Abstract
Wind energy is anticipated to become a backbone of the future energy system. Ageing wind turbine fleets, increasing land-use constraints and rising relevance of societal factors make the deployment of land-based (onshore) wind energy ever more complicated. Consequently, repowering is expected to become a rapidly growing point of focus for the wind industry. Here we propose a more holistic and socially informed project-level approach to analyse repowering activity that enables a more robust understanding of the process and potentials. We demonstrate that for wind pioneer in Denmark, only 67% of the capacity removed in repowering projects was related to the physical space needed for a new turbine. Other factors that drive repowering include regulation (for example, noise-related, 8–17%), development principles (for example, aesthetics, 7–20%) and political bargaining (4–13%). The recognition of repowering as a negotiated process between host communities and wind developers will probably be critical to unlock the full potential of wind energy in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset generated during the current study is published as Supplementary Data 1 (spreadsheet format). Although the dataset contains all quantitative data collected from the different sources, we cannot disclose specific disaggregate information from the interviews, which have been conducted under the Chatham House rules. Interview transcripts and notes may be requested from the authors, but will only be handed out after explicit consent from the interviewees. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Global Wind Energy Report 2018 (Global Wind Council Energy, 2019); https://gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/GWEC-Global-Wind-Report-2018.pdf
Wind Energy in Europe in 2018—Trends and Statistics (WindEurope, 2019); www.windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Statistics-2018.pdf
Rekord Lav CO2-Udledning fra Danskernes Elforbrug i 2019 (Energinet, 2020); www.energinet.dk/Om-nyheder/Nyheder/2020/01/16/Rekord-lav-CO2udledning-fra-danskernes-elforbrug-i-2019
Lantz, E., Leventhal, M. & Baring-Gould, I. Wind Power Project Repowering: Financial Feasibility, Decision Drivers, and Supply Chain Effects. Prepared under Task no. WE11.0630, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-60535 (NREL, 2013); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60535.pdf
Silvosa, A. C., Gómez, G. I. & Del Río, P. Analyzing the techno-economic determinants for the repowering of Wind Farms. Eng. Econ. 58, 282–303 (2013).
Ziegler, L., Gonzalez, E., Rubert, T., Smolka, U. & Melero, J. J. Lifetime extension of onshore wind turbines: a review covering Germany, Spain, Denmark, and the UK. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 1261–1271 (2018).
Scherhaufer, P., Höltinger, S., Salak, B., Schauppenlehner, T. & Schmidt, J. Patterns of acceptance and non-acceptance within energy landscapes: a case study on wind energy expansion in Austria. Energy Policy 109, 863–870 (2017).
Smallwood, K. S. in Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions (ed. Köppel. J.) 175–187 (Springer 2017).
Steininger, G. Wind turbine repowering is on the horizon (L. Buchsbaum and S. Patel, interviewers) POWER Magazine (2016); https://www.powermag.com/wind-turbine-repowering-horizon/
Villena-Ruiz, R., Ramirez, F. J., Honrubia-Escribano, A. & Gómez-Lázaro, E. A techno-economic analysis of a real wind farm repowering experience: the Malpica case. Energy Convers. Manag. 172, 182–199 (2018).
Filgueira, A., Seijo, M. A., Munoz, E., Castro, L. & Piegari, L. Technical and economic study of two repowered wind farms in Bustelo and San Xoán, 24.7 MW and 15.84 MW respectively. In 2009 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP) (ICCEP, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2009.5211998
Prabu, T. & Kottayil, S. K. Repowering a wind farm—a techno-economic approach. Wind Eng. 39, 385–397 (2015).
Nivedh, B., Devi, R. & Sreevalsan, E. Repowering of wind farms—a case study. Wind Eng. 37, 137–150 (2013).
Paul, A. & Prabu, T. Technical and economic feasibility study on repowering of wind farms. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–9 (2016).
Goyal, M. Repowering—next big thing in India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 1400–1409 (2010).
Del Río, P., Calvo Silvosa, A. & Iglesias Gómez, G. Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy 39, 1897–1908 (2011).
Santos-Alamillos, F. J., Thomaidis, N. S., Usaola-García, J., Ruiz-Arias, J. A. & Pozo-Vázquez, D. Exploring the mean-variance portfolio optimization approach for planning wind repowering actions in Spain. Renew. Energy 106, 335–342 (2017).
Möller, B. Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl. Energy 83, 477–494 (2006).
Himpler, S. & Madlener, R. Optimal timing of wind farm repowering: a two-factor real options analysis. J. Energy Mark. 7, 3–34 (2014).
Wind Energy in Europe: Outlook to 2023 (WindEurope, 2019); https://windeurope.org/about-wind/reports/wind-energy-in-europe-outlook-to-2023/#download
Lacal-Arántegu, R., Iglesias, A. & María Yusta, J. Technology effects in repowering wind turbines. Wind Energy 23, 660–675 (2019).
Frantál, B. Have local government and public expectations of wind energy project benefits been met? Implications for repowering schemes. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 17, 217–236 (2015).
Martínez, E., Latorre-Biel, J. I., Jiménez, E., Sanz, F. & Blanco, J. Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 260–271 (2018).
