Abstract
The voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.2 is essential for cardiac and vessel smooth muscle contractility and brain function. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that malfunctions of CaV1.2 are involved in brain and heart diseases. Pharmacological inhibition of CaV1.2 is therefore of therapeutic value. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of CaV1.2 in the absence or presence of the antirheumatic drug tetrandrine or antihypertensive drug benidipine. Tetrandrine acts as a pore blocker in a pocket composed of S6II, S6III, and S6IV helices and forms extensive hydrophobic interactions with CaV1.2. Our structure elucidates that benidipine is located in the DIII-DIV fenestration site. Its hydrophobic sidechain, phenylpiperidine, is positioned at the exterior of the pore domain and cradled within a hydrophobic pocket formed by S5DIII, S6DIII, and S6DIV helices, providing additional interactions to exert inhibitory effects on both L-type and T-type voltage gated calcium channels. These findings provide the structural foundation for the rational design and optimization of therapeutic inhibitors of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Voltage-gated calcium channels can be classified into high voltage activated calcium channels (HVAs) and low voltage activated calcium channels (LVAs)1,2. HVA (CaV1 and CaV2) contains pore-forming subunit α1, auxiliary subunits α2δ and β, whereas LVA (CaV3) contains only α1. CaV1 channels are defined as L-type due to their long-lasting current3. L-type CaV1.2 plays an essential role in cardiac and smooth muscle contractility, neuroendocrine regulation, and multiple other processes4,5,6. It is expressed in the brain, cardiomyocytes, sinoatrial node, vascular system, pancreatic islets, arsenal medulla, and intestinal/bladder smooth muscle. CaV1.2 is predominant in contraction in atrial, ventricular, and vascular excitable tissues as it triggers the release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum terminal cistern for actin-myosin interaction and thus is the uppermost target for the treatment of hypertension and one of the therapeutic targets of arrhythmia4. Meanwhile, approximately 90% of the L-type calcium channels in the brain are CaV1.2 (refs. 7,8,9). It is highly expressed in hippocampal neurons, participates in long-term synaptic plasticity and is essential for the formation of spatial memory, fear memory, and emotional behaviors9,10,11,12,13,14. Its malfunction is related to schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder15. CaV1.2 also plays an essential role in early development, regulating chondrogenesis16,17. Inherited mutations of CaV1.2 are associated with serious diseases, including cardiac and vessel diseases as well as neuronal disorders18,19,20.
The discovery of more drug binding patterns is one of the practical goals in structural biology. There are various marketed drugs targeting CaV1.2. In previous studies, the structures of L-type calcium channels bound with dihydropyridine (commercial name: nifedipine), phenylamine (verapamil), benzothiazine (diltiazem), and diphenylmethyl piperazine (cinnarizine) were resolved21,22. However, there are still unidentified inhibition mechanisms of clinical drugs remaining to be clarified. For instance, tetrandrine is a dibenzyl isoquinoline alkaloid and functions as a voltage gated calcium channel antagonist23,24,25. Similar to the well-known artemisinin, tetrandrine is an effective ingredient extracted from traditional Chinese medicine and is attracting more attention due to its diverse pharmacological effects. It is currently used in the clinic for anti-rheumatism and analgesia, as well as for the treatment of lung cancer and silicosis, and shows an effect of lowering blood pressure26,27,28,29,30. Analyzing the binding mode between CaV1.2 and tetrandrine can expand our understanding of ion channel inhibitors and provide structural bases for further modification and optimization of such drugs. However, different sidechain modifications of dihydropyridine may cause different pharmacological effects and varied affinity toward ion channels. For example, in guinea pig ventricular cells, the IC50 values of benidipine and nifedipine are at least 10 times different, providing a reference for affinity optimization of dihydropyridine or other drugs. To explain these phenomena, further analyses of more dihydropyridine drugs are still desirable. Moreover, many pathogenic mutations cause distortion of the electrophysiological properties of CaV1.2. As pathogenic mutation sites are usually not strictly conserved in L-type calcium channels, the lack of CaV1.2 structure limits the understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of these mutations.
In this study, we determine the near-atomic resolution cryo-EM structure of apo CaV1.2 and analyzed the distribution pattern as well as potential impacts on the gating of a collection of pathogenic mutations in CaV1.2. In addition, we solve the CaV1.2 complex structures in the presence of tetrandrine or benidipine. Tetrandrine blocks the pore of CaV1.2, interacting with hydrophobic residues in the central cavity. The mutations N741W (Asn-to-Trp mutation at the position 741) and N1179W can significantly reduce the inhibition of tetrandrine, confirming that a large cavity space is needed for tetrandrine blocking. Benidipine is located in the fenestration between DIII and DIV. The hydrophobic sidechain of benidipine provides extra interactions with the channel subunit α1, supporting the inhibition of both L- and T-type voltage gated calcium channels. These results elucidate how the chemical groups of these inhibitors subtly remodeled their interactions with CaV1.2.
Results and discussion
Architecture of the CaV1.2 channel complex
To investigate the inhibitory mechanism of CaV1.2-targeting drugs, we co-expressed the human CaV1.2 with its physiological auxiliary subunits α2δ1 and β2b in HEK293 cells. The genes encoding these three subunits were subcloned into pEG-BacMam vector. We also carried out whole-cell patch clamp using HEK293T cells to characterize the functional properties of these constructs (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The subunits expressed with these constructs form a functional complex, showing an activation curve similar to those from previous studies31,32, and the half-activation voltage (V1/2) of the recombinant channel is +1.0 (±0.5) mV. Subsequent purification experiments resulted in a sharp and symmetrical SEC profile, indicating homogeneity of the sample of the channel complex. The SDS-PAGE gel confirmed that the purified sample contained all three subunits (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Next, we collected cryo-EM data using Titan2 Krios and carried out single-particle cryo-EM analysis. The three-dimensional cryo-EM maps of CaV1.2 in the apo state (denoted as CaV1.2apo), tetrandrine bound state (CaV1.2TET), and benidipine bound state (CaV1.2BEN) were determined at 3.5-Å, 3.4-Å, and 3.3-Å resolutions, respectively. These maps are rich in structural features, including densities for sidechains, N-glycans, and lipid molecules, and allowed us to reliably build atomic models of these CaV1.2 complexes (Supplementary Figs. 2–3) (Supplementary Table 1).
