Main

A decade after the structure of the Torpedo marmorata nicotinic acetylcholine receptor10 (nAChR), the set of known pLGIC structures is rapidly expanding and reflects the diversity of this protein family. The structures share a conserved architecture, in which subunits are arranged around a central five-fold pseudo-symmetry axis. Together they have clarified details of ligand binding, selectivity and allosteric modulation. They have also revealed a complex landscape of conformations, raising questions of how to relate structures to the wealth of data that established the existence of multiple agonist-bound pre-active intermediate states11,12,13, of distinct open states14 and of multiple desensitized states15.

Mouse homomeric 5-HT3A receptors, with their entire intracellular domain (ICD), were solubilized with the detergent C12E9 and purified. We first performed cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) in the presence of the potent antagonist tropisetron, and obtained a 4.5 Å structure (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Figs. 1, 2, Extended Data Table 1), hereafter referred to as T. T is globally similar to the structure previously solved by X-ray crystallography5 (root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 0.6 Å), the pore of which was shown by molecular dynamics to be occluded16. Tropisetron fits in a peanut-shaped density present in the neurotransmitter pocket (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f). The ICD contains a region of about 60 residues, which is averaged out (also in the other reconstructions, see below) because of its intrinsic flexibility1,2. T resembles the 4.5 Å cryo-EM structure of the apo 5-HT3 receptor9 (r.m.s.d. of 1.15 Å), with small differences in the lipid-exposed helices M3, MX and M4.

Fig. 1: Three-dimensional reconstructions and structures of homomeric 5-HT3A receptor.
figure 1

a, b, Reconstructions (a) and structures (b) for: the tropisetron dataset (protein in blue and ligand in red), the serotonin and Ca2+ dataset (I1 in yellow, F in purple and ligand in green), and the serotonin and TMPPAA dataset (I2 and ligand in green). Resolutions are shown according to the Fourier shell coefficient 0.143 criterion.

We then sought to identify agonist-elicited conformations of the 5-HT3 receptor, and performed cryo-EM imaging in the presence of serotonin. A first reconstruction presented heterogeneity in the membrane domain. Further focused 3D classification allowed two subsets of particles to be separated, which yielded reconstructions at 4.2 Å and 4.1 Å resolution, corresponding to two different conformations (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 4). The maps offer a variable level of information: most side chains in the extracellular domain are resolved, whereas some parts of the transmembrane domain (TMD) do not have side-chain information and some have limited information in the main chain position (Extended Data Figs. 4c, 5), reflecting the receptor dynamics. In the two refined structures, the extracellular domains (ECDs) have undergone an equivalent transition from the T state and serotonin could be modelled in the neurotransmitter site, whereas the TMDs differed markedly (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 6). We call the first structure I1 for intermediate 1 and the second structure F for full, on the basis of the extent of movements compared to the inhibited state. I1 exhibits only limited displacements in the upper part of M1 and M2, and a rearrangement of the M2–M3 loop (Supplementary Video 1). F is characterized by a pronounced reorganization of the transmembrane helices, which can be described by a rigid-body movement of the four-helix bundle coupled to a rearrangement of M4 (and of M3 to a lesser extent) sliding along M1 and M2 (Supplementary Videos 2, 3). F also features a very dynamic ICD, beyond the intrinsically disordered region, in which model building was not possible even though the data showed incomplete densities for MX and M4 (Extended Data Fig. 4a–c).

Fig. 2: Transitions between the tropisetron-bound, the serotonin-bound, and the serotonin and TMPPA-bound states.
figure 2

a, View parallel to the membrane of one subunit of the serotonin-bound conformation I1 (yellow) overlaid with the tropisetron-bound conformation (blue, TMD superposition, left) or with the serotonin-bound conformation F (purple, ECD superposition, right). Inset, vectors indicate the local amplitude of movements, sampled on Cα atoms (T to I1 in blue, I1 to F in purple). b, Overlay of the I1 (yellow) and the serotonin and TMPPAA-bound I2 (green) conformations (left); vector representations of the I1 to I2 transition (ECD superposition). c, Pairwise overlays of the TMD illustrating transitions at the quaternary level. Structures were superimposed on the ECD pentamer. L9′ (L260) residues are shown as spheres. The line and arrow on the middle overlay indicate the region depicted in d and the orientation of the view, respectively. d, Tertiary reorganization within a subunit TMD. Overlay in ribbon representation of I2 and F with L260 Cα as spheres (TMD superposition within a single subunit). Note the vertical shift of M3–M4 relative to M1–M2, distortions on the extracellular halves of M1–M2, and interface re-arrangement with the neighbouring subunit helices (on the right of the dotted line).

