Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are processed products of primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) and regulate the target gene expression. Though the regulatory roles of the several mature plant miRNAs have been studied in detail, the functions of other regions of the pri-miRNAs are still unrecognized. Recent studies suggest that a few pri-miRNAs may encode small peptides, miRNA-encoded peptides (miPEPs); however, the functions of these peptides have not been studied in detail. We report that the pri-miR858a of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a small peptide, miPEP858a, which regulates the expression of pri-miR858a and associated target genes. miPEP858a-edited and miPEP858a-overexpressing lines showed altered plant development and accumulated modulated levels of flavonoids due to changes in the expression of genes associated with the phenylpropanoid pathway and auxin signalling. The exogenous treatment of the miPEP858a-edited plants with synthetic miPEP858a complemented the phenotypes and the gene function. This study suggests the importance of miPEP858a in exerting control over plant development and the phenylpropanoid pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Catalanotto, C., Cogoni, C. & Zardo, G. MicroRNA in control of gene expression: an overview of nuclear functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1712 (2016).
Vasudevan, S. Functional validation of microRNA–target RNA interactions. Methods 58, 126–134 (2012).
Ambros, V. MicroRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 107, 823–826 (2001).
Pillai, R. S. MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA 11, 1753–1761 (2005).
Chen, X. Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 21–44 (2009).
Bartel, D. P. & Chen, C. Z. Micromanagers of gene expression: the potentially widespread influence of metazoan microRNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 396–400 (2004).
Song, Q. X. et al. Identification of miRNAs and their target genes in developing soybean seeds by deep sequencing.BMC Plant Biol. 11, 5 (2011).
Nithin, C. et al. Computational prediction of miRNAs and their targets in Phaseolus vulgaris using simple sequence repeat signatures. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 140 (2015).
Liu, H., Yu, H., Tang, G. & Huang, T. Small but powerful: function of microRNAs in plant development. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 515–528 (2018).
Yu, Y., Jia, T. & Chen, X. The ‘how’ and ‘where’ of plant microRNAs. New Phytol. 216, 1002–1017 (2017).
Reinhart, B. J., Weinstein, E. G., Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, B. & Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev. 16, 1616–1626 (2002).
Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. & Bartel, B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 19–53 (2006).
Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297 (2004).
Kurihara, Y. & Watanabe, Y. Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12753–12758 (2004).
Lee, Y. MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 23, 4051–4060 (2004).
Lee, Y. et al. MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 21, 4663–4670 (2002).
Tang, G., Reinhart, B. J., Bartel, D. P. & Zamore, P. D. A biochemical framework for RNA silencing in plants. Genes Dev. 17, 49–63 (2003).
Kumar, S., Verma, S. & Trivedi, P. K. Involvement of small RNAs in phosphorus and sulfur sensing, signaling and stress: current update. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 285 (2017).
Tang, J. & Chu, C. MicroRNAs in crop improvement: fine-tuners for complex traits. Nat. Plants 3, 17077 (2017).
Lauressergues, D. et al. Primary transcripts of microRNAs encode regulatory peptides. Nature 520, 90–93 (2015).
Couzigou, J. M., Lauressergues, D., Becard, G. & Combier, J. P. MiRNA-encoded peptides (miPEPs): a new tool to analyze the roles of miRNAs in plant biology. RNA Biol. 12, 1178–1180 (2015).
Couzigou, J. M., Andre, O., Guillotin, B., Alexandre, M. & Combier, J. P. Use of microRNA-encoded peptide miPEP172c to stimulate nodulation in soybean. New Phytol. 211, 379–381 (2016).
Couzigou, J. M. et al. Gene regulation by a natural protective miRNA enables arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Cell Host Microbe 11, 106–112 (2017).
Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis: a colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 126, 485–493 (2001).
Buer, C. S. & Muday, G. K. The transparent testa4 mutation prevents flavonoid synthesis and alters auxin transport and the response of Arabidopsis roots to gravity and light. Plant Cell 16, 1191–1205 (2004).
Santelia, D. et al. Flavonoids redirect PIN mediated polar auxin fluxes during root gravitropic responses. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31218–31226 (2008).