The structure of the CaV1.2 channel complex is composed of a pore-forming α1 subunit and auxiliary subunits α2δ1 and β2b (Fig. 1a, b). Its α1 subunit consists of four repeat transmembrane domains (DI−DIV). Each domain contains six transmembrane helices (S1−S6) and forms the channel in a domain-swapped fashion. The S1−S4 helices constitute the voltage sensing domain (VSD) to detect changes in the cross-membrane electrostatic potential. Consistent with all known structures of voltage-gated channels, the S4 helix assumes a 310-helical conformation. The S5−S6 regions of all four domains form the pore domain to facilitate and control the passage of ions (Fig. 1c, d). The selectivity filter (SF) is contributed by the re-entrant loops from each subunit that connect S5 and S6 and include P1 and P2 helices (Fig. 1e). In contrast to the conformational heterogeneity of the α-interaction domain (AID) found in CaV1.1 (ref. 33), AID is well resolved in the current CaV1.2 structure, with its N- and C-termini adjacent to the intracellular gate and VSDII, respectively (Fig. 1a). The selectivity filter contains four acidic residues (E363DI, E706DII, E1135DIII, and E1464DIV; i.e. the EEEE motif), one from each domain, producing a strongly negatively charged zone to attract cations and determine selectivity for Ca2+ ions33 (Fig. 1e). On the cytoplasmic side, the four S6 helices bundle together and act as a gate to control the access of ions into the pore (Fig. 1f). The pore diameter profile indicates that the current structure represents an inactivated state with a closed intracellular gate (Fig. 1d). Although all S4 helices in the four VSDs are in an ‘up’ conformation, the intracellular gate remains closed, suggesting that the structure of CaV1.2 was captured in an inactivated state. In addition, the α2δ1 subunit was clearly resolved and sits on the extracellular side of CaV1.2, interacting with the E149, D150, and D151 residues from the DI repeat. The β2b subunit is composed of a GK domain and an SH3 domain and is associated with the cytosolic AID region of CaV1.2 (Fig. 1). A lipid molecule was observed in the DI−DII fenestration of CaV1.2apo, consistent with other structure studies on CaV1.2 (refs. 34,35,36).
The structure of CaV1.2apo was compared with that of CaV1.1 (PDB ID: 5GJW)33, giving rise to an RMSD of 1.35 Å for 1772 Cα-pairs. The overall structure, including VSD, SF, and extracellular loops (ECLs), is fairly superimposable (Supplementary Fig. 4a). In both structures, in the absence of applied membrane potential, all VSDs show an “up” conformation of the S4 helices and are thus in the “activated” state. However, some structural differences are observed between the structures of CaV1.2apo and CaV1.1. For example, two π-bulges occur on the S6DI and S6DIII helices of CaV1.2apo, whereas both helices assume a canonical α-helix conformation in CaV1.1. The sidechains of residues on the intracellular segment, starting from F394S6I and F1175S6III, undergo an approximate 90° rotation (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The residues forming the central cavity and the intracellular gate differs from that in CaV1.1. In specific, the side chain of F394 and F1175 face the central cavity, causing a shrinkage of the inner radius of the pore domain (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). In CaV1.1, the intracellular gate is constituted by V329, L333, F656, A660, F1060, V1064 F1376, and I1380. With the local conformational shifts on the S6 helices in CaV1.2, the intracellular gate is formed by L401, S405, L749, V753, V1182, I1186, F1519, and I1523 (Supplementary Fig. 4e). A previous study on TRPV6 channel suggested that the transition from an α-helix to a π-helix may prompt channel opening37. However, despite such transition being observed in CaV1.2, its intracellular gate remains closed (Supplementary Fig. 4f).
Pathogenic mutations of CaV1.2
Dysfunction of CaV1.2 usually causes heart and vessel diseases and neurological disorders18,19,20. At least 86 mutations of the CaV1.2 α1 subunit have been identified in various cases of human diseases, including Timothy syndrome (TS), long QT syndrome 8 (LQTS), short QT syndrome (SQTS), Brugada syndrome (BrS), autism, and schizophrenia, among others (Supplementary data). Our current CaV1.2 structure provides a template to map these disease-related mutations into the 3D structure. Among these mutants, 39 sites are distributed on the four VSDs, pore domain, and C-terminal domain (CTD) (Fig. 2). The VSDII and pore domain harbor most of the pathogenic mutations. The remaining 47 mutation sites are mainly distributed on the N-terminus, cytosolic long linkers between different domains (mainly DII−DIII), and the C-terminal tail, and they were not determined due to conformational heterogeneity.
Three gain-of-function (GOF) mutations have been identified and verified by electrophysiological experiments. G402S and G406R were found in Timothy syndrome cases, and they inhibit voltage-dependent inactivation of CaV1.2 (refs. 18,38). Since all G406 substitutions to other amino acid residues, such as alanine, serine, and valine, impair the inactivation process, the function of G406 is proposed as irreplaceable38. In our CaV1.2 structure, both G402 and G406 are located on the S6DI helix and close to the intracellular gate (Supplementary Fig. 5b). We speculate that the absence of a sidechain in glycine at these two positions is essential for the conformational transition from the open state to the inactivated state, and replacement by a sidechain-containing residue at either of these two positions probably hinders the transition.
In a previous study, L762F associated with LQTS was found to result in a GOF defect with slower inactivation39. In the current CaV1.2 structure, L762 on the S6DII helix is located around the cytosolic membrane surface. Its sidechain points toward the AID motif and the S4-S5DII linker helix (Supplementary Fig. 5c). We speculate that the mutation L762F results in steric hindrance with AID or S4-S5DII helices, leading to a conformational change in these helices and affecting channel inactivation kinetics.
N300D is a loss-of-function (LOF) mutation and has been identified in Brugada syndrome patients40. This mutation leads to a decrease in the current density by impairing the expression level of CaV1.2 in the membrane40. N300 is located in the extracellular loop between S5DI and S6DI (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and is exposed to the interface between the α1 and α2δ1 subunits, which is essential for trafficking of the CaV1.2 complex41,42. N300D may thus affect traffic by disturbing the interaction with α2δ1. In addition, E1135K is another LOF mutation identified in patients with idiopathic QT prolongation, bradycardia, and autism spectrum disorder43,44. This mutation is positioned in the EEEE motif of the selectivity filter in the current CaV1.2 structure (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 5d). Electrophysiological experiments demonstrated that the E1135K mutation makes CaV1.2 a nonselective monovalent cation channel, in line with functional roles of the EEEE motif in determining ion selectivity44,45.