Finally, we collected a dataset in the presence of serotonin and trans-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-n-(pentan-3-yl)acrylamide (TMPPAA, a compound exhibiting agonist and positive allosteric modulator activity on the human receptor17), a combination that yields weakly desensitizing currents (Extended Data Fig. 1f). From this dataset, we reconstructed a 3.2 Å resolution structure (Extended Data Fig. 2d–g), which provides non-ambiguous side-chain information for nearly the entire receptor. The refined structure has an ECD conformation essentially equivalent to that of I1 and F. The membrane domain is similar to that of I1, albeit with a slightly more expanded top section and pore (Fig. 2). We call this structure I2 for intermediate 2.

Serotonin can be unambiguously positioned in the neurotransmitter site of I2. It fits tightly within its binding pocket (Extended Data Fig. 3a–c) in an orientation consistent with functional and binding studies1. Surrounded by obligatory aromatic residues (F199 and Y207 on the principal side, Y126 and W63 on the complementary side), it is positioned to form a cation-π interaction with W156 and hydrogen bonds with the main chain of S155 and Y64. The C loop is positioned moderately inward relative to the inhibited conformations, its position locked by a salt bridge between D202 and R65. A hallmark of allosteric activation is the subunit–subunit rearrangement (Extended Data Fig. 3d), which affects the site volume and geometry.

TMPPAA has previously been proposed to bind to an allosteric site in the TMD17, but there is no clearly interpretable density in our data to model the compound. We tested TMPPAA agonist activity on a set of around 45 single-point mutants of the human receptor, which collectively reveal that the drug binds between M4, M1 and M3 into an intra-subunit cavity skirted by lipids of the outer leaflet in the upper part of the TMD (Extended Data Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 1), where endogenous steroids bind to nAChRs18. More generally, several allosteric druggable sites have been identified in pLGICs, which bind diverse compounds including general anaesthetics such as propofol and flavourings such as citral or eucalyptol3. Allosteric sites in the 5-HT3 receptor change in both shape and volume during transitions (Extended Data Figs. 3i, 7a).

At the ECD–TMD interface, a set of conserved residues that are essential for gating19 form a structural motif that is common to all pLGIC structures, the location of which may correlate with the state of the channel5. This motif consists of charged residues (E53, D145, E186 and R218) sandwiched between conserved aromatic residues: W187 at the top and the 142-FPF-144 motif of the Cys loop, plus Y223 at the bottom (Extended Data Fig. 8). The FPF motif itself penetrates the transmembrane domain similar to a wedge; its position differs in each conformation. When superimposing structures on a TMD subunit, the wedge lies close to M2 in the tropisetron-bound structure and moves towards M4–M1 in the I1, I2 and F structures (which is possible because the conserved P230 allows the upper M1 to kink or straighten). A marked downward concerted movement of the wedge and of the β8–β9 loop (containing E186 and W187) occurs in the F structure, pushing on the M2–M3 loop, and may be responsible for the marked reorganization of the TMD observed in that state.