Manchado, C. et al. Wind farm repowering guided by visual impact criteria. Renew. Energy 135, 197–207 (2019).
Hötker, H., Thomsen, K.-M. & Jeromin, H. Impacts on Biodiversity of Exploitation of Renewable Energy Sources: the Example of Birds and Bats—Facts, Gaps in Knowledge, Demands for Further Research, and Ornithological Guidelines for the Development of Renewable Energy Exploitation (Michael-Otto-Institut for the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union, 2006).
Smallwood, K. S. & Karas, B. Avian and bat fatality rates at old-generation and repowered wind turbines in California. J. Wildl. Manage. 73, 1062–1071 (2009).
Marques, A. T. et al. Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol. Conserv. 179, 40–52 (2014).
Ferri, V., Battisti, C. & Soccini, C. Bats in a Mediterranean mountainous landscape: does wind farm repowering induce changes at assemblage and species level? Environ. Manage. 57, 1240–1246 (2016).
Colmenar-Santos, A., Campíñez-Romero, S., Pérez-Molina, C. & Mur-Pérez, F. Repowering: An actual possibility for wind energy in Spain in a new scenario without feed-in-tariffs. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 41, 319–337 (2015).
Searchlist over all Plan Proposals and Plans Adopted Pursuant to the Planning Act (Danish Business Authority, 2019); kort.plandata.dk/searchlist/#/
Master Data Register for Wind Turbines—Data on Operating and Decommissioned Wind Turbines (Ultimo 02 2020) (Danish Energy Agency, accessed 26 March 2020; www.ens.dk/en/our-services/statistics-data-key-figures-and-energy-maps/overview-energy-sector
Afgifts og Tilskudsanalysen på Energiområdet—Delanalyse 6, Fremtidigt Tilskud til Landvind (Danish Ministry of Taxation, 2018); www.skm.dk/media/5361/afgifts-og-tilskudsanalysen-delanalyse-6.pdf
Bekendtgørelse om Planlægning for og Tilladelse til Opstilling af Vindmøller (Danish Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial Affairs, 2019); www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=210040
Vindmølleindustrien som Historisk Flagskib (Danish Energy Agency, 2011); www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Vindenergi/vindmoelleindustrien_historisk_flagskib.pdf
Wind Energy Generation (Strategic Energy Technologies Information System, European Commission, 2013); setis.ec.europa.eu/system/files/Technology_Information_Sheet_Wind_Energy_Generation.pdf
Directive 2001/77/EC on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Energy Market OJ L 283/33 (European Parliament and Council, 2001).
Chatham House Rule (Chatham House, 2020); www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule
Vejledning om planlægning for og tilladelse til opstilling af vindmøller (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark., 2015); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/131731/vejledning_06012015_web.pdf
Støj fra Vindmøller–Vejledning fra Miljøstyrelsen nr 1 (Environmental Protection Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2012); www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2012/05/978-87-92903-08-2.pdf
Vejledning om VVM i Planloven (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2009); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/9948968/vvm_vejledning2.pdf
Integration of Wind Power (Ea Energianalyse, 2015); www.ea-energianalyse.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1550_Integration_vindkraft_viking_link_og_andre_tiltag-2.pdf
Uihlein, A., Telsnig, T. & Vazquez Hernandez, C. JRC Wind Energy Database (Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2019).
Lacal-Arántegui, R. & Uihlein, A. Repowering wind turbines—analysis of the effects of technology substitution in repowered wind farms. Appl. Energy 23, 660–675 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work constitutes a contribution to the research in the international working group IEA TCP Wind Task 26 (Cost of Wind Energy). We thank all the members of the group for their extraordinary collaboration and essential comments on our work that formed this article. The work was in part funded by the Danish Public Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Program (EUDP), project no. 64018-0577. This Article constitutes a contribution from the European Commission to IEA Task 26 research. The views expressed are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. This work was authored (in part) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy under Contract no. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding was provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the Article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the US Government. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.K. and M.K.J. conceived the study, developed the analysis and undertook the interviews. M.K.J. led the data processing and analysis, with support from L.K. E.L. and T.T. contributed with international data. All the authors contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All the authors wrote and edited the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Notes 1–3, Figs. 1–4 and Table 1.
Supplementary Data 1
Full dataset, source data for tables and figures.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitzing, L., Jensen, M.K., Telsnig, T. et al. Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition. Nat Energy 5, 1012–1021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00717-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00717-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Artificial intelligence-aided wind plant optimization for nationwide evaluation of land use and economic benefits of wake steering
Nature Energy (2024)
-
Competing for space? A multi-criteria scenario framework intended to model the energy–biodiversity–land nexus for regional renewable energy planning based on a German case study
Energy, Sustainability and Society (2023)
-
Configurational Analysis of ESG Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Leverage: a Study on Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firms
Journal of the Knowledge Economy (2023)
-
Battery technology and recycling alone will not save the electric mobility transition from future cobalt shortages
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Development of onshore wind turbine fleet counteracts climate change-induced reduction in global capacity factor
Nature Energy (2022)