Abstract
The radial structure of a galaxy is a fundamental property that reflects its growth and assembly history. Although it is straightforward to measure that of external galaxies, it is challenging for the Milky Way because of our inside perspective. Traditionally, the radial structure of the Milky Way has been assumed to be characterized by a single-exponential disk and a central bulge component. Here we report (1) a measurement of the age-resolved Galactic surface brightness profile in a wide radial range from R = 0 to 17 kpc and (2) the corresponding size of the Milky Way in terms of a half-light radius. We find a broken surface brightness profile with a nearly flat distribution between 3.5 and 7.5 kpc, in contrast to a canonical single-exponential disk. This broken profile results in a half-light radius of 5.75 ± 0.38 kpc, significantly larger than that inferred from a single-exponential disk profile but consistent with that of local disk galaxies of similar mass. We also confirm that the size growth history of the Milky Way is broadly consistent with high-redshift galaxies but with systematically smaller size. Our results suggest that the Milky Way has a more complex radial structure and larger size than previously expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data presented in this work are available from a public repository https://github.com/lianjianhui/Source-data-for-MW-size-paper.git.
References
van der Kruit, P. C. & Freeman, K. C. Galaxy disks. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49, 301–371 (2011).
Bland-Hawthorn, J. & Gerhard, O. The Galaxy in context: structural, kinematic, and integrated properties. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 529–596 (2016).
Bovy, J. et al. The spatial structure of mono-abundance sub-populations of the Milky Way disk. Astrophys. J. 753, 148 (2012).
Shen, J. & Zheng, X.-W. The bar and spiral arms in the Milky Way: structure and kinematics. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 159 (2020).
Pohlen, M. & Trujillo, I. The structure of galactic disks. Studying late-type spiral galaxies using SDSS. Astron. Astrophys. 454, 759–772 (2006).
Zasowski, G. et al. Target selection for the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE). Astron. J. 146, 81 (2013).
Majewski, S. R. et al. The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE). Astron. J. 154, 94 (2017).
Zasowski, G. et al. Target selection for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2 Survey. Astron. J. 154, 198 (2017).
Beaton, R. L. et al. Final targeting strategy for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 north survey. Astron. J. 162, 302 (2021).
Santana, F. A. et al. Final targeting strategy for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2S survey. Astron. J. 162, 303 (2021).
Jurić, M. et al. The Milky Way tomography with SDSS. I. Stellar number density distribution. Astrophys. J. 673, 864–914 (2008).
Licquia, T. C. & Newman, J. A. Improved estimates of the Milky Way’s stellar mass and star formation rate from hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Astrophys. J. 806, 96 (2015).
Boardman, N. et al. Milky Way analogues in MaNGA: multiparameter homogeneity and comparison to the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 3672–3701 (2020).
Bovy, J. et al. The stellar population structure of the Galactic disk. Astrophys. J. 823, 30 (2016).
Mackereth, J. T. et al. The age–metallicity structure of the Milky Way disc using APOGEE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 3057–3078 (2017).
Gaia Collaboration. et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A1 (2016).
Gaia Collaboration. et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A1 (2021).
Rojas-Arriagada, A. et al. The bimodal [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H] bulge sequence as revealed by APOGEE DR14. Astron. Astrophys. 626, A16 (2019).
Lian, J. et al. The Milky Way tomography with APOGEE: intrinsic density distribution and structure of mono-abundance populations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 4130–4151 (2022).
Cantat-Gaudin, T. et al. Uniting Gaia and APOGEE to unveil the cosmic chemistry of the Milky Way disc. Astron. Astrophys. 683, A128 (2024).
Xiang, M. et al. Stellar mass distribution and star formation history of the Galactic disk revealed by mono-age stellar populations from LAMOST. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 237, 33 (2018).
Erwin, P., Pohlen, M. & Beckman, J. E. The outer disks of early-type galaxies. I. Surface-brightness profiles of barred galaxies. Astron. J. 135, 20–54 (2008).
Zoccali, M. et al. Age and metallicity distribution of the Galactic bulge from extensive optical and near-IR stellar photometry. Astron. Astrophys. 399, 931–956 (2003).
Nataf, D. M. The controversial star-formation history and helium enrichment of the Milky Way bulge. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 33, e023 (2016).
Hasselquist, S. et al. Exploring the stellar age distribution of the Milky Way bulge using APOGEE. Astrophys. J. 901, 109 (2020).
Lian, J. et al. The Milky Way’s bulge star formation history as constrained from its bimodal chemical abundance distribution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 3557–3570 (2020).
Bovy, J. et al. Life in the fast lane: a direct view of the dynamics, formation, and evolution of the Milky Way’s bar. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 4740–4747 (2019).
Frankel, N., Sanders, J., Rix, H.-W., Ting, Y.-S. & Ness, M. The inside-out growth of the Galactic disk. Astrophys. J. 884, 99 (2019).
Minniti, D., Saito, R. K., Alonso-García, J., Lucas, P. W. & Hempel, M. The edge of the Milky Way stellar disk revealed using clump giant stars as distance indicators. Astrophys. J. Lett. 733, L43 (2011).
Sellwood, J. A. & Binney, J. J. Radial mixing in galactic discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336, 785–796 (2002).
Martínez-Serrano, F. J., Serna, A., Doménech-Moral, M. & Domínguez-Tenreiro, R. Disk galaxies with broken luminosity profiles from cosmological simulations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 705, L133–L137 (2009).
Ruiz-Lara, T. et al. Observational hints of radial migration in disc galaxies from CALIFA. Astron. Astrophys. 604, A4 (2017).
Lian, J. et al. Quantifying radial migration in the Milky Way: inefficient over short time-scales but essential to the very outer disc beyond 15 kpc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 5639–5655 (2022).