pLGIC pores are lined with side chains of residues from the five M2 helices. In direct agreement with results from substituted cysteine accessibility mutagenesis1 (SCAM), our structures show that in all conformations, positions −1′, 2′, 6′, 9′, 13′, 16′, 17′ and 20′ of the M2 α-helix are exposed to the pore lumen (Fig. 3a). Positions 12′ and 15′, which are also accessible in SCAM, are partly exposed to solvent on the rear of the M2 helices. Superimposition of a single M2 helix underscores its flexibility at both ends; superimposition of the five M2 helices highlights the crucial role of movements of the hydrophobic side chain at the 9′ position (Fig. 3b, c). Minimum pore diameter is often a key element in the assignment of experimental structures to physiological states. Pore profiles are compatible with closed hydrophobic gates (rings at positions 9′, 13′, 16′ and 17′) in the T and I1 structures, with an open channel in the F structure, whereas the I2 structure presents an intermediate profile. However, pore profiles are influenced by the resolution, symmetry and rotameric state of the side chains pointing into the pore lumen. Some positions, such as the key negative charge in −1′ are often poorly resolved in density maps, and are known to adopt alternate conformations8,20. Moreover, pore profiles are not informative about hydrophobicity, wetting or dynamics, which have key roles in permeability21,22. We performed molecular dynamics simulations to better characterize permeation. In the microsecond-long trajectories starting from the inhibited X-ray structure or from I1, no water or ions cross the pore, and the hydrophobic 9′, 13′ and 16′ rings establish a de-wetted hydrophobic gate that is tighter than in the starting structures (Fig. 3d, Extended Data Fig. 9). By sharp contrast, a simulation starting from F features an open pore that is accessible to ions and water throughout the trajectory (Supplementary Video 4). During the initial part of the simulations starting from I2, when the Cα atoms are positionally restrained, wetting and de-wetting events of the pore occur as if its conformation were on the open–closed verge (Extended Data Fig. 9). Wetting is linked to the presence of transiently hydrated grooves at the back of M2 helices, down to the polar residues Y11′–S12′, affecting the electrostatic landscape inside the pore. Wetting also correlates with rotation of L9′ out of the pore lumen. Once the geometric restraints are removed, the I2 pore relaxes to a closed conformation similar to that observed in the I1 trajectory. The absence of TMPPAA in the simulation may rationalize the closure. Potentials of mean force for the translocation of a K+ ion reveal an insurmountable 12 kcal mol−1 barrier in the case of I1 (representative of closed hydrophobic gate conformations), and an essentially flat free-energy landscape in the case of F (Fig. 3e).

Fig. 3: Geometry, wetting and energy landscape of the transmembrane pore.
figure 3

a, Static pore geometry; the accessible pathway through the pore is represented as a solid surface for each structure. Diameters (∅) of the constriction zones are noted. One M2 helix is depicted as cartoon with pore-exposed side chains as spheres (polar in green, hydrophobic in yellow, charged in blue). The view is parallel to the plane of the membrane. b, Zoom on the hydrophobic gate constriction, formed at the level of L260 (sticks), which has a small movement backward in the I2 state and rotates outwards in the F state. Coloured lines indicate molecular surfaces. The view is perpendicular to the membrane plane. c, Superposition of one M2 helix in the four conformations. d, Water densities of the pore region during the unrestrained part of simulations. Densities are depicted as transparent surfaces at the same contouring level. The density for K+ ions is also included for the F trajectory featuring an open pore. e, Potentials of mean force of K+ ions as a function of the position along the pore axis.

We asked whether the structures could be assigned to physiological states. T and F are straightforward to assign, whereas I1 and I2 are less so. T typifies an inhibited state, with resting-like ECD stabilized by tropisetron, and a closed pore, resembling the apo state. F represents an open state, with an activated ECD with bound serotonin, an activated TMD and a wide open pore. Two assignments are possible for the closely related I1 and I2 conformations (Fig. 4a). In a first scheme, I1 exemplifies a serotonin-bound, pre-active closed state, in which the ECD and the ECD–TMD interface—but not the TMD—have undergone a transition. This is consistent with single-channel analysis of the 5-HT3 receptor, which yields kinetic models in which opening can occur from a ligand-bound pre-active state14. In a second scheme, I1 represents a closed desensitized state that occurs downstream from the open state. In both schemes, I2 is best described as in a state close to I1 (that is, close to either pre-active or desensitized) wherein the slightly wider pore promotes wetting, which could enable ion passage or merely favour the switch to a fully open state, consistent with the TMPPAA-induced modulation.

Fig. 4: Putative molecular mechanisms of operation.
figure 4

a, T (blue) represents an inhibited state, stabilized by tropisetron (red circle). I1 (yellow) represents either a closed pre-active serotonin-bound (green circle) state or a desensitized state. F (purple) represents an open active state. The grey line illustrates the electrical response to serotonin recorded in an oocyte expressing 5-HT3A receptors. b, Recordings of MTSEA (1mM) modification on serotonin-evoked current in the S2′C mutant. MTSEA is applied in the resting (blue), the desensitized (orange), or active (purple) state. The protocol includes 10-s test serotonin applications before and after 2-min MTSEA modification. c, Changes in current after MTSEA (1 mM) or MTSET (1 mM) modification, for −1′C, S2′C and T6′C mutants, in the resting (blue), active (purple) or desensitized (yellow) state.