Quattrocchio, F. et al. PH4 of Petunia is an R2R3 MYB protein that activates vacuolar acidification through interactions with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors of the anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell 18, 1274–1291 (2006).
Stracke, R. et al. Differential regulation of closely related R2R3-MYB transcription factors controls flavonol accumulation in different parts of the Arabidopsis thaliana seedling. Plant J. 50, 660–677 (2007).
Misra, P. et al. Modulation of transcriptome and metabolome of tobacco by Arabidopsis transcription factor, AtMYB12, leads to insect resistance. Plant Physiol. 152, 2258–2268 (2010).
Seleem, D., Pardi, V. & Murata, R. M. Review of flavonoids: a diverse group of natural compounds with anti-Candida albicans activity in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 76, 76–83 (2017).
Sharma, D. et al. MicroRNA858 is a potential regulator of phenylpropanoid pathway and plant development. Plant Physiol. 171, 944–959 (2016).
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Song, Z. & Zhang, H. Repression of MYBL2 by both microRNA858a and HY5 leads to the activation of anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 9, 1395–1405 (2016).
Pandey, A. et al. Expression of Arabidopsis MYB transcription factor, AtMYB111, in tobacco requires light to modulate flavonol content. Sci. Rep. 4, 5018 (2014).
Mehrtens, F., Kranz, H., Bednarek, P. & Weisshaar, B. The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB12 is a flavonol-specific regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 138, 1083–1096 (2005).
Stracke, R. et al. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor HY5 regulates expression of the PFG1/MYB12 gene in response to light and ultraviolet-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 88–103 (2010).
Rosany, C. R., Beatriz, V. T. & Blanca, S. S. MiR858-mediated regulation of flavonoid-specific MYB transcription factor genes controls resistance to pathogen infection in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 190–204 (2018).
Piya, S., Kihm, C., Rice, J. H., Baum, T. J. & Hewezia, T. Cooperative regulatory functions of miR858 and MYB83 during cyst nematode parasitism. Plant Physiol. 174, 1897–1912 (2017).
Ormancey, M. et al. Internalization of miPEP165a into Arabidopsis roots depends on both passive diffusion and endocytosis-associated processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2266 (2020).
Waterhouse, P. M. & Hellens, R. P. Coding in non-coding RNAs. Nature 520, 41–42 (2015).
Li, J. F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated plant genome editing via guide RNA/Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688–691 (2013).
Bhatia, C. et al. Low temperature enhanced flavonol synthesis requires light-associated regulatory components in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 2099–2112 (2018).
Brown, D. E. et al. Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126, 524–535 (2001).
Peer, W. A. & Murphy, A. S. Flavonoids and auxin transport: modulators or regulators? Trends Plant Sci. 12, 556–563 (2007).
Yin, R. et al. Kaempferol 3‐O‐rhamnoside‐7‐O‐rhamnoside is an endogenous flavonol inhibitor of polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis shoots. New Phytol. 201, 466–475 (2014).
Tan, H. et al. A crucial role of GA-regulated flavonol biosynthesis in root growth of Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12, 521–537 (2019).
Cheng, Y., Dai, X. & Zhao, Y. Auxin synthesized by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases is essential for embryogenesis and leaf formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 2430–2439 (2007).
Bao, Z., Clancy, M. A., Carvalho, R. F., Elliott, K. & Folta, K. M. Identification of novel growth regulators in plant populations expressing random peptides. Plant Physiol. 175, 619–627 (2017).
Vanyushin, B. F., Ashapkin, V. V. & Aleksandrushkina, N. I. Regulatory peptides in plants. Biokhimiya 82, 189–195 (2017).
Grillet, L. et al. IRON MAN is a ubiquitous family of peptides that control iron transport in plants. Nat. Plants 4, 953 (2018).
Sauter, M. Phytosulphokine peptide signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5161–5169 (2015).
Tabata, R. & Sawa, S. Maturation processes and structures of small secreted peptides in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 311 (2014).
Nakaminami, K. et al. AtPep3 is a hormone-like peptide that plays a role in the salinity stress tolerance of plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5810–5815 (2018).
