Abstract
Forests provide vital ecosystem services, particularly as carbon sinks for nature-based climate solutions. However, the impact of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels on carbon and nitrogen interactions of forests remains poorly quantified. We integrate experimental observations and biogeochemical models to elucidate the synergies between enhanced nitrogen and carbon cycling in global forests under elevated CO2. Elevated CO2 alone increases net primary productivity (+27%; 95% CI: 23–31%) and leaf C/N ratio (+26%; 95% CI: 16–39%), while stimulating biological nitrogen fixation (+25%; 95% CI: 0–56%) and nitrogen use efficiency (+32%; 95% CI: 5–65%) according to a global meta-analysis. Under the elevated CO2 middle-road scenario for 2050, the forest carbon sink is projected to increase by 0.28 billion tonnes (PgC yr−1), with reactive nitrogen loss decreasing by 8 Tg yr−1 relative to the baseline. The monetary impact assessment of the elevated CO2 impact on forests represents a societal value of US$271 billion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are openly available, and their sources are detailed in the Methods and Supplementary Information. A global database of elevated CO2 simulation experiments was established by extracting data from site-based manipulation studies. Climate data for our study sites were sourced from the WorldClim database (https://worldclim.org/data/index.html#). Soil data were obtained primarily from publications or supplemented with data from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) (https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/soils). Future forest areas under different socioeconomic pathways were projected using the Global Change Analysis Model. National carbon prices were obtained from a World Carbon Pricing Database, while fertilizer price data were sourced from the UN Comtrade Database (https://comtrade.un.org/). Source data are provided with this paper and are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10731367 (ref. 73).
Code availability
The code used in the analysis is available online and can be accessed in the Zenodo repository73.
References
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 (FAO, 2020).
The Global Forest Goals Report 2021 (DESA, 2021).
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).
Walker, W. S. et al. The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2111312119 (2022).
Chen, C., Riley, W. J., Prentice, I. C. & Keenan, T. F. CO2 fertilization of terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from site to global scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115627119 (2022).
Ruehr, S. et al. Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 518–534 (2023).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 73–79 (2019).
Lu, X. et al. Nitrogen deposition accelerates soil carbon sequestration in tropical forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020790118 (2021).
Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).
McCarthy, H. R. et al. Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. N. Phytol. 185, 514–528 (2010).
Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).
Talhelm, A. F. et al. Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2492–2504 (2014).
Jiang, M. et al. The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 580, 227–231 (2020).
Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Elevated CO2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 279–282 (2017).
Moscatelli, M. C., Lagomarsino, A., De Angelis, P. & Grego, S. Seasonality of soil biological properties in a poplar plantation growing under elevated atmospheric CO2. Appl. Soil Ecol. 30, 162–173 (2005).
Hagedorn, F. et al. Nine years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline stimulates soil respiration but does not alter soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 390–400 (2013).
Schleppi, P., Bucher-Wallin, I., Hagedorn, F. & Körner, C. Increased nitrate availability in the soil of a mixed mature temperate forest subjected to elevated CO2 concentration (canopy FACE). Glob. Change Biol. 18, 757–768 (2012).
Fleischer, K. et al. Amazon forest response to CO2 fertilization dependent on plant phosphorus acquisition. Nat. Geosci. 12, 736–741 (2019).
Feng, Z. et al. Constraints to nitrogen acquisition of terrestrial plants under elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3152–3168 (2015).
Terrer, C. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 684–689 (2019).
Terrer, C., Vicca, S., Hungate, B. A., Phillips, R. P. & Prentice, I. C. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect. Science 353, 72–74 (2016).
Du, E., Fenn, M. E., de Vries, W. & Ok, Y. S. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to global forests: status, impacts and management options. Environ. Pollut. 250, 1044–1048 (2019).
Du, E. & de Vries, W. Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to Global Forests: Spatial Variation, Impacts, and Management Implications (Elsevier, 2023).
Feng, M. et al. Overestimated nitrogen loss from denitrification for natural terrestrial ecosystems in CMIP6 Earth system models. Nat. Commun. 14, 3065 (2023).
Koch, A. & Kaplan, J. O. Tropical forest restoration under future climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 279–283 (2022).
Norby, R. J. et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052–18056 (2005).
Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. N. Phytol. 165, 351–372 (2005).
Rütting, T. Nitrogen mineralization, not N2 fixation, alleviates progressive nitrogen limitation—comment on ‘Processes regulating progressive nitrogen limitation under elevated carbon dioxide: a meta-analysis’ by Liang et al. (2016). Biogeosciences 14, 751–754 (2017).
Guo, Y. et al. Enhanced leaf turnover and nitrogen recycling sustain CO2 fertilization effect on tree-ring growth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1271–1278 (2022).
Tian, H. et al. Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007. Ecol. Manage. 259, 1311–1327 (2010).