Previous studies have indicated that R511Q, R518C, and R518H are associated with LQTS and cardiac only Timothy syndrome46,47. In the current CaV1.2 structure, R511 and R518 are located at a cytosolic amphiphilic helix N-terminal to S1DII (denoted as S0DII). The S0DII helix is rich in positive charged residues (511RFCRRKCRAAVK522) that electrostatically interact with the negatively charged C-terminus of AID (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Electrophysiological experiments demonstrated that pathogenic mutations associated with R511 and R518 result in slower inactivation46,47. We speculate that these mutations interfere with the interaction between S0DII and AID and thus affect the conformation of AID relative to the pore domain, resulting in reduced inactivation. This speculation is consistent with the notion that AID is important for regulating channel inactivation48,49.
Recognition of tetrandrine
Tetrandrine is a traditional Chinese clinical agent for autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension. It is extracted from the root of Stephania tetrandra S Moore and inhibits both L-type and T-type CaV channels25,50,51. To explore the molecular basis how tetrandrine blocks the activity of CaV1.2, tetrandrine (10 μM) was added during protein expression and purification. We determined the tetrandrine-bound CaV1.2 complex (CaV1.2TET) at 3.4-Å resolution (Supplementary Fig. 2). In our cryo-EM map, we found a well-resolved triangle-shaped density in the central cavity of the pore domain, which is well fitted with the tetrandrine molecule and positioned proximal to the selectivity filter (Fig. 3a–c). The two major moieties of the 6,7-dimethoxy-2-methyl-1-benzyl-isoquinoline ring are positioned close to the DII−DIII fenestration site and DIV, and they are stabilized by forming hydrophobic or Van Der Waals interactions with surrounding residues from the selectivity filter and S6 helices (Fig. 3d, e). In particular, the residues F1175S6III, M1178S6III, A1512S6IV, I1516S6IV, and F1519S6IV play important roles in stabilizing tetrandrine. The 6,7-dimethoxy and 2/2’-N groups from the isoquinoline ring form hydrogen bonds with the N741S6II and Y1508S6IV/N1179S6III residues. In addition, in agreement with observations in drug-bound CaV3.3 complex structures52, a lipid molecule penetrates through the fenestration site between DI and DII and participates in hydrophobic interactions with the tetrandrine molecule (Fig. 3d, e). Compared with other drug binding modes observed in the previously reported CaV1.1 structures, we found that the tetrandrine binding mode is distinct from those of nifedipine (a DHP derivative), verapamil (PAA), diltiazem (BTZ), and cinnarizine (CIN) (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In particular, tetrandrine completely squeezes the binding site of BTZ (Supplementary Fig. 6b), consistent with previous experimental results showing that tetrandrine and diltiazem cannot simultaneously bind to L-type CaV channels53. To validate the binding site of tetrandrine, we designed two mutants, N741W and N1179W, with the potential to create steric clash between tetrandrine and the binding site. We determined the dose-response curves of tetrandrine for both wild-type and these two mutants. The curves for both mutants exhibited a rightward shift compared to that of wild-type CaV1.2, indicating that these mutants reduce the sensitivity of these mutants to tetrandrine. The derived IC50 values for tetrandrine with the N741W and N1179W mutants are 71.3 nM and 41.8 nM, respectively, which are higher than that of wild-type (~14.2 nM) (Fig. 3), further confirming the binding site of tetrandrine.
Antagonism of benidipine
1,4-Dihydropyridine derivatives (DHPs), such as nifedipine, selectively inhibit certain voltage gated calcium channels and are widely used clinically for the treatment of hypertension54. However, DHPs frequently cause side effects such as proteinuria, upon chronic use. The specific inhibition of L-type calcium channels is usually an advantage but is a defect in the kidney. The reason is that L-type channels are distributed in the kidney glomerulus afferent arteriole but are absent in the efferent arteriole. This inconsistent inhibition results in unbalanced local blood pressure, leading to kidney damage with proteinuria55,56. However, benidipine, another DHP derivative, can additionally inhibit T-type calcium channels, which are more abundant in efferent arterioles than in afferent arterioles, making blood pressure more balanced in different parts of the kidney. Compared with nifedipine and amlodipine, benidipine causes fewer adverse side effects, such as proteinuria and leg edema55,57,58; therefore, it is widely used in the clinic. Compared with nifedipine, benidipine replaces 8-nitrophenyl with 9-nitrophenyl and 3-carboxylic acid methyl ester with 3-(1-phenylmethyl-3-piperidinyl) ester. By supplementing benidipine when solubilizing the membrane and before preparing the cryo-EM sample, we obtained a 3.3-Å resolution benidipine-bound CaV1.2 structure (CaV1.2BEN) (Supplementary Fig. 2).
The benidipine molecule penetrates into the DIII−DIV fenestration and corresponds to a ‘claw’ shape density in the map (Fig. 4a, b). Unlike the pore-blocker tetrandrine, benidipine does not directly block the pore but allosterically inhibits CaV1.2. The main moiety of dihydropyridine is biased towards DIII (Fig. 4c). The nitrogen atom on the pyridine ring forms a potential hydrogen bond with S1132P1 (Fig. 4d). The nitrogen atom on 9-nitrophenyl and the oxygen atom on 5-dicarboxylic acid of the pyridine ring form hydrogen bonds with T1056S5III and Q1060S5III, respectively (Fig. 4d). Whereas similar interactions with T935 and Q939 have been identified in the structure of the CaV1.1 complex, benidipine also contains a phenylmethyl piperidinyl group, which is positioned in a hydrophobic pocket formed by residues I1046S5III, I1049S5III, V1053S5III, F1181S6III, M1509S6IV, and F1513S6IV, providing additional hydrophobic interactions to stabilize its binding, in line with the inhibitory IC50 of benidipine being approximately ten times smaller than that of nifedipine59 (Fig. 4d, e). Previous studies indicated that nifedipine specifically inhibits L-type CaV channels, showing no sensitivity to N- and T-type CaV channels60,61,62. In contrast, benidipine, in addition to L-type CaV channel, can also inhibit both N-type and T-type CaV channels, with IC50 values of approximately 35 μM and 11 μM, respectively59,63,64. To understand the molecular basis of how benidipine is recognized by CaV3.1, we compared the benidipine-bound CaV1.2 structure with that of CaV3.1, and the result illustrates that most of the residues participating in benidipine binding are also conserved in CaV3.1, such as V1053S5III, F1129DIIIP1, and F1513S6IV. Although I1046S5III, M1178S6III, F1181S6III, and M1509S6IV in CaV1.2 are substituted by L1386S5III, V1505S6III, M1508S6III, and L1813S6IV in CaV3.1, respectively, we speculate that these substitutions by similar residues are tolerable and that the relatively conserved binding pocket underlies the basis for how benidipine acts as an inhibitor in multiple voltage gated calcium channels (Fig. 4f). Moreover, two residues, T1056 and Q1060, play pivotal roles in the binding of DHP drugs to L-type CaV channels. However, these residues are not conserved in N-type and T-type CaV. Residue T1056 of CaV1.2 is substituted by Y1289 in CaV2.2, and residue Q1060 is replaced by M1293 in CaV2.2 and F1400 in CaV3.1 (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b, Fig. 4f). Although benidipine does not inhibit mutations T1056Y, Q1060M, and Q1060F as potently as it does in WT CaV1.2, it still retains the ability to block the current (Supplementary Fig. 7c). In contrast, previous studies demonstrated that these same substitutions at positions T1056 and Q1060 almost abolished the sensitivity of CaV1.2 to the DHP drug R202-791 (ref. 65). The varied effects of these mutations on benidipine and R202-791 might arise from the phenylmethyl piperidinyl group in benidipine. This group establishes more interactions with the channel and appears to tolerate substitutions at positions T1056 and Q1060, especially in N- and T-type CaV channels.