Shen, S. et al. The size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 343, 978–994 (2003).
Blanton, M. R., Kazin, E., Muna, D., Weaver, B. A. & Price-Whelan, A. Improved background subtraction for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey images. Astron. J. 142, 31 (2011).
York, D. G. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: technical summary. Astron. J. 120, 1579–1587 (2000).
Simard, L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R., Ellison, S. L. & McConnachie, A. W. A catalog of bulge+disk decompositions and updated photometry for 1.12 million galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 196, 11 (2011).
Willett, K. W. et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 2835–2860 (2013).
Hart, R. E. et al. Galaxy Zoo: comparing the demographics of spiral arm number and a new method for correcting redshift bias. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3663–3682 (2016).
Lian, J., Bergemann, M., Pillepich, A., Zasowski, G. & Lane, R. R. The integrated metallicity profile of the Milky Way. Nat. Astron. 7, 951–958 (2023).
van der Wel, A. et al. 3D-HST+CANDELS: the evolution of the galaxy size–mass distribution since z = 3. Astrophys. J. 788, 28 (2014).
Schönrich, R. & Binney, J. Chemical evolution with radial mixing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 396, 203–222 (2009).
Blanton, M. R. et al. Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, nearby galaxies, and the distant Universe. Astron. J. 154, 28 (2017).
Wilson, J. C. et al. The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) spectrographs. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 055001 (2019).
Bowen, I. S. & Vaughan, A. H. The optical design of the 40-in. telescope and of the Irénée DuPont telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. Appl. Opt. 12, 1430–1434 (1973).
Gunn, J. E. et al. The 2.5 m telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astron. J. 131, 2332–2359 (2006).
Nidever, D. L. et al. The data reduction pipeline for the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Astron. J. 150, 173 (2015).
García Pérez, A. E. et al. ASPCAP: the APOGEE stellar parameter and chemical abundances pipeline. Astron. J. 151, 144 (2016).
Smith, V. V. et al. The APOGEE Data Release 16 spectral line list. Astron. J. 161, 254 (2021).
Pinsonneault, M. H. et al. The second APOKASC catalog: the empirical approach. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 239, 32 (2018).
Mackereth, J. T. et al. Dynamical heating across the Milky Way disc using APOGEE and Gaia. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 176–195 (2019).
Leung, H. W. & Bovy, J. Deep learning of multi-element abundances from high-resolution spectroscopic data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 3255–3277 (2019).
Bressan, A. et al. PARSEC: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, 127–145 (2012).
Chen, Y. et al. Improving PARSEC models for very low mass stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 2525–2543 (2014).
Chen, Y. et al. PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars up to 350 M⊙ at metallicities 0.0001 ≤ Z ≤ 0.04. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 1068–1080 (2015).
Marigo, P. et al. A new generation of PARSEC-COLIBRI stellar isochrones including the TP-AGB phase. Astrophys. J. 835, 77 (2017).
Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. On galactic density modeling in the presence of dust extinction. Astrophys. J. 818, 130 (2016).
Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, 231–246 (2001).
Maraston, C. Evolutionary population synthesis: models, analysis of the ingredients and application to high-z galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 362, 799–825 (2005).
Choi, J. et al. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).
Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 222, 8 (2016).
Chen, B. Q. et al. Three-dimensional interstellar extinction map toward the Galactic bulge. Astron. Astrophys. 550, A42 (2013).
Launhardt, R., Zylka, R. & Mezger, P. G. The nuclear bulge of the Galaxy. III. Large-scale physical characteristics of stars and interstellar matter. Astron. Astrophys. 384, 112–139 (2002).
Sormani, M. C. et al. Jeans modelling of the Milky Way’s nuclear stellar disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 7–24 (2020).
Lian, J., Yan, R., Zhang, K. & Kong, X. The quenching timescale and quenching rate of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 832, 29 (2016).
Kauffmann, G. et al. The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346, 1055–1077 (2003).
Brinchmann, J. et al. The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, 1151–1179 (2004).
Acknowledgements
J.L. acknowledges support from Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department (Grant Nos. 202005AB160002, 202105AE160021 and 202305AT350002) and the Start-up Fund of Yunnan University (Grant No. CY22623101). B.C. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.12173034 and 12322304). N.F.B. acknowledges support from the Science and Technologies Facilities Council (Grant No. ST/V000861/1). Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the US Department of Energy Office of Science and the participating institutions. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS web site is www.sdss.org. SDSS-IV is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the participating institutions of the SDSS Collaboration including the Brazilian Participation Group, the Carnegie Institution for Science, Carnegie Mellon University, the Chilean Participation Group, the French Participation Group, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Johns Hopkins University, the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics at the University of Tokyo, the Korean Participation Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy at Heidelberg, the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics at Garching, the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, the National Astronomical Observatories of China, New Mexico State University, New York University, University of Notre Dame, National Observatory of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, the United Kingdom Participation Group, the National Autonomous University of Mexico, University of Arizona, University of Colorado Boulder, University of Oxford, University of Portsmouth, University of Utah, University of Virginia, University of Washington, University of Wisconsin, Vanderbilt University and Yale University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.L. developed the initial idea. J.L. and G.Z. prepared the APOGEE data and calculated the APOGEE survey selection function. J.L. conducted the data analysis. B.C. provided the alternative dust extinction map towards the inner Galaxy. T.W. prepared the Gaia data for confirmation of the inner flattened profile. J.L., G.Z., B.C., J.I., N.B. and X.L. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lian, J., Zasowski, G., Chen, B. et al. The broken-exponential radial structure and larger size of the Milky Way galaxy. Nat Astron (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02315-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02315-7
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The Milky Way is ‘less weird’ than we thought
Nature (2024)