A distinctive feature of the second scheme is that the activation gate, consisting of rings of hydrophobic residues in the upper pore, would open in the active state and close in the desensitized state. This implies a marked movement of the upper pore during desensitization, and no ion access from the extracellular compartment to the lower pore in the desensitized state. Functional experiments on anionic receptors indicate that they have distinct activation and desensitization gates, the latter being located at the cytoplasmic end of the pore23. Moreover, structures of the GABAA receptor β3 homopentamer and of the α4β2 nAChR, with pores constricted at positions −2′ and −1′, have been assigned to desensitized states6,8. These receptors, however, were engineered close to the constriction, a feature that can alter desensitization in 5-HT3 receptors24.

To challenge the two schemes, we measured the movement of the gate region and the accessibility of the pore to organic cations. First, we used voltage-clamp fluorometry (VCF) to probe the local conformational changes in the upper pore at the 19′ position25,26 (Extended Data Fig. 10). We labelled S19′C mutants, expressed at the surface of Xenopus laevis oocytes, with 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine methanethiosulfonate (MTS-TAMRA). Transient stimulation with serotonin elicited simultaneous changes in current and fluorescence with parallel rise and decay, whereas prolonged (7-min) exposure to serotonin resulted in similar signals at the onset, followed by a slow decay for the current signal without a change in fluorescence. Both signals returned to baseline when serotonin was removed. The VCF results argue against the second scheme, because the probe environment changes upon activation but not during desensitization. Second, we performed SCAM in the resting (absence of ligand), open (during transient serotonin application) and desensitized (after prolonged serotonin application) states (Fig. 4b). MTSEA (2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate) and MTSET (2-2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl methanethiosulfonate) are organic cations that react with free cysteines through their methanethiosulfonate moiety. The aminoethyl head group of MTSEA is small, which enables it to access narrow spaces. MTSEA is, however, also known to cross membranes in its uncharged form. Application of 1 mM extracellular MTSEA in the resting state yielded no modification of currents in T6′C and S2′C mutants but inhibited currents (by 32%) in E1′C mutants (Fig. 4c). In the resting state, the compound can probably access position −1′ from the internal compartment, but it is unable to access the 2′ or 6′ positions. Similar applications in the open state produced irreversible inhibitions at 6′, 2′ and −1′ positions (82%, 69% and 58%, respectively). MTSEA can therefore reach 6′ and 2′ from the extracellular compartment in the open state, consistent with previous studies1 and with the opening of the activation gate in F. Applications of extracellular MTSEA in the desensitized state also produced irreversible inhibitions at 6′, 2′ and −1′ positions (30%, 63% and 50%, respectively). From these results, we infer that positions 6′ and 2′, located below the hydrophobic gate seen in T and I1, are accessible from the extracellular side in the desensitized state. No conclusions can be drawn for position −1′, as its labelling in the resting state precludes further interpretation. The results suggest that the activation gate is open in the desensitized conformation(s). MTSET possesses a bulkier trimethylammonium headgroup and cannot cross membranes. We observed that MTSET labels cysteine mutants at 6′, 2′ and −1′ positions when applied in the open state (71%, 75% and 46%, respectively). Application of MTSET in the desensitized state yielded a small variable inhibition at 2′ (12 ± 10%) and none at 6′, indicating that these positions are more accessible for MTSEA than for the bulkier MTSET. On the basis of these results, we favour the scheme in which I1 is assigned to a pre-active state. Nevertheless, desensitization is a complex process involving several distinct states15, and we cannot rule out the possibility that I1 represents a desensitized state.