Several dihydropyridine drugs binding L-type calcium channels complex structures have been resolved in previous study21,22,66,67,68, including amlodipine bound CaVAb (7KMD), nimodipine bound CaVAb (7KMF), nifedipine bound CaV1.1 (6JP5), amlodipine bound CaV1.1 (7JPX), (S)-Bay K 8644 bound CaV1.1 (6JP8) and (R)-Bay K 8644 bound CaV1.1 (7JPW). When CaV1.2BEN and these structures are superimposed, a same binding pocket in DIII-DIV fenestration are revealed to accommodate benidipine in CaV1.2 and amlodipine/(S)-Bay K 8644/(R)-Bay K 8644 in CaV1.1 (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c). However, benidipine binding site do not overlap with binding sites of amlodipine and nimodipine in CaVAb (Supplementary Fig. 8d–f), and the residues involved in interaction are not conserved as well.
L-type selective dihydropyridine (DHP) inhibitors and L/T-selective DHP inhibitors are cataloged in Supplementary Table 2. The structural similarities among Class 1, 2, and 3 necessitate collective consideration. Upon scrutinizing their chemical structures and inhibitory selectivity, we identified primary distinctions in functional group modifications, specifically additional alterations on the C3 and C4 benzene rings. Within Class 1 and Class 2, with the exception of three instances (cilnidipine, amlodipine, nimodipine), all DHP derivatives predominantly featured smaller, relatively hydrophilic C3 groups for L-type selective compounds, while L/T-type selective compounds displayed larger and hydrophobic C3 groups. For Class 4 and Class 5 compounds, characterized by a modification into a ring at the C5/C6 position, the sole difference between the L-type selective Class 4-1 and L/T-type selective Class 4-4 compounds lies in the presence of a benzoic acid group on the C4 benzene ring in Class 4-1, while Class 4-4 has a hydroxyl group at the corresponding position. Thus, for compounds with C5-C6 rings, the hydrophobic nature of C3 modification does not exert a significant impact; the pivotal factor influencing differences is the presence of an additional aromatic group modification on the C4 benzene ring.
To further investigate interactions among compounds of varied selectivity on L-type and T-type channels, CaV1.2BEN served as a docking template. L-type selective compounds from Class 1 were docked onto L-type channel CaV1.2, while L/T-type selective compounds from Class 1 were docked onto both L-type channel CaV1.2 and T-type channel CaV3.1. Irrespective of L-type or L/T-type selectivity, these compounds bound to the DIII-DIV fenestration in CaV1.2 or CaV3.1, exhibiting a favorable superposition of the dihydropyridine backbone (Supplementary Fig. 9b, c). Both L-type selective and L/T-type selective DHPs docked to CaV1.2 formed hydrogen bonds with T1056, Q1060, and S1132. However, the C3 group of L-type selective DHPs docked to CaV1.2 is confined near M1509 within the hydrophobic pocket formed by DIIIS6 and DIVS6. In contrast, L/T-type selective DHPs docked to CaV3.1, while unable to form hydrogen bonds at the corresponding positions, not only occupy the binding pocket formed by DIIIS6 and DIVS6 but also extend to the hydrophobic pocket formed by DIIIS5 and DIVS5, akin to the position occupied by L/T-type selective DHPs docked to CaV1.2. This suggests that the ability of the C3 group to occupy the binding pocket formed by DIIIS5 and DIVS5 may be pivotal in determining the L-type and L/T-type selectivity of DHPs. In the case of cilnidipine, its C3 benzenyl group occupies the C5 position in the CaV1.2 binding pocket, possibly due to the planar rigidity of the phenyl group preventing it from fitting into the C3 position. The excessively large C5 group may clash with F1400 in CaV3.1, elucidating why cilnidipine, despite its large and hydrophobic C3 group, cannot inhibit T-type channels. In the case of the other exception, amlodipine docked in CaV3.1, the C2 amino group extends towards the pore and forms potential interactions with hydrophilic residues K1462 and Q1868 near the pore, compensating for the modest interaction between the C3 group and CaV3.1. Given that L/T-type selective DHPs also exhibit different affinities for various T-type channels, such as nimodipine’s preference for inhibiting CaV3.2 and CaV3.3 over CaV3.1 (ref. 64), we aligned the CaV3.3 structure with the CaV3.1 structure. The alignment results revealed that the hydrophobic pockets formed by DIIIS5 and DIVS5 in CaV3.3 are smaller than those formed in CaV3.1, potentially explaining why nimodipine produces distinct inhibitory effects on T-type channels with different α1 subunits.
Methods
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were carried out using human embryonic kidney 293 T (HEK293T) cells, which were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAN-Biotech) at 37 °C supplemented with 5% CO2. Three distinct recombinant baculoviruses encoding CaV1.2, α2δ1, and β2 were used to coinfect HEK293T cells once they reached a confluence of 40–60%. After 8−12 h, transfected cells were re-plated on 8 × 8 mm coverslips, and sodium butyrate was added to the culture at a final concentration of 0.5−2.5 mM to improve protein expression. Whole-cell recordings of activation curves were performed from isolated GFP-positive HEK293T cells at 20−28 h after transfection with recombinant baculoviruses. Briefly, the external solution was composed of 105 mM NaCl, 30 mM TEA-Cl, 10 mM BaCl2, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 10 mM D-glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CsCl, and 318 mOsm/L. The pipette solution contained 135 mM K-gluconate, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM NaCl, 4 mM Mg-ATP, and 295 mOsm/L69. Pipettes were pulled to obtain final resistances of 2−6 MΩ with a Sutter P-97 puller and heat-polished before employment. For measuring the inhibitory effect of tetrandrine and benidipine, the series resistance was 2−10 MΩ and was compensated 80–90%; and for measuring the steady-state activation curve, the series resistance was <5 MΩ. The series resistance was not compensated in these experiments. All recordings were collected with an Axoclamp 700B amplifier and Digidata 1440 A (Molecular Devices). Signals were digitized at 10 kHz and low-pass filtered at 2 kHz. Data were analyzed with Clampfit 10.7.
