosites across batches after filtering out phosphosites which were not present in at least 50% of all samples. (d) Distribution of phosphosite intensities before and after imputation for each sample batch, with the median intensity for the batch displayed as a horizontal line. (e) PCA of phosphosite quantifications per sample colored by sample batch after phosphosites were filtered for missingness and imputed. (f) Principal Variance Component Analysis (PVCA) on the same data as E) demonstrating the proportion of explainable variance. (g) Same as E) after ComBat correction. (h) Same as F) after correction. (i) Scatter plot of median Pearson correlation between samples from the same perturbation across batches before (imputed data) versus after batch correction (corrected data). (j) Same as I) for coefficient of variation across phosphosites for each perturbation. (k) Volcano plot displaying the negative log10 of the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-values by the log2 fold change determined by LIMMA for each phosphosite in each perturbation. (l) Same as (K) for protein abundances. (m) Significantly regulated proteins in each selected perturbation. 2,185 quantified proteins on average, 257 regulated proteins and 791 regulated perturbation-protein pairs. Most perturbations showed regulation of less than 3% of all measured proteins. Intracellular pH changes had the strongest impact, affecting 5%-7% of measured proteins. (n) Regulated phosphosites across perturbations grouped by range of imputed values. (o) Proportion of phosphosites that are down-regulated versus up-regulated binned by a range of imputed values. Over-representation of down regulation vs up regulation is anti-correlated with imputation, which implies that this is a biological effect affecting highly abundant sites.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Structural, regulatory, and functional features of the yeast phosphoproteome.
(a) Protein abundance for all yeast proteins (n = 7,147), all identified phosphoproteins (n = 3,857) and all regulated phosphoproteins (n = 1,204). Two-sided Wilcoxon test p-value: *** p < 0.001. For boxplots, hinges represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, the bar denotes the median, and whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the hinges. (b) Histograms depicting the relative positions of non-modified peptides within proteins derived from proteomic datasets for all measured proteins, proteins with regulated phosphosites and proteins that have a regulated N-terminal phosphosite. No bias towards increased detection of N-terminal peptides was identified. C-terminal peptides are depleted, which is expected due to their increased probability of having a lower charge state. (c) Distribution of paralog pair sequence identity across phosphosites that occur at conserved residues in both parlogs (n = 41), in only one paralog (n = 183) and paralog pairs with conserved S/T sites that were not identified to be phosphorylated in either paralog (n = 971). On average, paralog pairs with conserved phosphorylation sites have a statistically higher sequence identity and therefore likely diverged more recently. Two-sided Wilcoxon test p-value: ** p < 0.01. For boxplots, hinges represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, the bar denotes the median, and whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the hinges.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Differential expression of phosphosites and proteins.
(a) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of regulated proteins across different perturbations. (b) Visualization of significantly enriched biological process terms within the 4 annotated clusters from (D). Most of the 123 proteins that increased in abundance showed a strong enrichment for amino acid metabolic processes, likely as a response to pH changes or adjusted metabolism. Down-regulated proteins were enriched for ribosome biogenesis, translation, and the oxidative stress response, all indicative of the early onset of the environmental stress response gene expression program. (c) Left: Dotplot of log2 fold changes of perturbations versus untreated for indicated phosphosites. Data points are color coded according to perturbation type (as in Fig. 1) if the indicated phosphosite is significantly regulated. Middle: count of perturbations where the phosphosite is regulated. Right: count of significant phenotypes when exposing indicated phospho-inhibitory mutants to different stresses13. Conserved phosphosites in human homologs are listed on the right.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Dephosphorylation is a major stress response.
(a) Summary of known regulation and functions of selected phosphatases49. (b) Count of stress-resistant and stress-sensitive growth phenotypes for deletion strains of selected kinases and phosphatases (indicated in Fig. 4c) as determined by (ref. 13). Average phenotypes for all assessed kinase and phosphatase deletion strains are indicated by dashed lines. (c) Line plots of counts of down- and up-regulated phosphosites or phosphopeptides upon different perturbations of S. cerevisiae over time as identified previously20,21,22. (d) Same plot as (C) for different perturbations in C. elegans and in the human MCF7 epithelial breast cancer cell line as previously identified50,51. (e) Bar plot of down- and up-regulated phosphosite counts upon different perturbations in rat L7 myotubes as previously identified52.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Analysis of the TOR signaling network.
(a) Numbers of target phosphosites associated with kinases in the TOR cascade that we considered in our analysis. (b) Signed R2 of the scale free topology model fit (left) and the mean connectivity (right) of the underlying adjacency matrix produced by raising the Pearson correlation matrix to a soft threshold power. (c) Number of phosphosites in the TOR cascade assigned to each subnetwork discovered by WGCNA. (d) Hierarchical clustering of the Pearson correlation between module eigensites. (e) Linear motif enrichment of phosphosites assigned to each TOR subnetwork. (f) Significantly enriched (Fisher exact test q-value < 0.01) GO biological processes (top) and kinase-protein interactions (bottom) for phosphoproteins within each subnetwork.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Co-regulation Analysis.
(a) Heatmap showing the aggregated relative intensity of phosphosites within modules. The intensity is scaled across individual perturbations. Hierarchical clustering is performed on rows and columns. Perturbation types and phosphosites contained within a module are color-coded. (b) Aggregated relative intensity of all phosphosites within a module across the sample UMAP faceted for all modules. (c) Phosphosite motif enrichment analysis for all phosphosites within a module using all phosphosites assigned to modules as a background. (d) UMAP embedding of 2,191 phosphosites based on their quantitative profiles across samples. Color-coded by the number of perturbations where phosphosite is up-regulated subtracted by the number of perturbations where phosphosite is downregulated.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary information.
Supplementary Table 1
Treatment, sample preparation and measurement information for all analyzed samples, related to all figures.
Supplementary Table 2
Ultradeep reference yeast phosphoproteome, related to Figs. 1 and 2.
Supplementary Table 3
Complete and uncorrected, quantitative phosphosite datasets, related to Fig. 1.
Supplementary Table 4
Proteome quantitation of 30 selected perturbations and differential expression of proteins versus untreated. Differential expression was determined using LIMMA on all samples at once. Significant differential expression was calculated for each treatment against the untreated samples, and P values were corrected globally using Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Related to Fig. 3.
Supplementary Table 5
Corrected quantitative core phosphoproteome dataset, related to Figs. 1, 5 and 6.
Supplementary Table 6
Differential expression of phosphosites in all perturbations versus the untreated control. Differential expression was determined using LIMMA on all samples at once. Significant differential expression was calculated for each treatment against the untreated samples, and P values were corrected globally using Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Related to Figs. 2, 3 and 4.
Supplementary Table 7
Perturbation-specific phosphosites. Related to Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Text 5.
Supplementary Table 8
Phosphosites associated with TOR subnetworks. Related to Fig. 5.
Supplementary Table 9
Catalog of characterized, co-regulated phosphosites, assembled in modules. Related to Fig. 6.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Leutert, M., Barente, A.S., Fukuda, N.K. et al. The regulatory landscape of the yeast phosphoproteome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 30, 1761–1773 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01115-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01115-3
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation
The EMBO Journal (2024)
-
µPhos: a scalable and sensitive platform for high-dimensional phosphoproteomics
Molecular Systems Biology (2024)
-
Looking back at 30 years of Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
-
Genome dilution by cell growth drives starvation-like proteome remodeling in mammalian and yeast cells
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
-
Surviving under stress conditions
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2023)