The challenge of matching structures to states without ambiguity transcends the present study and pertains to the whole field of pLGIC structures2,27,28. This challenge arises from diverse factors: limited resolution, putative influence of detergent, crystal packing and receptor engineering, and the possibility that ensembles of multiple related conformations are necessary to properly depict a physiological state. Bearing in mind the ambiguities on state assignment, we compared the 5-HT3 transitions to those observed for the Gloeobacter violaceus receptor (GLIC)4, the worm glutamate-gated receptor (GluCl)29 and the glycine α1 receptor (GlyR)7. Common agonist-induced features emerge, such as a global twist, quaternary reorganization of the ECD, rearrangement of the interface between domains involving the conserved sandwich motif, and local movements of the upper TMD. Differences also appear: the extent of TMD reorganization seen in F, with M4 sliding on other helices, is not observed in the other receptors; the ECD reorganization is well-described as ‘un-blooming’4 for GLIC and GluCl, but not for the 5-HT3 and glycine receptors. The open pore of F is wider than that of GLIC and narrower than that of GlyR. Bacterial, animal anionic and animal cationic channels may have evolved distinct sets of conformations for a given physiological state, as they belong to separate branches of the pLGIC family. Our 5-HT3 receptor structures highlight several transitions in the cationic branch. They also contribute to knowledge on other important aspects of pLGIC research that are only alluded to in this report, such as the role of M4 in gating, the pharmacology of allosteric sites and ICD dynamics. Further work with better resolution, structures of mutant receptors and structures of receptors in complex with other ligands will complement and increase mechanistic insights, but knowledge of this area may nevertheless remain incomplete until kinetic structural experiments come of age.

Methods

No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized. The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.

Protein expression

The wild-type mouse 5-HT3A receptor was expressed in a stable, inducible cell line derived from HEK T-REx 293 cells (Thermo Fisher), as previously described5,30,31. The cells were cultured in suspension in flasks in an orbital incubator (typical culture size, 5 l). The protein expression was induced when cells reached 2 × 106 cells/ml. Valproic acid was added one day later and cells were cultured for one more day. Cells were then pelleted by low-speed centrifugation, frozen and stored at −80°C.

Protein purification

In a typical purification batch, 20 g of cells were resuspended in buffer A (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, antiprotease cocktail; 10 ml buffer per gram of cells) mechanically lysed (Ultraturrax T20, 6 × 30 s) and membranes were collected by ultracentrifugation (100,000g for 1 h). All steps were carried out at 4 °C. Membranes were resuspended in buffer B (50 mM Tris pH 8, 500 mM NaCl, antiprotease cocktail, 25 ml buffer per gram of membrane) and the solution was supplemented with 0.15% of C12E9 for solubilisation using gentle stirring (1.5 h). The insoluble material was removed by ultracentrifugation (100,000g for 45 min). Solubilized proteins were purified by affinity chromatography using gravity flow Strep-Tactin resin (IBA, typically 25 ml resin), eluted in buffer C (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 125 mM NaCl, 0.01% C12E9) and concentrated to ~0.5 mg/ml using Millipore 100-kDa cut-off filters. The purification tag was cleaved, and carbohydrates were digested by addition of 0.04 mg TEV protease and 0.1 mg PNGase F per 1 mg protein with gentle stirring overnight. The protein was further concentrated and then applied to a Superose 6 column (GE healthcare) equilibrated in buffer C.

Electron microscopy

The most homogeneous fractions of 5-HT3 receptor following size-exclusion chromatography were concentrated to ~1.5 mg/ml (in the best cases, no concentration was required). The sample was mixed with lipids (0.01% phosphatidic acid, 0.01% cholesterol hemisuccinate, 0.01% brain phosphatidylcholine; Avanti Polar Lipids) and ligands: 2 mM tropisetron (Tocris), or 50 μM serotonin and 2 mM calcium (conditions known to promote fast desensitization32,33); or 30 μM serotonin and 100 mM TMPPAA (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were incubated for 10–30 min on ice. 3.5 μl were deposited on a glow-discharged (30 mA, 50 s) Quantifoil copper-rhodium 1.2/1.3 grid, blotted for 10 s at force 0 using a Mark IV Vitrobot and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane. Between four and ten grids were screened during each data collection, as ice thickness varied between grids. Optimization was performed on an in-house Polara electron microscope. Datasets were recorded on Titan Krios electron microscopes with K2 cameras at C-CINA (Basel) or at the ESRF (Grenoble). Details of data collections are shown in Extended Data Table 1.