To measure the inhibition curves, 2 μg endotoxin-free plasmids of wild-type (WT) or mutants generated by PCR expressing CaV1.2, α2δ1, and β2 were transiently transfected using 1.2 μg Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For curves determining, re-plated cells were held at −100 mV, and then depolarized at +10 mV to elicit inward currents. To ensure stable currents during measurement, a series of traces were pre-recorded at a specific time interval without drug application for each construct. The duration of stable currents for WT, T1056Y, Q1060M, and Q1060F was determined as ~10 min, meanwhile the duration of stable currents for N741W and N1179W was determined as ~3 min. Consequently, the depolarization time interval is set every 1 min for benidipine and every 20 s for tetrandrine. Perfusions applied using a gravity-driven system. The inhibition curve of benidipine was determined by first perfusing with the external solution and then with various concentrations of benidipine until the current amplitude reached a steady-state level. The inhibition curve of tetrandrine was determined by applying serial dilutions of tetrandrine at different concentrations for 20 s each. Data analyses were performed using Origin 2022 (Origin Lab Corporation), GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and Adobe illustrator 2018. Inhibition curves were generated using a Hill equation.
where I is the current at different drug concentrations, Imax is the maximal current of CaV1.2 without drug applied, [C] is the concentration of drugs, IC50 is the half-maximal inhibitory concentration and H is the Hill coefficient.
Clone, expression and purification of human CaV1.2-α2δ1-β2b complex
DNA fragments encoding CaV1.2 α1C, α2δ1, and β2b were amplified from a human cDNA library and subcloned into the pEG BacMam vector for co-expression in mammalian cells. For CaV1.2, the C-terminus was tandemly fused with a superfolder GFP (sfGFP) and a Twin-Strep affinity tag. The fluorescent protein mCherry and Twin-Strep tag were fused to the N-terminus of wild type α2δ1 and β2b subunits, respectively. Primers used for cloning and introducing mutations are provided in Supplementary Table 3. The Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen, USA) was used to produce recombinant baculovirus in sf9 cells (Thermofisher, 10902096). The HEK293F cells (Thermofisher, 11625019) at density of ~2 × 106 cells per ml were infected with 2% (v/v) P2 recombinant baculovirus and subsequently cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 12 h, 10 mM sodium butyrate was added to the medium to enhance protein expression. The cells were harvested 60 h after infection.
The cell pellets were resuspended and grinded on ice in a Dounce homogenizer using buffer D containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), 2 μg/mL aprotinin, 1.4 μg/mL leupeptin, and 0.5 μg/mL pepstatin A. The membrane was enriched by centrifugation at 110,000 g for 40 min at 4 °C. The collected membrane pellets were solubilized in buffer D supplemented with 1% (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM), 0.15% (w/v) cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) (Anatrace, USA), 2 mM adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and 5 mM MgCl2 for 2 h at 4 °C. The solubilized membrane was subjected to centrifugation at 110,000 g for 40 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was passed through a 0.22 μm filter before being applied to a streptavidin agarose column for protein affinity purification. Following loading of the sample, the column was washed with buffer D containing additional 0.025% DDM to remove nonspecific bound proteins. The CaV1.2 -α2δ1-β2b complex was then eluted with a buffer containing 5 mM desthiobiotin, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM β-ME, and 0.007% glyco-diosgenin (GDN) (Anatrace, USA). The elution was concentrated to a final volume of 1 mL with 100-kDa Millipore Tube (Merck Millipore, Germany) and further purified through size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare, USA) equilibrated with a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM β-ME, and 0.007% GDN. The peak fractions at ~12.5 mL were collected and concentrated to 7 mg/mL for cryo-EM grids preparation. For the tetrandrine/benidipine bound CaV1.2 complex, 10 μM concentration of tetrandrine (MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA)) was supplied throughout the expression and purification of CaV1.2 complex and 1 μM concentration of benidipine (MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA)) was supplied in the membrane solubilization process. A final concentration of 100 μM tetrandrine/benidipine was added to the cryo-EM sample and incubated for 40 min on ice before application in grids.
Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection
Quantifoil 1.2/1.3 Cu 300 mesh grids were glow-discharged for 60 s under H2-O2 condition with a Solarus plasma cleaner (Gatan, USA) before use. The grids were applied with a 2.5-μL droplet of protein sample at 4 °C and 100% humidity, and then snap-frozen in liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen using a Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The grids sample was stored in liquid nitrogen before being checked on the electron microscopy instrument.
Cryo-EM data were collected on a 300-kV Titan Krios (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UAS) equipped with a K2 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan, USA) and a GIF-Quantum LS energy filter. The energy filter slit width was set to 20 eV. Movie stacks were acquired using SerialEM70 at a calibrated magnification of 130,000× in the super-resolution mode, with defocus values ranging from −1.2 to −2.2 μm. The pixel size on motion-corrected micrographs was 1.04 Å. Each movie stack was dose-fractioned in 32 frames, yielding a total accumulated dose of 60 e−/Å2. The dose rate was set to 9.6 e–/pixel/s.
Cryo-EM data processing
For the data processing of CaV1.2apo, a total of 1278 movie stacks were motion-corrected and dose-weighted using MotionCorr2 with 5 × 5 patches71. Contrast transfer function (CTF) estimation was performed using Gctf72. Particles that picked using Blob picker, Template picker, and Topaz picker in cryoSPARC73 were combined, and duplicates were removed, yielding a total of 524k particles. Then, the particles were extracted into Relion 3.1 for guided multi-reference 3D classification against one good map which was generated by low pass filtering the high-resolution map of CaV2.2 (EMDB-31958) to 8 Å and 4 biased maps74. Particles from the class 1, which accounts for 47.1% of total particles, were selected and subjected to a single reference 3D classification to further remove poor particles, giving rise to one class with discernible structural features of α1, α2δ1, and β subunits as well as CTD. Particles belonging to this class were submitted for following 3D auto refinement, Bayesian Polish, and CTF refinement, yielding a 3.9-Å resolution map with clearly resolved transmembrane helices. To improve the quality of the map, a protein-only mask was used to avoid over-fitting of the detergent micelles in the subsequent 3D classification without particle alignment. The best class containing 35k particles was then imported back into cryoSPARC and subjected to Non-uniform Refinement, generating a final map reported at 3.5-Å resolution according to golden standard Fourier shell correlation (GSFSC) criterion.