You, Y. et al. Incorporating dynamic crop growth processes and management practices into a terrestrial biosphere model for simulating crop production in the United States: toward a unified modeling framework. Agric. For. Meteorol. 325, 109144 (2022).
Gu, B. et al. Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature 613, 77–84 (2023).
Gu, B. et al. Toward a generic analytical framework for sustainable nitrogen management: application for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1109–1118 (2019).
Cheng, W. et al. Global monthly gridded atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations under the historical and future scenarios. Sci. Data 9, 83 (2022).
Roebroek, C. T. J., Duveiller, G., Seneviratne, S. I., Davin, E. L. & Cescatti, A. Releasing global forests from human management: how much more carbon could be stored? Science 380, 749–753 (2023).
Liu, Y. et al. Field-experiment constraints on the enhancement of the terrestrial carbon sink by CO2 fertilization. Nat. Geosci. 12, 809–814 (2019).
Hume, A. M., Chen, H. Y. H. & Taylor, A. R. Intensive forest harvesting increases susceptibility of northern forest soils to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus loss. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 246–255 (2018).
Chen, M. et al. Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios. Sci. Data 7, 320 (2020).
Zhang, J., Fu, B., Stafford-Smith, M., Wang, S. & Zhao, W. Improve forest restoration initiatives to meet sustainable development goal 15. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 10–13 (2021).
Shah, N. W. et al. The effects of forest management on water quality. For. Ecol. Manage. 522, 120397 (2022).
Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).
Ben Keane, J. et al. Grassland responses to elevated CO2 determined by plant–microbe competition for phosphorus. Nat. Geosci. 16, 704–709 (2023).
Reich, P. B. et al. Even modest climate change may lead to major transitions in boreal forests. Nature 608, 540–545 (2022).
Wu, Q. et al. Contrasting effects of altered precipitation regimes on soil nitrogen cycling at the global scale. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 6679–6695 (2022).
Wang, J. et al. Precipitation manipulation and terrestrial carbon cycling: the roles of treatment magnitude, experimental duration and local climate. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 1909–1921 (2021).
Van Sundert, K. et al. When things get MESI: the Manipulation Experiments Synthesis Initiative—a coordinated effort to synthesize terrestrial global change experiments. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1922–1938 (2023).
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Brit. Med. J. 372, n71 (2021).
WebPlotDigitizer 4.4 WebPlotDigitizer https://apps.automeris.io/wpd/ (2022).
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Global Land Data Assimilation System. NASA https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas/soils (2022).
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150 (1999).
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S. & McShane, B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 567, 305–307 (2019).
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).
Kou-Giesbrecht, S. et al. Evaluating nitrogen cycling in terrestrial biosphere models: a disconnect between the carbon and nitrogen cycles. Earth Syst. Dyn. 14, 767–795 (2023).
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A. & Mooney, H. A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology (Springer Science, 2002).
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C. & Berry, J. A. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 107–136 (1991).
Bonan, G. B. The land surface climatology of the NCAR land surface model coupled to the NCAR community climate model. J. Clim 11, 1307–1326 (1998).
Sellers, P. J. et al. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: model formulation. J. Clim. 9, 676–705 (1996).
Landsberg, J. J., Waring, R. H. & Williams, M. The assessment of NPP/GPP ratio. Tree Physiol. 40, 695–699 (2020).
Luyssaert, S. et al. Toward a consistency cross-check of eddy covariance flux-based and biometric estimates of ecosystem carbon balance. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB3009 (2009).
Rayan, M. G. Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecol. Appl. 1, 157–167 (1991).
Cui, J. et al. Nitrogen cycles in global croplands altered by elevated CO2. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1166–1176 (2023).
Kristal, S. L., Randall-Kristal, K. A. & Thompson, B. M. The society for academic emergency medicine’s 2004–2005 emergency medicine faculty salary and benefit survey. Acad. Emerg. Med. 13, 548–558 (2006).
Sobota, D. J., Compton, J. E., McCrackin, M. L. & Singh, S. Cost of reactive nitrogen release from human activities to the environment in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 025006 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. Societal benefits of halving agricultural ammonia emissions in China far exceed the abatement costs. Nat. Commun. 11, 4357 (2020).
Dolphin, G. & Xiahou, Q. World carbon pricing database: sources and methods. Sci. Data 9, 573 (2022).
UN Comtrade Database. United Nations https://comtrade.un.org/ (2023).
FAO Database. FOA https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (2022).
Cui, J., & Gu, B. Database of eCO2 experiments in forests and global analysis (v1.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10731367 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42325707 and 42261144001, B.G.), National Key Research and Development Project of China (2022YFE0138200, B.G.) and Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (CPSF) (GZC20232311, J.C.). We thank H. Chen for assistance in meta-data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.G. and J.C. designed the study. J.C. analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the discussion and revision of the paper. M.Z. provided support for meta-data collection and visualization. Z.B., N.P. and H.T. provided modelling support for DLEM. X.Z. provided support for CHANS model and impact assessment. Z.Q. provided support for meta-data collection. J.X. contributed to the discussion of the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Climate Change thanks César Terrer, Kevin Van Sundert and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Modelling framework.