Image processing

At the Basel Krios microscope, the data collection was monitored online and good images were selected using Focus34; images were acquired in super-resolution mode and binned by Fourier-space cropping during the drift correction. At the ESRF Krios microscope, the counted mode was used. Drift was corrected with MotionCor235 and dose-weighted sums were used for subsequent processing, except for CTF correction, which was performed using GCTF36 on non-dose-weighted sums. Picking was performed with Gautomatch (http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch/) using average from 2D classes as templates. Subsequent steps were performed using Relion37 on a GPU workstation. Typically, two rounds of 2D classifications with 20–30 classes were performed, followed by a round of 3D classification without imposing symmetry (3–6 classes) with a low-pass-filtered initial model of the receptor. Particles presenting five-fold symmetry were selected, submitted to 3D classifications (classifications and data processing are further described in Extended Data Figs. 2, 4) and the best sets of particles were subjected to 3D auto-refinement. In the post-processing step, a soft mask was calculated and applied to the two half maps before the Fourier shell coefficient (FSC) was calculated. Map sharpening (B-factor fixed at −100 Å2 for I1 and F, automatic estimation for T and I2) was also performed in the post-processing step. We tried the Phenix auto-sharpen program38, which improved only the F map. The quality of the final reconstructions is shown in Extended Data Fig. 5.

Model refinement and structure analysis

Refinement was performed with the Phenix suite39. Cycles of real-space refinement were performed using global minimization, rigid body fit and local rotamer fitting (and B-factor refinement in late stages), alternating with manual rebuilding in Coot40. NCS and secondary structure restraints were enabled. The 4 models comprise residues 10–307 and 426–460. T, I1 and I2 also have MX and MA residues 308–330 and 399–426, which—owing to flexibility—could not be built in F. Tropisetron (numbered 902) was placed in the orthosteric side of T, and serotonin (numbered 901) was placed in the site of I1, F and I2. The densities for serotonin in I1 and F enable the ligand to be placed in several equivalent orientations, and we used the unambiguous density in I2 to choose the same ligand pose in these 3 structures. The stereochemical properties of the final models, analysed with the Molprobity server (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/), are reported in Extended Data Table 1. Pore profiles were plotted using HOLE41, r.m.s.d. values were calculated with ‘superpose’ in the CCP4 suite42. Figures were prepared with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrodinger), Chimera43 or CueMol.

Molecular dynamics

Molecular assays were built for the four conformational states of 5-HT3 described in the manuscript. For F, I1 and I2, we used the reported cryo-EM structures, whereas for the inhibited conformation we used the crystal structure (RCSB Protein Data Bank code (PDB): 4PIR) because of its higher resolution. The co-crystallized nanobodies were removed and the protein was modelled without serotonin. The five serotonins present in F, I1 and I2 structures were kept in the models. For I2, because no obvious densities were observed for TMPPAA, it was not represented in the model. The intracellular domain of the F conformation (not resolved in the cryo-EM density) was not included in the model.

Using the CHARMM-GUI web interface44,45, each structure was embedded in a fully hydrated palmitoyl-oleyl-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) bilayer consisting of around 240 lipid units and about 30,000 for F and 42,000 water molecules for T, I1 and I2. K+Cl (150 mM) was explicitly added to each system, while ensuring their electric neutrality. The all-atom CHARMM36 force field46 and revision thereof for lipids47 were used to describe the system and CMAP corrections were introduced for the protein48. For water, we used the TIP3P model49. A subset of mass of the heavy atoms of lipids, protein and serotonin were transferred on the hydrogens atoms to which they are bound, to reach a hydrogen mass of 3.024 Da. Using such a mass repartitioning scheme, the equation of motions can be integrated with a time step of up to 4 fs without modifying the dynamics and thermodynamics of the system50.

All simulations were carried out with the NAMD package v.2.1251. Simulations were performed in the isothermal–isobaric ensemble at T = 300K and P = 1 atm with anisotropic scaling of the simulation cell52, long-range electrostatic interactions were treated with the particle-mesh Ewald method53, and short-range electrostatics and Lennard-Jones interactions were smoothly truncated. The equations of motion were integrated with a time step of 4 and 8 fs for short- and long-range forces, respectively, using the Verlet r-RESPA multiple time-step propagator54. Covalent bonds involving hydrogen atoms were constrained to their equilibrium length by means of the ‘rattle/shake algorithm’55,56 and the ‘settle’ algorithm was used for water57. For each system, a smooth equilibration along which the positions of the heavy atoms of the protein were restrained harmonically, was carried out for 60 ns. After releasing the restraints, the simulations were extended up to 1 µs. All analyses and molecular rendering were achieved with VMD58. Pore radii were inferred using the program HOLE41.