Takahashi, F. et al. A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature 556, 235–238 (2018).
Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J. & Parrott, W. A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 15, 16 (2015).
Zhao, Y. et al. An alternative strategy for targeted gene replacement in plants using a dual-sgRNA/Cas9 design. Sci. Rep. 6, 23890 (2016).
Zhou, J. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 based genome editing reveals new insights into microRNA function and regulation in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1598 (2017).
Matsubayashi, Y. et al. Disruption and overexpression of Arabidopsis phytosulfokine receptor gene affects cellular longevity and potential for growth. Plant Physiol. 142, 45–53 (2006).
Kutschmar, A. et al. PSK‐α promotes root growth in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 181, 820–831 (2009).
Fiers, M. et al. Mis-expression of the CLV3/ESR-like gene CLE19 in Arabidopsis leads to a consumption of root meristem. Gene 327, 37–49 (2004).
Fletcher, J. C. et al. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283, 1911–1914 (1999).
Chae, K. & Lord, E. M. Pollen tube growth and guidance: roles of small, secreted proteins. Ann. Bot. 108, 627–636 (2011).
Qian, P. et al. The CLE9/10 secretory peptide regulates stomatal and vascular development through distinct receptors. Nat. Plants 4, 10–38 (2018).
Jun, J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of CLE polypeptide signaling gene expression and overexpression activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 154, 1721–1736 (2010).
Brown, D. E. et al. Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126, 524–535 (2001).
Tan, H. A crucial role of GA-regulated flavonol biosynthesis in root growth of Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12, 521–537 (2019).
Xing, H. L. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 327 (2014).
Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).
Jefferson, R. A. The GUS reporter gene system. Nature 342, 837–838 (1989).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \(2^{-{{\Delta\Delta{C}}_{\rm{T}}}}\) method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Kim, J. I. et al. Indole glucosinolate biosynthesis limits phenylpropanoid accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 27, 1529–1546 (2015).
Bruce, R. J. & West, C. A. Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and isoperoxidase activity by pectic fragments in suspension cultures of castor bean. Plant Physiol. 91, 889–897 (1989).
Li, S. et al. MYB75 phosphorylation by MPK4 is required for light-Induced anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 2866–2883 (2016).
Loyola, R. et al. The photomorphogenic factors UV-B RECEPTOR 1, ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5, and HY5 HOMOLOGUE are part of the UV-B signalling pathway in grapevine and mediate flavonol accumulation in response to the environment. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 5429–5445 (2016).
Niranjan, A. et al. Development and optimization of HPLC-PDA-MS-MS method for simultaneous quantification of three classes of flavonoids in legume seeds, vegetables, fruits and medicinal plants. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 34, 1729–1742 (2011).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 7, 248–254 (1976).
Acknowledgements
We thank Q.-J. Chen at China Agriculture University for the pHSE401 vector. This research was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, in the form of NCP project no. MLP026. P.K.T. also acknowledges the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, for financial support in the form of projects on pathway engineering, genome editing and a TATA Innovation Fellowship. A.S., P.K.B., D.S. and C.B. acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, and the University Grants Commission (UGC) for a Senior Research Fellowship, respectively. CSIR-NBRI manuscript number: MS/2020/07/04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.S. and P.K.T. conceived and designed the study. A.S., P.K.B. and C.B. participated in the execution of all the experiments. A.S., P.K.B., C.B., D.S. and P.K.T. interpreted and discussed the data. A.S., P.K.B., C.B., D.S. and P.K.T. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Overexpression of miPEP858a alters metabolite levels as compared to WT.
a-b, Quantification of total anthocyanin and flavonols in 10-day old seedlings of WT and OX miPEP lines. c, Quantification of lignin in 35-day old stem of WT and OX miPEP plants. For (a-c), the experiments were repeated three times independently with similar results. Small open circles represent individual values. d, Representative images of transverse sections of stem of 35-day old WT and OX miPEP plants stained with phluoroglucinol showing changes in lignin content. The experiment was repeated three times with n= 5 biologically independent replicates with similar results. e-f, Length of vascular bundles and interfascicular fiber of 35-day old stem of WT and OX miPEP plants, n=15 (small open circles represent individual values). These experiments were repeated three times independently with similar results. g, Expression analysis of lignin biosynthesis genes in 35-day old stem of WT and OX miPEP plants. The experiments were repeated three times independently with similar results. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are plotted as means ±SD. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks indicate a significant difference, *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Exogenous application of miPEP858a does not restore the function of miR858 in miR858CR plants.