A similar strategy was applied in the data processing of CaV1.2TET and CaV1.2BEN. Specifically, a total of 449k and 337k particles were picked from 979 and 444 micrographs, respectively. The final maps of CaV1.2TET and CaV1.2BEN were reported at 3.4 Å and 3.3 Å, respectively. A diagram of data processing is summarized in Supplementary Fig. 2.
Model building
To build the atomic model of CaV1.2apo, we extracted rabbit α1, α2δ1, and human β3 subunits from the structures of the rabbit CaV1.1 complex (5GJV)33 and CaV2.2 complex (7MIJ)75 and generated homology models of the α1, α2δ1, and β2b subunits of CaV1.2 using phenix.sculptor program based on sequence alignment. The resulting models of three subunits were fitted into the map of the CaV1.2apo complex as rigid bodies using the UCSF Chimera. Then, the model was manually adjusted in COOT76 iteratively, including the refinement of the main chain and side chains of residues. Phospholipid molecules were manually placed in the strip-shaped densities in both leaflets of the lipid bilayers and fenestrations of the pore domain of the CaV1.2 channel. Structure refinement was performed using phenix.real_space_refine application in PHENIX77 in real space with secondary structure and Ramachandran restraints.
For the model building of CaV1.2TET and CaV1.2BEN, the CaV1.2apo structure was used as the starting model and was fitted into the EM maps as a rigid body. The two-dimensional (2D) structures of tetrandrine and benidipine were downloaded from PubChem in SDF format, followed by the generation of 3D models and refinement restraints in phenix.ligand_eLBOW. The drug molecules were docked into the EM map and refined according to the corresponding density. All the manually adjusted models were then subjected to real-space refinement using PHENIX.real_space_refine.
All figures were prepared with software PyMOLl78 or UCSF Chimera79.
Docking
To investigate the interaction modes of various dihydropyridines (DHPs) in T-type and L-type calcium channels, a docking study was conducted utilizing the AutoDock Tools package (version 1.5.6)80 and AutoDock Vina (version 1.1.2)81. In the docking simulation, L-type selective inhibitors (Nifedipine, Nitrendipine, Felodipine, Cilnidipine) and non-selective inhibitors (Benidipine, Nimodipine, Manidipine, Amlodipine)64,82 were employed as ligands, while CaV1.2, CaV3.1 (6KZP)83, and CaV3.3 (7WLI)52 were utilized as receptors. The receptors and ligand were independently optimized and prepared as pdbqt format files required for docking. Given that the DHP binding pocket in the apo-state structure comprises only lipid and the site is considerably narrower compared to CaV1.2, the lipid and ligand was removed and the side chain dihedral angles of DHP binding pocket were adjusted. The docking grids for CaV1.2 were generated using enclosing boxes centered on benidipine, whereas the docking grids for CaV3.1 (or CaV3.3) were created using enclosing boxes centered on the residue L872 (or L769) involved in the DHP binding pocket. The processed ligands were subsequently docked into the two receptors. Only docking results with ligand conformations in a ‘claw’ shape configuration and biased towards DIII which analogous to the CaV1.2-benidipine complex that we have resolved were retained.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that support this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. The three-dimensional cryo-EM density maps of the CaV1.2 complex in the apo state, tetrandrine bound state, and benidipine bound state have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under the accession codes EMD-34880, EMD-34891, and EMD-34892, respectively. The coordinates for the corresponding complexes have been deposited in Protein Data Bank under accession codes 8HLP (CaV1.2apo), 8HMA (CaV1.2TET), and 8HMB (CaV1.2BEN). The model used for starting CaV1.2 complex model-building and docking is available in the PDB under the PDB ID 5GJV (rabit CaV1.1), 7MIJ (human CaV2.2), 6KZP (human CaV3.1 bound Z944), and 7WLI (human CaV3.3). Sequence of human CaV1.2 α1C, α2δ1 and β2b are available in Universal Protein Resource (Uniprot) databases under accession codes Q13936-1 [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q13936/entry] (CACNA1C), P54289-1 [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P54289/entry] (CACNA2D1), and Q08289-3 [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q08289/entry] (CACNB2). The source data underlying Fig. 3f, Supplementary Figs. 1a, c, and 7c are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Birnbaumer, L. et al. The naming of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron 13, 505–506 (1994).
Catterall, W. A. Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 521–555 (2000).
Lacinová, L. Voltage-dependent calcium channels. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 24, 1–78 (2005).
Balijepalli, R. C., Foell, J. D., Hall, D. D., Hell, J. W. & Kamp, T. J. Localization of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels to a caveolar macromolecular signaling complex is required for β2-adrenergic regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 7500–7505 (2006).
Hofmann, F., Flockerzi, V., Kahl, S. & Wegener, J. W. L-type CaV1. 2 calcium channels: from in vitro findings to in vivo function. Physiol. Rev. 94, 303–326 (2014).
Zamponi, G. W., Striessnig, J., Koschak, A. & Dolphin, A. C. The physiology, pathology, and pharmacology of voltage-gated calcium channels and their future therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Rev. 67, 821–870 (2015).
Hell, J. W. et al. Identification and differential subcellular localization of the neuronal class C and class D L-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunits. J. Cell Biol. 123, 949–962 (1993).
Sinnegger-Brauns, M. J. et al. Expression and 1, 4-dihydropyridine-binding properties of brain L-type calcium channel isoforms. Mol. Pharmacol. 75, 407–414 (2009).
Berger, S. M. & Bartsch, D. The role of L-type voltage-gated calcium channels Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 in normal and pathological brain function. Cell Tissue Res. 357, 463–476 (2014).
Obermair, G. J., Szabo, Z., Bourinet, E. & Flucher, B. E. Differential targeting of the L‐type Ca2+ channel α1C (CaV1. 2) to synaptic and extrasynaptic compartments in hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 2109–2122 (2004).
Tippens, A. L. et al. Ultrastructural evidence for pre‐and postsynaptic localization of Cav1. 2 L‐type Ca2+ channels in the rat hippocampus. J. Comp. Neurol. 506, 569–583 (2008).
Moosmang, S. et al. Role of hippocampal Cav1. 2 Ca2+ channels in NMDA receptor-independent synaptic plasticity and spatial memory. J. Neurosci. 25, 9883–9892 (2005).
Langwieser, N. et al. Homeostatic switch in Hebbian plasticity and fear learning after sustained loss of Cav1.2 calcium channels. J. Neurosci. 30, 8367–8375 (2010).
Jeon, D. et al. Observational fear learning involves affective pain system and Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in ACC. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 482–488 (2010).