The potentials of mean force underlying the translocation of a potassium ion in the I1 and F conformations of the 5-HT3 receptor were determined using a multiple-walker version59 of the adaptive biasing force algorithm60. For the I1 conformation, the reaction coordinate model was chosen as the Euclidian distance between the ion and the centre of mass of the protein, projected onto its longitudinal axis; that is, the z-direction of Cartesian space. In the case of the F conformation, a two-dimensional free-energy landscape was generated, exploring ion diffusion in the pore not only longitudinally by means of the aforementioned projected Euclidian distance, but also radially. The potential of mean force along the pore was recovered by integration of the marginal law in the radial direction. The reaction pathway was broken down into 14 and 12 windows for the I1 and F conformations, respectively. The free-energy landscapes were explored by four walkers, syncing gradients every 500 molecular-dynamics steps. The total simulation time for the I1 and F conformations amounted to 2.16 and 3.04 µs, respectively, wherein the last 0.8 µs was used to estimate the error bars associated with the potentials of mean force, based on an independent mapping of the free-energy landscape by the walkers.

Electrophysiology

Electrical recordings were obtained by two-electrode voltage-clamp (TEVC) on Xenopus oocytes expressing either wild-type or mutated homomeric mouse 5-HT3A receptors. Mutants were obtained using the QuickChange Lightning (Stratagene) site-directed mutagenesis kit and oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 2) to introduce point mutations into the pcDNA5/TO-m5-HT3A plasmid. All the mutations were verified by sequencing.

Oocytes were prepared as previously reported61 using procedures that conformed to European regulations for animal handling and experiments, and were approved by governmental services (authorization no. D 38 185 10 001 for the animal facility delivered by the Prefect of Isère) and the Institutional Ethics Committee (ethics approval N° 12-040 granted to C. Moreau by the Ethics Committee of Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives). Difolliculated oocytes were injected with 30 nl plasmid DNA (1–10 ng/µl) coding for the desired 5-HT3A subunit (subcloned into pcDNA5 vector). Microinjected oocytes were incubated for 1 to 5 days at 19 °C in Barth’s solution (in mM: 1 KCl, 0.82 MgSO4, 88 NaCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 0.41 CaCl2, 16 HEPES, pH 7.4) supplemented with 100 U ml−1 penicillin and streptomycin.

Whole-cell TEVC recordings were obtained using an OC-725C Oocyte Clamp amplifier (Warner Instruments) at a constant holding potential of −50 mV. Macroscopic currents were filtered at 1 kHz, digitized at 2 kHz with a Digidata 1440 analogue-to-digital interface and analysed with Clampfit (Molecular Devices). During the recordings, oocytes were constantly perfused with a 0 Ca-ND96 solution (containing in mM: 91 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 1 EGTA, pH 7.4) at a rate of 1.3 ml/min, which allowed the application of serotonin and other compounds in a time range of seconds (20-fold concentration change of applied compounds in 5 s). Throughout this study, electrophysiological responses were induced by 10 µM serotonin (a saturating dose for all tested constructions, not shown) and peaked in less than 3 s. In all constructions tested, 10-min applications of serotonin induced almost complete desensitization (to less than 3% of the peak current with t1/2 in the min range). Full recovery of desensitization was observed after washing serotonin for 10 min. Ca2+ ions are permeant through 5-HT3 receptors62. Calcium was therefore carefully removed from the recording perfusion solution to avoid contamination of the serotonin-induced responses by endogenous oocyte current secondarily activated by Ca2+ ions entering the oocyte through the serotonin receptors.