We establish a database of elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) experiments conducted across forest sites. A global synthesis is then performed to quantify the impacts of eCO2 on nitrogen and carbon cycles. We utilize the Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model (DLEM) and the Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS) model to simulate global forest carbon and nitrogen budgets under multiple scenarios. Finally, the carbon and nitrogen budgets are fed into the impact assessment module, facilitating the monetization of elevated CO2 impacts on forest assets.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Relationship between the response ratio to eCO2 for selected variables and moderators.
(a) Response ratio of NPP against the squared mean annual precipitation (MAP) in FACE Experiments. (b) Response ratio of BNF against soil C:N ratio. (c) Response ratio of DOC against MAP. (d) Response ratio of Rs against MAP in FACE Experiments. The regression lines illustrate the mean response of observations using mixed-effects meta-regression models. The gray shading denotes the 95% confidence intervals for the mean. The sizes of bubbles in the scatter plots are proportional to the weights of response ratios for each individual observation.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Relationship between the response ratio to eCO2 of selected variables and manipulation magnitude (ΔCO2).
Regressions between NUE (a), WUE (b), N2O (c) against ΔCO2. The regression lines illustrate the mean response of observations using mixed-effects meta-regression models. The gray shading denotes the 95% confidence intervals for the mean. The sizes of bubbles in the scatter plots are proportional to the weights of response ratios for each individual observation.
Extended Data Fig. 4 The nitrogen accumulation of global forests and the changes between eCO2 SSP2-4.5 middle-road scenario and baseline scenario in 2050.
Nitrogen accumulation in baseline scenario (a), eCO2 scenario (b), and Δaccumulation (eCO2-induced change) (c). NUE in baseline scenario (d), eCO2 scenario (e), and ΔNUE (eCO2-induced change) (f). Values in the legend reflect the average annual N budget from forests within a grid cell (0.5° × 0.5°). The base map is from GADM data.
Extended Data Fig. 5 The eCO2 impact on carbon sink and uncertainties in global forests under eCO2 SSP2-4.5 middle-road scenario for 2050.
(a) The eCO2–induced changes in carbon sink per square meter of forest area. (b) The absolute uncertainties of ΔC sink in Fig. 2 based on the standard deviations of the model ensembles derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Values of uncertainties in the legend reflect the annual values from forests within one grid cell (0.5° × 0.5°). The base map is from GADM data.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The nitrogen input of global forests and the changes between eCO2 SSP2-4.5 middle-road scenario and baseline scenario in 2050.
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in baseline scenario (a), eCO2 scenario (b), and ΔBNF (eCO2-induced change) (c); nitrogen deposition in baseline scenario (d), eCO2 scenario (e), and ΔDeposition (f); nitrogen fertilizer in baseline scenario (g), eCO2 scenario (h), and Δfertilizer (i). Values in the legend reflect the average annual nitrogen budget from forests within a grid cell (0.5° × 0.5°). The base map is from GADM data.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Uncertainties of eCO2–induced changes in nitrogen budgets in global forests under eCO2 SSP2-4.5 middle-road scenario for 2050.
(a) ΔN input; (b) ΔN products; (c) ΔNr loss. The absolute uncertainties are based on the standard deviations of the model ensembles derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Values in the legend reflect the annual values from forest within a grid cell (0.5° × 0.5°). The base map is from GADM data.
Extended Data Fig. 8 The reactive nitrogen loss of global forests and the changes due to elevated CO2 under eCO2 middle road scenario (SSP2-4.5) relative to baseline scenario in 2050.
NH3 emissions in baseline scenario (a), eCO2 scenario (b), and ΔNH3 (eCO2-induced change) (c); N2O emissions in baseline scenario (d), eCO2 scenario (e), and ΔN2O (f); NOx emissions in baseline scenario (g), eCO2 scenario (h), and ΔNOx (i); NO3− in baseline scenario (j), eCO2 scenario (k), and ΔNO3− (l). Values in the legend reflect the average annual nitrogen budget from forest within a grid cell (0.5° × 0.5°). The base map is from GADM data.
Extended Data Fig. 9 A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of our meta-analysis.
It delineates the flow of information, indicating the number of relevant publications at various stages of the meta-analysis process, encompassing ‘Identification’, ‘Screening & Eligibility’, and ‘Included’.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6, Tables 1–3, Discussion, Terminology used in the study and references.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 5
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2
Statistical Source Data
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7
Statistical source data.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, J., Zheng, M., Bian, Z. et al. Elevated CO2 levels promote both carbon and nitrogen cycling in global forests. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 511–517 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01973-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01973-9
- Springer Nature Limited