Bhat, S. et al. CACNA1C (Cav1.2) in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 99, 1–14 (2012).
Atsuta, Y., Tomizawa, R. R., Levin, M. & Tabin, C. J. L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel Ca(V)1.2 regulates chondrogenesis during limb development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21592–21601 (2019).
Cao, C. et al. The Ca(V)1.2 L-type calcium channel regulates bone homeostasis in the middle and inner ear. Bone 125, 160–168 (2019).
Splawski, I. et al. Ca(V)1.2 calcium channel dysfunction causes a multisystem disorder including arrhythmia and autism. Cell 119, 19–31 (2004).
Zhang, Q., Chen, J., Qin, Y., Wang, J. & Zhou, L. Mutations in voltage-gated L-type calcium channel: implications in cardiac arrhythmia. Channels (Austin) 12, 201–218 (2018).
Kessi, M. et al. Calcium channelopathies and intellectual disability: a systematic review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 16, 219 (2021).
Zhao, Y. et al. Molecular basis for ligand modulation of a mammalian voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel. Cell 177, 1495–1506.e1412 (2019).
Yao, X., Gao, S. & Yan, N. Structural basis for pore blockade of human voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(v)1.3 by motion sickness drug cinnarizine. Cell Res. 32, 946–948 (2022).
Liu, Q. Y., Karpinski, E., Rao, M. R. & Pang, P. K. Tetrandrine: a novel calcium channel antagonist inhibits type I calcium channels in neuroblastoma cells. Neuropharmacology 30, 1325–1331 (1991).
Weinsberg, F., Bickmeyer, U. & Wiegand, H. Effects of tetrandrine on calcium channel currents of bovine chromaffin cells. Neuropharmacology 33, 885–890 (1994).
Wu, S. N., Hwang, T. L., Jan, C. R. & Tseng, C. J. Ionic mechanisms of tetrandrine in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Eur. J. Pharm. 327, 233–238 (1997).
Wang, G., Lemos, J. R. & Iadecola, C. Herbal alkaloid tetrandrine: from an ion channel blocker to inhibitor of tumor proliferation. Trends Pharm. Sci. 25, 120–123 (2004).
Luan, F., He, X. & Zeng, N. Tetrandrine: a review of its anticancer potentials, clinical settings, pharmacokinetics and drug delivery systems. J. Pharm. Pharm. 72, 1491–1512 (2020).
Xu, W. et al. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of tetrandrine and cepharanthine in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and autoimmune diseases. Pharm. Ther. 217, 107659 (2021).
Liu, T. B., Lin, H. C., Huang, Y. T., Sun, C. M. & Hong, C. Y. Portal hypotensive effects of tetrandrine and verapamil in portal hypertensive rats. J. Pharm. Pharm. 49, 85–88 (1997).
Kwan, C. Y. & Achike, F. I. Tetrandrine and related bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids from medicinal herbs: cardiovascular effects and mechanisms of action. Acta Pharm. Sin. 23, 1057–1068 (2002).
Hennessey, J. A. et al. A CACNA1C variant associated with reduced voltage-dependent inactivation, increased CaV1. 2 channel window current, and arrhythmogenesis. PLoS One 9, e106982 (2014).
Simms, B. A. & Zamponi, G. W. The Brugada syndrome mutation A39V does not affect surface expression of neuronal rat Cav1.2 channels. Mol. Brain 5, 9 (2012).
Wu, J. et al. Structure of the voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(v)1.1 at 3.6 Å resolution. Nature 537, 191–196 (2016).
Chen, Z. et al. EMC chaperone-CaV structure reveals an ion channel assembly intermediate. Nature 619, 410–419 (2023).
Chen, Z., Mondal, A. & Minor, D. L. Structural basis for CaVα2δ:gabapentin binding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 735–739 (2023).
Gao, S. et al. Structural basis for human Cav1.2 inhibition by multiple drugs and the neurotoxin calciseptine. Cell 186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.10.007 (2023).
McGoldrick, L. L. et al. Opening of the human epithelial calcium channel TRPV6. Nature 553, 233–237 (2018).
Splawski, I. et al. Severe arrhythmia disorder caused by cardiac L-type calcium channel mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8089–8096 (2005).
Landstrom, A. P. et al. Novel long QT syndrome-associated missense mutation, L762F, in CACNA1C-encoded L-type calcium channel imparts a slower inactivation tau and increased sustained and window current. Int. J. Cardiol. 220, 290–298 (2016).
Béziau, D. M. et al. Complex Brugada syndrome inheritance in a family harbouring compound SCN5A and CACNA1C mutations. Basic Res. Cardiol. 109, 446 (2014).
Cantí, C. et al. The metal-ion-dependent adhesion site in the Von Willebrand factor-A domain of alpha2delta subunits is key to trafficking voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11230–11235 (2005).
Westhoff, M. & Dixon, R. E. Mechanisms and Regulation of Cardiac Ca(V)1.2 Trafficking. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115927 (2021).
Burashnikov, E. et al. Mutations in the cardiac L-type calcium channel associated with inherited J-wave syndromes and sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm 7, 1872–1882 (2010).
Ye, D., Tester, D. J., Zhou, W., Papagiannis, J. & Ackerman, M. J. A pore-localizing CACNA1C-E1115K missense mutation, identified in a patient with idiopathic QT prolongation, bradycardia, and autism spectrum disorder, converts the L-type calcium channel into a hybrid nonselective monovalent cation channel. Heart Rhythm 16, 270–278 (2019).
Kashiwa, A. et al. Disrupted Ca(V)1.2 selectivity causes overlapping long QT and Brugada syndrome phenotypes in the CACNA1C-E1115K iPS cell model. Heart Rhythm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.08.021 (2022).
Nakajima, T. et al. Novel CACNA1C R511Q mutation, located in domain I-II linker, causes non-syndromic type-8 long QT syndrome. PLoS One 17, e0271796 (2022).
Boczek, N. J. et al. Identification and functional characterization of a novel CACNA1C-mediated cardiac disorder characterized by prolonged QT intervals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart defects, and sudden cardiac death. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 8, 1122–1132 (2015).
Dafi, O. et al. Negatively charged residues in the N-terminal of the AID helix confer slow voltage dependent inactivation gating to CaV1.2. Biophys. J. 87, 3181–3192 (2004).
Gonzalez-Gutierrez, G., Miranda-Laferte, E., Naranjo, D., Hidalgo, P. & Neely, A. Mutations of nonconserved residues within the calcium channel alpha1-interaction domain inhibit beta-subunit potentiation. J. Gen. Physiol. 132, 383–395 (2008).