MTSEA (2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate bromide) and MTSET (2-trimethylammonium-ethyl methanethiosulfonate bromide) were purchased from Interchim and prepared immediately before perfusion from stock solutions in water stored at −20 °C. The effect of MTS compounds on pore cysteine-mutants was studied using the following protocol: (i) checking stability of the response with a train of three to five applications of 10 µM serotonin for 10 s, every 5 min (Ipre); (ii) applying MTS compounds for 2 min at 1 mM, either in the absence of 5-HT (to probe cysteine accessibility in the resting state), simultaneously with 10 µM 5-HT (to probe the open state) or simultaneously with 10 µM 5-HT after a 10 min pre-application of 5-HT alone allowing for complete desensitization; (iii) following the effect of MTS compounds during a second set of five applications of 5-HT for 10 s every 5 min (Ipost). Irreversible effects of MTS compounds were quantified by measuring Ipost 25 min after removal of the MTS compound. The percentage of inhibition or potentiation was calculated as (IpreIpost)/Ipre × 100. MTS compounds (applied at 1 mM simultaneously with 10 µM serotonin) have no detectable effect on wild-type receptors (not shown).

Voltage-clamp fluorometry

VCF recordings were performed on Xenopus oocytes provided by Ecocyte Bioscience that were injected with 50 ng/μl plasmid DNA encoding for the mouse 5-HT3A receptor S19′C mutant, after 2 to 6 days of expression in Barth solution at 17 °C. They were labelled with MTS-TAMRA (Toronto Chemicals) for 5 min at 17 °C in ND96 buffer without CaCl2 containing 10 μM 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), then rinsed and stored at 17 °C for up to 4 h before recording in ND96. Recording were made in a TEVC setup as described13, adapted for fluorescence recording. In brief, recordings were made with a VCF dedicated chamber with only a fraction of the oocyte perfused and illuminated by a LED (coolLED PE-4000). Light was collected using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axiovert135) equipped with a 40× objective (Plan Neofluar), a TRITC filter set and a photomultiplier tube (Hamamatsu Photonics). Recordings were made at −60 mV clamp, 500-Hz sampling rate with a 550-nm excitation wavelength. Data were filtered, corrected for baseline and photobleaching where necessary, and analysed using pClamp and Axograph. Dose–response curves were fitted using Prism to the Hill equation: I/Imax = 1/(1 + (EC50/[5-HT])nH) in which I is the response at a given [5-HT] (serotonin concentration), Imax is the maximal response, EC50 is half maximal effective concentration and nH is the Hill coefficient. Serotonin dose–response relations were shifted to the left with half-responses for fluorescence and current at 40 and 240 nM, respectively (the EC50 of the wild-type receptor is 800 nM).

Fluorescence imaging plate reader membrane potential blue assay

The agonist properties of 5-HT and TMPPAA (Sigma-Aldrich) were characterized at human wild-type or mutant 5-HT3A receptors transiently expressed in tsA201 cells in the fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) membrane potential blue (FMP; fluoresence-based membrane potential) assay. The generation of some of the human 5-HT3A mutants have previously been described63. Other mutants were constructed by introduction of point mutations into the h5-HT3A-pCIneo plasmid using Quikchange II XL site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) and oligonucleotides (TAG Copenhagen). The absence of unwanted mutations in all cDNAs created by PCR was verified by sequencing (Eurofins MWG Operon). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml) and 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C. Cells (1.2 × 106) were split into a 6-cm tissue culture plate, transfected the following day with 4 μg cDNA (wild-type or mutant h5-HT3A-pCIneo) using Polyfect (Qiagen) as transfection reagent, and split into poly-d-lysine-coated black 96-well plates (8 × 104 cells per well) with clear bottom (BD Biosciences) the following day. After 20–24 h following transfection, the medium was aspirated, and the cells were washed with 100 µl Krebs buffer (140 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 11 mM HEPES, 10 mM d-glucose, pH 7.4). Then 100 µl Krebs buffer supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml FMP assay dye (Molecular Devices) was added to each well, and the 96-well plate was assayed at 37 °C in a FLEXStation3 Benchtop Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices) measuring emission (in fluorescence units (FU)) at 565 nm caused by excitation at 530 nm before and up to 90 s after addition of 33.3 µl assay buffer supplemented with agonist (5-HT or TMPPAA). The experiments were performed in duplicate at least three times for each agonist at all receptors. Concentration–response curves for the agonists were constructed based on the difference in the fluorescence units (rFU) between the maximal fluorescence recording made before and after addition of the agonists at different concentrations. The curves were generated by non-weighted least-squares fits using the program KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.