a-c, Representative images of 10 days old seedlings of WT and CRISPR/cas9 edited miR858CR lines grown on 1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with water (control), 0.25 μM miPEP858a and 0.25 μM NSP (scale bars, 1 cm). d, Root length of 10 days old seedlings of WT and CRISPR/cas9 edited miR858CR lines grown on 1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with water (control), 0.25 μM miPEP858a and 0.25 μM NSP, (n=30 independent seedlings, small open circles). The experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are plotted as means ±SD. Error bars represent standard deviation Asterisks indicate a significant difference, *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns represents no significant difference.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Exogenous application of miPEP858a complements function of the peptide in miPEPCR plants.
a, Representative image showing altered bolting in WT and CRISPR edited miPEP lines after spraying with water and miPEP858a. b, Change in bolting time of WT and CRISPR edited miPEP lines after spraying with water and 0.25 μM miPEP858a, n=10 independent plants (small open circles). c, Representative image showing change in plant height of WT and CRISPR edited miPEP lines after spraying with water and 0.25 μM miPEP858a. d, Change in plant height (cm) of WT and CRISPR edited miPEP lines after spraying with water and 0.25 μM miPEP858a, n=10 independent plants (small open circles). e, Representative images of transverse sections of stem of 35-day old WT and CRISPR edited miPEP plants sprayed with water and 0.25 μM miPEP858a, stained with phluoroglucinol showing changes in lignin content. f-g, Length of interfascicular fiber and vascular bundles of 35-day old stem of WT and CRISPR edited miPEP plants sprayed with water and 0.25 μM miPEP858a, n=10 (small open circles represent individual values). Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are plotted as means ±SD. Error bars represent standard deviation Asterisks indicate a significant difference, *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 4 miPEP858a and miR858a regulate plant growth and development via auxin transport.
a, Representative image of 10-day old WT and CRISPR/Cas9 edited miR858aCR, miR858bCR, miR858abCR, pre-miR858aCR, miPEP858aCR, OX miPEP858a and OX miR858a seedling grown on 1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with ethanol (control) and 25 μM TIBA (scale bars, 1 cm). b, c, Root length of 10-day old WT and CRISPR/Cas9 edited miR858aCR, miR858bCR, miR858abCR, pre-miR858aCR, miPEP858aCR, OX miPEP858a and OX miR858a seedling lines grown on 1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with ethanol (control) and 25 μM TIBA (n=30 independent seedlings, small open circles). d, e, Quantification of AUX1, PIN1, ABCB19 and YUC1 in 30-day old rosette of WT and CRISPR/Cas9 edited miR858aCR, miR858bCR, miR858abCR, pre-miR858aCR, miPEP858aCR, OX miPEP858a and OX miR858a. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are plotted as means ±SD. Error bars represent standard deviation Asterisks indicate a significant difference between control and treatment, *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–20 and Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, A., Badola, P.K., Bhatia, C. et al. Primary transcript of miR858 encodes regulatory peptide and controls flavonoid biosynthesis and development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 1262–1274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00769-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00769-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Micropeptides: potential treatment strategies for cancer
Cancer Cell International (2024)
-
Fine-tuning plant valuable secondary metabolite biosynthesis via small RNA manipulation: strategies and potential
Planta (2024)
-
The LasmiR858-MYB111 module enhances the antioxidant capacity of green leaf lettuce by promoting flavonoid biosynthesis
Plant Growth Regulation (2024)
-
Selective allele stacking of a novel quantitative trait locus facilitates the enhancement of seed epicatechin content in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)
Euphytica (2024)
-
Coordination among flower pigments, scents and pollinators in ornamental plants
Horticulture Advances (2024)