Rossier, M. F. et al. Blocking T-type calcium channels with tetrandrine inhibits steroidogenesis in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells. Endocrinology 132, 1035–1043 (1993).
Liu, Q. Y., Karpinski, E. & Pang, P. K. Tetrandrine inhibits both T and L calcium channel currents in ventricular cells. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 20, 513–519 (1992).
He, L. et al. Structure, gating, and pharmacology of human CaV3. 3 channel. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–9 (2022).
Felix, J. P. et al. Bis(benzylisoquinoline) analogs of tetrandrine block L-type calcium channels: evidence for interaction at the diltiazem-binding site. Biochemistry 31, 11793–11800 (1992).
Epstein, B. J., Vogel, K. & Palmer, B. F. Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension. Drugs 67, 1309–1327 (2007).
Hayashi, K. et al. Ca2+ channel subtypes and pharmacology in the kidney. Circ. Res. 100, 342–353 (2007).
Romero, R. et al. Comparative effects of captopril versus nifedipine on proteinuria and renal function of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 17, 191–198 (1992).
Ohishi, M. et al. Renal-protective effect of T-and L-type calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients: an Amlodipine-to-Benidipine Changeover (ABC) study. Hypertens. Res. 30, 797–806 (2007).
Yao, K., Nagashima, K. & Miki, H. Pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and clinical properties of benidipine hydrochloride, a novel, long-acting calcium channel blocker. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 243–261 (2006).
Yamamoto, M., Gotoh, Y., Imaizumi, Y. & Watanabe, M. Mechanisms of long-lasting effects of benidipine on Ca current in guinea-pig ventricular cells. Br. J. Pharm. 100, 669–676 (1990).
Nowycky, M. C., Fox, A. P. & Tsien, R. W. Three types of neuronal calcium channel with different calcium agonist sensitivity. Nature 316, 440–443 (1985).
Aosaki, T. & Kasai, H. Characterization of two kinds of high-voltage-activated Ca-channel currents in chick sensory neurons. Differential sensitivity to dihydropyridines and omega-conotoxin GVIA. Pflug. Arch. 414, 150–156 (1989).
Furukawa, T. et al. Differential blocking action of dihydropyridine Ca2+ antagonists on a T-type Ca2+ channel (alpha1G) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 45, 241–246 (2005).
Furukawa, T. et al. Selectivities of dihydropyridine derivatives in blocking Ca(2+) channel subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 291, 464–473 (1999).
Furukawa, T. et al. Five different profiles of dihydropyridines in blocking T-type Ca(2+) channel subtypes (Ca(v)3.1 (alpha(1G)), Ca(v)3.2 (alpha(1H)), and Ca(v)3.3 (alpha(1I))) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Eur. J. Pharm. 613, 100–107 (2009).
He, M., Bodi, I., Mikala, G. & Schwartz, A. Motif III S5 of L-type calcium channels is involved in the dihydropyridine binding site. A combined radioligand binding and electrophysiological study. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2629–2633 (1997).
Tang, L. et al. Structural basis for Ca2+ selectivity of a voltage-gated calcium channel. Nature 505, 56–61 (2014).
Tang, L. et al. Structural basis for inhibition of a voltage-gated Ca2+ channel by Ca2+ antagonist drugs. Nature 537, 117–121 (2016).
Zhao, Y. et al. Molecular basis for ligand modulation of a mammalian voltage-gated Ca channel. Cell 177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.043 (2019).
Dong, Y. et al. Closed-state inactivation and pore-blocker modulation mechanisms of human Ca(V)2.2. Cell Rep. 37, 109931 (2021).
Mastronarde, D. N. SerialEM: a program for automated tilt series acquisition on Tecnai microscopes using prediction of specimen position. Microsc. Microanal. 9, 1182–1183 (2003).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. Estimation of high-order aberrations and anisotropic magnification from cryo-EM data sets in RELION-3.1. IUCrJ 7, 253–267 (2020).
Gao, S., Yao, X. & Yan, N. Structure of human Cav2.2 channel blocked by the painkiller ziconotide. Nature 596, 143–147 (2021).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
DeLano, W. L. Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr. 40, 82–92 (2002).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009).
Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
Löhn, M. et al. Cilnidipine is a novel slow-acting blocker of vascular L-type calcium channels that does not target protein kinase C. J. Hypertens. 20, 885–893 (2002).
Zhao, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structures of apo and antagonist-bound human Cav3.1. Nature 576, 492–497 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. X. Liu and Dr. J. Geng (Beihang University) for their invaluable assistance in the electrophysiological experiments. We thank X. Huang, B. Zhu, X. Li, and other staff members at the Center for Biological Imaging (CBI), Core Facilities for Protein Science at the Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science (IBP, CAS) for the support in cryo-EM data collection. We thank Mr. Yan Wu for his research assistant service. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant 2021YFA1301501 to Y.Z.), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program (grant XDB37030304 to Y.Z., and grant XDB37030301 to X.C.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 31971134 to X.C.Z., grant 92157102 to Y.Z., grant 82341246 and 82271498 to Z.H., and grant 32301026 to Y.D.), the Chinese National Programs for Brain Science and Brain-like Intelligence Technology (grant 2022ZD0205800 to Y.Z.), Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Project (grant 2021ZD0202103 to Z.H.), Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Key Research and Development Project (grant 2022BEG02042 to Z.H.), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Multi-disciplinary Team Program (grant CYDXK202211 to N.L.), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Z. conceived and supervised the project. Y.Q.W. carried out molecular cloning and cell biology experiments. Y.Q.W., X.W., and Y.D. expressed and purified protein complex samples for cryo-EM study. Y.Q.W., Z.Y., and Y.D. carried out cryo-EM data collection. Z.Y. and Y.Q.W. processed the cryo-EM data. Y.Q.W., Z.Y., and Y.H.W. built and refined the atomic model. Y.Z., Y.Q.W., and Z.Y. analyzed the structures. Y.Z. designed mutants and L.W., X.L. performed electrophysiological experiments. Q.B. designed and carried out molecule docking analysis. Y.Z., Z.Y., Y.Q.W., X.L., Q.B., R.L., Y.M., and H.X. prepared figures. N.L. summarized and revised diseases associated mutations in Supplementary data. Y.Q.W., Z.Y., and X.L. prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. Y.Z., X.C.Z., and Z.H. edited the manuscript with input from all authors in the final version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Alexander Sobolevsky and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Y., Yu, Z., Wang, L. et al. Structural bases of inhibitory mechanism of CaV1.2 channel inhibitors. Nat Commun 15, 2772 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47116-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47116-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Structural biology and molecular pharmacology of voltage-gated ion channels
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2024)